Flux-based assessment of ozone visible foliar injury in Southern Alps

Elena Marra , Alessandra De Marco , Andrea Ebone , Anna Maria Ferrara , Fabio Giannetti , Francesco Tagliaferro , Pierre Sicard , Andrei Popa , Ionel Popa , Elena Paoletti , Yasutomo Hoshika

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 124

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) :124 DOI: 10.1007/s11676-025-01918-8
Original Paper
research-article

Flux-based assessment of ozone visible foliar injury in Southern Alps

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Tropospheric ozone (O3) is a harmful air pollutant negatively impacting forest health, causing O3-specific visible foliar injury (O3 VFI). Ozone monitoring in forests has usually implemented by passive samplers, although they cannot detect the diurnal peak when a significant part of stomatal O3 uptake occurs. This results into uncertainties for the calculation of stomatal O3 uptake. This study compares the stomatal-flux-based POD1 (phytotoxic ozone dose above a threshold of 1 nmol m−2s−1) for forest trees/shrubs estimated from data collected by either passive samplers or active O3 monitors to evaluate O3 damage to plants in terms of O3 VFI in the Southern Alps. The study was conducted over two years (2018–2019) in a mountainous Alpine area (Valle Stura, Italy). An integrative monitoring station for active O3 monitoring, as well as passive O3 monitors, were installed in an open field area (OFD). The O3 VFI was investigated in woody species in the light exposed sampling Site (LESS—Betula pendula, Fagus sylvatica, Larix decidua, Populus tremula, Salix caprea, Rubus sp. and Vaccinium myrtillus) in late summer according to the international co-operative programme on assessment and monitoring of air pollution effects on forests (ICP Forests) manual. The results confirmed that Fagus sylvatica and Rubus sp. are O3-sensitive species showing relatively high POD1 (> 20 mmol m⁻2), while Larix decidua is O3-tolerant. We derived flux-based critical levels (CL) corresponding to the presence of O3 VFI (5, 25, and 50% of symptomatic plants along the LESS) from flux-effect relationships for forest protection against O3 VFI. The results support the hypothesis that passive samplers cannot detect episodic high stomatal O₃ fluxes (> 1 nmol m−2 s−1). According to the active monitoring, the CL for O3 VFI occurrence was estimated to be 17.1 mmol m⁻2 POD1 for 25% presence and 34.3 mmol m⁻2 POD1 for 50% presence of symptomatic plants, while passive samplers underestimated POD1 values for CL calculations by 17% on average, with underestimation increasing at higher CL thresholds. The findings demonstrate that active monitoring refines CLs towards a proper quantitative assessment of O3 impact, particularly in capturing peak flux events that are crucial for evaluating plant damage and emphasizes the importance of active O₃ monitoring for reliable forest health assessments.

The online version is available at https://link.springer.com/.

Corresponding editor: Lei Yu.

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-025-01918-8.

The original online version of this article was revised: In this article the author's name Yasutomo Hoshika was incorrectly written as Yasutoma Hoshika.

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-025-01928-6.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Keywords

Stomatal conductance model / Leaf symptoms / Forest / Phytotoxic ozone dose

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Elena Marra, Alessandra De Marco, Andrea Ebone, Anna Maria Ferrara, Fabio Giannetti, Francesco Tagliaferro, Pierre Sicard, Andrei Popa, Ionel Popa, Elena Paoletti, Yasutomo Hoshika. Flux-based assessment of ozone visible foliar injury in Southern Alps. Journal of Forestry Research, 2025, 36(1): 124 DOI:10.1007/s11676-025-01918-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Agathokleous E, Saitanis CJ, Agathokleous S, Savvides C, Calatayud V, Sicard P (2022) isoaot40: an improved ozone exposure index based on the Annual Ozone Spectrum Profile (AO3SP). J for Res 33(6):1949–1955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01537-7

[2]

AgrawalSB, AgrawalM, SinghATropospheric ozone: a hazard for vegetation and human health, 2021Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

[3]

AnavA, De MarcoA, FriedlingsteinP, SaviF, SicardP, SitchS, VitaleM, PaolettiE. Growing season extension affects ozone uptake by European forests. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 669: 1043-1052.

[4]

Aranda I, Gil L, Pardos JA (2000) Water relations and gas exchange in Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl. in a mixed stand at their southern limit of distribution in Europe. Trees 14(6):344–352

[5]

Aasamaa K, Sõber A, Rahi M (2001) Leaf anatomical characteristics associated with shoot hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance and stomatal sensitivity to changes of leaf water status in temperate deciduous trees. Funct Plant Biol 28(8):765. https://doi.org/10.1071/pp00157

[6]

Baesso Moura B, Carrari E, Dalstein-Richier L, Sicard P, Leca S, Badea O, Pitar-Silaghi D, Shashikumar A, Ciriani ML, Paoletti E, Hoshika Y (2022) Bridging experimental and monitoring research for visible foliar injury as bio-indicator of ozone impacts on forests. Ecosyst Health Sustain 8:2144466. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2022.2144466

[7]

Benecke U, Schulze ED, Matyssek R, Havranek WM (1981) Environmental control of CO2-assimilation and leaf conductance in Larix decidua Mill I a comparison of contrasting natural environments. Oecologia 50(1):54–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378793

[8]

Calatayud V, Diéguez JJ, Sicard P, Schaub M, De Marco A (2016) Testing approaches for calculating stomatal ozone fluxes from passive samplers. Sci Total Environ 572:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.155

[9]

CarrariE, De MarcoA, LaschiA, BadeaO, Dalstein-RichierL, FaresS, LecaS, MarchiE, SicardP, PopaI, HoshikaY, MaterassiA, PallanteG, PitarD, PaolettiE. Economic and life cycle analysis of passive and active monitoring of ozone for forest protection. Environments, 2021, 810104.

[10]

Cienciala E, Lindroth A (1995) Gas-exchange and sap flow measurements of Salix viminalis trees in short-rotation forest: II. Diurnal and seasonal variations of stomatal response and water use efficiency. Trees 9(5):295–301

[11]

CLRTAP (2017) Mapping critical levels for vegetation, Chapter III of Manual on methodologies and criteria for modelling and mapping critical loads and levels and air pollution effects, risks and trends. UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. www.icpmapping.org. Accessed 1 Feb 2024

[12]

Cox RM, Malcolm JW (1999) Passive ozone monitoring for forest health assessment. Wat Air Soil Pollut 116(1):339–344

[13]

Dai LL, Xu YS, Harmens H, Duan HL, Feng ZZ, Hayes F, Sharps K, Radbourne A, Tarvainen L (2021) Reduced photosynthetic thermal acclimation capacity under elevated ozone in poplar (Populus tremula) saplings. Glob Change Biol 27(10):2159–2173. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15564

[14]

DalsteinL, VasN, TagliaferroF, AmF, SpazianiF. Effets de l’ozone sur la forêt et la végétation dans les Alpes franco-italiennes. Forêt Méditerranéenne, 2005, XXVI(2): 149-156

[15]

De Marco A, Vitale M, Kilic U, Serengil Y, Paoletti E (2014) New functions for estimating AOT40 from ozone passive sampling. Atmos Environ 95:82–88

[16]

De MarcoA, SicardP, FengZZ, AgathokleousE, AlonsoR, AraminieneV, AugustatisA, BadeaO, BeasleyJC, BranquinhoC, BruckmanVJ, CollaltiA, David-SchwartzR, DomingosM, DuEZ, Garcia GomezH, HashimotoS, HoshikaY, JakovljevicT, McnultyS, OksanenE, Omidi KhaniabadiY, PrescherAK, SaitanisCJ, SaseH, SchmitzA, VoigtG, WatanabeM, WoodMD, KozlovMV, PaolettiE. Strategic roadmap to assess forest vulnerability under air pollution and climate change. Glob Change Biol, 2022, 28(17): 5062-5085.

[17]

Emberson LD, Ashmore MR, Cambridge HM, Simpson D, Tuovinen JP (2000) Modelling stomatal ozone flux across Europe. Environ Pollut 109(3):403–413

[18]

European Commission (2016) Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European parliament and of the council of 14 December 2016 on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants, amending Directive 2003/35/EC and repealing Directive 2001/81/EC

[19]

EwersFW, FisherJB, FichtnerKPutzFE, MooneyH. Water flux and xylem structure in vines. Biology of vines, 1991Cambridge University Press. 119152

[20]

Fares S, Paoletti E (2019) Il monitoraggio degli ecosistemi forestali per comprendere gli impatti dell’inquinamento atmosferico e le opportunità di mitigazione. Forest@-J Silvicult Forest Ecol 16(1):32

[21]

Fellner H, Dirnberger GF, Sterba H (2016) Specific leaf area of European Larch (Larix decidua MILL.). Trees 30(4):1237–1244

[22]

FengZZ, BükerP, PleijelH, EmbersonL, KarlssonPE, UddlingJ. A unifying explanation for variation in ozone sensitivity among woody plants. Glob Change Biol, 2018, 24(1): 78-84.

[23]

Ferm M (2001) Validation of a diffusive sampler for ozone in workplace atmospheres according to EN838.In: Proceedings form the international conference on measuring air pollutants by diffusive sampling, France, 26–28 September 2001, pp 298–303

[24]

Ferretti M, Fischer R, Mues V, Granke O, Lorenz M, Seidling W (2017) Part II: basic design principles for the ICP forests monitoring networks. In: UNECE ICP Forests Programme Co-ordinating Centre (ed): Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, Assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. Thünen Institute of Forest Ecosystems, Eberswalde, Germany, p 21 + Annex. [https://www.icp-forests.net/page/icp-forests-manual]

[25]

GrantzDA. Diel trend in plant sensitivity to ozone: implications for exposure- and flux-based ozone metrics. Atmos Environ, 2014, 98: 571-580.

[26]

Gerosa G, Ferretti M, Bussotti F, Rocchini D (2007) Estimates of ozone AOT40 from passive sampling in forest sites in south-Western Europe. Environ Pollut 145(3):629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.02.030

[27]

GrulkeNE. The physiological basis of ozone injury assessment attributes in Sierran conifers. Ozone air pollution in the siera Nevada : distribution and effects on forests, 2003Elsevier. 5581.

[28]

HochG, RichterA, KörnerC. Non-structural carbon compounds in temperate forest trees. Plant Cell Environ, 2003, 26(7): 1067-1081.

[29]

HoshikaY, CarrariE, ZhangL, CarrieroG, PignatelliS, FasanoG, MaterassiA, PaolettiE. Testing a ratio of photosynthesis to O(3) uptake as an index for assessing O(3)-induced foliar visible injury in poplar trees. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2018, 25(9): 8113-8124.

[30]

HoshikaY, CarrariE, MariottiB, MartiniS, De MarcoA, SicardP, PaolettiE. Flux-based ozone risk assessment for a plant injury index (PII) in three European cool-temperate deciduous tree species. Forests, 2020, 11182.

[31]

Innes JL, Skelly JM, Schaub M (2001) Ozone and broadleaved species. A guide to the identification of ozone-induced foliar injury. Ozon, Laubholz-und Krautpflanzen. Führer zum Bestimmen von Ozonsymptomen. Birmensdorf, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL, Bern, Stuttgart, Wien

[32]

Kangur O, Steppe K, Schreel JDM, von der Crone JS, Sellin A (2021) Variation in nocturnal stomatal conductance and development of predawn disequilibrium between soil and leaf water potentials in nine temperate deciduous tree species. Funct Plant Biol 48(5):483–492. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP20091

[33]

KhiemM, OokaR, HuangH, HayamiH, YoshikadoH, KawamotoY. Analysis of the relationship between changes in meteorological conditions and the variation in summer ozone levels over the central Kanto area. Adv Meteor, 2010, 2010. 349248

[34]

KrupaSV, LeggeAH. Passive sampling of ambient, gaseous air pollutants: an assessment from an ecological perspective. Environ Pollut, 2000, 107(1): 31-45.

[35]

Larcher W (2003) Physiological Plant Ecology, 4th ed. Springer-Verlag, New York

[36]

LoiblW, WiniwarterW, KopscaA, ZufgerJ, BaumannR. Estimating the spatial distribution of ozone concentrations in complex terrain. Atmos Environ, 1994, 28(16): 2557-2566.

[37]

Manzini J, Hoshika Y, Moura BB, Paoletti E (2023) Exploring a new O3 index as a proxy for the avoidance/tolerance capacity of forest species to tolerate O3 injury. Forests 14(5):901. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14050901

[38]

Matyssek R, Schulze ED (1988) Carbon uptake and respiration in above-ground parts of a Larix decidua × Leptolepis tree. Trees 2(4):233–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202378

[39]

McHughK, CumminsT, AherneJ. The threat from ozone to vegetation in Ireland. Environ Res, 2024, 262Pt 2119974.

[40]

Mills G, Pleijel H, Braun S, Büker P, Bermejo V, Calvo E, Danielsson H, Emberson L, González Fernández I, Grünhage L, Harmens H, Hayes F, Karlsson P-E, Simpson D (2011) New stomatal flux-based critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation. Atmos Environ 45(28):5064–5068

[41]

NiglasA, AlberM, SuurK, JasińskaAK, KupperP, SellinA. Does increased air humidity affect stomatal morphology and functioning in hybrid aspen?. Botany, 2015, 93(4): 243-250.

[42]

Paoletti E (2006) Impact of ozone on Mediterranean forests: a review. Environ pollut 144(2):463–474

[43]

Paoletti E, Manning WJ (2007) Toward a biologically significant and usable standard for ozone that will also protect plants. Environ Pollut 150(1):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.037

[44]

Paoletti E, Alivernini A, Anav A, Badea O, Carrari E, Chivulescu S, Conte A, Ciriani ML, Dalstein-Richier L, De Marco A, Fares S, Fasano G, Giovannelli A, Lazzara M, Leca S, Materassi A, Moretti V, Pitar D, Popa I, Sabatini F, Hoshika Y (2019) Toward stomatal–flux based forest protection against ozone: The MOTTLES approach. Sci Total Environ 691:516–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.525

[45]

PopaA, PopaI. Photosynthesis traits of pioneer broadleaves species from tailing dumps in Călimani mountains (eastern carpathians). Forests, 2021, 126658.

[46]

Qiang XL, Sun ZJ, Li XQ, Li SQ, Yu Z, He J, Li Q, Han L, He L (2024) The impacts of planting patterns combined with irrigation management practices on watermelon growth, photosynthesis, and yield. Plants 13(10):1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101402

[47]

R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Accessed from https://www.R-project.org/

[48]

Raftoyannis Y, Radoglou K (2002) Physiological responses of beech and sessile oak in a natural mixed stand during a dry summer. Ann Bot 89(6):723–730

[49]

RulkeNE, HeathRL. Ozone effects on plants in natural ecosystems. Plant Biol, 2020, 22(S1): 12-37.

[50]

SicardP, HoshikaY, CarrariE, De MarcoA, PaolettiE. Testing visible ozone injury within a light exposed sampling site as a proxy for ozone risk assessment for European forests. J For Res, 2021, 32(4): 1351-1359.

[51]

SoldatenkoSA. Artificial intelligence and its application in numerical weather prediction. Russ Meteorol Hydrol, 2024, 49(4): 283-298.

[52]

SicardP, De MarcoA, CarrariE, Dalstein-RichierL, HoshikaY, BadeaO, PitarD, FaresS, ConteA, PopaI, PaolettiE. Epidemiological derivation of flux-based critical levels for visible ozone injury in European forests. J for Res, 2020, 31(5): 1509-1519.

[53]

SkärbyL, Ro-PoulsenH, WellburnFA, SheppardLJ. Impacts of ozone on forests: a European perspective. New Phytol, 1998, 139(1): 109-122.

[54]

Schaub M, Haeni M, Ferretti M, Gottardini E, Calatayud V (2016) Ground level ozone and its impact on European forests. In: Forest condition in Europe... Executive Report. Tühnen, pp 52−56

[55]

Sicard P, De Marco A, Dalstein-Richier L, Tagliaferro F, Renou C, Paoletti E (2016) An epidemiological assessment of stomatal ozone flux-based critical levels for visible ozone injury in Southern European forests. Sci Total Environ 541:729–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.113

[56]

Streit K, Siegwolf RTW, Hagedorn F, Schaub M, Buchmann N (2014) Lack of photosynthetic or stomatal regulation after 9 years of elevated [CO2] and 4 years of soil warming in two conifer species at the alpine treeline. Plant Cell Environ 37(2):315–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12197

[57]

UddlingJ, Günthardt-GoergMS, MatyssekR, OksanenE, PleijelH, SelldénG, KarlssonPE. Biomass reduction of juvenile birch is more strongly related to stomatal uptake of ozone than to indices based on external exposure. Atmos Environ, 2004, 38(28): 4709-4719.

[58]

WieserG, HavranekWM. Environmental control of ozone uptake in Larix decidua Mill a comparison between different altitudes. Tree Physiol, 1995, 15(4): 253-258.

[59]

Wieser G, Tegischer K, Tausz M, Häberle KH, Grams TEE, Matyssek R (2002) Age effects on Norway spruce (Picea abies) susceptibility to ozone uptake: a novel approach relating stress avoidance to defense. Tree Physiol 22(8):583–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/22.8.583

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Northeast Forestry University

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

96

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/