Optimization and static strength test of carbody of light rail vehicle

Abstract

Preliminary structure of light rail vehicle (LRV) carbody made of steel was designed considering its usage, strength, manufacturing, etc. Based on the finite element analysis, the optimization of design parameters associated with thickness of LRV carbody is carried out to increase the whole strength of the carbody and to reduce its mass. With the aids of the substructure technique and the modified technique with discrete variables in the optimization based on the finite element method, the consumed computing time is reduced dramatically. The optimized LRV carbody is re-analyzed by FEM to obtain its static strength and vibrating mode and is manufactured. The mass of the optimized carbody reduces about 1.3 kg, and the relative reduction ratio is about 10%. Then, the strength test of the real carbody under the static load is executed. It is shown by the numerical and test results that the design requirements of the LRV carbody are satisfying. The newly designed carbody is used in the LRV, which is the first one used commercially developed by China independently. Nowadays, the LRV is running on the transportation circuit in Changchun of China.

Keywords

optimization / LRV / carbody / strength / modal analysis / substructure

References

[1] KimJ. S., LeeS. J., ShinK. B.. Manufacturing and structural safety evaluation of a composite train carbody [J]. Composite Structures, 2007, 78(4): 468-476

[2] BakerB. C., NolanJ. M., O’NeillB., GenetosA. P.. Crash compatibility between cars and light trucks: Benefits of lowering front-end energy-absorbing structure in SUVs and pickups [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2008, 40(1): 116-125

[3] JAMES M G. Dallas area rapid transit light rail vehicle-modern equipment with a modern appearance [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference. 1994: 77–80.

[4] PorterD. R.. Transit-focused development and light rail systems: The little connection [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1998, 1623: 165-169

[5] KimJ. S., ChungS. K.. A study on the low-velocity impact response of laminates for composite railway bodyshells [J]. Composite Structures, 2007, 77(4): 484-492

[6] HarteA. M., McnamaraJ. F., RoddyI. D.. A multilevel approach to the optimisation of a composite light rail vehicle bodyshell [J]. Composite Structures, 2004, 63(3/4): 447-453

[7] SiuL. K.. Innovative lightmass transit technologies for sustainable transportation [J]. J of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2007, 7(2): 63-70

[8] HarteA. M., McnamaraJ. F., RoddyI. D.. A multilevel approach to the optimization of a composite light rail vehicle bodyshell [J]. Composite Structures, 2004, 63(3/4): 447-453

[9] RichardsonM. O. W.. Material and structural aspects of composite materials for light rail vehicle track [J]. Progress in Rubber and Plastics Technology, 1993, 9(1): 71-88

[10] QinS.-j., ZhongY.-z., YangX.-yun.. Steel structure design of Q6W-2 LRV carbody with low floor [J]. Rail Vehicle, 2004, 42(11): 23-26

[11] THOMAS R S. Traction electrification and NEC compliance: the Portland light rail experience [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference. 1999: 28–32.

[12] ShuaiC.-j., XiaoG., NiZ.-s., ZhongJ.. Application of computer-aided engineering optimum de sign method in aluminum profile extrusion mould [J]. J of Central South University of Technology, 2003, 10(1): 64-68

[13] YuH.-p., LiC.-feng.. Finite element analysis of free expansion of aluminum alloy tube under magnetic pressure trans [J]. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2005, 15(5): 1040-1044

[14] QinS.-j., LiH.-b., PengJ.-g., LiS.-ben.. Numerical simulation and optimum clearance in blanking process [J]. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2003, 2(13): 407-411

[15] HyderM. J., AsifM.. Optimization of location and size of opening in a pressure vessel cylinder using ANSYS [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2008, 15(1/2): 1-19