Specifications grading: Redefining success in the classroom

Abstract

Background Tiered grading practices that use letter, percentage, and numerical systems to express learner achievement of course outcomes are entrenched in nursing education programs. Despite their prevalence, these approaches present notable issues, including limited actionable feedback, challenges in fostering transferable practice competencies, and inconsistencies among evaluators. These concerns highlight the need for alternative assessment practices by educators that better support student learning and achievement of course outcomes.

Methods A fourth-year online nursing course was redesigned by the course instructor to employ specifications grading, an objective-driven, mastery-based assessment model. The implementation strategies and subsequent course revisions are documented and investigated following the highlights from the design.

Discussion The main challenges encountered by the instructor during the implementation phase included adapting new course structures to the existing ones, clarifying learner expectations, and supporting learners in transitioning to a new assessment framework. Revision opportunities helped improve transparency, alignment with learning outcomes, and learner engagement.

Conclusions Specifications grading demonstrates potential as a viable alternative assessment to traditional systems. Considering the novelty of this approach, recommendations and lessons learned are provided to guide educators considering similar approaches.

Keywords

Alternative assessment / Course redesign and implementation / Online nursing education / Specifications grading

References

[1] Crogman HT, Eshun KO, Jackson M, et al. Ungrading: the case for abandoning institutionalized assessment protocols and improving pedagogical strategies. Educ Sci. 2023; 13(11): 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111091

[2] DeLuca C, Braund H, Valiquette, et al. Grading policies and practices in Canada: A landscape study. Can J Educ Adm Policy. 2017; 184: 4-22.

[3] Cain J, Medina M, Romanelli F, et al. Deficiencies of traditional grading systems and recommendations for the future. Am J Pharm Educ. 2022; 86(7): 908-15. PMid:34815216 https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8850

[4] Lewis M, Johnson T, Ramirez A. Competency based education in nursing: Addressing gaps in traditional grading systems. Teach Learn Nurs. 2022; 17(3): 175-81.

[5] Keupper Tetzel CE, Gardner P. Effects of temporary mark withholding on academic performance. Psych Learn Teach. 2021; 20(3): 405-419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725721999958

[6] Clark D, Talbert R. Grading for growth. New York: Routledge; 2023.

[7] Parekh G. Practical accessibility strategies and exploring the K-12 context. Distinguished Visiting Scholars Series. Trent University, Peterborough; 2025 Nov 19.

[8] Rosenfeld H. Ungrading for cartographic education: reflections from small undergraduate classes. Cartogr Perspect. 2023. https://doi.org/10.14714/CP101.1775

[9] Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing (CASN). National nursing education framework. 2nd ed. Ottawa (ON): CASN; 2022. Available from: https://www.casn.ca

[10] Dabney BW, VanDerWoude CJ. Implementing a specifications grading system in a nursing course. Nurse Educ. 2023; 48(4): 187-91. PMid:36749967 https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001372

[11] Bloom BS. Learning for mastery. UCLA Eval Comment. 1968; 1(2): 1-12.

[12] Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. Am Psychol. 2000; 55(1): 68-78. PMid:11392867 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

[13] Niemiec CP, Ryan RM. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom. Theory Res Educ. 2009; 7(2): 133-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318

[14] Katzman S, Hurst Kennedy J, Barrera A, et al. The effect of specifications grading on students’ learning and attitudes in an undergraduate level cell biology course. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021; 22(3). PMid:34804323 https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00200-21

[15] Carlisle S. Simple specifications grading. PRIMUS. 2020; 30(8-10): 926-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1695238

[16] McKnelly KJ, Howitz W, Thane T, et al. Specifications grading at scale: Improved letter grades and grading related interactions in a course with over 1,000 students. J Chem Educ. 2023; 100: 3179-93. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00740

[17] Nilson LB. Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students and saving faculty time. New York: Routledge; 2015.

[18] Howitz W, McKnelly K, Link R. Delving into the design and implementation of specifications grading systems in higher education. Educ Sci. 2025; 15(1): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010083

[19] Howitz W, McKnelly K, Link R. Developing and implementing a specification grading system in an organic chemistry laboratory course. J Chem Educ. 2021; 98(2): 385-94. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00450

[20] Mueller J. Authentic assessment toolbox. 2018. Available from: http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/

[21] Yik BJ, Machost H, Streifer AC, et al. Students’ perceptions of specifications grading: Development and evaluation of the perceptions of grading schemes (PGS) instrument. J Chem Educ. 2024; 101: 3723-38. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00698

[22] Guskey TR. Closing achievement gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s “Learning for mastery. ” J Adv Acad. 2007; 19(1): 8-31. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-704

[23] Werth E, Williams K. What Motivates Students About Open Pedagogy? Motivational Regulation Through the Lens of Self- Determination Theory. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2021; 22(3): 34-54. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i3.5373

[24] Wiles B, Levesque-Bristol C. Motivation and achievement in undergraduate STEM calculus: Applying self-determination theory to examine the differential impact of learning environments across demographic groups. School Science and Mathematics. 2023; 123(4-5): 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12590

[25] Bachman C, Stewart C. Self-Determination Theory and Web- Enhanced Course Template Development. Teaching of Psychology. 2011; 38(3): 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311411798

[26] Davidoff Y, Jayusi W. Effective online teaching and learning strategies: interdisciplinary research of student perceptions in higher education. Educ Inf Technol. 2024; 30(2025): 3717-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12958-8

[27] Vitale S, Concepción D. Improving student learning with aspects of specifications grading. Teaching Philosophy. 2021; 44(1): 29-57. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil2020121133

[28] Mingoia J, Busque B. Exploring course components as predictors of academic success in an online psychology course. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. 2022. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi24.824

[29] Harris HS. Foreword: Turning Research into Practice: ix-xi. 2021. https://doi.org/10.37514/pra-b.2021.1145.1.2

[30] Amant KS. Afterword: Re-Mapping the Global Context for Online Education. 2021. https://doi.org/10.37514/pra-b.2021.1145.3.2

[31] Jopp R, Cohen J. Choose your own assessment, Assessment choice for students in online higher education. Teach High Educ. 2020; 27(6): 738-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1742680

[32] Krašna M, Bratina T. E-learning materials for social science students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 2014; 61(1): 77-87. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/14.61.77

[33] Dyer J, Hudon A, Montpetit-Tourangeau K, et al. Example-based learning: comparing the effects of additionally providing three different integrative learning activities on physiotherapy intervention knowledge. BMC Medical Education. 2015; 37: 15. PMid:25889066 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0308-3

[34] Streifer A, Palmer M, Taggart J. From expectations to experiences: Students’ perceptions of specifications grading in higher education. Int J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2024; 18(2): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2024.180205

[35] Forbes M, Murphy A, Alderman L. Course enhancement conversations: A holistic and collaborative evaluation approach to quality improvement in higher education. Evaluation Journal of Australasia. 2022; 22(4): 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X221120295

[36] Donato JJ, Marsh TC. Specifications grading is an effective approach to teaching biochemistry. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023; 24(2): 1-9. PMid:37614878 https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00236-22

[37] Authement RS, Beatty LB, Yearty B. Instructor Presence: Improving Communication, Civility, and Student Success in Online Nursing Education. SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Oct 31; 11. PMid:41179244 https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251390036

[38] Narayanan L, Nasser R, Menon S, et al. Course Crafting in the Pandemic: Examination of Students’ Positive Experiences. Education Sciences. 2024; 14(2): 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020131