A simple method for detailed carbon calculations in forest management—with examples for planted larch

Abstract

Carbon sequestration is an important management objective in China’s plantation forests, which are the most extensive in the world. Planning of plantation management often employs simulators that use either tree- or stand-level models. The use of individual-tree models is increasing in Heilongjiang Province, northeastern China, as these models enable flexible analyses of different stand structures, species compositions, and cutting types. So far, management optimization with individual-tree simulators has considered only the carbon storage of living tree biomass. This study proposed a method for expanding the simulators to accommodate the carbon storage of dead organic materials (DOM) and wood products. A dead tree is transferred to the dead-tree list, and a cut tree is transferred to the harvested tree list. Each new dead tree is characterized by the biomass of stem, branches, foliage, and roots, and the annual decomposition rate of each biomass component. A harvested tree is partitioned into harvest residue and wood product components. A residue component obtains biomass and the annual decomposition rate, and a wood product component obtains biomass and the yearly product disposal rate. From these lists, the remaining biomass of any DOM or product category can be easily computed for any future year. The method can be used in any country. In the example analyses conducted for Chinese larch (Larix gmelinii) plantations, the live tree carbon stock accounted for 75–80% of the total carbon storage, and wood products accounted for a maximum of 10–12%. Increasing the importance of carbon storage decreased cutting and led to longer rotations. Maximizing carbon storage as the sole objective resulted in very low harvest and long rotations (> 200 years).

Keywords

Carbon sequestration / Carbon forestry / Forest management / Larix gmelinii / Simulation model

References

[1] Assmuth A, Tahvonen O. Optimal carbon storage in even- and uneven-aged forestry. For Policy Econ, 2018, 87: 93-100

[2] Buendia E, Tanabe K, Kranjc A, Baasansuren J, Fukuda M, Ngarize S, Osako A, Pyrozhenko Y, Shermanau P, Federici S (2019) Refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories; intergovernmental panel on climate change: geneva, Switzerland

[3] Díaz-Yáñez O, Pukkala T, Packalen P, Peltola H. Multifunctional comparison of different management strategies in boreal forests. Forestry, 2019, 93(1): 84-95

[4] Dong LH, Zhang LJ, Li FR. Developing two additive biomass equations for three coniferous plantation species in Northeast China. Forests, 2016, 7(7): 136

[5] Dong LB, Lu W, Liu ZG. Determining the optimal rotations of larch plantations when multiple carbon pools and wood products are valued. For Ecol Manag, 2020, 474 118356

[6] Dong LB, Bettinger P, Qin HY, Liu ZG. Optimizing rotation lengths for maximizing carbon balance of larch plantations in northeast China. J Clean Prod, 2022, 343 131025

[7] Dong LH, Wang Q, Jin XJ, Pukkala T, Li FR. Productivity of mixed plantations of ash and larch in northeastern China -a model-based analysis. For Ecol Manag, 2025, 585 122609

[8] National forestry and grassland administration (2021a) National guidelines for the development of under-forest economy (2021–2030) [Report]. https://www.forestry.gov.cn/

[9] National forestry and grassland administration (2021b) Comprehensive monitoring and assessment report on forest and grassland ecology in China. [Report]. https://www.forestry.gov.cn/

[10] National forestry and grassland administration (2022) Development plan for forestry and grassland industries (2021–2025) [Report]. https://www.forestry.gov.cn.

[11] Gan XF, Guo BQ, Ma ZM, Fang MJ, Yan Y, Liu WG. The effect of forest growth rate on climate change impacts of logging residues utilization. Atmosphere, 2023, 14(81270

[12] Guthrie G, Kumareswan D. Carbon subsidies, taxes and optimal forest management. Environ Resource Econ, 2009, 43: 275-293

[13] Heilongjiang provincial forestry and grassland bureau (2021) 14th five-year plan for forestry and grassland protection and development in Heilongjiang Province [Report]. http://lyhcyj.hlj.gov.cn/lyhcyj/c107253/202110/30886007/files/1634780515074015448.pdf

[14] Heinonen T, Pukkala T, Mehtätalo L, Asikainen A, Kangas J, Peltola H. Scenario analyses for the effects of harvesting intensity on development of forest resources, timber supply, carbon balance and biodiversity of Finnish forestry. For Policy Econ, 2017, 80: 80-98

[15] Helmisaari HS, Derome J, Nöjd P, Kukkola M. Fine root biomass in relation to site and stand characteristics in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands. Tree Physiol, 2007, 27(101493-1504

[16] Huang ZS, Cheng Q. Analysis of the optimal rotation of eucalypt carbon sequestration forests under various scenarios. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2016, 25(S1): 25-31

[17] Hurmekoski E, Myllyviita T, Seppälä J, Heinonen T, Kilpeläinen A, Pukkala T, Mattila T, Hetemäki L, Asikainen A, Peltola H. Impact of structural changes in wood-using industries on net carbon emissions in Finland. J Ind Ecol, 2020, 24(4): 899-912

[18] Hurmekoski E, Kunttu J, Heinonen T, Pukkala T, Peltola H. Does expanding wood use in construction and textile markets contribute to climate change mitigation?. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2023, 174 113152

[19] Jiang L, Zhang XQ, Duan AG, Zhang JG. Annual tree diameter growth model of Chinese fir plantations including different stand density indices. For Res, 2022, 35(4): 123-129

[20] Jin XJ, Pukkala T, Li FR, Dong LH. Optimal management of Korean pine plantations in multifunctional forestry. J for Res, 2017, 28(5): 1027-1037

[21] Kaipainen T, Liski J, Pussinen A, Karjalainen T. Managing carbon sinks by changing rotation length in European forests. Environ Sci Policy, 2004, 7(3): 205-219

[22] Liski J, Pussinen A, Pingoud K, Mäkipää R, Karjalainen T. Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration?. Can J for Res, 2001, 31(11): 2004-2013

[23] Liski J, Palosuo T, Peltoniemi M, Sievänen R. Carbon and decomposition model Yasso for forest soils. Ecol Model, 2005, 189(1–2): 168-182

[24] Liski J, Lehtonen A, Palosuo T, Peltoniemi M, Eggers T, Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R. Carbon accumulation in Finland's forests 1922–2004 -an estimate obtained by combination of forest inventory data with modeling of biomass, litter and soil. Ann for Sci, 2006, 63(7): 687-697

[25] Lu LL, Wang Z, Zhang XQ, Zhang JG. Individual tree diameter growth model of Chinese fir plantations using Bayesian model averaging and stepwise regression approaches. Sci Silv Sin, 2021, 57(9): 87-97

[26] Mäkinen H, Hynynen J, Siitonen J, Sievänen R. Predicting the decomposition of scots pine, Norway spruce and birch stems in Finland. Ecol Appl, 2006, 16(5): 1865-1879

[27] Nabuurs GJ, Schelhaas MJ. Carbon profiles of typical forest types across Europe assessed with CO2FIX. Ecol Indic, 2002, 1(3): 213-223

[28] Olson JS. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology, 1963, 44(2): 322-331

[29] Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T, Alboreca AR. Optimal management of Pinus pinaster in Galicia (Spain) under risk of fire. Int J Wildland Fire, 2010, 19(7): 937-948

[30] Peltoniemi M, Mäkipää R, Liski J, Tamminen P. Changes in soil carbon with stand age -an evaluation of a modeling method with empirical data. Glob Change Biol, 2004, 10(12): 2078-2091

[31] Peng W, Pukkala T, Jin XJ, Li FR. Optimal management of larch (Larix olgensis A. Henry) plantations in Northeast China when timber production and carbon stock are considered. Ann for Sci, 2018, 75 63

[32] Peng YX, Li FR, Liu F, Dong LH. Prediction models of sapwood density, heartwood density, and bark density in Larix olgensis plantation. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31(4): 1113-1120

[33] Pukkala T. Optimising the semi-continuous cover forestry of Finland. Allg Forst Jagdztg, 2006, 177(8–9): 141-149

[34] Pukkala T. Optimizing forest management in Finland with carbon subsidies and taxes. For Policy Econ, 2011, 13(6): 425-434

[35] Pukkala T. Does biofuel harvesting and continuous cover management increase carbon sequestration?. For Policy Econ, 2014, 43: 41-50

[36] Pukkala T. Carbon forestry is surprising. For Ecosyst, 2018, 5 11

[37] Pukkala T. At what carbon price forest cutting should stop. J for Res, 2020, 31(3): 713-727

[38] Pukkala T. Calculating the additional carbon sequestration of finnish forestry. J Sustain for, 2020, 41(7): 624-641

[39] Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O. Using optimization for fitting individual-tree growth models for uneven-aged stands. Eur J for Res, 2011, 130(5): 829-839

[40] Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O. Stand management optimization -the role of simplifications. Forest Ecosyst, 2014, 1 3

[41] Raymer AK, Gobakken T, Solberg B. Optimal forest management with carbon benefits included. Silva Fenn, 2011, 45(3): 395-414

[42] Richards FJ. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot, 1959, 10(2): 290-301

[43] Rong JT, Lei XD, Zhang HR, Feng QX. Forest management planning incorporating values of timber and carbon. J Northwest for Univ, 2012, 27(02): 155-162

[44] Schelhaas MJ, van Esch PW, Groen TA, et al. (2004) CO2FIX V 3.1—a modelling framework for quantifying carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. Alterra-rapport 1068

[45] Shen HL, Ding BY, Shen GF, Chen AM. Decomposing dynamics of several coniferous and broadleaved litters in Mongolian Scots pine plantation. Sci Silv Sin, 1996, 32(05): 393-402

[46] Song L, Jin XJ, Pukkala T, Li FR. Research on multi-objective management schedules of Larix olgensis plantations. J Nanjing for Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2023, 47(02): 150-158

[47] Tikkanen OP, Heinonen T, Kouki J, Matero J. Habitat suitability models of saproxylic red-listed boreal forest species in long-term matrix management: cost-effective measures for multi-species conservation. Biol Conserv, 2007, 140: 359-372

[48] Tong QP, Jin XJ, Pukkala T, Dong LH, Li FR. Stochastic optimization of the management schedule of Korean pine plantations. Forests, 2024, 15(6): 935

[49] Tong QP, Jin XJ, Pukkala T, Dong LH, Li FR. Adaptive optimisation of the management of Korean pine plantation. For Ecosyst, 2025, 13: 100326

[50] Tuomi M, Laiho R, Repo A, Liski J. Wood decomposition model for boreal forests. Ecol Model, 2011, 222(3709-718

[51] Van Kooten GC, Binkley CS, Delcourt G. Effect of carbon taxes and subsides on optimal forest rotation and supply of carbon services. Am J Agric Econ, 1995, 77(2365-374

[52] Vanninen P, Mäkelä A. Fine root biomass of Scots pine stands differing in age and soil fertility in southern Finland. Tree Physiol, 1999, 19(12): 823-830

[53] Wen LN, Zhang HG, Sun T, Zhang ZJ, Zan P, Gu WP, Ma PY, Cao FY, Mao ZJ. Fine root decomposition and N dynamics of Larix gmelinii at different soil depths. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(13): 4865-4871

[54] Yang HQ, Ji CY, Yang H, Nie Y, Chen XL. Global climate change and China’s contribution to carbon reduction: based on carbon storage accounting of Chinese harvested wood products. J Nat Resour, 2013, 28(12): 2023-2033

[55] Yatskov M, Harmon ME, Krankina ON. A chronosequence of wood decomposition in the boreal forests. Can J for Res, 2003, 33(7): 1211-1226

[56] Zhang ZX. Dendrology (Northern China Edition), 2008, Beijing, China Forestry Publishing House

[57] Zhang DL, Mao ZJ, Zhu SY, Zhou B. Litter falls of 6 major forest stands in Maoershan Mountain of Heilongjiang Province. Bull Bot Res, 2008, 28(01): 104-108

[58] Zhang XQ, Zhang JG, Duan AG. Tree-height growth model for Chinese fir plantation based on Bayesian method. Sci Silv Sin, 2014, 50(3): 69-75

[59] Zhao LF, Li CM, Tang SZ. Individual-tree diameter growth model for fir plantations based on multi-level linear mixed effects models across southeast China. J for Res, 2013, 18: 305-315

[60] Zhu Y, Zhao R, Zhang HG, Gu WP, Long FQ, Mao ZJ, Sun T. Coarse root decomposition and its control factors among 10 co-occuring common tree species in a temperate forest, Noreast China. Acta Ecol Sin, 2023, 43(16): 6682-6690

[61] Zubizarreta-Gerendiain A, Pukkala T, Peltola H. Effect of wind damage on the habitat suitability of saproxylic species in a boreal forest landscape. J for Res, 2019, 30(3): 879-889

Funding

University of Eastern Finland (including Kuopio University Hospital)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)