Microscopic analysis of saturated soft clay in Pearl River Delta

Abstract

A series of researches were carried out for the soil samples in the Pearl River Delta under the action of consolidation loads, such as the quantitative analyses of the pore scale, shape and size distributions of micro-structure units, with an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM), a mercury intrusion analyzer and a mineral diffractometer. The experimental results show that the consolidation pressures remarkably change the pore sizes and distribution characteristics of the silt, thus changing its compressibility and permeability. This can be proved by the fact that, in the earlier stage with a consolidation pressure of p<200 kPa, the pore sizes are greater and the compressibility and permeability coefficients are larger. However, they rapidly decrease with the increase in consolidation pressure. And in the later stage with a consolidation pressure of p>200 kPa, the pore sizes are smaller and the compressibility and permeability coefficients are less. Therefore, the empirical formulas of compression coefficient and permeability coefficient vs consolidation load and average pore diameter are deduced.

Keywords

saturated soft soil / Pearl River Delta (PRD) / micro-structure / microscopic analysis / pore distribution / engineering properties

References

[1] ZhouC.-ying.. Research into soil mass microstructure and some progresses on soil mechanics [J]. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2000, 25(2): 215-218

[2] HuangZ.-g., LiP.-r., ZhangZ.-ying.Evolution of formation and development about the Pearl River Delta [M], 1982, Guangzhou, Guangzhou Popular Science Press: 15-24

[3] MirandaE., JorgeR. G.. Influence of stiffness degradation on strength demands of structures built on soft soil sites [J]. Engineering Structures, 2002, 24(10): 1271-1281

[4] FredlundD. G., RahardjoH.Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils [M], 1993, New York, John Wiley and Sons: 123-128

[5] ToveyN. K., KrinsleyD. H., DentD. L., CorbettW. M.. Techniques to quantitatively study the microfabric of soils [J]. Geoderma, 1992, 53(3/4): 217-235

[6] ChengX. H., JanssenH., BarendsF. B. J., HaanE. J. D.. A combination of ESEM, EDX and XRD studies on the fabric of Dutch organic clay from Oostvaardersplassen (Netherlands) and its geotechnical implications[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2004, 25(3/4): 179-185

[7] QianJ.-h., YinZ.-ze.Principle and calculation of geotechnical [M], 1996, Beijing, China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press: 89-97

[8] KennethP.. Forensic examination of rocks, sediments, soils and dusts using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray chemical microanalysis [J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004, 232(1): 103-121

[9] ZhouH., FangY.-g., YuC.-jiang.. Micro-structure observation and analysis on Guangzhou soft soil during the consolidation process [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(S2): 3830-3837

[10] LowellS., ShieldsJ. E.Powder surface area and porosity [M], 1997, New York, Chapman and Hall: 10-35

[11] LiuP.-s., MaX.-ming.Detection of porous materials [M], 2006, Beijing, Metallurgy Industry Press: 122-150

[12] ToveyN. K., SmartP., HounslowM. W.. Quantitative orientation analysis of soil microfabric [J]. Developments in Soil Science, 1990, 19: 631-639

[13] ShearD. L., OlsenH. W., NelsonK. R.. Effects of desiccation on the hydraulic conductivity versus void ratio relationship for a natural clay [C]. NRC. Transportation Research Record, 1993, Washington D C, National academy press: 1365-1370

[14] JozefaciukG., TothT., SzendreiG.. Surface and micropore properties of saline soil profiles [J]. Geoderma, 2006, 135: 1-15

[15] WeiR.-long.. Derivation for coefficient of consolidation from settlement observation [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1993, 15(2): 12-19