Numerical simulation of busbar configuration in large aluminum electrolysis cell

Abstract

Various busbar configurations were built and modeled by the custom code based on the commercial package ANSYS for the 500 kA aluminum electrolysis cell. The configuration parameters, such as side riser entry ratio, number of cathode bars connected to each riser, vertical location of side cathode busbar and short side cathode busbar, distance between rows of cells in potline, the number of neighboring cells, ratio of compensation busbar carried passing under cell and its horizontal location under cell along with large magnetohydrodynamic(MHD) computation based on the custom evaluation function were simulated and discussed. The results show that a cell with riser entry y ratio of 11:9:8:9:11 and cathode busbar located at the level of aluminum solution, 50% upstream cathode current passing under cell for magnetic field compensation, the distance between rows of 50 m is more stable.

Keywords

numerical simulation / aluminum electrolysis cell / busbar configuration / magnetohydrodynamic

References

[1] DupuisM., BojarevicsV., FreibergsJ.. Demonstration thermo-electric and MHD mathematical models of a 500 kA aluminum electrolysis cell (Part 2) [C]. Light Metals, 2004, Carlotte, TMS: 453-459

[2] DupuisM., BojarevicsV.. Weakly coupled thermo-electric and MHD mathematical models of an aluminium electrolysis cell [C]. Light Metals, 2005, San Francisco, TMS: 449-454

[3] El-demerdashM. F., AdlyA. A., Abu-shadyS. E., IsmailW.. Towards a more stable aluminum cell via busbar configuration optimization [C]. Light Metals, 2000, Nashville, TMS: 291-295

[4] GusevA., KriuokovskyV., KrylovL., PlatonovV.. Busbar optimization of high-current reduction cells [C]. Light Metals, 2004, Carlotte, TMS: 467-472

[5] DesclouxJ., FlueckM., RomerioM. V.. Stability in aluminum reduction cells: A spectral problem solved by an iterative procedure[C]. Light Metals, 1994, San Francisco, TMS: 275-281

[6] SeleT.. Instabilities of the metal surfaces in electrolytic aluminum reduction cells[J]. Met Trans B, 1977, 8B: 613

[7] UrataN.. Magnetics and metal pad instability [C]. Light Metals, 1985, New York, TMS: 581-591

[8] MoreauR. J., ZieglerD.. Stability of aluminum cells—A new approach [C]. Light Metals, 1986, New Orleans, TMS: 359-364

[9] SunH., ZikanovO., ZieglerD. P.. Non-linear two-dimensional model of melt flows and interface instability in aluminum reduction cells[J]. Fluid Dynamics Research, 2004, 35(4): 255-274

[10] SevereD. S., SchneiderA. F., PintoE. C., GusbertiV.. Modeling magnetohydrodynamics of aluminum electrolysis cells with ANSYS and CFX [C]. Light Metals, 2005, San Francisco, TMS: 475-480

[11] ZhouP., MeiC., ZhouN.-j., JiangC.-wei.. Effect of electromagnetic force on turbulent flow of molten metal in aluminum electrolysis cells[J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2004, 11(3): 265-269

[12] LacameraA. F., ZieglerD. P., KozarekR. L.. Magnetohydrodynamics in the Hall-Heroult process, an overview [C]. Light Metals, 1992, Seattle, TMS: 1179-1186

[13] DrosteC., SegatzM., VogelsangD.. Improved 2-dimensional model for magnetohydrodynamic stability analysis in reduction cells [C]. Light Metals, 1998, San Antonio, TMS: 419-428

[14] SegatzM., DrosteC.. Analysis of magnetohydrodynamic instabilities in aluminum reduction cells [C]. Light Metals, 1994, San Francisco, TMS: 313-322

[15] GrjotheimK., KvandeH.Understanding the Hall-Heroult process for production of aluminum[M], 1986, Dusseldorf, Aluminum-Verlag