Performance assessment of long-distance timber extraction in environmentally sensitive areas

Abstract

Sustainable forest management practices frequently confront the tension between economic viability and conservation objectives, particularly where forests occur in environmentally sensitive zones. The use of skidders in protected areas is an essential solution for enabling timber harvesting in environments where the establishment of new skidding trails is either prohibited or highly restricted. These machines are the most used timber extraction machines in Central and Eastern Europe, and cable/adapted skidders are used to increase productivity and to reduce labor. This study compared the work cycles, productivity and costs of four types of skidders working in similar coniferous stands: a dedicated cable skidder, a dedicated cable-grapple skidder, a dedicated grapple skidder and an adapted skidder. The comparison of delay-free work cycles of the four skidders showed the largest share is occupied by travel loaded. The cable-grapple skidder had the highest average speed of 5.6 km h⁻¹, followed by the grapple skidder at 3.97 km h⁻¹, the cable skidder at 3.79 km h⁻¹, and the adapted skidder with an average speed of 3.31 km h⁻¹. The average delay-free productivity of the study skidders is highest for the adapted skidder, followed by the grapple skidder with a slightly lower rate, the cable-grapple skidder, and the cable skidder. In conclusion, the average payload of the grapple skidder and the cable grapple skidder is less than the maximum payload of the machine. This is due to the narrow skidding roads and because these skidders are not suitable for the specific site-selective felling with marked single and small groups of trees. The dedicated cable skidders and the adapted cable skidder are very close in productivity. The average productivity of dedicated cable skidders was 17.7 m³ h⁻¹, while the productivity of the adapted skidder is 14.5 m³ h⁻¹. Considering this, adapted skidders could be a good solution for improving economic productivity in sensitive forests.

The online version is available at https://link.springer.com/.

Corresponding editor: Tao Xu.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Keywords

Natura 2000 / Sustainable forest management / Forest operations / Productivity and costs

References

[1] AcarHH, YoshimuraT. A study on the productivity and cost of cable logging in Turkey. J For Res, 1997, 2(4): 199-202.

[2] AckermanP, GleasureE, AckermanS, ShuttleworthBStandards for time studies for the South African forest industry, 2014, South Africa. ICFR/FESA. 49

[3] AlamM, AcunaM, BrownM. Self-levelling feller-buncher productivity based on lidar-derived slope. Croat J For Eng, 2013, 34(2): 273-281

[4] AllmanM, FerenčíkM, JankovskýM, StanovskýM, MessingerováV. Damage caused by wheeled skidders on Cambisols of central Europe. Croat J For Eng, 2015, 36(2): 205-215

[5] AmishevD, EvansonT, RaymondK. Felling and bunching on steep terrain—a review of the literature. FFR Tech Note, 2009, 1(7): 1-10

[6] AvonC, DumasY, BergèsL. Management practices increase the impact of roads on plant communities in forests. Biol Conserv, 2013, 159: 24-31.

[7] BehjouFK. A techno-economic evaluation of skidding operation by Timberjack 450C and Clark Ranger 666DBS in Caspian forests. J Food Agric Environ, 2010, 8(3–4): 1020-1023

[8] BehjouFK, MajnounianB, NamiranianM, DvořákJ. Time study and skidding capacity of the wheeled skidder Timberjack 450C in Caspian forests. J For Sci, 2008, 54(4): 183-188.

[9] BjörhedenR, ApelK, ShibaM, ThompsonMAIUFRO Forest work study nomenclature, 1995, Garpenberg. Department of Operational Efficiency, Swedish University of Agricultural Science.

[10] BorzSA, DinulicăF, BîrdaM, IgneaG, CiobanuVD, PopaB. Time consumption and productivity of skidding Silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) round wood in reduced accessibility conditions: a case study in windthrow salvage logging form Romanian Carpathians. Ann For Res, 2013, 56(2): 363-375

[11] BorzSA, IgneaG, PopaB. Modelling and comparing timber winching performance in windthrow and uniform selective cuttings for two Romanian skidders. J For Res, 2014, 19(6): 473-482.

[12] BorzSA, IgneaG, PopaB, SpârchezG, IordacheE. Estimating time consumption and productivity of roundwood skidding in group shelterwood system—a case study in a broadleaved mixed stand located in reduced accessibility conditions. Croat J For Eng, 2015, 36(1): 137-146

[13] BrittoPC, JaegerD, HoffmannS, RobertRCG, FantiniAC, VibransAC. Productivity assessment of timber harvesting techniques for supporting sustainable forest management of secondary Atlantic Forests in southern Brazil. Ann For Res, 2017, 60(2): 203-215.

[14] BrownRO, Oliveira-NascimentoKA, RobertRCG, DeArmondD. Wood extraction performance with a farm tractor in a mountainous region of Brazil: cycle time, productivity and costs of two different work crews. South For J For Sci, 2022, 84(2): 136-147.

[15] CaglarS. Productivity analysis of tree-length harvesting using farm tractor in a nordmann fir stand in Turkey. Eur J For Eng, 2020, 6(2): 78-86.

[16] CataldoMF, ProtoAR, MacrìG, ZimbalattiG. Evaluation of different wood harvesting systems in typical Mediterranean small-scale forests: a Southern Italian case study. Ann Silvicult Res, 2020, 45(1): 1-11

[17] CavalliR, GrigolatoS. Influence of characteristics and extension of a forest road network on the supply cost of forest woodchips. J For Res, 2010, 15(3): 202-209.

[18] De OliveiraPN, SampietroJA, TonettEL, FerrariLH, Casemiro SoaresPR, BonazzaM, de VargasDA, NicolletiMF, Gonçalves RobertRC. Performance of a whole tree mechanised timber harvesting system when clear-felling a 32-year-old Pinus taeda L. stand. N Z J For Sci, 2021.

[19] DudekT, JanasD. The productivity and the costs forwarding wood of a farm tractor with a trailer in late thinning and cutting in gaps of forests. Forests, 2022, 1381309.

[20] DymovAA. The impact of clearcutting in boreal forests of Russia on soils: a review. Eurasian Soil Sci, 2017, 50(7): 780-790.

[21] GainullinI, ZainullinAInfluence of design parameters of propellers and load modes of tractors on the soil, 2017

[22] GallisC, SpyroglouG. Productivity linear regression models of tree-length harvesting system in natural coastal Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis L.) forests in the Chalkidiki area of Greece. Croat J For Eng, 2012, 33(1): 115-123

[23] GhaffariyanMR, NaghdiR, GhajarI, NikooyM. Time prediction models and cost evaluation of cut-to-length (CTL) harvesting method in a mountainous forest. Small Scale For, 2013, 12(2): 181-192.

[24] GheorgheI, StelianAB, BogdanP. Assessing timber skidding efficiency in a group shelterwood system applied to a fir-beech stand. Afr J Agric Res, 2014, 9(1): 160-167.

[25] GiefingDF, BembenekM, GackowskiM, GrzywińskiW, KaraszewskiZ, KlentakI, KosakJ, MederskiPS, SiewertS. Evaluation of thinning operations in older pine stands. Res Methods, 2012.

[26] Heinimann HR (1999) Ground-based harvesting technologies for steep slopes. In: Proceedings of international mountain logging and 10th pacific northwest skyline symposium Corvallis, OR

[27] HorvatD, ZečićŽ, ŠušnjarM. Morphologial characteristics and productivity of skidder ECOTRACK 120 V. Croat J For Eng, 2007, 28(1): 11-25

[28] IlyintsevA, BykovYu, SoldatovaD, BogdanovA, ErshovRThe impact of modern logging equipment on the physical properties of the soil in the Northern taiga of the Arkhangelsk region Anthropogenic transformation of the natural environment, 2018, Perm. Perm State National Research University.

[29] Iranparast BodaghiA, NikooyM, NaghdiR, VenanziR, LatteriniF, TavankarF, PicchioR. Ground-based extraction on salvage logging in two high forests: a productivity and cost analysis. Forests, 2018, 912729.

[30] KluenderRA, StokesBJ. Productivity and costs of three harvesting methods. South J Appl For, 1994, 18(4): 168-174.

[31] KulakD, StańczykiewiczA, SzewczykG. Productivity and time consumption of timber extraction with a grapple skidder in selected pine stands. Croat J For Eng, 2017, 38(1): 55-63

[32] LabelleER, HanssonL, HögbomL, JourgholamiM, LaschiA. Strategies to mitigate the effects of soil physical disturbances caused by forest machinery: a comprehensive review. Curr For Rep, 2022, 8(1): 20-37.

[33] LatteriniF, VenanziR, PicchioR. Using pack animals instead of tractors in Central Italy’s protected areas: no evidence of reduced soil disturbance. For Ecol Manage, 2024, 572. 122312

[34] LotfalianM, MoafiM, FoumaniBS, AkbariRA. Time study and skidding capacity of the wheeled skidder Timberjack 450C. J Soil Sci Environ Manage, 2011, 2(7): 120-124

[35] MacrìG, ZimbalattiG, RussoD, ProtoAR. Measuring the mobility parameters of tree-length forwarding systems using GPS technology in the Southern Italy forestry. Agron Res, 2016, 14(3): 836-845

[36] MaesanoM, PicchioR, Lo MonacoA, NeriF, LasserreB, MarchettiM. Productivity and energy consumption in logging operation in a Cameroonian tropical forest. Ecol Eng, 2013, 57: 149-153.

[37] MargonoBA, TurubanovaS, ZhuravlevaI, PotapovP, TyukavinaA, BacciniA, GoetzS, HansenMC. Mapping and monitoring deforestation and forest degradation in Sumatra (Indonesia) using Landsat time series data sets from 1990 to 2010. Environ Res Lett, 2012, 73. 034010

[38] MarčetaD, KoširB. Comparison of two felling and processing methods in beech forests. Croat J For Eng, 2016, 37(1): 163-174

[39] MarčetaD, PetkovićV, KoširB. Comparison of two skidding methods in beech forests in mountainous conditions new mechanization in forestry. J Theory Pract For Eng, 2014, 35(1): 51-62

[40] MoskalikT, BorzSA, DvořákJ, FerencikM, GlushkovS, MuisteP, LazdiņšA, StyranivskyO. Timber harvesting methods in eastern European countries: a review. Croat J For Eng, 2017, 38(2): 231-241

[41] MousaviR. Time consumption, productivity, and cost analysis of skidding in the Hyrcanian forest in Iran. J For Res, 2012, 23(4): 691-697.

[42] MousaviR, SeyahkalMN, NaghdiR. Comparison of timber skidding using two ground-based skidding systems: grapple skidding versus cable skidding. Int J For Soil Eros, 2013, 3: 79-86

[43] NaghdiR, MohammadiL. Optimal forest road density based on skidding and road construction costs in Iranian Caspian forests. Casp J Environ Sci, 2009, 7: 79-86

[44] Olsen ED, Hossain MM, Miller ME (1998) Statistical comparison of methods used in harvesting work studies. College of Forestry, The Forest Research Laboratory of Oregon State University. http://webdata.for.orst.edu/forestry/pubs/frl/

[45] OrlovskýL, MessingerováV, DanihelováZ. Analysis of the time efficiency of skidding technology based on the skidders. Cent Eur For J, 2020, 66(3): 177-187.

[46] OzturkT. Productivity of New Holland farm tractor at beech stands on mountainous areas in Black Sea Region. For Ideas, 2010, 16: 52-57

[47] OzturkT. Productivity of MB track 900 tractor at beech stands on mountainous areas in black sea region. Afr J Agric Res, 2010, 5: 28-33

[48] OzturkTOLGA, SenturkN. Productivity and time studies of MB Trac 900 tractor at beech stands on mountainous areas in Turkey. Balt For, 2010, 16(1): 132-138

[49] PajkošM, KlvačR, NerudaJ, Kumar MishraP. Comparative time study of conventional cut-to-length and an integrated harvesting method—a case study. Forests, 2018, 94194.

[50] PalanderT, OvaskainenH, LaurenA, PasiA. An enhanced method for improving the efficiency of harvesting tree plantations on flat and sloping terrain using a cutting-cycle productivity model. J For Res, 2025, 36139.

[51] PapandreaSF, StoilovS, CataldoMF, NichevP, AngelovG, ProtoAR. How different distribution of assortments on worksites influences forwarder performance in coniferous plantations. Croat J For Eng (Online), 2025, 46(1): 33-45.

[52] PapandreaSF, StoilovS, CataldoMF, PetkovK, AngelovG, ZumboA, ProtoAR. Evaluation of productivity and cost analysis on a combined logging system. Forests, 2024, 156980.

[53] Peev D, Georgiev D, Marinov K (2022) Exploitation research of a cable skidder TAF 690 PE for timber skidding in the Western Stara Planina

[54] PentekT, NevečerelH, PoršinskyT, DasovićK, ŠušnjarM, PotočnikI. Analysis of secondary canopy openness in mountainous forests as a basis for selecting winch cable length. For J, 2010, 134(5–6): 241-248

[55] PicchioR, MederskiPS, TavankarF. How and how much, do harvesting activities affect forest soil, regeneration and stands?. Curr For Rep, 2020, 6(2): 115-128.

[56] PicchioR, NeriF, MaesanoM, SavelliS, SirnaA, BlasiS, BaldiniS, MarchiE. Growth effects of thinning damage in a Corsican pine (Pinus laricio Poiret) stand in central Italy. For Ecol Manage, 2011, 262(2): 237-243.

[57] ProtoAR, BernardiniV, CataldoMF, ZimbalattiG. Whole tree system evaluation of thinning a pine plantation in southern Italy. Ann Silvicult Res, 2020, 45(1): 44-52

[58] ProtoAR, MacrìG, VisserR, RussoD, ZimbalattiG. Comparison of timber extraction productivity between winch and grapple skidding: a case study in southern Italian forests. Forests, 2018, 9261.

[59] ProtoAR, MaesanoM, ZimbalattiG, Scarascia MugnozzaG, MacrìG, AntonucciF, CostaC, SperandioG. A three-step neural network artificial intelligence modeling approach for time, productivity and costs prediction: a case study in Italian forestry. Croat J For Eng, 2020, 41(1): 35-47.

[60] ProtoAR, ZimbalattiG. Firewood cable extraction in the southern Mediterranean area of Italy. For Sci Technol, 2016, 12(1): 16-23.

[61] SaboA, PoršinskyT. Skidding of fir roundwood by Timberjack 240C from selective forests of Gorski Kotar. Croat J For Eng, 2005, 26(1): 13-27

[62] SarkerSK, DebJC, HalimMA. A diagnosis of existing logging bans in Bangladesh. Int Forum Rev, 2011, 13(4): 461-475.

[63] SchweierJ, LudowicyC. Comparison of a cable-based and a ground-based system in flat and soil-sensitive area: a case study from southern Baden in Germany. Forests, 2020, 116611.

[64] SpinelliR, MagagnottiN. Comparison of two harvesting systems for the production of forest biomass from the thinning of Picea abies plantations. Scand J For Res, 2010, 25(1): 69-77.

[65] SpinelliR, MagagnottiN. The effects of introducing modern technology on the financial, labour and energy performance of forest operations in the Italian Alps. For Policy Econ, 2011, 13(7): 520-524.

[66] SpinelliR, MagagnottiN. Wood extraction with farm tractor and sulky: estimating productivity, cost and energy consumption. Small Scale For, 2012, 11(1): 73-85.

[67] SpinelliR, MagagnottiN, Laina RelañoR. An alternative skidding technology to the current use of crawler tractors in Alpine logging operations. J Clean Prod, 2012, 31: 73-79.

[68] SpinelliR, MagagnottiN, VisserR, O’NealB. A survey of the skidder fleet of Central, Eastern and Southern Europe. Eur J For Res, 2021, 140(4): 901-911.

[69] StoilovS, KrumovT. Study of wheel cable skidder productivity in West Balkan Mountains. Manag Sustain Dev, 2016, 61: 103-107

[70] StoilovS, PapandreaSF, AngelovG, OslekovD, ZimbalattiG, ProtoAR. Productivity analysis and costs of wheel cable skidder during salvage logging in European beech stand. J Agric Eng, 2023.

[71] Stokes BJ (1989) Glossary of terms used in timber harvesting and forest engineering, vol 73. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station

[72] StrandgardM, AlamM, MitchellRG. Impact of slope on productivity of a self-levelling processor. Croat J For Eng, 2014, 35: 193-200

[73] SvoikinF, SvoikinV, BoroznaA, TarabanM, MakarenkoA. Results of studies to determine the pressure on the soil of wheeled logging sites harvesters (VLSH) of middle-small, middle and heavy classes in the natural and production conditions of the Kronoberg County (South of Sweden). J For Res, 2025, 36137.

[74] SzewczykG, SowaJ, KamińskiK, KulakD, StańczykiewiczA. Selection of time study methods for forest operations. Environ Sci, 2017.

[75] TiernanD, ZelekeG, OwendePMO, KanaliCL, LyonsJ, WardSM. Effect of working conditions on forwarder productivity in cut-to-length timber harvesting on sensitive forest sites in Ireland. Biosyst Eng, 2004, 87(2): 167-177.

[76] VisserR, BerkettH. Effect of terrain steepness on machine slope when harvesting. Int J For Eng, 2015, 26(1): 1-9.

[77] Visser R (2013) Tension monitoring of a cable assisted machine harvesting. Technical Note HTN05–11, Future Forests Research Limited, Rotorua, New Zealand

[78] VusićD, ŠušnjarM, MarchiE, SpinaR, ZečićŽ, PicchioR. Skidding operations in thinning and shelterwood cut of mixed stands–work productivity, energy inputs and emissions. Ecol Eng, 2013, 61: 216-223.

[79] WangJX, LongC, McNeelJ, BaumgrasJ. Productivity and cost of manual felling and cable skidding in central Appalachian hardwood forests. For Prod J, 2004, 54(12): 45-51.

[80] ZečićŽ, VusićD, PrkaM, KlepacS. Influence of skidding road slope on productivity of skidding timber assortments with tractor Timberjack 240C in selective forests. Sumar List, 2010, 134: 103-114

[81] ŽeljkoZ, JurijM. Mathematical models for optimization of group work in harvesting operation. Croat J For Eng, 2005, 26(1): 29-37

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Northeast Forestry University