Carbon sink and its uncertainty for secondary forest ecosystems in Northeast China

Yuan Zhu , Jiaojun Zhu , Xueyi Sun , Dexiong Teng , Tian Gao , Yirong Sun , Fengyuan Yu , Yanyang Hu , Huaqi Liu , Kai Yang

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1) : 48

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1) :48 DOI: 10.1007/s11676-026-01998-0
Original Paper
research-article

Carbon sink and its uncertainty for secondary forest ecosystems in Northeast China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

To clarify the carbon sinks and their uncertainty components in the temperate secondary forest ecosystem (mosaics of natural secondary forests and plantations). We selected three typical forest stands including secondary mixed broadleaved forest (T1-MBF), secondary Mongolian oak forest (T2-MOF), and larch plantation (T3-LPF). The net primary productivity (NPP) and soil heterotrophic respiration (Rh) were monitored for 4 years (2020–2023) by both inventory and chamber methods, and net ecosystem productivity (NEP, carbon sink; NEP=NPP−Rh) and its uncertainty were further calculated for three forest stands. The results showed that the NEP were 1.99±1.78, 1.87±2.06 and 2.68±1.42 t ha−1·a−1 for T1-MBF, T2-MOF, and T3-LPF, respectively, with high relative uncertainties (89.33%, 109.98% and 52.93%, accordingly). Specifically, fine root NPP dominated uncertainty (58.05–78.63%), followed by Rh (2.20–30.45%) and leaf (2.47–9.58%), while stable pools (e.g., stem, coarse root) contributed minimally. Importantly, to improve reliability, we developed a revised method to estimate low-uncertainty carbon sink, which focuses on low-uncertainty carbon pools, including stem, coarse root, and soil carbon. Low-uncertainty carbon sinks reached 1.82±0.21, 1.79±0.34, and 2.56±0.54 t ha−1·a−1 for T1-MBF, T2-MOF, and T3-LPF, respectively. Notably, relative uncertainties dropped sharply to 11.52%, 18.77%, and 21.15%. This study provides a robust framework for quantifying low-uncertainty carbon sinks in the temperate secondary forest ecosystem by integrating resilient carbon pools, significantly improving estimation reliability while reducing uncertainty by 60.0–87.1% compared to conventional approaches.

Keywords

Temperate forest / Inventory method / Carbon sink / Uncertainty

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yuan Zhu, Jiaojun Zhu, Xueyi Sun, Dexiong Teng, Tian Gao, Yirong Sun, Fengyuan Yu, Yanyang Hu, Huaqi Liu, Kai Yang. Carbon sink and its uncertainty for secondary forest ecosystems in Northeast China. Journal of Forestry Research, 2026, 37(1): 48 DOI:10.1007/s11676-026-01998-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aceñolaza PG, Zamboni LP, Rodriguez EE, Gallardo JF. Litterfall production in forests located at the pre-delta area of the Paraná River (Argentina). Ann for Sci, 2010, 67(3 311

[2]

Addo-Danso SD, Prescott CE, Smith RG. Methods for estimating root biomass and production in forest and woodland ecosystem carbon studies: a review. For Ecol Manag, 2016, 359: 332-351

[3]

Bain WG, Hutyra L, Patterson DC, Bright AV, Daube BC, Munger JW, Wofsy SC. Wind-induced error in the measurement of soil respiration using closed dynamic chambers. Agric for Meteorol, 2005, 1313–4): 225-232

[4]

Baldocchi DD. How eddy covariance flux measurements have contributed to our understanding of global change biology. Glob Change Biol, 2020, 26: 242-260

[5]

Bastin J-F, Finegold Y, Garcia C, Mollicone D, Rezende M, Routh D, Zohner CM, Crowther TW. The global tree restoration potential. Science, 2019, 365(6448): 76-79

[6]

Bert D, Danjon F. Carbon concentration variations in the roots, stem andcrown of mature Pinus pinaster (Ait.). For Ecol Manag, 2006, 222: 279-295

[7]

Burba G (2013) Eddy covariance method for scientific, industrial, agricultural and regulatory applications: a field book on measuring ecosystem gas exchange and areal emission rates. LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, p 442

[8]

Cai HY, Di XY, Chang SX, Wang CK, Shi BS, Geng PF, Jin GZ. Carbon storage, net primary production and net ecosystem production in four major temperate forest types in northeast China. Can J for Res, 2016, 46(2): 620-623

[9]

Campioli M, Malhi Y, Vicca S, Luyssaert S, Papale D, Penuelas J, Reichstein M, Migliavacca M, Arain MA, Janssens IA. Evaluating the convergence between eddy-covariance and biometric methods for assessing carbon budgets of forests. Nat Commun, 2016, 7 13716

[10]

Dong YL, Yu Z, Agathokleous E, Zhou GY, Liu SR. Pitfalls in forest carbon sink projection. J for Res, 2024

[11]

Gao T, Yu LZ, Yu FY, Wang XC, Yang K, Lu DL, Li XF, Yan QL, Sun YR, Liu LF, Xu S, Zhen XJ, Ni ZD, Zhang JX, Wang GF, Wei XH, Zhou XH, Zhu JJ. Functions and applications of multi-tower platform of Qingyuan Forest Ecosystem Research Station of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31: 695-705

[12]

Girardin CAJ, Aragão LEOC, Malhi Y, Huasco WH, Metcalfe DB, Durand L, Mamani M, Silva-Espejo JE, Whittaker RJ. Fine root dynamics along an elevational gradient in tropical Amazonian and Andean forests. Glob Biogeochem Cycles, 2013, 27(1): 252-264

[13]

Givnish TJ. Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1988, 15: 63-92

[14]

Han LF, Sun K, Jin J, Xing BS. Some concepts of soil organic carbon characteristics and mineral interaction from a review of literature. Soil Biol Biochem, 2016, 94: 107-121

[15]

Harris NL, Gibbs DA, Baccini A, Birdsey RA, de Bruin S, Farina M, Fatoyinbo L, Hansen MC, Herold M, Houghton RA, Potapov PV, Suarez DR, Roman-Cuesta RM, Saatchi SS, Slay CM, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nat Clim Chang, 2021, 11(3): 234-240

[16]

Jia BR, Sun HR, Yu WY, Zhou GS. Quantifying the interannual litterfall variations in China's forest ecosystems. J Plant Ecol, 2020, 13(3): 266-272

[17]

Jian SY, Li JW, Wang GS, Kluber LA, Schadt CW, Liang JY, Mayes MA. Multi-year incubation experiments boost confidence in model projections of long-term soil carbon dynamics. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 5864

[18]

Jiao Z, Wang XC. Contrasting rhizospheric and heterotrophic components of soil respiration during growing and non-growing seasons in a temperate deciduous forest. Forests, 2019, 10(8): 622

[19]

Jin BB, Guo QX. Root decomposition and nutrient dynamics of Quercus mongolica and Betula Platyphylla. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 3382416-2424

[20]

Lauenroth WK, Wade AA, Williamson MA, Ross BE, Kumar S, Cariveau DP. Uncertainty in calculations of net primary production for grasslands. Ecosystems, 2006, 9(5): 843-851

[21]

Liang JJ, Crowther TW, Picard N, Wiser S, Zhou M, Alberti G, Schulze ED, McGuire AD, Bozzato F, Pretzsch H, de-Miguel S, Paquette A, Herault B, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Barrett CB, Glick HB, Hengeveld GM, Nabuurs GJ, Pfautsch S, Viana H, Vibrans AC, Ammer C, Schall P, Verbyla D, Tchebakova N, Fischer M, Watson JV, Chen HYH, Lei XD, Schelhaas MJ, Lu HC, Gianelle D, Parfenova EI, Salas C, Lee E, Lee B, Kim HS, Bruelheide H, Coomes DA, Piotto D, Sunderland T, Schmid B, Gourlet-Fleury S, Sonké B, Tavani R, Zhu J, Brandl S, Vayreda J, Kitahara F, Searle EB, Neldner VJ, Ngugi MR, Baraloto C, Frizzera L, Balazy R, Oleksyn J, Zawila-Niedzwiecki T, Bouriaud O, Bussotti F, Finér L, Jaroszewicz B, Jucker T, Valladares F, Jagodzinski AM, Peri PL, Gonmadje C, Marthy W, O'Brien T, Martin EH, Marshall AR, Rovero F, Bitariho R, Niklaus PA, Alvarez-Loayza, Chamuya N, Valencia R, Mortier F, Wortel V, Engone-Obiang NL, Ferreira LV, Odeke DE, Vasquez RM, Lewis SL, Reich PB (2016) Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science 354(6309). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8957

[22]

Liu F, Wang XC, Wang CK. Autumn phenology of a temperate deciduous forest: validation of remote sensing approach with decadal leaf-litterfall measurements. Agric for Meteorol, 2019, 279 107758

[23]

Liu L, Wang HY, Dai W. Characteristics of soil organic carbon mineralization and influence factor analysis of natural Larix olgensis forest at different ages. J for Res, 2019, 30(4): 1495-1506

[24]

Loescher HW, Law BE, Mahrt L, Hollinger D, Campbell J, Wofsy SC. Uncertainties in, and interpretation of, carbon flux estimates using the eddy covariance technique. J Geophys Res Atmos, 2006, 111(D21 D21S90

[25]

Lu DG, Chen Y, Feng ZK, Wang ZC. Assessment of carbon sink and carbon flux in forest ecosystems: instrumentation and the influence of seasonal changes. Remote Sens, 2024, 165 789

[26]

Luyssaert S, Inglima I, Jung M, Richardson AD, Reichstein M, Papale D. CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database. Glob Change Biol, 2007, 1312): 2509-2537

[27]

Matthews HD, Gillett NP, Stott PA, Zickfeld K. The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. Nature, 2009, 459(7248): 829-832

[28]

Pan YD, Birdsey RA, PhillipsOL JRB. The structure, distribution, and biomass of the world’s forests. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2013, 44: 593-622

[29]

Pan J, Wang CK, Wang XC. Seven-year decomposition rates of roots with different diameters for three temperate broadleaf tree species. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(13): 5166-5174

[30]

Pan J, See CR, Wang R, Luan JW, Wang J, Liu F, Quan XK, Chen HY, Wang XC, Wang CK. Decoupling of nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon release from fine and coarse roots during 7 years of decomposition. J Ecol, 2023, 111(5): 1127-1140

[31]

Redeker KR, Baird AJ, Teh YA. Quantifying wind and pressure effects on trace gas fluxes across the soil-atmosphere interface. Biogeosciences, 2015, 12(24): 7423-7434

[32]

Renchon AA, Drake JE, Macdonald CA, Sihi D, Hinko-Najera N, Tjoelker MGet al.. Concurrent measurements of soil and ecosystem respiration in a mature eucalypt woodland: advantages, lessons, and questions. J Geophys Res Biogeosci, 2021, 126(3 e2020JG006191

[33]

Richards KR. The time value of carbon in bottom-up studies. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 1997, 27S1): 279-292

[34]

Ryan MG. The enduring mystery of differences between eddy covariance and biometric measurements for ecosystem respiration and net carbon storage in forests. New Phytol, 2023, 239: 2060-2063

[35]

Scurlock JMO, Johnson K, Olson RJ. Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements. Glob Change Biol, 2002, 8(8): 736-753

[36]

Smyth CE, Metsaranta J, Tompalski P, Hararuk O, Le Noble S. 10-year progress on forest carbon research in Canada. Environ Rev, 2024, 32(4): 611-637

[37]

Sun T, Dong LL, Mao ZJ, Li YY. Fine root dynamics of trees and understorey vegetation in a chronosequence of Betula platyphylla stands. For Ecol Manag, 2015, 346: 1-9

[38]

Sun YR, Yu LZ, Zhu JJ, Hu LL, Liu LF, Mao HZ, Zhang Y, Zhang JX. Woody species in Qingyuan Forest, 2022, Beijing, China Forestry Publishing House380

[39]

Tang WX, Liu SG, Jing MD, Healey JR, Smith MN, Farooq TH, Zhu LJ, Zhao SQ, Wu YP. Vegetation growth responses to climate change: a cross-scale analysis of biological memory and time lags using tree ring and satellite data. Glob Change Biol, 2024, 30 e17441

[40]

Vogt KA. Carbon budgets of temperate forest ecosystems. Tree Physiol, 1991, 9(1): 69-86

[41]

Vorster AG, Evangelista PH, Stovall AEL, Ex S. Variability and uncertainty in forest biomass estimates from the tree to landscape scale: the role of allometric equations. Carbon Balance Manag, 2020, 15(1 8

[42]

Vourlitis GL, Pinto OBJr, Dalmagro HJ, de Arruda PEZ, Lobo FA, Nogueira JdS. Net primary production and ecosystem carbon flux of Brazilian tropical savanna ecosystems from eddy covariance and inventory methods. J Geophys Res-Biogeosci, 2022, 127 e2022JG006956

[43]

Wang CK. Biomass allometric equations for 10 co-occurring tree species in Chinese temperate forests. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 2221–3): 9-16

[44]

Wang X, Liu LL, Piao SL, Janssens IA, Tang JW, Liu WX, Chi YG, Wang J, Xu S. Soil respiration under climate warming: differential response of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. Glob Change Biol, 2014, 20(10): 3229-3237

[45]

Wang XC, Wang CK, Bond-Lamberty B. Quantifying and reducing the differences in forest CO2-fluxes estimated by eddy covariance, biometric and chamber methods: a global synthesis. Agric for Meteorol, 2017, 247: 93-103

[46]

Wang XC, Liu F, Sun X, Jiao Z, Sun XF, Zhang QZ, Quan XK, Wang CK. Intercomparison of carbon fluxes measured with eddy covariance and inventory methods in temperate secondary forest. Sci Silvae Sin, 2023, 59(3): 31-43

[47]

Wen LN, Zhang HG, Sun T, Zhang ZJ, Zan P, Gu WP, Ma PY, Cao FY, Mao ZJ. Fine root decomposition and N dynamics of Larix gmelinii at different soil depths. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(13): 4865-4871

[48]

Wilczyński S, Danek M, Danek T. Climatic sensitivity and the growth prospects of Silver fir and European larch in the Carpathians in the light of observed climate changes. For Ecol Manag, 2024, 573 122337

[49]

Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas M-L, Niinemets Ü, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 2004, 428(6985): 821-827

[50]

Yanai RD, See CR, Campbell JL. Current practices in reporting uncertainty in ecosystem ecology. Ecosystems, 2018, 21(5): 971-981

[51]

Yang K, Zhu JJ. The effects of N and P additions on soil microbial properties in paired stands of temperate secondary forests and adjacent larch plantations in Northeast China. Soil Biol Biochem, 2015, 90: 80-86

[52]

Yang Y, Yanai RD, See CR, Arthur MA. Sampling effort and uncertainty in leaf litterfall mass and nutrient flux in northern hardwood forests. Ecosphere, 2017, 8(11 e01999

[53]

Yuan ZY, Chen HYH. Indirect methods produce higher estimates of fine root production and turnover rates than direct methods. PLoS ONE, 2012, 711 e48989

[54]

Zhang QZ, Wang CK, Wang XC, Quan XK. Carbon concentration variability of 10 Chinese temperate tree species. For Ecol Manage, 2009, 258: 722-727

[55]

Zhou GY, Yin GC, Tang XL, Wen DZ, Liu CP, Kuang YW, Wang WT (2018) Carbon Storage in China's Forest Ecosystems--Biomass equation. China Science Publishing & Media Ltd., p 31

[56]

Zhu JJ, Mao ZH, Hu LL, Zhang JX. Plant diversity of secondary forests in response to anthropogenic disturbance levels in montane regions of northeastern China. J for Res, 2007, 126): 403-416

[57]

Zhu JJ, Gao T, Yu LZ, Yu FY, Yang K, Lu DL, Yan QL, Sun YR, Liu LF, Xu S, Zhang JX, Zheng X, Song LN, Zhou XH. Functions and applications of multi-tower platform of Qingyuan Forest Ecosystem Research Station of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Qingyuan Ker Towers). Bull Chin Acad Sci, 2021, 36: 351-361+371

[58]

Zhu JJ, Gao T, Yu LZ, Yang K, Sun T, Lu DL, Liu ZH, Chu YD, Zhang JX, Teng DX, Zhu Y, Sun YR, Wang XG, Wang GF. Carbon sink of forest ecosystems: concept, time effect and improvement approaches. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2024, 35(9): 2313-2321

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Northeast Forestry University

PDF

2

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/