Uncertainty in life cycle economical analysis of cassava-based ethanol fuel

Abstract

Biomass ethanol fuel is not only renewable but also environmental-friendly. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region is developing the cassava-based ethanol fuel. Economical performance of the project is the key issue. The traditional life cycle economical analysis is just a static calculation process. Uncertainty is the character of cassava yield, cost of cassava plant, cassava price, tax rate and gasoline price, and the economical performance of the project is determined by these aspects. This study proposes an economical model of cassava-based ethanol fuel. The method of Monte Carol is used to simulate the economical performance. This method conquers the shortage of the traditional way. The results show that cassava-based ethanol fuel can get survived when the tax is exempted. Finally, the study also evaluates the potential of the economical performance.

Keywords

uncertainty / life cycle economical analysis / cassava / ethanol fuel

References

[1] CadenasA, CabezuoS. Biofules as sustainable technologies: Perspectives for less developed countries[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1998, 58: 83-103

[2] The European CommissionBio-energy for Europe-which one fits best, Rapport final project. 6. Biofit [R], 2000, Heidelberg, IFEU

[3] ColleS, de AbreuS L. uncertainty in economical analysis of solar water heating and photovoltaic systems [J]. Solar Energy, 2001, 70(2): 131-142

[4] ZhangCheng, HanWei-jian, JingXue-dong, et al.. Life cycle economic analysis of fuel ethanol derived from cassava in southwest China[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2003, 7: 353-366

[5] SonnemannG W, SchuhmacherM, CastellsF. Uncertainty assessment by a Monte Carlo simulation in a life cycle inventory of electricity produced by a waste incinerator[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2003, 11: 279-292

[6] HuijbregtsM A J. Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA (part I)—a general framework for the analysis of uncertainty and variability in life cycle assessment[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1998, 3(5): 273-80

[7] McCleeseD L, LaPumaP T. Using monte carlo simulation in life cycle assessment for electric and internal combustion vehicles[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7(4): 230-236

[8] GluchaP, BaumannbH. The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making[J]. Building and Environment, 2004, 39: 571-580

[9] McGuigan J R, Moyer R C, de Frederick H B. Harris: Managerial Economics Applications, Strategy, and Tactics[M]. South-Western Educational Press, 1998. 39–42.

[10] Pedro B. Economic Analysis of Investment Operations: Analytical Tools & Practical Applications [M]. World Bank, 2001. 95–105.

[11] PeiminL. Development strategies for Chinese cassava-industry[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2002, 22(2): 44-8(In Chinese)

[12] Huang J, Lin X, Li K, et al. Study of fertilizers’ effect on cassava growth [J]. Guangxi Science & Technology of Tropical Crops, 2000, (3): 1–3. (In Chinese)

[13] China Electric Power Yearbook Compiled Committee [M]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2001. 12. (In Chinese)

[14] National Bureau of Statistics of China. China statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2001. 140. (In Chinese)

[15] Wang M Q. GREET 1.5 — Transportation Fuel-Cycle Model, vol. 1: Methodology, Development, Use, and Results [M]. Center for Transportation Research, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, 1999.

[16] Wang M Q. GREET 1.5-Transportation Fuel-Cycle model, vol. 2: Appendices of Data and Results. Argonne (IL) [M]. Center for Transportation Research, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 1999.