Self-administered depression screening tool compared to structured clinical interviews: Implications for practice and research
Krystyna de Jacq , Allison A. Norful
Journal of Nursing Education and Practice ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 19 -24.
Background and objective Nurses are at a higher risk for depression compared to the general public, thus requiring regular screening for depression. It remains unclear if a self-assessment screening tool may be recommended. The objective of this study was to compare a self-administered screening tool versus a clinician-guided interview.
Methods Twenty-five nurses completed BDI-II and the SCID-5-RV. We used descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation for analyses.
Results BDI-II identified 44% as screening positive for depression, and SCID-5-RV identified 40.0%.
Conclusions Self-administered tools like BDI-II may be cost-effective for screening, while clinical interviews remain the diagnostic gold standard. Future research should focus on improving screening accuracy.
BDI-II / Depression / Nurses / SCID-5
| [1] |
National Institute of Mental Health. Depression. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. 2024. Available from: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/depression |
| [2] |
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2021 NSDUH annual national report. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. 2023. Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2021-nsduh-annual-national-report |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |