Numerical analysis of effect of friction between diaphragm wall and soil on braced excavation

Abstract

A plane strain finite element model was established to investigate the effect of friction between diaphragm wall and soil on braced excavation. The behavior of interface between diaphragm wall and soil was simulated with the interface model of ABAQUS. Parametric studies were conducted with different diaphragm wall external friction angles δ. The results show that deflection of diaphragm wall and ground surface settlement decrease with the decrease of δ. However, the reduction effect on diaphragm wall deflection is the most significant at the depth where the maximum wall deflection occurs and can be neglected at the wall base. The ratio between wall deep inward component and wall cantilever component reaches its peak value 2.7 when δ=5°. The ratio of the maximum ground surface settlement to the maximum wall lateral deflection decreases at a reduced rate with the increase of δ. For excavation with braced diaphragm wall, the effect of friction between diaphragm and soil on the deflection of diaphragm wall and ground settlement, especially the distribution of ground surface settlement behind diaphragm, should be taken into account.

Keywords

excavation / diaphragm wall / friction / deflection / ground settlement / FEM

References

[1] FinnoR. J., FrankT. V., RossowE., BlackburnJ. T.. Evaluating damage potential in building affected by excavations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 2005, 131(10): 1199-1210

[2] KungG. T. C., HseinC. J., HsiaoE. C. L., HashashY. M. A.. Simplified model for wall deflection and ground-surface settlement caused by brace excavation in clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 2007, 133(6): 731-747

[3] OsmanA. S., BoltonM. D.. A new design method for retaining walls in clay[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2004, 41(3): 451-466

[4] OsmanA. S., BoltonM. D.. Ground movement prediction for braced excavations in undrained clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 2006, 132(4): 465-477

[5] RoboskiJ., FinnoR. J.. Distributions of ground movements parallel to deep excavation in clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 2006, 43(1): 43-58

[6] KungG. T. C., HseinC. J., HsiaoE. C. L.. Modeling small-strain behavior of Taipei clays for finite element analysis of braced excavations[J]. Computer and Geotechnics, 2008, 35(4): 1-14

[7] FinnoR. J., BlackburnJ. T., RoboskiJ.. Three-dimensional effects for supported excavations in clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 2007, 133(1): 30-36

[8] FinnoR. J., BlackburnJ. T., RoboskiJ.. Three-dimensional modeling of excavation sequences[C]. GeoCongress2006. Geotechnical Engineering in the Information Technology Age, 2006, Atlanta, ASCE: 1-6

[9] OuC. Y., TengF. C., WangI. W.. Analysis and design of partial ground improvements in deep excavations[J]. Computer and Geotechnics, 2008, 35(7): 578-584

[10] BenmebrarekN., BenmebarekS., KastnerR., SorbraA. H.. Passive and active earth pressures in the presence of groundwater flow[J]. Geotechnique, 2006, 56(3): 149-158

[11] BicaA. V. D., ClaytonC. R. I.. An experimental study of the behaviour of embedded lengths of cantilever walls[J]. Geotechnique, 1998, 48(6): 731-745

[12] NakaiT., KawanoH., MurataK., BannoM., HashimotoT.. Model tests and numerical simulation of raced excavation in sandy ground: Influence of construction history, wall friction, wall, stiffness, strut position and strut stiffness[J]. Soil and Foundations, 1999, 39(3): 1-12

[13] HsiehP. G., OuC. Y.. Shape of ground surface settlement profiles caused by excavations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, 1998, 35(9): 1004-1017