Restorative just culture significantly improves stakeholder inclusion, second victim experiences and quality of recommendations in incident responses
Kathryn Turner , Jerneja Sveticic , Diana Grice , Matthew Welch , Catherine King , Jenni Panther , Claire Strivens , Brad Whitfield , Geoffrey Norman , Alice Almeida-Crasto , Tamirin Darch , Nicolas J.C. Stapelberg , Sidney Dekker
Journal of Hospital Administration ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2) : 8 -17.
Restorative just culture significantly improves stakeholder inclusion, second victim experiences and quality of recommendations in incident responses
Objective: Matching safety and quality improvements to the complexity of healthcare, Gold Coast Mental Health and Specialist Services implemented a new response to clinical incidents: the Gold Coast Clinical Incident Response Framework (GC-CIRF). It utilises a Restorative Just Culture (RJC) framework and Safety II principles. This paper evaluates its impact.
Methods: Staff surveys measured perceptions of just culture and second victim experiences. Quality of recommendations were compared before and after implementation. For the 19 incidents that occurred after the implementation of GC-CIRF, audits of the review processes were undertaken, measuring several components.
Results: Results show significant improvement in staff perceptions of just culture and second victim experiences. Review of incident review data showed several shifts in line with Safety II and RJC. The process audit demonstrated inclusion of a broad range of stakeholders, and significant improvements in the quality and strength of recommendations.
Conclusions: Embedding RJC and Safety II concepts into the incident review process is associated with improved measures of culture and review outputs. The integration of Safety II concepts and support of cultural shifts will require further work and committed leadership at all levels.
Restorative just culture / Just culture / Zero suicide framework / Clinical incidents / Safety II / Resilient healthcare / Complex systems / Second victim / Human error and patient safety / Root cause analysis
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Sharpe VA. Accountability and Justice in Patient Safety Reform. Washington: Georgetown University Press; 2004. |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hierarchy of Controls. 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hierarchy/default.html |
| [27] |
State of Queensland. STARS Tool for Clinician Disclosure. Patient Safety Queensland. 2011. |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Incident Analysis Collaborating Parties, Canadian Incident Analysis Framework. Edmonton, AB; 2012. |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
Gold Coast Mental Health and |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
State of Queensland, Best Practice Guide to Clinical Incident Management, Queensland Government Department of Health, Editor. Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Service,: Fortitude Valley Queensland; 2014. |
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |