Efficiency and regional differences of forest restoration across China’s Upper Yangtze River Basin

Abstract

Evaluating the effectiveness of forest restoration projects is crucial for designing adaptive restoration strategies. However, existing studies have primarily focused on ecological outcomes while overlooking cost inputs. This gap can lead to increased uncertainties in restoration planning. Here we investigated forest dynamics in China’s Upper Yangtze River Basin (UYRB) using kernel Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (kNDVI), Leaf Area Index (LAI), Gross Primary Productivity (GPP), Ku-band Vegetation Optical Depth (Ku-VOD) time series and climate data from 1982 to 2020. Subsequently, we employed a residual trend analysis integrating temporal effects to determine the relative contributions of climate change and human activities to forest dynamics before and after the implementation of forest restoration engineering in 1998. Additionally, we developed an Afforestation Efficiency Index (AEI) to quantitatively assess the cost efficiency of afforestation projects. Results indicated that forest in the UYRB showed sustained increases during 1982–2020, with most areas experiencing greater growth after 1998 than before. Temporal effects of climatic factors influenced over 42.7% of the forest, and incorporating time-lag and cumulative effects enhanced climate-based explanations of forest variations by 1.61–24.73%. Human activities emerged as the dominant driver of forest dynamics post 1998, whereas climate variables predominated before this period. The cost-effectiveness of forest restoration projects in the UYRB typically ranges from moderate to high, with higher success predominantly observed in the northeastern and eastern counties, while the central, western, and northwestern counties mainly showed relatively low efficiency. These findings stress the need for assessing forest restoration outcomes from both ecological and cost perspectives, and can offer valuable insights for optimizing the layout of forest restoration initiatives in the UYRB.

The online version is available at https://link.springer.com/.

Corresponding editor: Lei Yu.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Keywords

Forest restoration / Driving force analysis / Temporal effects / Afforestation efficiency

References

[1] AbatzoglouJT, DobrowskiSZ, ParksSA, HegewischKC. Terraclimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci Data, 2018, 5. 170191

[2] AndereggWRL, SchwalmC, BiondiF, CamareroJJ, KochG, LitvakM, OgleK, ShawJD, ShevliakovaE, WilliamsAP, WolfA, ZiacoE, PacalaS. Pervasive drought legacies in forest ecosystems and their implications for carbon cycle models. Science, 2015, 349(6247): 528-532.

[3] BakerS, EckerbergK. Ecological restoration success: a policy analysis understanding. Restor Ecol, 2016, 24(3): 284-290.

[4] BuschJ, BukoskiJJ, Cook-PattonSC, GriscomB, KaczanD, PottsMD, YiYY, VincentJR. Cost-effectiveness of natural forest regeneration and plantations for climate mitigation. Nat Clim Change, 2024, 14(9): 996-1002.

[5] BusettoL, ColomboR, MigliavaccaM, CremoneseE, MeroniM, GalvagnoM, RossiniM, SiniscalcoC, Morra Di CellaU, PariE. Remote sensing of larch phenological cycle and analysis of relationships with climate in the Alpine region. Glob Change Biol, 2010, 16(9): 2504-2517.

[6] CampbellJE, BerryJA, SeibtU, SmithSJ, MontzkaSA, LaunoisT, BelvisoS, BoppL, LaineM. Large historical growth in global terrestrial gross primary production. Nature, 2017, 544(7648): 84-87.

[7] Camps-VallsG, Campos-TabernerM, Moreno-MartínezÁ, WaltherS, DuveillerG, CescattiA, MahechaMD, Muñoz-MaríJ, García-HaroFJ, GuanterL, JungM, GamonJA, ReichsteinM, RunningSW. A unified vegetation index for quantifying the terrestrial biosphere. Sci Adv, 2021, 79. eabc7447

[8] CaoFF, LiWB, JiangY, GanXL, ZhaoCY, MaJC. Effects of grazing on grassland biomass and biodiversity: a global synthesis. Field Crops Res, 2024, 306. 109204

[9] ChenSS, WenZF, ZhangSL, HuangP, MaMH, ZhouX, LiaoT, WuSJ. Effects of long-term and large-scale ecology projects on forest dynamics in Yangtze River Basin. China for Ecol Manag, 2021, 496. 119463

[10] ChengYM, LiuL, ChengL, FaKY, LiuXC, HuoZL, HuangGH. A shift in the dominant role of atmospheric vapor pressure deficit and soil moisture on vegetation greening in China. J Hydrol, 2022, 615. 128680

[11] ChengMM, WangZH, WangSD, LiuXJ, JiaoWZ, ZhangY. Determining the impacts of climate change and human activities on vegetation change on the Chinese Loess Plateau considering human-induced vegetation type change and time-lag effects of climate on vegetation growth. Int J Digit Earth, 2024, 1712336075.

[12] ChengK, ZhangYX, YangHT, RenY, XiangTY, ChenYL, YangZK, ChenMX, XuJC, HuangGR, XuGC, TaoSL, YuZ, GuoQH. China’s naturally regenerated forests currently have greater aboveground carbon accumulation rates than newly planted forests. Commun Earth Environ, 2025, 6345.

[13] CrouzeillesR, CurranM, FerreiraMS, LindenmayerDB, GrelleCEV, Rey BenayasJM. A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success. Nat Commun, 2016, 711666.

[14] DengYJ, CaiWC, HouMY, ZhangXL, XuSY, YaoN, GuoYJ, LiH, YaoSB. How eco-efficiency is the forestry ecological restoration program? the case of the sloping land conversion program in the Loess Plateau, China. Land, 2022, 115712.

[15] DingYX, LiZ, PengSZ. Global analysis of time-lag and-accumulation effects of climate on vegetation growth. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 2020, 92. 102179

[16] DingZH, PengJ, QiuSJ, ZhaoY. Nearly half of global vegetated area experienced inconsistent vegetation growth in terms of greenness, cover, and productivity. Earths Future, 2020, 810. e2020EF001618

[17] DingZW, ZhengH, WangJ, O’ConnorP, LiC, ChenXD, LiRN, OuyangZY. Integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches improves practicality and efficiency of large-scale ecological restoration planning: insights from a social–ecological system. Engineering, 2023, 31: 50-58.

[18] EgerAM, MarzinelliEM, ChristieH, FagerliCW, FujitaD, GonzalezAP, HongSW, KimJH, LeeLC, McHughTA, NishiharaGN, TatsumiM, SteinbergPD, VergésA. Global kelp forest restoration: past lessons, present status, and future directions. Biol Rev, 2022, 97(4): 1449-1475.

[19] FanXL, QuY, ZhangJ, BaiE. China’s vegetation restoration programs accelerated vegetation greening on the Loess Plateau. Agric for Meteor, 2024, 350. 109994

[20] FrappartF, WigneronJP, LiXJ, LiuXZ, Al-YaariA, FanL, WangMJ, MoisyC, Le MassonE, Aoulad LafkihZ, ValléC, YgorraB, BaghdadiN. Global monitoring of the vegetation dynamics from the vegetation optical depth (VOD): a review. Remote Sens, 2020, 12182915.

[21] Fu BJ, Liu YX, Meadows ME (2023) Ecological restoration for sustainable development in China. Natl Sci Rev 10: nwad033. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad033

[22] GaoFF, ZhouJS, JiangHD, YangW, WangGY. Assessing the true value of ecological restoration in mining areas: an input-output approach based on ecosystem service valuation. Ecol Indic, 2024, 166. 112591

[23] HeW, DiBF, ZengYJ, DuanYN, LiJH, QiuLK, BalikuddembeJK, PengQQ, ZengW, StamatopoulosCA, LuoB, PanJ. Reconsidering the eco-economic benefits of grain for green program in Sichuan Province, China. Ecol Indic, 2023, 157. 111225

[24] HollKD, BrancalionPHS. Tree planting is not a simple solution. Science, 2020, 368(6491): 580-581.

[25] KimballS, LulowM, SorensonQ, BalazsK, FangYC, DavisSJ, O’ConnellM, HuxmanTE. Cost-effective ecological restoration. Restor Ecol, 2015, 23(6): 800-810.

[26] LiXY, WangK, HuntingfordC, ZhuZC, PeñuelasJ, MyneniRB, PiaoSL. Vegetation greenness in 2023. Nat Rev Earth Environ, 2024, 5(4): 241-243.

[27] LiH, YanXB, SuPY, SuYM, LiJF, XuZX, GaoCR, ZhaoY, FengMC, ShafiqF, XiaoLJ, YangWD, QiaoXX, WangC. Estimation of winter wheat LAI based on color indices and texture features of RGB images taken by UAV. J Sci Food Agric, 2025, 105(1): 189-200.

[28] LiangHX, ZhangD, WangWS, YuSY, NimaiS. Evaluating future water security in the Upper Yangtze River Basin under a changing environment. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 889. 164101

[29] LiuSR, ShiZM, MaJM, ZhaoCM, ZhangYD, LiuXL. Ecological strategies for restoration and reconstruction of degraded natural forests on the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Sci Silvae Sin, 2009, 45(2): 120-124(in Chinese)

[30] LiuR, LiuY, ChenJGlobmap global leaf area index since 1981 dataset2021Zenodo

[31] LiuY, LiuHH, ChenY, GangCC, ShenYF. Quantifying the contributions of climate change and human activities to vegetation dynamic in China based on multiple indices. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 838. 156553

[32] LiuCX, ShiS, WangT, GongW, XuL, ShiZX, DuJ, QuFF. Analysis of net primary productivity variation and quantitative assessment of driving forces—a case study of the Yangtze River Basin. Plants, 2023, 12193412.

[33] LiuHK, ShiH, ZhouQ, HuM, ShuX, ZhangKR, ZhangQF, DangHS. Habitat heterogeneity and biotic interactions mediate climate influences on seedling survival in a temperate forest. For Ecosyst, 2023, 10. 100138

[34] LiuYH, ZhongYF, MaAL, ZhaoJ, ZhangLP. Cross-resolution national-scale land-cover mapping based on noisy label learning: a case study of China. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 2023, 118. 103265

[35] MaZH, GuoJH, LiWM, CaiZY, CaoSX. Regional differences in the factors that affect vegetation cover in China. Land Degrad Dev, 2021, 32(5): 1961-1969.

[36] MaBX, HeCX, JingJL, WangYF, LiuB, HeHC. Attribution of vegetation dynamics in southwest China from 1982 to 2019. Acta Geogr Sin, 2023.

[37] MaMY, WangQM, LiuR, ZhaoY, ZhangDQ. Effects of climate change and human activities on vegetation coverage change in northern China considering extreme climate and time-lag and-accumulation effects. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 860. 160527

[38] MaQ, SuYJ, NiuCY, MaQ, HuTY, LuoXZ, TaiXN, QiuT, ZhangY, BalesRC, LiuLL, KellyM, GuoQH. Tree mortality during long-term droughts is lower in structurally complex forest stands. Nat Commun, 2023, 147467.

[39] MaY, HeQ, ZhangY, ShiY, LiJ, YuanF. Influences of climate factors and human acintes on vegeaton leaf area index dynamics m the Songliao River Basin considering time-lag and cumulative effects. Acta Ecol Sin, 2024.

[40] MeestersAGCA, De JeuRAM, OweM. Analytical derivation of the vegetation optical depth from the microwave polarization difference index. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 2005, 2(2): 121-123

[41] MirónIJ, LinaresC, DíazJ. The influence of climate change on food production and food safety. Environ Res, 2023, 216. 114674

[42] MoesingerL, DorigoW, de JeuR, van der SchalieR, ScanlonT, TeubnerI, ForkelM. The global long-term microwave vegetation optical depth climate archive (VODCA). Earth Syst Sci Data, 2020, 12(1): 177-196.

[43] NewtonAC, HodderK, CantarelloE, PerrellaL, BirchJC, RobinsJ, DouglasS, MoodyC, CordingleyJ. Cost–benefit analysis of ecological networks assessed through spatial analysis of ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol, 2012, 49(3): 571-580.

[44] NovickKA, FicklinDL, GrossiordC, KoningsAG, Martínez-VilaltaJ, SadokW, TrugmanAT, WilliamsAP, WrightAJ, AbatzoglouJT, DannenbergMP, GentineP, GuanKY, JohnstonMR, LowmanLEL, MooreDJP, McDowellNG. The impacts of rising vapour pressure deficit in natural and managed ecosystems. Plant Cell Environ, 2024, 47(9): 3561-3589.

[45] ParrCL, te BeestM, StevensN. Conflation of reforestation with restoration is widespread. Science, 2024, 383(6684): 698-701.

[46] PengSZ, DingYX, LiuWZ, LiZ. 1 km monthly temperature and precipitation dataset for China from 1901 to 2017. Earth Syst Sci Data, 2019, 11(4): 1931-1946.

[47] PettittAN. A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat, 1979, 28(2): 126-135.

[48] Pinzon JE, Pak EW, Tucker CJ, Bhatt US, Frost GV, Macander MJ (2023) Global Vegetation Greenness (NDVI) from AVHRR GIMMS-3G+, 1981–2022, ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/2187

[49] PrachK, DuriganG, FennessyS, OverbeckGE, TorezanJM, MurphySD. A primer on choosing goals and indicators to evaluate ecological restoration success. Restor Ecol, 2019, 27(5): 917-923.

[50] QuS, WangLC, LinAW, ZhuHJ, YuanMX. What drives the vegetation restoration in Yangtze River basin, China: climate change or anthropogenic factors?. Ecol Indic, 2018, 90: 438-450.

[51] QuS, WangLC, LinAW, YuDQ, YuanMX, LiCA. Distinguishing the impacts of climate change and anthropogenic factors on vegetation dynamics in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Ecol Indic, 2020, 108. 105724

[52] SarmahS, SinghaM, WangJS, DongJW, Deb BurmanPK, GoswamiS, GeY, IlyasS, NiuSL. Mismatches between vegetation greening and primary productivity trends in South Asia–a satellite evidence. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 2021, 104. 102561

[53] SongWQ, FengYH, WangZH. Ecological restoration programs dominate vegetation greening in China. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 848. 157729

[54] SongXY, XiePJ, SunWY, MuXM, GaoP. The greening of vegetation on the Loess Plateau has resulted in a northward shift of the vegetation greenness line. Glob Planet Change, 2024, 237. 104440

[55] StaviI, IslamKR, RahmanMA, GusarovY, LahamJ, ComayO, BassonU, XuC, XuZW, ArgamanE. Unexpected consequences of afforestation in degraded drylands: divergent impacts on soil and vegetation. J Environ Manage, 2023, 345. 118703

[56] StubleKL, BennionLD, KuebbingSE. Plant phenological responses to experimental warming—a synthesis. Glob Change Biol, 2021, 27(17): 4110-4124.

[57] ThomasCC, HuberC, SkrabisKE, HoelzleTB. A framework for estimating economic impacts of ecological restoration. Environ Manage, 2024, 74(6): 1239-1259.

[58] van LeeuwenWJD, HueteAR, LaingTW. MODIS vegetation index compositing approach a prototype with AVHRR data. Remote Sens Environ, 1999, 69(3): 264-280.

[59] WainainaP, MinangPA, GitukuE, DugumaL. Cost-benefit analysis of landscape restoration: a stocktake. Land, 2020, 911465.

[60] WaltherS, GuanterL, HeimB, JungM, DuveillerG, WolaninA, SachsT. Assessing the dynamics of vegetation productivity in circumpolar regions with different satellite indicators of greenness and photosynthesis. Biogeosciences, 2018, 15(20): 6221-6256.

[61] WangSH, ZhangYG, JuWM, QiuB, ZhangZY. Tracking the seasonal and inter-annual variations of global gross primary production during last four decades using satellite near-infrared reflectance data. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 755. 142569

[62] WangTH, ShiRJ, YangDW, YangSY, FangBJ. Future changes in annual runoff and hydroclimatic extremes in the Upper Yangtze River Basin. J Hydrol, 2022, 615. 128738

[63] WangYM, ZhangZX, ChenX. The dominant driving force of forest change in the Yangtze River Basin, China: climate variation or anthropogenic activities?. Forests, 2022, 13182.

[64] WangL, CaoW, HuangL. Integrated analysis of ecological effectiveness of major ecological projects in China over the past 40 years. Shengtai Xuebao, 2024.

[65] WangXP, WuBQ, ZhouGL, WangT, MengFW, ZhouL, CaoH, TangZY. How a vast digital twin of the Yangtze River could prevent flooding in China. Nature, 2025, 639(8054): 303-305.

[66] WeiW, WangN, YinL, GuoSY, BoLM. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and driving mechanisms of Urban–Agricultural–Ecological space in ecologically fragile areas: a case study of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Land Use Policy, 2024, 145. 107282

[67] WeiXX, LiuRG, LiuY, HeJY, ChenJL, QiL, ZhouYL, QinYW, WuCY, DongJW, XiaoXM, ChenJM, GeQS. Forest areas in China are recovering since the 21st century. Geophys Res Lett, 2024, 5122. e2024GL110312

[68] WenYY, LiuXP, XinQC, WuJ, XuXC, PeiFS, LiX, DuGM, CaiYL, LinK, YangJ, WangYP. Cumulative effects of climatic factors on terrestrial vegetation growth. J Geophys Res Biogeosci, 2019, 124(4): 789-806.

[69] WuDH, ZhaoX, LiangSL, ZhouT, HuangKC, TangBJ, ZhaoWQ. Time-lag effects of global vegetation responses to climate change. Glob Change Biol, 2015, 21(9): 3520-3531.

[70] WuXT, WangS, FuBJ, LiuJG. Spatial variation and influencing factors of the effectiveness of afforestation in China’s Loess Plateau. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 771. 144904

[71] WuK, HuZM, WangXH, ChenJH, YangH, YuanWP. Widespread increase in sensitivity of vegetation growth to climate variability on the Tibetan Plateau. Agric for Meteorol, 2024, 358. 110260

[72] WuTT, XuL, LvY, CaiRN, PanZW, ZhangXH, ZhangX, ChenNC. Integrating causal inference with ConvLSTM networks for spatiotemporal forecasting of root zone soil moisture. J Hydrol, 2025, 659. 133246

[73] XiaoX, GuanQY, ZhangZP, LiuHQ, DuQQ, YuanTW. Investigating the underlying drivers of vegetation dynamics in cold-arid mountainous. CATENA, 2024, 237. 107831

[74] XuH, YueC, ZhangY, LiuD, PiaoS. Forestation at the right time with the right species can generate persistent carbon benefits in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2023, 120. e2304988120

[75] YanW, WangHS, JiangC, SunOJ, ChuJM, ZhangAZ. Afforestation boosted gross primary productivity of China: evidence from remote sensing. J for Res, 2025, 36140.

[76] YeganehKH. A typology of sources, manifestations, and implications of environmental degradation. Manag Environ Qual, 2020, 31(3): 765-783.

[77] YuanM, OuyangJY, ZhengSN, TianY, SunR, BaoR, LiT, YuTS, LiS, WuD, LiuYJ, XuCY, ZhuY. Research on ecological effect assessment method of ecological restoration of open-pit coal mines in alpine regions. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19137682.

[78] ZhanC, LiangC, ZhaoL, JiangSZ, NiuKJ, ZhangYL, ChengL. Detection and attribution of vegetation dynamics in the National Barrier Zone of China by considering climate temporal effects. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 2023, 116. 103140

[79] ZhangMY, LiuHY, WangKL, ChenY, RenYJ, YueYM, DengZH, ZhangCH. Nonlinear trends of vegetation changes in different geomorphologic zones and land use types of the Yangtze River basin, China. Land Degrad Dev, 2023, 34(9): 2548-2559.

[80] ZhangJ, GuanQY, ZhangZP, ShaoWY, ZhangEY, KangTT, XiaoX, LiuHQ, LuoHP. Characteristics of spatial and temporal dynamics of vegetation and its response to climate extremes in ecologically fragile and climate change sensitive areas–a case study of Hexi region. CATENA, 2024, 239. 107910

[81] ZhaoQY, XuCX, AnWL, LiuYC, XiaoGQ, HuangCJ. Increasing tree growth in subalpine forests of Central China due to earlier onset of the thermal growing season. Agric for Meteorol, 2023, 333. 109391

[82] ZhouX, YamaguchiY, ArjasakusumaS. Distinguishing the vegetation dynamics induced by anthropogenic factors using vegetation optical depth and AVHRR NDVI: a cross-border study on the Mongolian Plateau. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 616–617: 730-743.

[83] ZhouDC, ZhangLX, HaoL, SunG, XiaoJF, LiX. Large discrepancies among remote sensing indices for characterizing vegetation growth dynamics in Nepal. Agric for Meteorol, 2023, 339. 109546

[84] ZongXZ, LiuY, YinYH. Identifying the dominant compound events and their impacts on vegetation growth in China. Weather Clim Extrem, 2024, 45. 100715

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Northeast Forestry University