Strength and deformation behaviour of coarse-grained soil by true triaxial tests

Abstract

In order to investigate the influence of intermediate principal stress on the stress-strain and strength behaviour of a coarse-grained soil, a series of true triaxial tests were performed. The tests were conducted in a recently developed true triaxial apparatus with constant minor principal stress σ₃ and constant value of intermediate principal stress ratio b=(σ₂−σ₃)/(σ₁−σ₃) (σ₁ is the vertical stress, and σ₂ is the horizontal stress). It is found that the intermediate principal strain, ɛ₂, increases from negative to positive value with the increase of parameter b from zero to unity under a constant minor principal stress. The minor principal strain, ɛ₃, is always negative. This implies that the specimen exhibits an evident anisotropy. The relationship between b and friction angle obtained from the tests is different from that predicted by LADE-DUNCAN and MATSUOKA-NAKAI criteria. Based on the test results, an empirical equation of g(b) that is the shape function of the failure surface on π-plane was presented. The proposed equation is verified to be reasonable by comparing the predicted results using the equation with true triaxial test results of soils, such as coarse-grained soils in this study, sands and gravels in other studies.

Keywords

cohesionless soil / coarse-grained soil / true triaxial test / strength / deformation / failure criterion

References

[1] HaeriS. M., HosseiniS. M., TollD. G., YasrebiS. S.. The behaviour of an artificially cemented sandy gravel [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2005, 23: 537-560

[2] ZhuH. N., MehrabadiM. M., MassoudiM.. Three-dimensional constitutive relations for granular materials based on the dilatant double shearing mechanism and the concept of fabric [J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2006, 22: 826-857

[3] GeorgiadisK., PottsD. M., ZdravkovicL.. Modelling the shear strength of soils in the general stress space [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2004, 31: 357-364

[4] LadeP. V., DuncanJ. M.. Elastoplastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil [J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1975, 101(10): 1037-1053

[5] DouqlasM., DayakarP.. True triaxial testing system for clay with proportional-integral-differential (PID) control [J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2004, 27(2): 134-144

[6] KhalidA. A., HeathS. W.. A true triaxial apparatus for soil testing with mixed boundary conditions [J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2005, 28(6): 534-543

[7] ChoiC. H., PedroA., MichaelD. H.. Development of a true triaxial apparatus for sands and gravels [J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2008, 31(1): 32-44

[8] LadeP. V., MamJ., HongW. P.. Interpretation of strains in torsion shear tests [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36: 211-225

[9] LinH., PrashantA., PenumaduD.. Single hardening elasto-plastic model for kaolin clay with loading-history-dependent plastic potential function [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2006, 6(1): 55-63

[10] LadeP. V., KirkgardM. M.. Effects of stress rotation and changes of b-values on cross-anisotropic behavior of natural K₀-consolidated soft clay [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2000, 40(6): 93-105

[11] LadeP. V.. Assessment of test data for selection of 3-D failure criterion for sand [J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2006, 30: 307-333

[12] LadeP. V., DuncanJ. M.. Cubical triaxial tests on cohesionless soil [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1973, 99(10): 793-812

[13] AbelevA. V., LadeP. V.. Effects of cross anisotropy on three-dimensional behavior of sand (I): Stress-strain behavior and shear banding [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2003, 129(2): 160-166

[14] JafarzadehF., JavaheriH., SadekT., Muir WoodD.. Simulation of anisotropic deviatoric response of hostun sand in true triaxial tests [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2008, 35: 703-718

[15] MatsuokaH., NakaiT.. Relationship among Tresca, Mises, Mohr-Coulomb and Matsuoka-Nakai failure criterion [J]. Soils and Foundations, 1985, 25(4): 123-128

[16] LadeP. V.. Modeling failure in cross-anisotropic frictional materials [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2007, 44: 5146-5162

[17] NgT. T.. Behavior of gravity deposited granular material under different stress paths [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42: 1644-1655

[18] KarstunenM., KrennH., WheelerS. J., KoskinenM., ZentarR.. Effect of anisotropy and destructuration on the behavior of Murro test embankment [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2005, 5(2): 87-97

[19] SoroushA., AraeiA. A.. Analysis of behaviour of a high rockfill dam [J]. Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 159: 49-59

[20] VaradarajanA., SharmaK. G., VenkatachalamK., GuptaA. K.. Testing and modeling two rockfill materials [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(3): 206-218

[21] DihoruL., Muir WoodD., SadekT., LingsM.. A neural network for error prediction in a true triaxial apparatus with flexible boundaries [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2005, 32: 59-71

[22] DuncanJ. M., ByrneP. M., WongK. S.Strength, stress-strain and bulk modulus parameters for finite element-analysis of stress and movements in soil masses (VCB/GT/78 — 02) [R], 1978, Berkeley, University of California

[23] ZienkiewiczO. C., PandeG. N.. Some useful forms of isotropic yield surfaces for soil and rock mechanics [C]. Finite Elements in Geomechanics, 1977, New York, John Wiley & Sons: 179-190

[24] ShiW.-c., ZhuJ.-g., LiuH.-long.. Influence of intermediate principal stress on deformation and strength of gravel [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(10): 1449-1453