Using hybrid modeling for life cycle assessment of motor bike and electric bike

Abstract

Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is environmental evaluation of products, materials, and processes over their life cycle. Truncation uncertainty and corresponding uncertainty are main problems occurred in process life cycle assessment (PLCA) modeling and economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIOLCA) modeling. Through combination of these two modelings in different life cycle stage and use of an uncertainty reduction strategy, a hybrid life cycle assessment modeling method was proposed in this study. Case studies were presented on gasoline-powered motorbikes (M-bike) and electricity-powered electric bike (E-bike). Web-based software was developed to analyze process environmental impacts. Results show that the largest part of life cycle energy (LCE) is consumed at use stage. Less energy is consumed in life cycle of E-bike than that of M-bike. GWP (Global Warming Potential), CO (Carbon Monoxide), PM10 (particulate matter) emission of M-bike are higher than that of E-bike, especially at use stage, AP (acidification Potential) emission of E-bike is higher than that of M-bike. Comprehensively, E-bike is energy efficient and less emitting, and better choice for urban private transportation.

Keywords

life cycle assessment / hybrid modeling / bike

References

[1] MauriceB, FrischknechtR, Coelho-SchwirtzV, et al.. Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory: application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2000, 8: 95-108

[2] HeatherL, MacLean, LaveL B. Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2003, 29: 1-69

[3] LaveL B, Cobas-FloresE, HendricksonC T, et al.. Using input-output analysis to estimate economy-wide discharges[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1999, 29: 420A-426A

[4] AzapagicA. Life cycle assessment and its application to process selection, design and optimisation [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1999, 73: 1-21

[5] NielsenA M, WeidemaB PInput/output analysis-Shortcuts to life cycle data[R], 2001, Copenhagen, Denmark, Danish Environmental Protection Agency

[6] JacquettaJ, LeeP, O’Callaghan, et al.. Critical review of life cycle analysis and assessment techniques and their application to commercial activities[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 1995, 13: 37-56

[7] ISO 14040. Environmental Management-life Cycle Assessment-principles and Framework[S].

[8] GuineeJ BHandbook on Life Cycle Assessment[M], 2002, New York, Kluwer Academic Press

[9] ToddJ A TStreamlined Life-Cycle Assessment: A Final Report from the SETAC[R], 1999, Belgium, The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

[10] JoshiS, LansingE. Product environmental life-cycle assessment using input-output techniques[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2002, 3: 95-118

[11] TreloarG J. Extracting embodied energy paths from input-output tables: towards an input-output-based hybrid energy analysis method[J]. Economic Systems Research, 1997, 4: 375-378

[12] Department of National Accounts, National Statistics Bureau of ChinaInput-output Table[M], 1999, Beijing, China Statistics Press

[13] National Bureau of Statistics of ChinaChina Statistical Yearbook[M], 2004, Beijing, China Statistics Press

[14] GB/T4754-94, National Economic Sector Classification and Codes[S].

[15] WangM QGREET 1.5-Transportation Fuel-Cycle Model Volume 1: Methodology, Development, Use, and Results[R], 1999, Dearborn, USA, Agronne Information and Publishing Division

[16] National Environmental Protection BureauHandbook for Industrial Pollutants and Emission Factors [M], 1996, Beijing, China Environmental Science Press: 10-28