Multi-scale and multi-fractal analysis of pressure fluctuation in slurry bubble column bed reactor

Xing-jun Wang , Li-shun Hu , Jun-jie Shen , Zhi-nan Yu , Fu-chen Wang , Zun-hong Yu

Journal of Central South University ›› 2007, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 696 -700.

PDF
Journal of Central South University ›› 2007, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 696 -700. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-007-0133-x
Article

Multi-scale and multi-fractal analysis of pressure fluctuation in slurry bubble column bed reactor

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The Daubechies second order wavelet was applied to decompose pressure fluctuation signals with the gas flux varying from 0.18 to 0.90 m3/h and the solid mass fraction from 0 to 20% and scales 1–9 detail signals and the 9th scale approximation signals. The pressure signals were studied by multi-scale and R/S analysis method. Hurst analysis method was applied to analyze multi-fractal characteristics of different scale signals. The results show that the characteristics of mono-fractal under scale 1 and scale 2, and bi-fractal under scale 3–9 are effective in deducing the hydrodynamics in slurry bubbling flow system. The measured pressure signals are decomposed to micro-scale signals, meso-scale signals and macro-scale signals. Micro-scale and macro-scale signals are of mono-fractal characteristics, and meso-scale signals are of bi-fractal characteristics. By analyzing energy distribution of different scale signals, it is shown that pressure fluctuations mainly reflects meso-scale interaction between the particles and the bubble.

Keywords

pressure fluctuation / R/S analysis / multi-scale / multi-fractal / bubble column bed reactor

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xing-jun Wang, Li-shun Hu, Jun-jie Shen, Zhi-nan Yu, Fu-chen Wang, Zun-hong Yu. Multi-scale and multi-fractal analysis of pressure fluctuation in slurry bubble column bed reactor. Journal of Central South University, 2007, 14(5): 696-700 DOI:10.1007/s11771-007-0133-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

StolojanuV., PrakashA.. Hydrodynamic measurements in a slurry bubble column using ultrasonic techniques[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1997, 52(21/22): 4225-4230

[2]

FanL. S.Gas-liquid-solid Fluidization Engineering[M], 1989, Boston, Butterworths

[3]

IshibashiH., OnozakiM., KobayashiM., et al.. Gas holdup in slurry bubble column reactors of a 150 t/d coal liquefaction pilot plant process[J]. Fuel, 2001, 80(5): 655-664

[4]

MarettoC., KrishnaR.. Design and optimization of a multi-stage bubble column slurry reactor for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Catalysis Today, 2001, 66(2/4): 241-248

[5]

ZhangJ. P., LiY., FanL. S.. Discrete phase simulation of gas-liquid-solid fluidization systems: Single bubble rising behavior[J]. Powder Technology, 2000, 113(3): 310-326

[6]

IngaJ. R., MorsiB. I.. Effect of operating variables on the gas holdup in a large-scale slurry bubble column reactor operating with an organic liquid mixture[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 1999, 38(3): 928-937

[7]

GandhiB., PrakashA., BergougnouM. A.. Hydrodynamic behavior of slurry bubble column at high solids concentrations[J]. Powder Technology, 1999, 103(2): 80-94

[8]

ZhouL. X., YangM., FanL. S.. A second-order moment three-phase turbulence model for simulating gas-liquid-solid flows[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(3): 647-653

[9]

de SwartJ. W. A., KrishnaR.. Simulation of the transient and steady state behaviour of a bubble column slurry reactor for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2002, 41(1): 35-47

[10]

LiJ. H., KwaukM.. Exploring complex systems in chemical engineering—the multi-scale methodology[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2003, 58(3/6): 521-535

[11]

LiuM. Y., LiJ. H., KwaukM.. Application of the energy-minimization multi-scale method to gas-liquid-solid fluidized beds[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(24): 6805-6812

[12]

LiJ. H., ChengC. L., ZhangZ. D.. The EMMS model-its application, development and updated concepts[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1999, 54(22): 5409-5425

[13]

LiX. X., ShiY. F., GuL. L., et al.. Chaotic identification of regimes of gas-liquid-solid three-phase co-current flow system[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2002, 16(1): 84-88

[14]

ZhouW. X., PanB., YuZ. H.. Algorithm and properties of rescaled range analysis[J]. Journal Nonlinear Dynamics in Science and Technology, 2000, 7(3): 180-191

[15]

ChenX. L., LiD., YuZ. H.. R/S analysis of the differential-pressure signals of gas-liquid flow on bubble-cap tray plate[J]. Computers and Applied Chemistry, 2005, 22(2): 91-95

[16]

MandelbrotB. B.. Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascade: Divergence of high moments and dimension of carrier[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1974, 62(2): 331-358

[17]

CouillardM., DavisonM.. A comment on measuring the Hurst exponent of financial time series[J]. Physica A, 2005, 348: 404-418

[18]

MandelbrotB. B.The Fractal Geometry of Nature[M], 1982, New York, W H Freeman and Company

[19]

ShensaM. J.. The discrete wavelet transform: Wedding the atrous and mallat algorithms[J]. IEEE Trans on Signal Processing, 1992, 40(10): 2464-2482

[20]

MallatS.. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation[J]. IEEE Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1989, 11(7): 674-693

[21]

LuX. S., LiH. Z.. Wavelet analysis of pressure fluctuation signals in a bubbling fluidized bed[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1999, 75(2): 113-119

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

138

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/