Shear behavior of sand-expanded polystyrene beads lightweight fills

Abstract

Through direct shear and triaxial compression tests, effects of expanded polystyrene (EPS) mass ratios in sand-EPS mixtures and stress status on materials’ shear behavior were investigated. Hyperbolic curves were used to fit relationship between shear stress and shear displacement. The shear behavior is marginally associated with the EPS ratios and normal/confining stresses. Increases of EPS ratios and decreases of normal/confining stresses result in shear strength decreases. The shapes of Mohr-Coulomb’s envelope include linear and piecewise linear types, which are basically determined by the EPS ratio. Such difference is thought related to the embedding or apparent cohesion effect under relatively high EPS ratio conditions. Shear strength parameters can be used for further modeling and design purposes.

Keywords

expanded polystyrene / lightweight fills / shear strength / mixing ratios / strength envelope / sands

References

[1] DengA., XiaoY., LiuH.-long.. Engineering behavior of sand-EPS beads lightweight fills [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(8): 1140-1145

[2] LiuH.-l., DengA., ChuJ.. Effect of different mixing ratios of polystyrene pre-puff beads and cement on the mechanical behaviour of lightweight fill [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Elsevier, 2006, 24(6): 331-338

[3] TsuchidaT., PorbahaA., YamaneN.. Development of a geomaterial from dredged bay mud [J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2001, 13(2): 152-160

[4] SnowC. L., NickersonC. R.. Case study of EPS Geofoam lightweight fill for settlement control at bridge approach embankment [C]. Geotechnical Special Publication, 2004, Reston, American Society of Civil Engineers: 580-589

[5] BarrK. M. H.. Lightweight fill in dam remediation-a case study[C]. Improvements in Reservoir Construction, Operation and Maintenance, 2006, London, Thomas Telford Services Ltd: 412-418

[6] YangD., GohlB.. Geotechnical and seismic design of innovative roger pierlet bridge and approach structures [C]. Geotechnical Special Publication, 2006, Reston, American Society of Civil Engineers: 458-465

[7] HazarikaH., OkuzonoS.. Modeling the behavior of a hybrid interactive system involving soil, structure and EPS geofoam [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2004, 44(5): 149-162

[8] PierceC. E., BlackwellM. C.. Potential of scrap tire rubber as lightweight aggregate in flowable fill [J]. Waste Management, 2003, 23(3): 197-208

[9] CetinH., FenerM., GunaydinO.. Geotechnical properties of tire-cohesive clayey soil mixtures as a fill material [J]. Engineering Geology, 2006, 88(1/2): 110-120

[10] TanchaisawatT., VoottipruexP., BergadoD. T., HayashiS.. Performance of full scale test embankment with reinforced lightweight geomaterials on soft ground [J]. Lowland Technology International, 2008, 10(1): 84-92

[11] YouwaiS., BergadoD. T.. Strength and deformation characteristics of shredded rubber tire-sand mixtures [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(2): 254-264

[12] GhazaviM.. Shear strength characteristics of sand-mixed with granular rubber [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2004, 22(3): 401-416

[13] QianJ.-h., YinZ.-ze.Theory and computation of soil engineering [M], 1996, Beijing, Water Resources and Hydro Power Press of China

[14] LuT.-h., LiuZ.-d., ChenG.-xing.Advanced soil mechanics [M], 2006, Beijing, China Machine Press

[15] QuZ.-jiong.Soil plasticity mechanics [M], 1987, Chengdu, Chengdu University of Science and Technology Press

[16] HuangW.-x., PuJ.-l., ChenY.-jiong.. Hardening rule and yield function for soils [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1981, 3(3): 19-26

[17] ShenZ.-jiang.. Development of constitutive modelling of geological materials (1985–1988) [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 1989, 10(2): 3-13