Material selection of polymeric composite automotive bumper beam using analytical hierarchy process

Abstract

Selection of materials, as an area of design research, has been under considerable interest over the years. Materials selection is one of the most important activities in the product development process. Inappropriate decision of materials can cause the product to be reproduced or remanufactured. To avoid this circumstance, one of the useful tools that can be employed in determining the most appropriate material is analytical hierarchy process (AHP). To illustrate the application of AHP, six different types of composite materials were considered. The most appropriate one for suitability of use in manufacturing automotive bumper beam was determined by considering eight main selection factors and 12 sub-factors. The AHP analysis reveals that the glass fibre epoxy is the most appropriate material because it has the highest value (25.7%, mass fraction) compared with other materials. The final material is obtained by performing six different scenarios of the sensitivity analysis. It is proved that glass fibre epoxy is the most optimum decision.

Keywords

composite / polymer matrix / bumper beam / analytical hierarchy process

References

[1] MazumdarS. K.Composite manufacturing: Material, product and process engineering [M], 2002, Florida, CRC Press

[2] DieterG. E.Engineering design: A materials and processing approach [M], 2000, Michigan, McGraw Hill

[3] DowlatshahiS.. Material selection and product safety: Theory versus practice [J]. Journal of International of Management Science, 2000, 28: 467-480

[4] SapuanS. M., MalequeM. A., HameedullahM., SuddinM., IsmailN.. A note on the conceptual design of polymeric composite automotive bumper system [J]. Journal of Material and Design, 2005, 159(2): 145-151

[5] HosseinzadehR., ShokriehM. M., LessardL. B.. Parametric study of automotive composite bumper beams subjected to low-velocity impacts [J]. Journal of Composite Structures, 2005, 68: 419-427

[6] SuddinM. N., HarunM. R., HamzahA. T., AnuarS.. A prototype of KBS for material selection in bumper beam design [J]. Suranaree Journal Science Technology, 2007, 14: 215-222

[7] SaatyL. T., VargasL. G.Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytical hierarchy process [M], 2001, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers

[8] ANONYMOUS. Analytical hierarchy process [EB/OL]. [2007-10-10]. http://www.rfp-templates.com/Analytical Hierarchy-Process-(AHP). html.

[9] HoW.. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications: A literature review [J]. Journal of European Journal of Operation Research, 2008, 186: 211-228

[10] DweiriF., Al-OqlaF. M.. Material selection using analytical hierarchy process [J]. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 2006, 26(4): 82-189

[11] HajeehM., Ai-OthmanA.. Application of the analytical hierarchy process in the selection of desalination plants [J]. Desalination, 2005, 174: 97-108

[12] ChengE. W. L., LiH.. Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [J]. Information Management and Computer Security, 2001, 9(2): 61-70

[13] VaidyaO. S., KumarS.. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 169: 1-29

[14] BERNERT W, BULYCH S, CRAN J, EGLE D, HENSELEIT K, HERSBERGER T, KANTNER C, KOCH M, KUDELKO C, MIHELICH M, MOHAN R, STOKFISZ S, TANG M, VIKSTROM T, WELTE E, ZABIK B. American iron and steel institute: Steel bumper systems for passenger cars and light trucks (Revision number three) [EB/OL]. [2006-06-30]. http://www.bumper.autosteel.org.

[15] SapuanS. M., SuddinN., MalequeM. A.. A critical review of polymer-based composite automotive bumper system [J]. Journal of Polymers and Polymer Composite, 2002, 10: 627-636

[16] RUSH K C. An overview of automotive plastic bumpers, in automotive bumper system and exterior panels [R]. SAE Technical Paper, 900420, 1990.

[17] MohanR.. SRIM composites for automotive structural applications [C]. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Advanced Composites, 1987, Detroit, Michigan, ASM Int: 57-62

[18] CLARK G L, BALS C K, LAYSON M A. Effects of fibre and property orientation on ‘C’ shaped cross sections [R]. SAE Technical Paper, 910049, 1991.

[19] CheonS. S., ChoiJ. H., LeeD. G.. Development of the composite bumper beam for passenger cars [J]. Journal of Composite Structures, 1995, 32: 491-499

[20] KUMAR A, JOHNSTON C. Comparative performance of a compression: Molded I-section bumper beam with integrated mounting stays versus other GMT bumper design [R]. SAE Technical Papers, 1998.

[21] GILLIARD B, BASSETT W, HAQUE E, LEWIS T, FEATHERMAN D, JOHNSON C. I-section bumper with improved impact performance from new mineral-filled glass mat thermoplastic (GMT) composite [R]. SAE Technical Paper, 1999.

[22] MurphyJ.The reinforced plastics handbook [M], 1998, New York, Elsevier

[23] MOINAR A A. Bumper beam: USA, 4671550 [P]. 1987.

[24] KELMAN J, NELSON G V. Composite motor vehicle bumper beam: USA, 5804511 [P]. 1998.

[25] ROBIAH Y, ZAHARI N H, SALEH M A, IBRAHIM N Z. Development of carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene for bumper beam application [C]// Proceedings of the 3rd National Conference on Carbon Fiber and Composites (NCFC07). Pulau Perhentian, Terengganu, 2007: 16–25.

[26] ANONYMOUS. Advanced glass-mat thermoplastic composite applications for the automotive industry: Plastic composite [EB/OL]. [2008-06-20]. http://www.quadrantcomposites.com/pdf/.

[27] StrongA. B.Fundamentals of composites manufacturing [M], 2007, Michigan, Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME)

[28] SaatyT. L.The analytic hierarchy process [M], 1980, New York, McGraw-Hill

[29] ADHIKARI I, KIM S Y, LEE Y D. Selection of appropriate schedule delay analysis method: Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) [C]// Proceedings of PICMET. Istanbul, 2006: 483–488.

[30] ChengS. C., ChenM. Y., ChangH. Y., ChouT. C.. Semantic-based facial expression recognition using analytical hierarchy process [J]. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 2007, 33(1): 86-95

[31] ZavbiR., DuhovnikJ.. The analytic hierarchy process and functional appropriateness of components of technical systems [J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 1996, 7: 313-327

[32] FormanE. H., SellyM. A.Decision by objectives: How to convince others that you are right [M], 2001, New York, World Scientific

[33] SaatyT. L.Fundamentals of decision making and priority: Theory with the analytical hierarchy process [M], 2001, Pittsburgh, RWS Publications

[34] HsiaoS. W.. Concurrent design method for developing a new product [J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2002, 29: 41-55

[35] FormanE. H., SaatyT. L., SellyM. A., WaldronR.Expert coice 1982–2000 McLean [M], 2000, Pittsburgh, Decision Support Software Inc

[36] RosatoD. V., RosatoV. D.Reinforced plastics handbook [M], 2004, New York, Elsevier

[37] Material property data (MatWeb) [EB/OL]. [2000-01-12]. http://www.matweb.com/.

[38] Polymer material properties (efunda). [EB/OL]. [2009-01-15]. http://www.efunda.com/.

[39] CallisterW. D.Material science and engineering: An introduction [M], 2003, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[40] ANONYMOUS. Composite materials price trends forecasts and analysis [EB/OL]. [2008-10-21]. http://www.researchandmarkets.com/eports/592028.

[41] MallickP. K.Fiber-reinforced composites: Materials, manufacturing and design [M], 2007, New York, CRC Press

[42] MIRACLE D B, DONALDSON S L. ASM handbook: Composites [M]. ASM International Handbook Committee, 2001.

[43] ChangC. W., WuC. R., LinC. T., ChenH. C.. An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine [J]. Journal of Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2007, 52: 296-307