Differential responses of moth communities along successional gradients in plantation and regenerating warm temperate forests

Abstract

This study investigates temporal changes in moth diversity and community composition within plantation ecosystems, evaluates their comparative status relative to regrowth forest habitats, and examines the differential responses of distinct moth taxa along successional gradients. Moth communities were sampled using standardized black light traps at 22 forest sites in southern Korea, representing early-stage plantations (EP, 1–3 years), mid-stage plantations (MP, 10–12 years), and regrowth forests (RF). Sampling was conducted monthly from May to September (excluding July) in 2023–2024. A total of 8075 individuals from 650 species and 22 families were recorded. Species richness (q = 0) was highest between EP and MP, while Shannon (q = 1) and Simpson (q = 2) diversity in MP matched those of RF. Community composition differed significantly in EP, with MP converging toward RF. All-sized moths showed stronger separation among forest types. Family- and subfamily-level patterns showed that Crambidae and Erebinae were abundant in EP, whereas Geometridae, Pyralidae, and Bryophilinae (Noctuidae) were abundant in MP or RF. At the species level, six species were identified to differentiate among plantation types. This suggests that responses to plantation age are more clearly expressed at higher taxonomic levels than at the species level. Moth diversity and composition can substantially recover within a decade after plantation establishment. Older plantations may serve as valuable habitats, supporting biodiversity conservation in managed forest landscapes.

Keywords

Biodiversity / Forest succession / Moths / NMDS / Plantation forests

References

[1] Alonso Rodríguez AM (2014) Land use effects on geometrid and arctiine moth assemblages in the tropical lowlands of southwestern Costa Rica. MSc thesis. Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center, Turrialba, Costa Rica. https://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/7095

[2] Ampoorter E, Barbaro L, Jactel H, Baeten L, Boberg J, Carnol M, Castagneyrol B, Charbonnier Y, Dawud SM, Deconchat M, De Smedt P, De Wandeler H, Guyot V, Hättenschwiler S, Joly FX, Koricheva J, Milligan H, Muys B, Nguyen D, Ratcliffe S, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Scherer-Lorenzen M, van der Plas F, Van Keer J, Verheyen K, Vesterdal L, Allan E. Tree diversity is key for promoting the diversity and abundance of forest-associated taxa in Europe. Oikos, 2020, 129(2): 133-146

[3] An JS, Choi SW. Forest moth assemblages as indicators of biodiversity and environmental quality in a temperate deciduous forest. Eur J Entomol, 2013, 110(3): 509-517

[4] Bae YS, Byun BK, Paek MK (2008) Pyralid moths of Korea (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea). Korea National Arboretum, Samsungad.com, Seoul, 426 pp. (in Korean)

[5] Barlow J, Louzada J, Parry L, Hernández MIM, Hawes J, Peres CA, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Gardner TA. Improving the design and management of forest strips in human-dominated tropical landscapes: a field test on Amazonian dung beetles. J Appl Ecol, 2010, 47(4): 779-788

[6] Beck J, Kitching IJ, Linsenmair KE. Effects of habitat disturbance can be subtle yet significant: biodiversity of hawkmoth-assemblages (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) in southeast-Asia. Biodivers Conserv, 2006, 15(1): 465-486

[7] Betzholtz PE. Population structure and movement patterns within an isolated and endangered population of the moth Dysauxes ancilla L. (Lepidoptera, Ctenuchidae): implications for conservation. J Insect Conserv, 2002, 6(1): 57-66

[8] Bonner MTL, Allen DE, Brackin R, Smith TE, Lewis T, Shoo LP, Schmidt S. Tropical rainforest restoration plantations are slow to restore the soil biological and organic carbon characteristics of old growth rainforest. Microb Ecol, 2020, 79(2): 432-442

[9] Braga L, Diniz IR. Importance of habitat heterogeneity in richness and diversity of moths (Lepidoptera) in Brazilian savanna. Environ Entomol, 2015, 44(3): 499-508

[10] Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Quine CP, Sayer J. Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity?. Biodivers Conserv, 2008, 17(5): 925-951

[11] Carnus JM, Parrotta J, Brockerhoff E, Arbez M, Jactel H, Kremer A, Lamb D, O’Hara K, Walters B. Planted forests and biodiversity. J for, 2006, 104(2): 65-77

[12] Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Hsieh TC, Sander EL, Ma KH, Colwell RK, Ellison AM. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol Monogr, 2014, 84(1): 45-67

[13] Chao A, Kubota Y, Zelený D, Chiu CH, Li CF, Kusumoto B, Yasuhara M, Thorn S, Wei CL, Costello MJ, Colwell RK. Quantifying sample completeness and comparing diversities among assemblages. Ecol Res, 2020, 35(2): 292-314

[14] Coulthard E, Norrey J, Shortall C, Harris WE. Ecological traits predict population changes in moths. Biol Conserv, 2019, 233: 213-219

[15] Crouzeilles R, Curran M, Ferreira MS, Lindenmayer DB, Grelle CEV, Rey Benayas JM. A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success. Nat Commun, 2016, 7 Article ID: 11666

[16] Cunningham SC, Mac Nally R, Baker PJ, Cavagnaro TR, Beringer J, Thomson JR, Thompson RM. Balancing the environmental benefits of reforestation in agricultural regions. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst, 2015, 17(4): 301-317

[17] Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2003, 34: 487-515

[18] FAO (2022) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The state of the World’s forestsForest pathways for green recovery and building inclusive, resilient and sustainable economies, 2022RomeFAO

[19] Franzén M, Betzholtz PE, Pettersson LB, Forsman A. Urban moth communities suggest that life in the city favours thermophilic multi-dimensional generalists. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci, 2020, 287(1928): Article ID: 20193014

[20] Gray REJ, Slade EM, Chung AYC, Lewis OT. Movement of moths through riparian reserves within oil palm plantations. Front for Glob Change, 2019, 2 Article ID: 68

[21] Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, Cook WM, Damschen EI, Ewers RM, Foster BL, Jenkins CN, King AJ, Laurance WF, Levey DJ, Margules CR, Melbourne BA, Nicholls AO, Orrock JL, Song DX, Townshend JR. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv, 2015, 1(2): Article ID: e1500052

[22] Hawes J, da Silva Motta C, Overal WL, Barlow J, Gardner TA, Peres CA. Diversity and composition of Amazonian moths in primary, secondary and plantation forests. J Trop Ecol, 2009, 25(3): 281-300

[23] Highland SA, Miller JC, Jones JA. Determinants of moth diversity and community in a temperate mountain landscape: vegetation, topography, and seasonality. Ecosphere, 2013, 4(10): Article ID: art129

[24] Hilt N, Fiedler K. Diversity and composition of Arctiidae moth ensembles along a successional gradient in the Ecuadorian Andes. Divers Distrib, 2005, 11(5): 387-398

[25] Holloway JD, Kirk-Spriggs AH, Khen CV. The response of some rain forest insect groups to logging and conversion to plantation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 1992, 335(1275): 425-436

[26] Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol Evol, 2016, 7(12): 1451-1456

[27] Jactel H, Brockerhoff EG. Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecol Lett, 2007, 10(9): 835-848

[28] Janzen DH. Two ways to be a tropical big moth: Santa Rosa saturniids and sphingids. Oxf Surv Evol Biol, 1984, 1: 85-140

[29] Jost JT. The end of the end of ideology. Am Psychol, 2006, 61(7): 651-670

[30] Jung UK, Lee ES, Won HJ, Kim HJ, Yi H. Comparison of insect community structures of a Pinus rigida plantation and a Quercus mongolica secondary forest in the suburban area, Korea. Ecol Resilient Infrastruct, 2015, 2(4): 291-295

[31] Kanowski J, Catterall CP, Wardell-Johnson GW. Consequences of broadscale timber plantations for biodiversity in cleared rainforest landscapes of tropical and subtropical Australia. For Ecol Manage, 2005, 208(1–3): 359-372

[32] Kim SS, Kim NHA guide to the larvae of Korean moths and butterflies, 2022SeoulPureunhaengbok688

[33] Kim SS, Paek MKA photographic guide to Korean moths, 2020SeoulEconature781

[34] Kim SS, Beljaev EA, Oh SHIllustrated catalogue of Geometridae in Korea (Lepidoptera: Geometrinae, Ennominae), 2001SeoulKorea Research Institute of Bioscience, Biotechnology 278

[35] Kim SM, An JH, Lim YK, Pee JH, Kim GS, Lee HY, Cho YC, Bae KH, Lee CS. Ecological changes of the Larix kaempferi plantations and the restoration effects confirmed from the results. Korean J Limnol, 2013, 46(2): 241-250

[36] Kim SS, Choi SW, Sohn JC, Kim TW, Lee BWThe Geometrid moths of Korea (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), 2016SeoulJunghaengsa499

[37] Kitching RL, Orr AG, Thalib L, Mitchell H, Hopkins MS, Graham AW. Moth assemblages as indicators of environmental quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest. J Appl Ecol, 2000, 37(2): 284-297

[38] Kononenko VS, Pinratana AMoths of Thailand. Part 2. Noctuoidea. An illustrated catalogue of Erebidae, Nolidae, Euteliidae and Noctuidae (Insecta, Lepidoptera) in Thailand, 2013ThailandBrothers of St. Gabriel in Thailand6253

[39] Kononenko VS, Ahn SB, Ronkay LIllustrated catalogue of Noctuidae in Korea (Lepidoptera), 1998SeoulKorea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology507

[40] Kravchenko VD, Orlova O, Fibiger M, Mooser J, Li C, Muller GC. The Acronictinae, Bryophilinae, Hypenodinae and Hypeninae of Israel (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). SHILAP Rev Lepid, 2006, 34(135): 255-264

[41] Kwon TS, Yang HM, Shin JH, Kim SK, Yi HB. Effects of thinning on abundance and community structure of arthropods in a Pinus koraiensis plantation. Korean J Appl Entomol, 2010, 49(3): 187-198

[42] MOLIT (2025) Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea. VWorld Spatial Information Open Platform. https://www.vworld.kr

[43] Muiruri EW, Barantal S, Iason GR, Salminen JP, Perez-Fernandez E, Koricheva J. Forest diversity effects on insect herbivores: do leaf traits matter?. New Phytol, 2018, 221(4): 2250-2260

[44] Nowinszky L, Puskás J, Tar K, Hufnagel L, Ladányi M. The dependence of normal and black light type trapping results upon the wingspan of moth species. Appl Ecol Environ Res, 2013, 11(4): 593-610

[45] Poole RWFascicle 118, Noctuidae. Lepidoptorum Catalogus (New Series), 1989LeidenE.J. Brill and Flora and Fauna Publications1313

[46] Quine CP, Humphrey JW. Plantations of exotic tree species in Britain: irrelevant for biodiversity or novel habitat for native species?. Biodivers Conserv, 2010, 19(5): 1503-1512

[47] Shewring MP, Vaughan IP, Thomas RJ. Moth biomass and diversity in coniferous plantation woodlands. For Ecol Manag, 2022, 505 Article ID: 119881

[48] Shin YHColoured illustrations of the moths of Korea, 2001SeoulAcademybook551

[49] Sisson MS, Dowdy NJ, Fisher ML, Gall LF, Goldstein PZ, Homziak NT, Schmidt BC, Simmons RB, Weller SJ, Zahiri R, Zaspel JM, Zilli A. Erebidae systematics: past, present, and future—progress in understanding a diverse lepidopteran lineage. Insect Syst Divers, 2025, 9(3): 5

[50] Slade EM, Merckx T, Riutta T, Bebber DP, Redhead D, Riordan P, Macdonald DW. Life‐history traits and landscape characteristics predict macro‐moth responses to forest fragmentation. Ecology, 2013, 94(7): 1519-1530

[51] Smith GF, Gittings T, Wilson M, French L, Oxbrough A, O’Donoghue S, O’Halloran J, Kelly DL, Mitchell FJG, Kelly T, Iremonger S, McKee AM, Giller P. Identifying practical indicators of biodiversity for stand-level management of plantation forests. Biodivers Conserv, 2008, 17(5): 991-1015

[52] Staab M, Gossner MM, Simons NK, Achury R, Ambarlı D, Bae S, Schall P, Weisser WW, Blüthgen N. Insect decline in forests depends on species’ traits and may be mitigated by management. Commun Biol, 2023, 6: 338

[53] Summerville KS, Crist TO. Contrasting effects of habitat quantity and quality on moth communities in fragmented landscapes. Ecography, 2004, 27(1): 3-12

[54] Taki H, Makihara H, Matsumura T, Hasegawa M, Matsuura T, Tanaka H, Makino S, Okabe K. Evaluation of secondary forests as alternative habitats to primary forests for flower-visiting insects. J Insect Conserv, 2013, 17(3): 549-556

[55] Tudor EP, Cross AT, Tomlinson S. Insect community reassembly in a spatiotemporally heterogenous restoration landscape. Landsc Ecol, 2023, 38(11): 2763-2778

[56] Uhl B, Wölfling M, Fiedler K. Exploring the power of moth samples to reveal community patterns along shallow ecological gradients. Ecol Entomol, 2022, 47(3): 371-381

[57] Wagner DL, Schweitzer DF, Sullivan JB, Reardon RCOwlet caterpillars of Eastern North America (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), 2011New JerseyPrinceton University Press576

[58] Watson AT, O’Neill MA, Kitching IJ. Automated identification of live moths (Macrolepidoptera) using digital automated identification system (DAISY). Syst Biodivers, 2004, 1(3): 287-300

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)