Assessment practices and types of knowledge in two clinical examination formats in nursing education

Abstract

Background and objective: The assessment of nursing students' clinical competencies is a global concern, as different exam formats emphasize different types of knowledge and skills. There is a lack of research that uncovers the linkage between clinical exam formats, assessment practices and types of knowledge tested. This study investigates how two different formats of clinical exams—one based on written assignments (control exam), and one conducted in real patient situations (intervention exam)—influence educators’ assessment practices and the types of knowledge they enhance or limit respectively.

Methods: The study applied a comparative, ethnographic design, incorporating participant observations, focus group interviews with educators, and grade analysis of 104 nursing students. The analytical framework was informed by Institutional Ethnography (IE) and Donald Schön’s concepts of reflection in practice.

Results: The control exam is predictable and controlled facilitating assessment of theoretical knowledge and reflection-on-reflection-in-action but is detached from real-life patient interactions. In contrast, the intervention exam is unpredictable and complex emphasizing assessment of knowing-in-action and reflection-in-action but poses challenges in assessing theoretical reasoning and reflection-on-reflection-in-action. Despite these differences, no significant variation was found in students’ final grades between the two formats.

Conclusions: The findings highlight the impact of exam formats on assessment practices and suggest that nursing education should incorporate diverse assessment methods to balance theoretical rigor with clinical competence.

Keywords

Nursing education / Clinical exams / Real-life patient situations / Theoretical reflection / Assessment practices / Types of knowledge / Institutional ethnography / Schön’s reflection theory

References

[1] Immonen K, et al. Assessment of nursing students’ competence in clinical practice: a systematic review of reviews. Elsevier. 2019. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748919302214

[2] Sulosaari V, et al. A comparative review of advanced practice nurse programmes in the Nordic and Baltic countries. Nurse Educ Today. 2023; 127: 105847. PMid:37216703 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105847

[3] Nursing and Midwifery Council NMC. Review of Minimum Education and Training Standards in Nursing and Midwifery - Desk Based Research Evidence review final report. 2021. Available from: http://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/education-programme/education-programme-standards-research-sept-2021---harlow-consulting-evidence-review-report.pdf

[4] Bernild C, Holen M. Fremtidens sygeplejerskeuddannelse. in Et sundhedsvæsen for fremtiden 1., L. A. Falch and D. B. Samfundslitteratur. 2023; pp. Danbjørg, Eds., 139-154.

[5] Oermann MH, Gaberson KB,De Gagne JC. Evaluation and Testing in Nursing Education, 7th ed. Springer Publishing. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826139177

[6] Andersson PL, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Johansson UB, et al. Nursing students’ experiences of assessment by the Swedish National Clinical Final Examination. Nurse Educ Today. 2013; 33(5): 536-540. PMid:22225948 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.004

[7] Ha EH, Lim E. The effect of objective structured clinical examinations for nursing students. PLoS One. 2023.

[8] Traynor M, Galanouli D, Rice B, et al. Evaluating the objective structured long examination record for nurse education. British Journal of Nursing. 2016; 25(12): 681-687. PMid:27345072 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2016.25.12.681

[9] Yao J, et al. Case-based learning interventions for undergraduate nursing students in a theoretical course: A review of design, implementation, and outcomes. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2023; 46: 119-133. PMid:37188400 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.03.007

[10] Mårtensson G, Löfmark A. Implementation and student evaluation of clinical final examination in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2013; 33(12): 1563-1568. PMid:23398913 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.003

[11] Eraut M. A wider perspective on assessment. Med Educ. 2004; 38(8:) 803-804. PMid:15271039 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01930.x

[12] Helminen K, Johnson M, Isoaho H, et al. Final assessment of nursing students in clinical practice: Perspectives of nursing teachers, students and mentors. 2017.

[13] Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P.Study designs: Part 4-Interventional studies. 2019. PMid:31404185 https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_91_19

[14] Smith Dorothy E. Lanham,Institutional Ethnography as Practice. MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 2006.

[15] Bisaillon SL, Webster F. Blurring the boundaries: using institutional ethnography to inquire into health professions education and practice. Med Educ. 2017; 51(1): 51-60. PMid:27582407 https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13050

[16] Ministry of Higher Education and Science, “Concepts — English. ” Accessed: Nov. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ufm.dk/en/education/recognition-and-transparency/transparency-tools/qualifications-frameworks/concepts/?set_language=en

[17] Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action - The Critique of Functionalist Reason. Polity Press; 2006.

[18] Emerson MR, Fretz IR, Shaw LL. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Second Edition., Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 2011.

[19] Powell RA, Single HM, PoweIl RA. Focus Groups IS A FOCUS GROUP? 1996. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article/8/5/499/1843013 PMid:9117204 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499

[20] Alvesson M, Skölberg K. Reflexive Methodology - New Vistas for Qualitative Research, Second ed. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2009.

[21] Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner-How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Routledge, 2016.

[22] Schön DA. Educating the Reflective Practitioner, 1. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.

[23] Kukkonen P, et al. Nurse managers’ assessments about nursing education and work life’s competence demands: A European multi-country cross-sectional survey. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research. 2023; 43(1): 205715852211353. https://doi.org/10.1177/20571585221135304

[24] Alvesson A. Methodology for close up studies - struggling with closeness and closure. Higher Education. 2003; 46(2): 167-193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024716513774