Drought tolerance modulates the effects of neighborhood diversity and competition on tree growth in a tropical forest
Yuhan Tong , Gheyur Gheyret
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1) : 205
Neighborhood diversity and competition are key drivers of tree growth in tropical forests, but their responses to drought remain uncertain. It is also unclear whether species-level drought tolerance regulates the strength of these neighborhood effects. Using 33 years of individual-level census data from the 50-ha ForestGEO plot on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama, we quantified the effects of neighborhood species richness (NSR) and neighborhood competition index (NCI) on tree basal area growth across seven census intervals from 1982 to 2015. To distinguish long-term and short-term competitive effects, NCI was decomposed into a between-individual component representing each tree’s long-term mean competitive environment and a within-individual component representing temporal deviations from that mean. We used linear mixed-effects models to test whether climatic water balance, represented by the standardized precipitation-evapotranspiration index (SPEI), and focal-tree drought tolerance, represented by xylem water potential at 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity (P50), modified these effects. Among long-term surviving focal trees, NSR had a significant positive effect on basal area growth rate, although sensitivity analyses including pre-mortality observations suggest that this diversity benefit is conditional on individual tree vigor. However, both NCI components significantly reduced growth, with the between-individual component exhibiting a substantially stronger negative effect than the within-individual component. Climatic water balance modified persistent and temporal components of neighborhood competition in contrasting ways: long-term competitive environments exhibited a statistically significant but modest increase in competitive suppression under dry conditions, whereas temporal fluctuations in competition had stronger growth consequences under wetter conditions. In contrast, drought did not significantly modify the positive effect of NSR, suggesting that competitive suppression rather than diversity-mediated complementarity dominated tree growth under water-limited conditions. Among the 29 species with available P50 data, which represented 39.4% of the focal-tree observations, drought tolerance significantly modulated the neighborhood effects. Drought-sensitive species, with less negative P50 values, showed stronger positive responses to NSR. However, they also suffered greater growth suppression from both competition components. Drought-tolerant species, with more negative P50 values, responded weaklier overall. Whether this pattern holds for the broader BCI community remains untested, particularly for rarer and less-studied species. These findings show that long-term competitive environment and short-term competitive fluctuations influence tree growth differently depending on moisture conditions, and that hydraulic traits mediate how trees respond to neighborhood interactions. Incorporating hydraulic traits and decomposed competition effects into neighborhood models could be a promising direction for future work.
Neighborhood competition / Neighborhood species richness / Tree growth / Hydraulic traits / Drought tolerance / SPEI / Tropical forest
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
Beguería S (2017) sbegueria/SPEIbase: Version 2.5.1. 10.5281/ZENODO.834462 |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Condit R, Pérez R, Aguilar S, Lao S, Foster R, Hubbell S (2019) Complete data from the Barro Colorado 50-ha plot: 423617 trees, 35 years, 2019 version. https://doi.org/10.15146/5xcp-0d46 |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
Liang JJ, Crowther TW, Picard N, Wiser S, Zhou M, Alberti G, Schulze ED, McGuire AD, Bozzato F, Pretzsch H, de-Miguel S, Paquette A, Hérault B, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Barrett CB, Glick HB, Hengeveld GM, Nabuurs GJ, Pfautsch S, Viana H, Vibrans AC, Ammer C, Schall P, Verbyla D, Tchebakova N, Fischer M, Watson JV, Chen HYH, Lei XD, Schelhaas MJ, Lu HC, Gianelle D, Parfenova EI, Salas C, Lee E, Lee B, Kim HS, Bruelheide H, Coomes DA, Piotto D, Sunderland T, Schmid B, Gourlet-Fleury S, Sonké B, Tavani R, Zhu J, Brandl S, Vayreda J, Kitahara F, Searle EB, Neldner VJ, Ngugi MR, Baraloto C, Frizzera L, Bałazy R, Oleksyn J, Zawiła-Niedźwiecki T, Bouriaud O, Bussotti F, Finér L, Jaroszewicz B, Jucker T, Valladares F, Jagodzinski AM, Peri PL, Gonmadje C, Marthy W, O’Brien T, Martin EH, Marshall AR, Rovero F, Bitariho R, Niklaus PA, Alvarez-Loayza P, Chamuya N, Valencia R, Mortier F, Wortel V, Engone-Obiang NL, Ferreira LV, Odeke DE, Vasquez RM, Lewis SL, Reich PB (2016) Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science 354(6309): aaf8957. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8957 |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
Pustejovsky JE (2022) clubSandwich: cluster-robust (sandwich) variance estimators with small-sample corrections. R package version 0.5.8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=clubSandwich |
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
Northeast Forestry University
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |