High physiological recovery but strong reductions in growth and biomass after drought and rehydration in tree seedlings commonly used in Atlantic Forest restoration

Abstract

Although Brazil boasts exceptional forest biodiversity, there is limited knowledge on how its native tree species respond to intensifying drought events, a key uncertainty for restoration under climate change. Understanding morphophysiological responses to drought across tree species is particularly important for the implementation of restoration projects, when seedlings are most vulnerable to soil water restriction. Thus, this study investigated the impact of drought on the physiology and early growth of six Atlantic Forest tree species, as well as their capacity to recover after rehydration. Seedlings of pioneer (Schinus terebinthifolia, Luehea divaricata, and Peltophorum dubium) and non-pioneer (Cordia trichotoma, Cedrela fissilis, and Eugenia involucrata) species were subjected to an induced drought experiment in a greenhouse. Leaf water potential, chlorophyll a fluorescence, and gas exchange were measured over time, while growth and biomass were assessed at the end of the experiment. The species showed contrasting morphophysiological responses to drought, which were more consistently associated with differences along the isohydric-anisohydric continuum than with successional classification. S. terebinthifolia, C. fissilis, and E. involucrata exhibit predominantly isohydric behavior, whereas L. divaricata, P. dubium, and C. trichotoma are more anisohydric. With the exception of E. involucrata, drought strongly impaired physiological performance and both shoot and root growth, with overall growth reductions of up to 51%. Despite prolonged drought, all species demonstrated a high capacity to recover carbon assimilation after rehydration, indicating their potential for establishment in water-limited environments, albeit with substantial reductions in growth and biomass. The combined assessment of physiological recovery and growth impacts therefore contributes to the selection of species that maximize both growth and resilience in forest restoration projects in the Atlantic Forest and other biomes.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Drought tolerance / Forest restoration / Isohydric-anisohydric continuum / Resilience / Water deficit

References

[1] Alboukadel K, Mundt F (2017) Factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/factoextra/readme/README.html

[2] Amaral S, Metzger JP, Rosa M, Adorno BV, Gonçalves GC, Guedes Pinto LF. Alarming patterns of mature forest loss in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Nat Sustain, 2025, 8(3): 256-264.

[3] Andivia E, Villar-Salvador P, Oliet JA, Puértolas J, Dumroese RK, Ivetić V, Molina-Venegas R, Arellano EC, Li GL, Ovalle JF. Climate and species stress resistance modulate the higher survival of large seedlings in forest restorations worldwide. Ecol Appl, 2021, 31(6): e02394.

[4] Attia Z, Domec JC, Oren R, Way DA, Moshelion M. Growth and physiological responses of isohydric and anisohydric poplars to drought. J Exp Bot, 2015, 66(14):4373-4381.

[5] Barbosa LM, Shirasuna RT, Lima FC, Ortiz PRT, Barbosa KC, Barbosa TCLista de espécies indicadas para restauração ecológica para diversas regiões do estado de São Paulo, 20171st ednSão PauloInstituto de Botânica

[6] Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, Rcpp L (2025) Package ‘lme4’: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using “Eigen” and S4. In: CRAN. https://github.com/lme4/lme4/

[7] Bin Abdul Qadeer MA, Sajad M, Zia ML, El-Mansi AA, Iqbal R, Sameeullah M, Aslam N, İmren M, Çiftçi V, Samad AFA, Waheed MT, Turabi TH, Dababat AA, Ali I, Aziz U, Ahmed HGM, Ismail I. Genetic innovations in forest tree breeding: combating nematode threats and enhancing climate resilience. J Forestry Res2026, 37: 106.

[8] Blackman CJ, Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ. Leaf hydraulics and drought stress: response, recovery and survivorship in four woody temperate plant species. Plant Cell Environ, 2009, 32(11): 1584-1595.

[9] Brancalion PHS, Bello C, Chazdon RL, Galetti M, Jordano P, Lima RAF, Medina A, Pizo MA, Reid JL. Maximizing biodiversity conservation and carbon stocking in restored tropical forests. Conserv Lett, 2018, 11(4): e12454.

[10] Brancalion PHS, Hua FY, Joyce FH, Antonelli A, Holl KD. Moving biodiversity from an afterthought to a key outcome of forest restoration. Nat Rev Biodivers, 2025, 1(4):248-261.

[11] Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (2016) Manual de calagem e adubação para os Estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina, 11th edn.

[12] Brodribb TJ, Bowman DJMS, Nichols S, Delzon S, Burlett R. Xylem function and growth rate interact to determine recovery rates after exposure to extreme water deficit. New Phytol, 2010, 188(2): 533-542.

[13] Broggio IS, Silva-Junior CHL, Nascimento MT, Villela DM, Aragão LEOC. Quantifying landscape fragmentation and forest carbon dynamics over 35 years in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Environ Res Lett, 2024, 19(3): 034047.

[14] Carvalho PEREspécies Arbóreas Brasileiras, 20031st ednColomboEmbrapa Florestas

[15] Chazdon RL, Finegan B, Capers RS, Salgado-Negret B, Casanoves F, Boukili V, Norden N. Composition and dynamics of functional groups of trees during tropical forest succession in northeastern Costa Rica. Biotropica2010, 42(1):31-40.

[16] Choat B, Brodribb TJ, Brodersen CR, Duursma RA, López R, Medlyn BE. Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature, 2018, 558(7711): 531-539.

[17] D’Almeida W, Monteiro LM, Raman V, Rehman JU, Paludo KS, de Noronha Sales Maia BHL, Casapula I, Khan IA, Farago PV, Budel JM. Microscopy of Eugenia involucrata, chemical composition and biological activities of the volatile oil. Rev Bras Farmacogn, 2021, 31(2): 239-243.

[18] da Silva Leite R, do Nascimento MN, Tanan TT, Gonçalves Neto LP, da Silva Ramos CA, da Silva AL. Alleviation of water deficit in Physalis angulata plants by nitric oxide exogenous donor. Agric Water Manag, 2019, 216: 98-104.

[19] de Almeida C, Reid JL, Ferreira de Lima RA, Pinto LFG, Viani RAG. Restoration plantings in the Atlantic Forest use a small, biased, and homogeneous set of tree species. For Ecol Manag, 2024, 553: 121628.

[20] DellaSala DA, MacKey B, Kormos CF, Young V, Boan JJ, Skene JL, Lindenmayer DB, Kun Z, Selva N, Malcolm JR, Laurance WF. Measuring forest degradation via ecological-integrity indicators at multiple spatial scales. Biol Conserv, 2025, 302: 110939.

[21] Farooq M, Wahid A, Zahra N, Hafeez MB, Siddique KHM. Recent advances in plant drought tolerance. J Plant Growth Regul, 2024, 43(10): 3337-3369.

[22] Feron S, Cordero RR, Damiani A, MacDonell S, Pizarro J, Goubanova K, Valenzuela R, Wang CH, Rester L, Beaulieu A. South America is becoming warmer, drier, and more flammable. Commun Earth Environ, 2024, 5: 501.

[23] Ferraz TM, de Oliveira Maia S, de Souza GAR, Baroni DF, Rodrigues WP, de Sousa EF, Penchel R, Loos R, de Assis Figueiredo FAMM, Rakocevic M, Campostrini E. Clonal differences in ecophysiological responses to imposed drought in selected Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla hybrids. Tree Physiol, 2025, 45(1): tpae160 .

[24] Ferreira EB, Cavalcanti PP, Nogueira DA. ExpDes: an R package for ANOVA and experimental designs. Appl Math, 2014, 5(19):2952-2958.

[25] Férriz M, Martin-Benito D, Fernández-de-Simón MB, Conde M, García-Cervigón AI, Aranda I, Gea-Izquierdo G. Functional phenotypic plasticity mediated by water stress and [CO₂] explains differences in drought tolerance of two phylogenetically close conifers. Tree Physiol, 2023, 43(6): 909-924.

[26] Fontes CG, Fine PVA, Wittmann F, Bittencourt PRL, Piedade MTF, Higuchi N, Chambers JQ, Dawson TE. Convergent evolution of tree hydraulic traits in Amazonian habitats: implications for community assemblage and vulnerability to drought. New Phytol, 2020, 228(1): 106-120.

[27] Grossnickle SC. Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes. New for, 2012, 43(5): 711-738.

[28] Guerra A, Reis LK, Borges FLG, Ojeda PTA, Pineda DAM, Miranda CO, de Lima Maidana DPF, dos Santos TMR, Shibuya PS, Marques MCM, Laurance SGW, Garcia LC. Ecological restoration in Brazilian biomes: Identifying advances and gaps. For Ecol Manag, 2020, 458: 117802.

[29] Guillemot J, Martin-StPaul NK, Bulascoschi L, Poorter L, Morin X, Pinho BX, le Maire G, Bittencourt PRL, Oliveira RS, Bongers F, Brouwer R, Pereira L, Gonzalez Melo GA, Boonman CCF, Brown KA, Cerabolini BEL, Niinemets Ü, Onoda Y, Schneider JV, Sheremetiev S, Brancalion PHS. Small and slow is safe: on the drought tolerance of tropical tree species. Glob Change Biol, 2022, 28(8): 2622-2638.

[30] Hoagland D, Arnon DCircular 347 - the water-culture method for growing plants without soil, 1950, Berkeley: University of California

[31] Hoang NT, Kanemoto K. Mapping the deforestation footprint of nations reveals growing threat to tropical forests. Nat Ecol Evol2021, 5(6): 845-853.

[32] Hoffmann WA, Poorter H. Avoiding bias in calculations of relative growth rate. Ann Bot, 2002, 90(1): 37-42.

[33] Husson F, Josse J, Le S, Mazet J (2024) FactoMineR: Multivariate exploratory data analysis and data mining. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FactoMineR/index.html

[34] IUCN (2024) The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2023–1. https://www.iucnredlist.org/

[35] Jassby AD, Platt T. Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr, 1976, 21(4): 540-547.

[36] Ji L, Liu Y, Wang J, Lu ZM, Zhang LJ, Yang YC. Differential variation in non-structural carbohydrates in root branch orders of Fraxinus mandshurica rupr. seedlings across different drought intensities and soil substrates. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 692715.

[37] Kassambara A (2023) ggcorrplot: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix using “ggplot2.” https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggcorrplot/index.html

[38] Klein T. The variability of stomatal sensitivity to leaf water potential across tree species indicates a continuum between isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Funct Ecol, 2014, 28(6): 1313-1320.

[39] Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest Package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw, 2017, 82: 1-26.

[40] Laoué J, Havaux M, Ksas B, Orts JP, Reiter IM, Fernandez C, Ormeno E. A decade of rain exclusion in a Mediterranean forest reveals trade-offs of leaf chemical defenses and drought legacy effects. Sci Rep, 2024, 14: 24119.

[41] Lenth RV, Piaskowski J, Banfai B, Bolker B, Buerkner P, Giné-Vázquez L, Hervé M, Jung M, Love J, Miguez F, Riebl H, Singmann H, Derumigny A, Schmidt P (2025) Package ‘emmeans’: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. In: CRAN. https://rvlenth.github.io/emmeans/

[42] Liang XY, Ye Q. Integrating dehydration tolerance and avoidance in drought adaptation. J Plant Ecol, 2024, 17(6): rtae073.

[43] Liu FH, Zhao Y, Wang XR, Wang B, Xiao F, He KQ. Physiological response and drought resistance evaluation of Gleditsia sinensis seedlings under drought-rehydration state. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1):19963.

[44] Lloret F, Keeling EG, Sala A. Components of tree resilience: effects of successive low-growth episodes in old ponderosa pine forests. Oikos, 2011, 120(12):1909-1920.

[45] Macedo TM, da Costa WS, das Neves Brandes AF, Valladares F, Barros CF. Diversity of growth responses to recent droughts reveals the capacity of Atlantic Forest trees to cope well with current climatic variability. For Ecol Manag, 2021, 480: 118656.

[46] Markesteijn L, Poorter L. Seedling root morphology and biomass allocation of 62 tropical tree species in relation to drought- and shade-tolerance. J Ecol, 2009, 97(2): 311-325.

[47] Markesteijn L, Poorter L, Bongers F, Paz H, Sack L. Hydraulics and life history of tropical dry forest tree species: coordination of species’ drought and shade tolerance. New Phytol, 2011, 191(2): 480-495.

[48] Markesteijn L, Poorter L, Paz H, Sack L, Bongers F. Ecological differentiation in xylem cavitation resistance is associated with stem and leaf structural traits. Plant Cell Environ, 2011, 34(1): 137-148.

[49] Marques MCM, Trindade W, Bohn A, Grelle CEVMarques MCM, Grelle CEV. The Atlantic forest: an introduction to the megadiverse forest of South America. The Atlantic Forest: history, biodiversity, threats and opportunities of the mega-diverse forest, 2021, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 3-23.

[50] Martínez-Vilalta J, Poyatos R, Aguadé D, Retana J, Mencuccini M. A new look at water transport regulation in plants. New Phytol2014, 204(1): 105-115.

[51] McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Plaut J, Sperry J, West A, Williams DG, Yepez EA. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?. New Phytol, 2008, 178(4): 719-739.

[52] Niemczyk M, Thomas BR, Jastrzębowski S. Strategies for difficult times: physiological and morphological responses to drought stress in seedlings of Central European tree species. Trees, 2023, 37(6): 1657-1669.

[53] Olmo M, Lopez-Iglesias B, Villar R. Drought changes the structure and elemental composition of very fine roots in seedlings of ten woody tree species. Implications for a drier climate. Plant Soil, 2014, 384(1): 113-129.

[54] Pereira S, Santos M, Leal I, Tabarelli M, Santos MG. Arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation increases drought tolerance and survival of Cenostigma microphyllum seedlings in a seasonally dry tropical forest. For Ecol Manag, 2021, 492: 119213.

[55] R Development Core Team (2022) The R rroject for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/

[56] Reis LAC, de Oliveira JA, dos Santos FF, Rosado AM, Reis LAC. Chlorophyll fluorescence and water content parameters are good biomarkers for selecting drought tolerant Eucalyptus clones. For Ecol Manag, 2021, 481: 118682.

[57] Rodrigues RR, Gandolfi S, Nave AG, Aronson J, Barreto TE, Vidal CY, Brancalion PHS. Large-scale ecological restoration of high-diversity tropical forests in SE Brazil. For Ecol Manag, 2011, 261(10): 1605-1613.

[58] Rolim SG, Piña-Rodrigues FC, Piotto D, Batista A, Freitas MLM, Brienza Junior S, Zakia MJB, Calmon MResearch gaps and priorities in silviculture of native species in Brazil, 2019, São Paulo: WRI Brasil

[59] Sandoval-Martínez J, Badano EI, Guerra-Coss FA, Flores Cano JA, Flores J, Gelviz-Gelvez SM, Barragán-Torres F. Selecting tree species to restore forest under climate change conditions: complementing species distribution models with field experimentation. J Environ Manage2023, 329: 117038.

[60] Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LHC, Oliveira VA, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, Almeida JA, Araújo Filho JC, Oliveira JB, Cunha TJFSistema brasileiro de classificação de solos, 20185th ednBrasíliaEmbrapa

[61] Silverio JM, dos Santos JKV, da Silva MS, de P Q Scalon S, Santos CC, Reis LC, Linné JA. Does hydrogel help in the mitigation and recovery of Eugenia myrcianthes Nied. under water stress?. Rev Caatinga, 2024, 37: e12000.

[62] Simonson WD, Miller E, Jones A, García-Rangel S, Thornton H, McOwen C. Enhancing climate change resilience of ecological restoration—a framework for action. Perspect Ecol Conserv, 2021, 19(3): 300-310.

[63] Skelton R. Stem diameter fluctuations provide a new window into plant water status and function. Plant Physiol2020, 183(4): 1414-1415.

[64] Slot M, Poorter L. Diversity of tropical tree seedling responses to drought. Biotropica, 2007, 39(6): 683-690.

[65] Smith-Martin CM, Muscarella R, Ankori-Karlinsky R, Delzon S, Farrar SL, Salva-Sauri M, Thompson J, Zimmerman JK, Uriarte M. Hydraulic traits are not robust predictors of tree species stem growth during a severe drought in a wet tropical forest. Funct Ecol, 2023, 37(2): 447-460.

[66] Soares-Filho B, Rajão R, Macedo M, Carneiro A, Costa W, Coe M, Rodrigues H, Alencar A. Cracking Brazil’s forest code. Science, 2014, 344(6182): 363-364.

[67] Soil Survey Staff (2022) Keys to soil taxonomy, 13th edn. Washington

[68] Swaine MD, Whitmore TC. On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forests. Vegetatio, 1988, 75(1): 81-86.

[69] Swoczyna T, Kalaji HM, Bussotti F, Mojski J, Pollastrini M. Environmental stress—what can we learn from chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis in woody plants? A review. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13: 1048582.

[70] Toto R, Alix-García J, Sims KRE, Coutinho B, Muñoz Brenes C, Pugliese L, Mendes AF. Evidence on scaling forest restoration from the Atlantic Forest restoration pact in Brazil. Nat Commun, 2025, 16: 4715.

[71] Urban L, Aarrouf J, Bidel LPR. Assessing the effects of water deficit on photosynthesis using parameters derived from measurements of leaf gas exchange and of chlorophyll a fluorescence. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 2068.

[72] Vander Mijnsbrugge K, Turcsan A, Moreels S, Van Goethem M, Meeus S, Van der Aa B. Does drought stress on seedlings have longer term effects on sapling phenology, reshooting, growth and plant architecture in Quercus robur, Q. petraea and their morphological intermediates?. Forests, 2019, 10(11): 1012.

[73] Vidal CY, Naves RP, Viani RAG, Rodrigues RR. Assessment of the nursery species pool for restoring landscapes in southeastern Brazil. Restor Ecol, 2020, 28(2):427-434.

[74] Walder MT, de Oliveira CL, Morante-Filho JC, Benchimol M. Agricultural expansion and landscape heterogeneity explain vegetation degradation in Brazilian Atlantic forest landscapes. Land Degrad Dev, 2025, 36(4): 1121-1132.

[75] Walters MB, Kunkle JM, Kobe RK, Farinosi EJ. Seedling drought responses governed by root traits, site-soil moisture regimes and overstory competition-facilitation. For Ecol Manag, 2023, 544: 121159.

[76] Wang J, Wang B, Wang DH, Dong YP, Li JX, Lu F, Tao WL, Guo YL, Xiang WS, Wen ML, Li XK. Trade-off strategies between drought resistance and growth rate of dominant tree species in karst forests within heterogeneous habitats. Sci Rep, 2025, 15: 26381.

[77] Wang XG, Jiao L, Xue RH, Zhang P, Li Q, Yuan X. Drought type determines the pattern of ecological response to drought in trees with different sensitivities. Plant Soil, 2025, 513(2): 3027-3039.

[78] Xiong SF, Wang YD, Chen YC, Gao M, Zhao YX, Wu LW. Effects of drought stress and rehydration on physiological and biochemical properties of four oak species in China. Plants (Basel), 2022, 11(5): 679.

[79] Yaakobi A, Livne-Luzon S, Marques F, Mariani B, Stern R, Klein T. Growth and drought resilience of four native tree species suitable for reforestation of Brazil’s Atlantic Forest. Forestry (Lond), 2023, 96(4):530-546.

[80] Yin QL, He JW, Tian TT, Quan JX, Zhao P, Chai YF, Wang L, Yue M. Hydraulic and photosynthetic traits vary with successional status of woody plants on the Loess Plateau. Forests (Basel), 2019, 10(4): 327.

[81] Zhang R, Wang CK, Duan RB, Wang LL, Jin Y. The sequence of physiological stress thresholds responses to drought in a temperate mixed forest. Agric for Meteorol, 2025, 371: 110635.

[82] Ziegler C, Cochard H, Stahl C, Foltzer L, Gérard B, Goret JY, Heuret P, Levionnois S, Maillard P, Bonal D, Coste S. Residual water losses mediate the trade-off between growth and drought survival across saplings of 12 tropical rainforest tree species with contrasting hydraulic strategies. J Exp Bot, 2024

[83] Zlobin IE. Tree post-drought recovery: scenarios, regulatory mechanisms and ways to improve. Biol Rev2024, 99(5):1595-1612.

[84] Zuo GQ. Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) in photoprotection: insights into NPQ levels required to avoid photoinactivation and photoinhibition. New Phytol, 2025, 246(5): 1967-1974.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior(Finance Code 001)

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Universidade Federal De Santa Maria

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)