Optimal management for promoting growth of poplar plantations: insights from canopy structure and light environment

Abstract

Tree plantations are globally significant, and therefore, growth-related challenges cannot be ignored. Canopy structure and light environment influence the growth of plantations, but the precise relationship remains unclear. We selected seven-year-old poplar plantations of varying cultivars planted various densities and measured their growth, canopy structure, and light environment. The findings indicate that poplar plantations of different cultivars and at different planting densities showed variations in leaf area index (LAI), average leaf angle (ALA), crown length (CL), length ratio (CLR), roundness (CR) and surface area (CSA), which directly or indirectly affect growth, resulting in disparities in their growing conditions. Crown roundness directly impacted growth, while LAI, CLR and ALA influenced growth indirectly by affecting intercellular carbon dioxide concentration. LAI and CLR had a positive effect; ALA had a negative one. Crown length and surface area directly and indirectly influenced growth by affecting photosynthetically active radiation and net photosynthetic rate, with direct impacts being more pronounced. This research has clarified the regulatory role of canopy structure in plantations growth, providing valuable insights for developing more effective management strategies.

The online version is available at http://link.springer.com.

Corresponding editor: Shuxuan Li.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Keywords

Poplar growth / Photosynthesis / Hybrid clones / Structural equation modelling / Crown surface area

References

[1] AliA, DaiD, AkhtarK, TengMJ, YanZG, Urbina-CardonaN, MullerovaJ, ZhouZX. Response of understory vegetation, tree regeneration, and soil quality to manipulated stand density in a Pinus massoniana plantation. Glob Ecol Conserv, 2019, 20. e00775

[2] AllenST, KeimRF, DeanTJ. Contrasting effects of flooding on tree growth and stand density determine aboveground production, in baldcypress forests. For Ecol Manage, 2019, 432: 345-355.

[3] AnnighöferP. Stress relief through gap creation? Growth response of a shade tolerant species (Fagus sylvatica L.) to a changed light environment. For Ecol Manag, 2018, 415: 139-147.

[4] AnthonyBM, MinasIS. Optimizing peach tree canopy architecture for efficient light use, increased productivity and improved fruit quality. Agronomy, 2021, 11101961.

[5] AtkinsJW, WalterJA, StovallAEL, FaheyRT, GoughCM. Power law scaling relationships link canopy structural complexity and height across forest types. Funct Ecol, 2022, 36(3): 713-726.

[6] BaoY, LiuX, FengCH, NiuMX, LiuC, WangHL, YinWL, XiaXL. Light and light signals regulate growth and development in woody plants. Forests, 2024, 153523.

[7] BelloJ, ValletP, PerotT, BalandierP, SeignerV, PerretS, CouteauC, KorboulewskyN. How do mixing tree species and stand density affect seasonal radial growth during drought events?. For Ecol Manage, 2019, 432: 436-445.

[8] BendokasV, GelvonauskieneD, SiksnianasT, StanieneG, SiksnianieneJB, GelvonauskisB, StanysV. Morphological traits of phytomers and shoots in the first year of growth as markers for predicting apple tree canopy architecture. Plant Breed, 2012, 131(1): 180-185.

[9] BinkleyD, LaclauJP, SterbaH. Why one tree grows faster than another: patterns of light use and light use efficiency at the scale of individual trees and stands. For Ecol Manage, 2013, 288: 1-4.

[10] BorzSA, ToazaJMM, ProtoAR. Accuracy of two LiDAR-based augmented reality apps in breast height diameter measurement. Ecol Inform, 2024, 81. 102550

[11] BudeanuM, ApostolEN, PopescuF, PostolacheD, IoniţăL. Testing of the narrow crowned Norway spruce ideotype (Picea abies f. pendula) and the hybrids with normal crown form (pyramidalis) in multisite comparative trials. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 689: 980-990.

[12] CaoB, QiJB, ChenEX, XiaoQ, LiuQH, LiZY. Fine scale optical remote sensing experiment of mixed stand over complex terrain (FOREST) in the Genhe Reserve Area: objective observation and a case study. Int J Digit Earth, 2021, 14(10): 1411-1432.

[13] CaoJ, LiuHY, ZhaoB, LiZS, LiangBY, ShiL, WuL, CresseyEL, QuineTA. High forest stand density exacerbates growth decline of conifers driven by warming but not broad-leaved trees in temperate mixed forest in northeast Asia. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 795. 148875

[14] CapriottiL, RicciA, MolesiniB, MezzettiB, PandolfiniT, PiuntiI, SabbadiniS. Efficient protocol of de novo shoot organogenesis from somatic embryos for grapevine genetic transformation. Front Plant Sci, 2023, 141172758.

[15] ChenZS. The establishment of binomial stock volume tables of poplar. For Res, 1989, 2(1): 78-83(in Chinese)

[16] ChenFG, ShenJ, MinD, KeLX, TianX, KorpelainenH, LiCY. Male Populus cathayana than female shows higher photosynthesis and less cellular injury through ABA-induced manganese transporting inhibition under high manganese condition. Trees, 2018, 32(1): 255-263.

[17] ChenMH, FengS, GaoMY, LiuM, WangKB, WangJ, ShangguanZP, ZhangYW. The difference in the photosynthetic characteristics and soil moisture of different varieties of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L). Agric Water Manag, 2024, 302109002.

[18] CortiniF, ComeauPG. Effects of red alder and paper birch competition on juvenile growth of three conifer species in southwestern British Columbia. For Ecol Manage, 2008, 256(10): 1795-1803.

[19] CôtéJF, FournierRA, FrazerGW, Olaf NiemannK. A fine-scale architectural model of trees to enhance LiDAR-derived measurements of forest canopy structure. Agric for Meteor, 2012, 166: 72-85.

[20] DănilăIC, MititeluC, PalaghianuC. Productivity of short-rotation poplar crops: a case study in the NE of Romania. Forests, 2022, 1371089.

[21] DaviesAB, AncrenazM, OramF, AsnerGP. Canopy structure drives orangutan habitat selection in disturbed Bornean forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017, 114(31): 8307-8312.

[22] De FrenneP, LenoirJ, LuotoM, ScheffersBR, ZellwegerF, AaltoJ, AshcroftMB, ChristiansenDM, DecocqG, De PauwK, GovaertS, GreiserC, GrilE, HampeA, JuckerT, KlingesDH, KoelemeijerIA, LembrechtsJJ, MarrecR, MeeussenC, OgéeJ, TyystjärviV, VangansbekeP, HylanderK. Forest microclimates and climate change: importance, drivers and future research agenda. Glob Chang Biol, 2021, 27(11): 2279-2297.

[23] de MattosEM, BinkleyD, CampoeOC, AlvaresCA, StapeJL. Variation in canopy structure, leaf area, light interception and light use efficiency among Eucalyptus clones. For Ecol Manag, 2020, 463. 118038

[24] Dickmann D (Ed) 2001 Poplar culture in north America. NRC Research Press.

[25] DingCJ, ZhangWX, WangYB, DingM, WangXJ, LiAP, LiangDJ, SuXH. Study on the differences of phyllosphere microorganisms between poplar hybrid offspring and their parents. PeerJ, 2022, 10. e12915

[26] DouYX, LiaoJJ, AnSS. Importance of soil labile organic carbon fractions in shaping microbial community after vegetation restoration. CATENA, 2023, 220. 106707

[27] DuursmaRA, KolariP, PerämäkiM, PulkkinenM, MäkeläA, NikinmaaE, HariP, AurelaM, BerbigierP, BernhoferCH, GrünwaldT, LoustauD, MölderM, VerbeeckH, VesalaT. Contributions of climate, leaf area index and leaf physiology to variation in gross primary production of six coniferous forests across Europe: a model-based analysis. Tree Physiol, 2009, 29(5): 621-639.

[28] EldegardK, ScholtenJ, StoklandJN, GranhusA, LieM. The influence of stand density on bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) cover depends on stand age, solar irradiation, and tree species composition. For Ecol Manag, 2019, 432: 582-590.

[29] FangSZ, LiuY, YueJ, TianY, XuXZ. Assessments of growth performance, crown structure, stem form and wood property of introduced poplar clones: results from a long-term field experiment at a lowland site. For Ecol Manage, 2021, 479. 118586

[30] FengLY, RazaMA, LiZC, ChenYK, KhalidMHB, DuJB, LiuWG, WuXL, SongC, YuL, ZhangZW, YuanS, YangWY, YangF. The influence of light intensity and leaf movement on photosynthesis characteristics and carbon balance of soybean. Front Plant Sci, 2019, 91952.

[31] ForresterDI. Linking forest growth with stand structure: Tree size inequality, tree growth or resource partitioning and the asymmetry of competition. For Ecol Manag, 2019, 447: 139-157.

[32] FotisAT, MorinTH, FaheyRT, HardimanBS, BohrerG, CurtisPS. Forest structure in space and time: biotic and abiotic determinants of canopy complexity and their effects on net primary productivity. Agric for Meteor, 2018, 250: 181-191.

[33] FranssonP, BrännströmÅ, FranklinO. A tree’s quest for light-optimal height and diameter growth under a shading canopy. Tree Physiol, 2021, 41(1): 1-11.

[34] GeorgiL, KunzM, FichtnerA, BienertA, MaasHG, von OheimbG. Effects of tree diversity on canopy space occupation vary with tree size and canopy space definition in a mature broad-leaved forest. Agric for Meteor, 2022, 323. 109055

[35] Grams TEE, Lüttge U (2010) Space as a resource. In: Progress in botany 72. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13145-5_13

[36] GuoWY, LiPY, DuQQ, ZhouYH, XuDX, ZhangZY. Hydrogeochemical processes regulating the groundwater geochemistry and human health risk of groundwater in the rural areas of the Wei River Basin. China Expo Health, 2024, 16(2): 291-306.

[37] HeDN, PengDL, YangH, ZhangXH. The response of seedlings and saplings to canopy structure and light in different gaps in a spruce-fir mixed stand in Changbai Mountains. China for Ecol Manag, 2023, 546. 121365

[38] HellwigT, AbboS, OphirR. Phylogeny and disparate selection signatures suggest two genetically independent domestication events in pea (Pisum L.). Plant J, 2022, 110(2): 419-439.

[39] HoleskiLM, HillstromML, WhithamTG, LindrothRL. Relative importance of genetic, ontogenetic, induction, and seasonal variation in producing a multivariate defense phenotype in a foundation tree species. Oecologia, 2012, 170(3): 695-707.

[40] HosseiniA, HosseiniSM, LinaresJC. Linking morphological and ecophysiological leaf traits to canopy dieback in Persian oak trees from central Zagros. J for Res, 2019, 30(5): 1755-1764.

[41] HuB, TangLQ, LiuH, ZhaoXJ, LiuZR, WangYS, WangLC. Trends of photosynthetically active radiation over China from 1961 to 2014. Int J Climatol, 2018, 38(10): 4007-4024.

[42] HuiG, ZhangL, WangH, ZhangG. Stand crowding degree and its application. J Beijing for Univ, 2016, 38: 1-6.

[43] IanoviciN, BataluA, HriscuD, Daniela DatcuA. Phytomonitoring study on intra urban variations of leaves of some evergreen and deciduous trees. Ecol Indic, 2020, 114. 106313

[44] JiangQH, LiuZC, LiuWW, LiT, CongWL, ZhangHC, ShiJL. A principal component analysis based three-dimensional sustainability assessment model to evaluate corporate sustainable performance. J Clean Prod, 2018, 187: 625-637.

[45] JuckerT, BouriaudO, CoomesDA. Crown plasticity enables trees to optimize canopy packing in mixed-species forests. Funct Ecol, 2015, 29(8): 1078-1086.

[46] KholdaenkoYA, BelokopytovaLV, ZhirnovaDF, UpadhyayKK, TripathiSK, KoshurnikovaNN, SobachkinRS, BabushkinaEA, VaganovEA. Stand density effects on tree growth and climatic response in Picea obovata Ledeb. plantations. For Ecol Manage, 2022, 519. 120349

[47] KingDA, DaviesSJ, Nur SupardiMN, TanS. Tree growth is related to light interception and wood density in two mixed dipterocarp forests of Malaysia. Funct Ecol, 2005, 19(3): 445-453.

[48] KongFL, BiHQ, McLeanM, LiFR. Comparative performances of new and existing indices of crown asymmetry: an evaluation using tall trees of Eucalyptus pilularis (Smith). J for Res, 2021, 32(1): 43-65.

[49] KovácsB, TinyaF, ÓderP. Stand structural drivers of microclimate in mature temperate mixed forests. Agric for Meteor, 2017, 234: 11-21.

[50] KrůčekM, TrochtaJ, CibulkaM, KrálK. Beyond the cones: how crown shape plasticity alters aboveground competition for space and light—evidence from terrestrial laser scanning. Agric for Meteorol, 2019, 264: 188-199.

[51] LeiJ, DuHL, DuanAG, ZhangJG. Effect of stand density and soil layer on soil nutrients of a 37-year-old Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation in Naxi, Sichuan province. China Sustainability, 2019, 11195410.

[52] LiaoLH, CaoL, XieYJ, LuoJZ, WangGB. Phenotypic traits extraction and genetic characteristics assessment of Eucalyptus trials based on UAV-borne LiDAR and RGB images. Remote Sens, 2022, 143765.

[53] LiuCLC, KuchmaO, KrutovskyKV. Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: Development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future. Glob Ecol Conserv, 2018, 15. e00419

[54] LiuXQ, FengYH, HuTY, LuoY, ZhaoXX, WuJ, MaedaEE, JuWM, LiuLL, GuoQH, SuYJ. Enhancing ecosystem productivity and stability with increasing canopy structural complexity in global forests. Sci Adv, 2024, 1020eadl1947.

[55] LodoliniEM, de IudicibusA, LucchesePG, Las CasasG, TorrisiB, NicolosiE, GiuffridaA, FerlitoF. Comparison of canopy architecture of five olive cultivars in a high-density planting system in Sicily. Agriculture (Basel), 2023, 1381612.

[56] MatsuoT, Martínez-RamosM, BongersF, van der SandeMT, PoorterL. Forest structure drives changes in light heterogeneity during tropical secondary forest succession. J Ecol, 2021, 109(8): 2871-2884.

[57] NiinemetsÜ, TobiasM. Canopy leaf area index at its higher end: dissection of structural controls from leaf to canopy scales in bryophytes. New Phytol, 2019, 223(1): 118-133.

[58] ParkerGG. Tamm review: leaf area index (LAI) is both a determinant and a consequence of important processes in vegetation canopies. For Ecol Manage, 2020, 477. 118496

[59] PrimiciaI, CamareroJJ, ImbertJB, CastilloFJ. Effects of thinning and canopy type on growth dynamics of Pinus sylvestris: inter-annual variations and intra-annual interactions with microclimate. Eur J for Res, 2013, 132(1): 121-135.

[60] PrimiciaI, CamareroJJ, JandaP, VojtĕchČ, MorrisseyRC, TrotsiukV, BačeR, TeodosiuM, SvobodaM. Age, competition, disturbance and elevation effects on tree and stand growth response of primary Picea abies forest to climate. For Ecol Manag, 2015, 354: 77-86.

[61] ProutsosN, LiakatasA, AlexandrisS. Ratio of photosynthetically active to total incoming radiation above a Mediterranean deciduous oak forest. Theor Appl Climatol, 2019, 137(3): 2927-2939.

[62] RawatM, ArunachalamK, ArunachalamA, AlataloJM, PandeyR. Predicting litter decomposition rate for temperate forest tree species by the relative contribution of green leaf and litter traits in the Indian Himalayas region. Ecol Indic, 2020, 119. 106827

[63] RédeiT, CsecseritsA, LhotskyB, BarabásS, Kröel-DulayG, GáborÓ, Botta-DukátZ. Plantation forests cannot support the richness of forest specialist plants in the forest-steppe zone. For Ecol Manag, 2020, 461. 117964

[64] SeidelD, RuzickaKJ, PuettmannK. Canopy gaps affect the shape of Douglas-fir crowns in the western Cascades, Oregon. For Ecol Manag, 2016, 363: 31-38.

[65] ShahAN, YangGZ, TanveerM, IqbalJ. Leaf gas exchange, source–sink relationship, and growth response of cotton to the interactive effects of nitrogen rate and planting density. Acta Physiol Plant, 2017, 395119.

[66] ShiTT, ZhangXX, HouYK, JiaCF, DanXM, ZhangYL, JiangYZ, LaiQ, FengJJ, FengJJ, MaT, WuJL, LiuSY, ZhangL, LongZQ, ChenLY, StreetNR, IngvarssonPK, LiuJQ, YinTM, WangJ. The super-pangenome of Populus unveils genomic facets for its adaptation and diversification in widespread forest trees. Mol Plant, 2024, 17(5): 725-746.

[67] SilveiraEMO, RadeloffVC, MartinuzziS, Martinez PasturGJ, BonoJ, PolitiN, LizarragaL, RiveraLO, CiuffoliL, RosasYM, OlahAM, Gavier-PizarroGI, PidgeonAM. Nationwide native forest structure maps for Argentina based on forest inventory data, SAR Sentinel-1 and vegetation metrics from Sentinel-2 imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 2023, 285. 113391

[68] SullivanTP, SullivanDS. Acceleration of old-growth structural attributes in lodgepole pine forest: tree growth and stand structure 25 years after thinning. For Ecol Manage, 2016, 365: 96-106.

[69] Uria-DiezJ, PommereningA. Crown plasticity in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) as a strategy of adaptation to competition and environmental factors. Ecol Model, 2017, 356: 117-126.

[70] WanP, HeRR. Canopy structure and understory light characteristics of a natural Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata forest in China northwest: Influence of different forest management methods. Ecol Eng, 2020, 153105901.

[71] WangWJ, HeHS, FraserJS, DijakWD, SpetichMA. Population dynamics has greater effects than climate change on tree species distribution in a temperate forest region. J Biogeogr, 2018, 45(12): 2766-2778.

[72] WangHB, QinJ, HuYH, GuoCB. Asymmetric growth of belowground and aboveground tree organs and their architectural relationships: a review. Can J for Res, 2023, 53(5): 315-327.

[73] XiBY, ClothierB, ColemanM, DuanJ, HuW, LiDD, DiN, LiuY, FuJY, LiJS, JiaLM, FernándezJE. Irrigation management in poplar (Populus spp) plantations: a review. For Ecol Manag, 2021, 494119330.

[74] XingY, BrimblecombeP, WangSF, ZhangH. Tree distribution, morphology and modelled air pollution in urban parks of Hong Kong. J Environ Manage, 2019, 248. 109304

[75] XuZF, ChenLH, TangSS, ZhuangLY, YangWQ, TuLH, TanB, ZhangL. Sex-specific responses to Pb stress in Populus deltoides: root architecture and Pb translocation. Trees, 2016, 30(6): 2019-2027.

[76] YangYN, JiangH, WangML, KorpelainenH, LiCY. Male poplars have a stronger ability to balance growth and carbohydrate accumulation than do females in response to a short-term potassium deficiency. Physiol Plant, 2015, 155(4): 400-413.

[77] YangYQ, LiPY, ElumalaiV, NingJ, XuF, MuDW. Groundwater quality assessment using EWQI with updated water quality classification criteria: a case study in and around Zhouzhi County, Guanzhong basin (China). Expo Health, 2023, 15(4): 825-840.

[78] YaoJX, LiHG, YeJ, ShiLL. Relationship between parental genetic distance and offspring’s heterosis for early growth traits in Liriodendron: implication for parent pair selection in cross breeding. New for, 2016, 47(1): 163-177.

[79] ZhangS, JiangH, ZhaoHX, KorpelainenH, LiCY. Sexually different physiological responses of Populus cathayana to nitrogen and phosphorus deficiencies. Tree Physiol, 2014, 34(4): 343-354.

[80] ZhangZQ, ZhangL, XuH, CreedIF, BlancoJA, WeiXH, SunG, AsbjornsenH, BishopK. Forest water-use efficiency: effects of climate change and management on the coupling of carbon and water processes. For Ecol Manag, 2023, 534. 120853

[81] ZhaoXL, XiePL, ZhangXQ, OuZY, MaHX, SuoC, MaJQ, WanP. Characteristics of different aged plantations of Ormosia hosiei with regards to soil microbial biomass and enzymatic activities. J for Res, 2024, 351119.

[82] ZhaoXL, ZhangXQ, LiZF, WangBX, ZhangTQ, WanP. Development of root rot in Zanthoxylum bungeanum is closely linked to changes in soil microbial communities, enzyme activities, and physicochemical factors. Glob Ecol Conserv, 2024, 55. e03249

[83] ZhouLH, WangYX, ChenCC, TongSY, KangF. Influence of leaf area index inversion and the light transmittance mechanism in the apple tree canopy. Forests, 2024, 155823.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Northeast Forestry University