How different thinning can improve carbon sequestration, carbon stock and mechanical stability in peri-urban mixed forest stands: a study case in Mediterranean environment

Abstract

Peri-urban plantations in the Mediterranean are often degraded due to human inactivity and climate change, leading to a loss of ecosystem services and biodiversity. This study investigates the impact of different thinning practices on carbon sequestration and tree stability in a degraded peri-urban plantation in the Italian Apennines, six years after thinning. Three treatments were compared: (a) moderate thinning from below (− 25% biomass), representing the typical practice; (b) intense selective thinning (-35% biomass), representing an innovative approach; and (c) no management as the control. Growth projections were used to estimate carbon recovery for these treatments, based on site-specific models calibrated with real data. The results show that both thinning approaches increased carbon sequestration over time, with the innovative thinning achieving a 7% higher annual carbon sequestration rate than traditional thinning and 8% more than the control. Estimated payback times were 9 years for recovering the harvested volume in both thinning approaches, 10 years for innovative thinning to surpass traditional thinning, 17 years for innovative thinning to surpass the control, and 24 years for traditional thinning to surpass the control. Additionally, tree mechanical stability improved significantly in both thinning treatments after two years, with further increases observed in the innovative thinning group after six years. These results suggest that selective thinning can accelerate forest recovery and carbon sequestration, especially in areas with high stem density, where it can reduce the negative impacts of tree mortality and deadwood accumulation. However, careful planning is required to mitigate potential short-term stability issues, particularly in challenging environments (e.g., windy conditions, steep slopes). Forest management strategies should therefore aim to balance growth, carbon storage, and tree stability, considering both long-term sustainability and local environmental conditions. The findings are particularly relevant for current climate change mitigation strategies, emphasizing that thinning should be carefully tailored to forest type and conditions to maximize benefits in carbon credit generation and sustainable forest management practices.

The online version is available at https://link.springer.com.

Corresponding editor: Lei Yu.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Keywords

Peri-urban plantations / Carbon sequestration / Thinning / Payback time / Tree mechanical stability

References

[1] AllaireJ. RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA, 2012, 770: 165-171

[2] AndereggWRL, KaneJM, AndereggLDL. Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress. Nat Clim Chang, 2013, 3: 30-36.

[3] AndersonKPBDRModel selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach Springer-Verlag, 2002, New York. NY, USA.

[4] AssmannEThe principles of forest yield study, 1970, Oxford. Pergamon Press. 506

[5] BellassenV, LuyssaertS. Carbon sequestration: managing forests in uncertain times. Nature, 2014, 506: 153-155.

[6] CalamaR, MonteroG. Multilevel linear mixed model for tree diameter increment in stone pine (Pinus pinea): a calibrating approach. Silva Fenn, 2005, 39: 37-54.

[7] CantianiP, PlutinoM, AmoriniE. Effects of silvicultural treatment on the stability of black pine plantations. Ann Silvicult Res, 2010, 36: 49-58.

[8] CenniE, BussottiF, GaleottiL. The decline of a Pinus nigra Arn. reforestation stand on a limestone substrate: the role of nutritional factors examined by means of foliar diagnosis. Ann Sci for, 1998, 55: 567-576.

[9] De MeoI, AgnelliAE, GrazianiA, et al.. Deadwood volume assessment in Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) peri-urban forests: comparison between two sampling methods. J Sustain for, 2017, 36: 666-686.

[10] Del RíoM, Bravo-OviedoA, PretzschH, et al.. A review of thinning effects on Scots pine stands: from growth and yield to new challenges under global change. For Syst, 2017, 26. eR03S

[11] DíazS, HectorA, WardleDA. Biodiversity in forest carbon sequestration initiatives: not just a side benefit. Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 2009, 1: 55-60.

[12] ErkanN, GünerŞT, AydınAC. Thinning effects on stand growth, carbon stocks, and soil properties in Brutia pine plantations. Carbon Balance Manag, 2023, 186.

[13] ForresterDI, MedhurstJL, WoodM, et al.. Growth and physiological responses to silviculture for producing solid-wood products from Eucalyptus plantations: an Australian perspective. For Ecol Manage, 2010, 259: 1819-1835.

[14] GauthierS, BernierP, KuuluvainenT, et al.. Boreal forest health and global change. Science, 2015, 349(1979): 819-822.

[15] GiuntiniF, De MeoI, GrazianiA, et al.. Stima del volume di legno morto in rimboschimenti di pino nero (Pinus nigra JF Arnold) in Toscana: confronto tra casi studio. Dendronatura, 2017, 1: 19-28

[16] GraceJB, AndersonTM, OlffH, ScheinerSM. On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems. Ecol Monogr, 2010, 80: 67-87.

[17] HaleSE, GardinerBA, WellpottA, et al.. Wind loading of trees: influence of tree size and competition. Eur J for Res, 2012, 131: 203-217.

[18] HilmersT, FriessN, BässlerC, et al.. Biodiversity along temperate forest succession. J Appl Ecol, 2018, 55: 2756-2766.

[19] KnokeT, AmmerC, StimmB, MosandlR. Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics. Eur J for Res, 2008, 127: 89-101.

[20] LuyssaertS, SchulzeE-D, BörnerA, et al.. Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature, 2008, 455: 213-215.

[21] MarchiM, ChiavettaU, CantianiP. Assessing the mechanical stability of trees in artificial plantations of Pinus nigra J. F. Arnold using the LWN tool under different site indexes. Ann Silvicult Res, 2017, 41: 48-53.

[22] MasseyFJ. The Kolmogorov-smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc, 1951, 46: 68-78.

[23] MazzaG, AgnelliAE, CantianiP, et al.. Short-term effects of thinning on soil CO₂, N₂O and CH₄ fluxes in Mediterranean forest ecosystems. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 651: 713-724.

[24] McKinleyDC, RyanMG, BirdseyRA, et al.. A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States. Ecol Appl, 2011, 21: 1902-1924.

[25] MichettiM, ZampieriM. Climate–human–land interactions: a review of major modelling approaches. Land (Basel), 2014, 3: 793-833.

[26] Moreau G, Chagnon C, Achim A et al (2022) Opportunities and limitations of thinning to increase resistance and resilience of trees and forests to global change. For Int J For Res 95:595–615. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpac010

[27] Navarro-CerrilloRM, Ruiz-GómezFJ, CamareroJJ, et al.. Long-term carbon sequestration in pine forests under different silvicultural and climatic regimes in Spain. Forests, 2022, 13450.

[28] NocentiniS. The renaturalization of forest plantations. An experimental trial with Pinus nigra and P. nigra var. laricio on Monte Morello near Florence. Ital for Mont, 1995, 50: 425-435

[29] NowakDJ, CraneDE, StevensJC. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban for Urban Green, 2006, 4: 115-123.

[30] PalettoA, GuerriniS, De MeoI. Exploring visitors’ perceptions of silvicultural treatments to increase the destination attractiveness of peri-urban forests: a case study in Tuscany Region (Italy). Urban for Urban Green, 2017, 27: 314-323.

[31] Pretzsch H (2009) Forest dynamics, growth, and yield. In: Forest dynamics, growth and yield: from measurement to model. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1–3

[32] PretzschH. Density and growth of forest stands revisited. Effect of the temporal scale of observation, site quality, and thinning. For Ecol Manage, 2020, 460. 117879

[33] PretzschH, BiberP, SchützeG, et al.. Forest stand growth dynamics in Central Europe have accelerated since 1870. Nat Commun, 2014, 54967.

[34] Pretzsch H, Forrester DI, Bauhus J (2017) Mixed-species forests. Ecology and management. Springer, Berlin, 653

[35] PretzschH, ForresterDI, RötzerT. Representation of species mixing in forest growth models. A review and perspective. Ecol Modell, 2015, 313: 276-292.

[36] PughTAM, LindeskogM, SmithB, et al.. Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2019, 116: 4382-4387

[37] Puletti N, Mura M, Castaldi C et al (2023) Package ‘ForIT.’ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5790157

[38] Quine C, Coutts M, Gardiner B, Pyatt G (1995) Forests and wind: management to minimize damage

[39] R Core Team (2020) R. A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical. Computing

[40] Ruiz-PeinadoR, Del RioM, MonteroG. New models for estimating the carbon sink capacity of Spanish softwood species. For Syst, 2011, 20: 176-188.

[41] SchützJ-P, GötzM, SchmidW, MandallazD. Vulnerability of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest stands to storms and consequences for silviculture. Eur J for Res, 2006, 125: 291-302.

[42] ShapiroSS, WilkMB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 1965, 52: 591-611.

[43] SlodicakM, NovakJ. Silvicultural measures to increase the mechanical stability of pure secondary Norway spruce stands before conversion. For Ecol Manage, 2006, 224: 252-257

[44] SmirnovN. Table for estimating the goodness of fit of empirical distributions. Ann Math Stat, 1948, 19: 279-281.

[45] TabacchiG, Di CosmoL, GaspariniP. Aboveground tree volume and phytomass prediction equations for forest species in Italy. Eur J for Res, 2011, 130: 911-934.

[46] Tabacchi G, Di Cosmo L, Gasparini P, Morelli S (2011b) Stima del volume e della fitomassa delle principali specie forestali italiane. Equazioni di previsione, tavole del volume e tavole della fitomassa arborea epigea. Trento

[47] TukeyJW. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 1949, 599.

[48] Valladares F, Benavides R, Rabasa SG, et al (2014) Global change and Mediterranean forests: current impacts and potential responses. In: Coomes DA, Burslem DFRP, Simonson WD (eds) Forests and global change. Ecological reviews. Cambridge University Press, pp 47−76. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323506.005

[49] VayredaJ, Martinez-VilaltaJ, GraciaM, RetanaJ. Recent climate changes interact with stand structure and management to determine changes in tree carbon stocks in Spanish forests. Glob Chang Biol, 2012, 18: 1028-1041.

[50] Vilà M, Inchausti P, Vayreda J et al (2005) Confounding factors in the observational productivity-diversity relationship in forests. In: Forest diversity and function: temperate and boreal systems. Springer, pp 65–86

[51] Vilà-CabreraA, CollL, Martínez-VilaltaJ, RetanaJ. Forest management for adaptation to climate change in the Mediterranean basin: a synthesis of evidence. For Ecol Manage, 2018, 407: 16-22.

[52] WilsonJS, BakerPJ. Flexibility in forest management: managing uncertainty in Douglas-fir forests of the Pacific Northwest. For Ecol Manage, 2001, 145: 219-227

[53] YücesanZ, ÖzçelikS, OktanE. Effects of thinning on stand structure and tree stability in an afforested oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stand in northeast Turkey. J for Res (Harbin), 2015, 26: 123-129.

[54] ZeileisA, HothornT. Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News, 2002, 2(3): 7-10

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Northeast Forestry University