Finite element analysis of stress distribution of obturator prostheses for acquired unilateral maxillary defects

Abstract

Objective To assess stresses produced by different obturator prostheses. Methods Three-dimensional finite element models of unilateral maxillary defects rehabilitated with different obturators were constructed. The different stresses were analyzed by three-dimensional finite element method under different load angle. Results The Von Mises stress values obtained for the remaining tissues adjacent to defect cavity were higher when rehabilitated by inferior hollow obturator in comparison with by superior hollow obturator. The maximum of Von Mises were higher when rehabilitated by resilient hollow obturator than by rigid hollow obturator. It was also observed that in the rigid type stress distribution contours formed in the remaining tissues adjacent to defect cavity, while in resilient hollow obturator prostheses the stress distributed mainly in the prosthesis itself. The oblique load shows the most maximum of Von Mises among all types of obturator prostheses. Conclusions A high lateral wall of an obturator may be more better in preserving the remaining structures than a shorter prosthesis lateral wall. A soft liner may be incorporated to reduce the pain of the residual maxillary structures and mucosa. When load on defect, higher stress would be generated to the residual maxillary structures. The adjustment of occlusual relationship is very important.

Keywords

maxillary defect / obturator prosthesis / 3-dimention finite element / stress

References

[1] RogersS N, LoweD, BrownJ S, et al.. Health-related quality of life after maxillectomy: a comparison between prosthetic obturation and free flap [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2003, 61(2): 174-181

[2] LightJ. Functional assessment testing for maxillofacial prosthetics[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1997, 77(4): 388-393

[3] MuzaffarA R, AdamsW P, HartogJ M, et al.. Maxillary reconstruction: functional and aesthetic considerations[J]. Plast Reconstru Surg, 1999, 104: 2172-2183

[4] KornblithA B, ZlotolowI M, GooenJ, et al.. Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis[J]. Head Neck, 1996, 18(3): 323-334

[5] MoroiH H, OkimotoK, TeradaY. The effect of oral prosthesis on the quality of life for head and neck cancer patients[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 1999, 26(4): 265-273

[6] FutranN D, WadsworthJ T, VillaretD, et al.. Midface reconstruction with the fibula free flap[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2002, 128(2): 161-166

[7] GendenE M, SteppM T, RezaeeR P, et al.. Comparison of functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with and without palatomaxillary reconstruction [J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2003, 129(7): 775-780

[8] ParrG R, GardnerL K. The evolution of the obturator framework design[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2003, 89(6): 608-610

[9] AliA, FardyM J, PattonD W. Maxillectomy: to reconstruct or obdurate? Results of a UK survey of oral and maxillofacial surgeons[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1995, 33(4): 207-210

[10] RobbG L, MarunickM T, MartinJ W, et al.. Midface reconstruction: surgical reconstruction versus prosthesis[J]. Head Neck, 2001, 23(1): 48-58

[11] AramanyM A. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part II: Design principoles[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2001, 86(6): 562-568

[12] SchwartzmanB, CaputoA, BeumerJ. Occlusal force transfer by removable partial denture designs for a radial maxillectomy[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1985, 54(3): 397-403

[13] MyersR E, MitchellD L. A photoelastic study of stress induced by framework design in a maxillary resection[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1989, 61(5): 590-594

[14] ZhangTong, LiuHong-chen, WangYan-yong, et al.. The construction of three-dimensional finite element model of human maxillary complex[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2000, 35(5): 374-376

[15] ChenYong, ZhaoYi-min, WangYi-bin, et al.. Study on the design of the implant prosthesis in the edentulous unilateral maxillary defect- A quasi three dimensional finite element analysis[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2000, 16(4): 308-310

[16] AckermanA J. The prosthetic management of oral and facial defects following cancer surgery [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1955, 5(3): 413-432

[17] BrownK E. Periaheral consideration in improving obturator retention[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1968, 20(2): 176-181

[18] BrownK E. Clinical considerations improving obturator treatment[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1970, 24(4): 461-466

[19] ZarbG A. The maxillary resection and its prosthetic replacement[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1967, 18(3): 268-281

[20] SharryJ J. Extension on partial denture treatment [J]. Dent Clin North Am, 1962, 5(11): 821-835

[21] MurataH, HongG, HamadaT, et al.. Dynamic mechanical properties of silicone maxillofacial prosthetic materials and the influence of frequency and temperature on their properties[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2003, 16(4): 369-374

[22] MurataH, TaguchiN, HanadaT, et al.. Dynamic viscoelasticity of soft liners and masticatory function [J]. J Dent Res, 2002, 81(2): 123-128