Increase in temperature and precipitation reduces the sensitivity of δ13C dynamics to temperature in cold-temperate forest respiration products
Xin Zhang , Qiuliang Zhang , Changwei Lü , Shoujia Sun , Rula Sa , Bing Wang , Fei Wang , Yanan Jian
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1) : 17
Increase in temperature and precipitation reduces the sensitivity of δ13C dynamics to temperature in cold-temperate forest respiration products
Research on the sensitivity of carbon isotope composition (δ13C) dynamics to temperature (Q10) and its influencing factors in the process of ecosystem respiration (Re) can accurately predict the trend for ecosystem carbon release with global warming for assessing ecosystem carbon sequestration capacity. We used stable isotope techniques to monitor canopy CO2 concentration and δ13C in a cold-temperate Larix gmelinii forest in Northeast China. δ13C values were also analyzed in plant and soil samples across five stand types. The sensitivity of δ13C dynamics to temperature during Re and the main factors affecting the variation in Q10 values were determined. Carbon isotope composition of ecosystem respiration (δ13CRe), autotrophic respiration (δ13CRa), and heterotrophic respiration (δ13CRh) decreased with increase in temperature, and δ13CRa < δ13CRe < δ13CRh. The contribution of Ra and Rh to Re were 51.57 and 48.42%, respectively. Temperature and precipitation had inhibitory effects on Q10, whereas soil organic carbon and total nitrogen had stimulatory effects. Autotrophic respiration is the dominant pathway for carbon release in this ecosystem. Heterotrophic respiration, and particularly maintenance respiration, are more temperature-sensitive. Rising temperatures and precipitation reduce the δ13C sensitivity to temperature.
Ecosystem respiration / Autotrophic respiration / Heterotrophic respiration / Carbon isotopes / Temperature sensitivity / Larix gmelinii
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
CMA Climate Change Centre (2023) Blue book on climate change in China. Beijing: Science Press pp. 3–5 (In Chinese) |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
Northeast Forestry University
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |