Partitioning soil carbon emissions in a temperate oak forest: insights from metabolic theory and the role of fine roots and microbial biomass

Abstract

Assessment of soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics is often inadequately represented in empirical measurements because of the significant heterogeneity in soil structure and physico-chemical properties. Partitioning soil carbon (C) emissions into autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration is essential for understanding CO₂ flux sources, but inconsistencies in their magnitude and responses reveal a knowledge gap in partitioning methodologies and their impact on respiration estimates. Utilizing data from an eight-yr field mesocosm study in a temperate oak forest, we computed C emissions from multiple components based on the metabolic theory. Our theoretical calculations of soil C emissions from various treatments were validated against periodic field measurements of soil respiration over an eight-year period. The optimized computations, which included annual precipitation data and accounted for biomass C from litter, roots, and microbes, closely aligned with field measurements of soil respiration across varying treatments. These results showed that fine root and microbial biomass jointly drove temporal variations in soil C emissions, while interannual precipitation variability plays a secondary role. This study confirms the feasibility of using metabolic theory to quantify soil C emissions and highlights the critical role of fine roots and soil microbial biomass, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of these factors in SOC budget assessments.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Fine roots / Litter input / Mesocosm / Metabolic theory / Soil carbon emission / Temporal variations

References

[1] Batjes NH. The total carbon and nitrogen in soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci, 1996, 47(2): 151-163.

[2] Bond-Lamberty B. New techniques and data for understanding the global soil respiration flux. Earths Future, 2018, 6(9): 1176-1180.

[3] Bond-Lamberty B, Thomson A. Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature, 2010, 464: 579-582.

[4] Boone RD, Nadelhoffer KJ, Canary JD, Kaye JP. Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration. Nature, 1998, 396: 570-572.

[5] Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology, 2004, 85(7): 1771-1789.

[6] Cusack DF, Dietterich LH, Sulman BN. Soil respiration responses to throughfall exclusion are decoupled from changes in soil moisture for four tropical forests, suggesting processes for ecosystem models. Glob Biogeochem Cycles, 2023, 37(4): e2022GB007473

[7] de Nijs EA, Hicks LC, Leizeaga A, Tietema A, Rousk J. Soil microbial moisture dependences and responses to drying-rewetting: the legacy of 18 years drought. Glob Change Biol, 2019, 25(3): 1005-1015.

[8] de Vries FT, Williams A, Stringer F, Willcocks R, McEwing R, Langridge H, Straathof AL. Changes in root-exudate-induced respiration reveal a novel mechanism through which drought affects ecosystem carbon cycling. New Phytol, 2019, 224(1): 132-145.

[9] Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, Houghton RA, Trexier MC, Wisniewski J. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 1994, 263: 185-190.

[10] Doetterl S, Stevens A, Six J, Merckx R, Van Oost K, Casanova Pinto M, Casanova-Katny A, Muñoz C, Boudin M, Venegas EZ, Boeckx P. Soil carbon storage controlled by interactions between geochemistry and climate. Nat Geosci, 2015, 8(10): 780-783.

[11] Edwards NT. Effects of temperature and moisture on carbon dioxide evolution in a mixed deciduous forest floor. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1975, 39(2): 361-365.

[12] Fenn KM, Malhi Y, Morecroft MD. Soil CO₂ efflux in a temperate deciduous forest: environmental drivers and component contributions. Soil Biol Biochem, 2010, 42(10): 1685-1693.

[13] Fuchslueger L, Bahn M, Fritz K, Hasibeder R, Richter A. Experimental drought reduces the transfer of recently fixed plant carbon to soil microbes and alters the bacterial community composition in a mountain meadow. New Phytol, 2014, 201(3): 916-927.

[14] Gao D, Bai E, Wasner D, Hagedorn F. Global prediction of soil microbial growth rates and carbon use efficiency based on the metabolic theory of ecology. Soil Biol Biochem, 2024, 190: 109315

[15] Hanson PJ, Edwards NT, Garten CT, Andrews JA. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry, 2000, 48: 115-146.

[16] Heinemeyer A, Hartley IP, Evans SP, Carreira de La Fuente JA, Ineson P. Forest soil CO₂ flux: uncovering the contribution and environmental responses of ectomycorrhizas. Glob Change Biol, 2007, 13(8): 1786-1797.

[17] Hopkins F, Gonzalez-Meler MA, Flower CE, Lynch DJ, Czimczik C, Tang J, Subke JA. Ecosystem-level controls on root-rhizosphere respiration. New Phytol, 2013, 199(2): 339-351.

[18] Huang N, Wang L, Song XP, Black TA, Jassal RS, Myneni RB, Wu C, Wang L, Song W, Ji D, Yu S, Niu Z. Spatial and temporal variations in global soil respiration and their relationships with climate and land cover. Sci Adv, 2020, 6: eabb8508.

[19] Janssens IA, Dieleman W, Luyssaert S, Subke JA, Reichstein M, Ceulemans R, Ciais P, Dolman AJ, Grace J, Matteucci G, Papale D, Piao SL, Schulze E-D, Tang J, Law BE. Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition. Nat Geosci, 2010, 3: 315-322.

[20] Janssens IA, Lankreijer H, Matteucci G, Kowalski AS, Buchmann N, Epron D, Pilegaard K, Kutsch W, Longdoz B, Grünwald T, Montagnani L, Dore S, Rebmann C, Moors EJ, Grelle A, Rannik Ü, Morgenstern K, Oltchev S, Clement R, Guðmundsson J, Minerbi S, Berbigier P, Ibrom A, Moncrieff J, Aubinet M, Bernhofer C, Jensen NO, Vesala T, Granier A, Schulze E-D, Lindroth A, Dolman AJ, Jarvis PG, Ceulemans R, Valentini R. Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests. Glob Change Biol, 2001, 7(3): 269-278.

[21] Kieft TL, Soroker E, Firestone MK. Microbial biomass response to a rapid increase in water potential when dry soil is wetted. Soil Biol Biochem, 1987, 19(2): 119-126.

[22] Kutsch WL, Staack A, Wötzel J, Middelhoff U, Kappen L. Field measurements of root respiration and total soil respiration in an alder forest. New Phytol, 2001, 150(1): 157-168.

[23] Kuzyakov Y. Sources of CO₂ efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods. Soil Biol Biochem, 2006, 38(3): 425-448.

[24] Lai J, Zou Y, Zhang J, Peres-Neto PR. Generalizing hierarchical and variation partitioning in multiple regression and canonical analyses using the rdacca.hp R package. Methods Ecol Evol, 2022, 13(4): 782-788.

[25] Lavigne MB, Boutin R, Foster RJ, Goodine G, Bernier PY, Robitaille G. Soil respiration responses to temperature are controlled more by roots than by decomposition in balsam fir ecosystems. Can J Forest Res, 2003, 33(9): 1744-1753.

[26] Lei J, Guo X, Zeng Y, Zhou J, Gao Q, Yang Y. Temporal changes in global soil respiration since 1987. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 403

[27] Li Y, Lin S, Chen Q, Ma X, Wang S, He K. Response of soil respiration to environmental and photosynthetic factors in different subalpine forest-cover types in a loess alpine hilly region. J for Res, 2022, 33: 653-665.

[28] Liu Y, Liu S, Wan S, Wang J, Luan J, Wang H. Differential responses of soil respiration to soil warming and experimental throughfall reduction in a transitional oak forest in central China. Agric Forest Meteorol, 2016, 226: 186-198.

[29] Luo Z, Feng W, Luo Y, Baldock J, Wang E. Soil organic carbon dynamics jointly controlled by climate, carbon inputs, soil properties and soil carbon fractions. Glob Change Biol, 2017, 23(10): 4430-4439.

[30] Moyano FE, Manzoni S, Chenu C. Responses of soil heterotrophic respiration to moisture availability: an exploration of processes and models. Soil Biol Biochem, 2013, 59: 72-85.

[31] Muratore TJ, Knorr MA, Simpson MJ, Stephens RB, Phillips RP, Frey SD. Response of root respiration to warming and nitrogen addition depends on tree species. Glob Change Biol, 2024, 30(10): e17530

[32] Orchard VA, Cook FJ. Relationship between soil respiration and soil moisture. Soil Biol Biochem, 2008, 15: 447-453.

[33] Pacaldo RS, Aydin M. Soil respiration in a natural forest and a plantation during a dry period in the Philippines. J for Res, 2023, 34: 1975-1983.

[34] Peng Y, Song S, Li Z, Li S, Chen G, Hu H, Xie J, Chen G, Xiao Y, Liu L, Tang Y, Tu L. Influences of nitrogen addition and aboveground litter-input manipulations on soil respiration and biochemical properties in a subtropical forest. Soil Biol Biochem, 2020, 142: 107694

[35] R Core Team (2024) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

[36] Ren H, Zhang L, Yan M, Tian X, Zheng X. Sensitivity analysis of Biome-BGCMuSo for gross and net primary productivity of typical forests in China. For Ecosyst, 2022, 9: 100011

[37] Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). J Stat Softw, 2012, 48: 1-36.

[38] Schlesinger WH, Andrews JA. Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry, 2000, 48: 7-20.

[39] Sulman BN, Phillips RP, Oishi AC, Shevliakova E, Pacala SW. Microbe-driven turnover offsets mineral-mediated storage of soil carbon under elevated CO₂. Nat Clim Change, 2014, 4(12): 1099-1102.

[40] Sun OJ, Campbell J, Law BE, Wolf V. Dynamics of carbon stocks in soils and detritus across chronosequences of different forest types in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Glob Change Biol, 2004, 10(9): 1470-1481.

[41] Sun X, Tang Z, Ryan MG, You Y, Sun OJ. Changes in soil organic carbon contents and fractionations of forests along a climatic gradient in China. Forest Ecosyst, 2019, 6: 1.

[42] Terrer C, Phillips RP, Hungate BA, Rosende J, Pett-Ridge J, Craig ME, van Groenigen KJ, Keenan TF, Sulman BN, Stocker BD, Reich PB, Pellegrini AFA, Pendall E, Zhang H, Evans RD, Carrillo Y, Fisher JB, Sundert KV, Vicca S, Jackson RB. A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO₂. Nature, 2021, 591(7851): 599-603.

[43] Wang B, McCormack ML, Ricciuto DM, Yang X, Iversen CM. Embracing fine-root system complexity in terrestrial ecosystem modeling. Glob Change Biol, 2023, 29(11): 2871-2885.

[44] Wang C, Qu L, Yang L, Liu D, Morrissey E, Miao R, Liu Z, Wang Q, Fang Y, Bai E. Large-scale importance of microbial carbon use efficiency and necromass to soil organic carbon. Glob Change Biol, 2021, 27(11): 2039-2048.

[45] Xu M, Zhou Z, Guo Y, Shen Y, Zhang H, Yu Q. Soil pH promoted respiration is stimulated by exoenzyme kinetic properties for a Pinus tabuliformis forest of northern China. Soil Biol Biochem, 2025, 202: 109709

[46] Xu S, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Kuzyakov Y, Wu Y, Liu L, Yang Y, Li Y, Yu Y, Zhu B, Yao H. Positive soil priming effects are the rule at a global scale. Glob Change Biol, 2024, 30(9): e17502

[47] Zhang J, Liu S, Liu C, Wang H, Luan J, Liu X, Guo X, Niu B. Different mechanisms underlying divergent responses of autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration to long-term throughfall reduction in a warm-temperate oak forest. Forest Ecosyst, 2021, 8: 41.

[48] Zhou X, Luo Y, Gao C, Verburg PS, IiiArnone JA, Darrouzet‐Nardi A, Schimel DS. Concurrent and lagged impacts of an anomalously warm year on autotrophic and heterotrophic components of soil respiration: a deconvolution analysis. New Phytol, 2010, 187(1): 184-198.

[49] Zhang Y, Guo X, Chen L, Kuzyakov Y, Wang R, Zhang H, Han X, Jiang Y, Sun OJ. Global pattern of organic carbon pools in forest soils. Glob Change Biol, 2024, 30(6): e17386

[50] Zhang Y, Tang Z, You Y, Guo X, Wu C, Liu S, Sun OJ. Differential effects of forest-floor litter and roots on soil organic carbon formation in a temperate oak forest. Soil Biol Biochem, 2023, 180: 109017

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)