Methods for identifying topkill in conifers using airborne lidar to monitor structural diversity and disturbance
Brent W. Oblinger , Benjamin C. Bright , Andrew T. Hudak , Kerri T. Vierling
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1) : 34
Methods for identifying topkill in conifers using airborne lidar to monitor structural diversity and disturbance
Forest insects and pathogens, in addition to fire, contribute to structural diversity by creating snags (dead trees) and dead tops on live trees or “topkill” in conifers throughout western North America. Snags and top-killed trees are important sources of wildlife habitat but quantifying their presence can be challenging at broad scales. Multiple approaches for detecting snags have been developed, but limited methods exist for detecting topkill via remote sensing. There is a need to monitor overlapping disturbances across time and space in addition to the structural diversity in mature and old-growth forests. We used airborne light detection and ranging (lidar) and associated field observations to map individual dead trees and live trees with topkill across a forest dominated by Pinus ponderosa in central Oregon. The lidar point cloud was segmented into individual tree objects (polygons representing tree crown extents as viewed from nadir), for which lidar metrics were computed. Lidar-detected tree objects were paired with 647 field-observed trees with corresponding tree health measurements, and a random forest classifier was developed that separated trees into: (1) live without topkill; (2) live with topkill; and (3) dead classes with 87% accuracy using lidar metrics. Tree mortality was mainly due to fire injury and native bark beetles, such as western pine beetle (Dendroctonus brevicomis), while topkill was primarily due to comandra blister rust (caused by the native fungal pathogen Cronartium comandrae). The classifier was applied to map individual tree health status for 46,444 tree objects from which tree health class density maps were created across the 229-ha study area. Approximately 43% were classified as live without topkill, 22% of trees were classified as live with topkill, and 35% of trees were classified as dead. This approach can be used to improve detection of topkill in conifers, along with tree mortality, caused by disturbances associated with forest insects and pathogens.
Remote sensing / Snags / Topkill / Pinus ponderosa / Cronartium comandrae
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Aho PE (1984) Losses associated with Douglas-fir and true fir tops killed by western spruce budworm in eastern Washington. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR. https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-RP-318 |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
Briechle S, Krzystek P, Vosselman G (2020) Classification of tree species and standing dead trees by fusing UAV-based lidar data and multispectral imagery in the 3D deep neural network PointNet++. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-203-2020 |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Chen C, Liaw A, Breiman L (2004) Using random forest to learn imbalanced data. University of California, Berkeley. https://statistics.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/tech-reports/666.pdf [Accessed on 30.10.2024] |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
Ciesla WM (2006) Describing signatures: a key to successful use of remote sensing for forest damage assessment. Ambiência 2(3): 153–167. https://revistas.unicentro.br/index.php/ambiencia/article/view/264 [accessed on 30.10.2024] |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
Evans JS, Murphy MA (2018) rfUtilities. R package version 2.1–3. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rfUtilities/index.html [Accessed on 30.10.2024] |
| [27] |
Ferrell GT, Scharpf RF (1982) Stem volume losses in grand firs topkilled by western spruce budworm in Idaho. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-RP-164 |
| [28] |
Ferrell GT (1980) Risk-rating systems for mature red fir and white fir in northern California. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-GTR-39 |
| [29] |
Fiedler CE, Friederici P, Petruncio M (2007) Monitoring old growth in frequent-fire landscapes. Ecol Society 12(2):22. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art22/ [accessed on 30.10.2024] |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Furniss RL, Carolin VM (1977) Western forest insects (No. 1339). USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Hijmans R (2022) terra: Spatial Data Analysis. R package version 1.6–7. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/terra/index.html [accessed on 30.10.2024] |
| [48] |
Isenbrg M (2020) LAStools: efficient LiDAR processing software (version 200216, academic). http://rapidlasso.com/LAStools [accessed on 30.10.2024] |
| [49] |
Iversen EA (2020) Detection of root and butt rot in Norway Spruce (Picea abies) using airborne hyperspectral images and laser scanning. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås. |
| [50] |
Jacobi WR, Geils BW, Taylor JE (2002) Frequency of comandra blister rust infections on lodgepole pine. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO. https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-RP-36 |
| [51] |
Jacobi WR (1993) Insects emerging from lodgepole pine infected with Comandra blister rust. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
Johnson DW (1986) Comandra blister rust. Forest Insect and Disease Leaflet 62, USDA Forest Service |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News, 2(3):18–22. https://journal.r-project.org/articles/RN-2002-022/RN-2002-022.pdf [accessed on 30.10.2024] |
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
McGaughey RJ (2022) FUSION/LDV: software for lidar data analysis and visualization. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. https://forsys.sefs.uw.edu/fusion/fusionlatest.html [accessed on 30.10.2024] |
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
Miller JM, Keen FP (1960) Biology and control of the western pine beetle. USDA Forest Service, Misc. Publication 800, Washington, DC |
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (2016) The Oregon conservation strategy: Chapter 6: strategy species. https://oregonconservationstrategy.org/media/6-Strategy-Species-12.30.16.pdf [accessed on 30.10.2024] |
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
Polewski P, Yao W, Heurich M, Krzystek P, Stilla U (2015) Active learning approach to detecting standing dead trees from ALS point clouds combined with aerial infrared imagery. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Boston, MA, USA. pp 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2015.7301378 |
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
R Core Team (2022) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ [accessed on 30.10.2024] |
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
Roussel JR, Auty D (2022) Airborne LiDAR data manipulation and visualization for forestry applications. R package version 4.0.1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=lidR [accessed on 30.10.2024] |
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
Thomas JW, Anderson RG, Maser C, Bull EL (1979) Snags. In: Thomas JW (ed) Wildlife habitats in managed forests: the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook No. 553, Washington, D.C., pp 60–77. |
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
Vierling KT, Saab VA, Tobalske BW (2020) Lewis’s woodpecker (Melanerpes lewis), version 1.0. In: Poole AF (ed) Birds of the world. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.lewwoo.01 |
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |