Saturating allometric relationships reveal how wood density shapes global tree architecture

Abstract

Allometric equations are fundamental tools in ecological research and forestry management, widely used for estimating above-ground biomass and production, serving as the core foundations of dynamic vegetation models. Using global datasets from Tallo (a tree allometry and crown architecture database encompassing thousands of species) and TRY (a plant traits database), we fit Bayesian hierarchical models with three alternative functional forms (power-law, generalized Michaelis–Menten (gMM), and Weibull) to characterize how diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (H), and crown radius (CR) scale with and without wood density as a species-level predictor. Our analysis revealed that the saturating Weibull function best captured the relationship between tree height and DBH in both functional groups, whereas the CR–DBH relationship was best predicted by a power-law function in angiosperms and by the gMM function in gymnosperms. Although including wood density did not significantly improve predictive performance, it revealed important ecological trade-offs: lighter-wood angiosperms achieve taller mature heights more rapidly, and denser wood promotes wider crown expansion across clades. We also found that accurately estimating DBH required considering both height and crown size, highlighting how these variables together distinguish trees of similar height but differing trunk diameters. Our results emphasize the importance of applying saturating functions for large trees to improve forest biomass estimates and show that wood density, though not always predictive at broad scales, helps illuminate the biomechanical and ecological constraints underlying diverse tree architectures. These findings offer practical pathways for integrating height- and crown-based metrics into existing carbon monitoring programs worldwide.

The online version is available at https://link.springer.com/.

Corresponding editor: Lei Yu.

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-025-01898-9.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Keywords

Above ground biomass / Crown radius / Diameter at breast height / Tree allometry model / Tree height / Wood density

References

[1] AibaM, NakashizukaT. Architectural differences associated with adult stature and wood density in 30 temperate tree species. Funct Ecol, 2009, 23: 265-273.

[2] AntenN, SchievingF. The role of wood mass density and mechanical constraints in the economy of tree architecture. Am Nat, 2009, 175: 250-260.

[3] BazrgarAB, ThevathasanN, GordonA, SimpsonJ. Allometric equations for estimating aboveground biomass carbon in five tree species grown in an intercropping agroforestry system in southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforest Syst, 2024, 98: 739-749.

[4] BrownS, GillespieAJR, LugoAE. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. For Sci, 1989, 35: 881-902.

[5] BrownJH, GilloolyJF, AllenAP, et al.. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology, 2004, 85: 1771-1789.

[6] CarpenterB, GelmanA, HoffmanMD, et al.. Stan: a probabilistic programming language. J Stat Softw, 2017, 76: 1-32.

[7] ChaveJ, CoomesD, JansenS, et al.. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol Lett, 2009, 12: 351-366.

[8] ChaveJ, Réjou-MéchainM, BúrquezA, et al.. Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob Change Biol, 2014, 20: 3177-3190.

[9] CochraneA, SimsCR, BejjankiVR, et al.. Multiple timescales of learning indicated by changes in evidence-accumulation processes during perceptual decision-making. Npj Sci Learn, 2023, 8: 1-10.

[10] DormannCF, ElithJ, BacherS, et al.. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 2013, 36: 27-46.

[11] FajardoA. Wood density relates negatively to maximum plant height across major angiosperm and gymnosperm orders. Am J Bot, 2022, 109: 250-258.

[12] FajardoA, PiperFI, García-CervigónAI. The intraspecific relationship between wood density, vessel diameter and other traits across environmental gradients. Funct Ecol, 2022, 36: 1585-1598.

[13] FalsterDS, WestobyM. Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends Ecol Evol, 2003, 18: 337-343.

[14] FalsterDS, BrännströmÅ, WestobyM, DieckmannU. Multitrait successional forest dynamics enable diverse competitive coexistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017, 114: E2719-E2728.

[15] FausetS, JohnsonMO, GloorM, et al.. Hyperdominance in Amazonian forest carbon cycling. Nat Commun, 2015, 66857.

[16] FayolleA, Loubota PanzouGJ, DrouetT, et al.. Taller trees, denser stands and greater biomass in semi-deciduous than in evergreen lowland central African forests. For Ecol Manage, 2016, 374: 42-50.

[17] FeldpauschTR, BaninL, PhillipsOL, et al.. Height-diameter allometry of tropical forest trees. Biogeosciences, 2011, 8: 1081-1106.

[18] FilipescuCN, GrootA, MacIsaacDA, et al.. Prediction of diameter using height and crown attributes: a case study. West J Appl for, 2012, 27: 30-35.

[19] FossdalCG, KrokeneP, OlsenJE, et al.. Epigenetic stress memory in gymnosperms. Plant Physiol, 2024, 195: 1117-1133.

[20] Gelder HAV, Poorter L, Sterck FJ (2006) Wood mechanics, allometry, and life‐history variation in a tropical rain forest tree community. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01757.x

[21] GelmanA, HillJData analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models, 2006Cambridge University Press.

[22] GelmanA, JakulinA, PittauMG, SuY-S. A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. Ann Appl Stat, 2008, 2: 1360-1383.

[23] GelmanA, CarlinJB, SternHS, et al.Bayesian data analysis, 20153New York. Chapman; Hall/CRC.

[24] GoodmanRC, PhillipsOL, BakerTR. The importance of crown dimensions to improve tropical tree biomass estimates. Ecol Appl, 2014, 24: 680-698.

[25] HenryM, BesnardA, AsanteWA, et al.. Wood density, phytomass variations within and among trees, and allometric equations in a tropical rainforest of Africa. For Ecol Manage, 2010, 260: 1375-1388.

[26] HulshofCM, SwensonNG, WeiserMD. Tree height–diameter allometry across the United States. Ecol Evol, 2015, 5: 1193-1204.

[27] IidaY, PoorterL, SterckFJ, et al.. Wood density explains architectural differentiation across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Funct Ecol, 2012, 26: 274-282.

[28] JuckerT, CaspersenJ, ChaveJ, et al.. Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes. Glob Change Biol, 2017, 23: 177-190.

[29] JuckerT, FischerFJ, ChaveJ, et al.. Tallo: a global tree allometry and crown architecture database. Glob Change Biol, 2022, 28: 5254-5268.

[30] Jucker T, Fischer FJ, Chave J, et al (2024) The global spectrum of tree crown architecture

[31] KattgeJ, BönischG, DíazS, et al.. TRY plant trait database – enhanced coverage and open access. Glob Change Biol, 2020, 26: 119-188.

[32] KingDA. Linking tree form, allocation and growth with an allometrically explicit model. Ecol Modell, 2005, 185: 77-91.

[33] KingDA, ClarkDA. Allometry of emergent tree species from saplings to above-canopy adults in a Costa Rican rain forest. J Trop Ecol, 2011, 27: 573-579

[34] KingDA, DaviesSJ, TanS, NoorNSMd. The role of wood density and stem support costs in the growth and mortality of tropical trees. J Ecol, 2006, 94: 670-680.

[35] KooymanRM, WestobyM. Costs of height gain in rainforest saplings: main-stem scaling, functional traits and strategy variation across 75 species. Ann Bot, 2009, 104: 987-993.

[36] LandauWM. The targets r package: a dynamic make-like function-oriented pipeline toolkit for reproducibility and high-performance computing. J Open Source Softw, 2021, 62959

[37] LauransM, MunozF, Charles-DominiqueT, et al.. Why incorporate plant architecture into trait-based ecology?. Trends Ecol Evol, 2024.

[38] LigotG, Gourlet-FleuryS, OuédraogoD-Y, et al.. The limited contribution of large trees to annual biomass production in an old-growth tropical forest. Ecol Appl, 2018, 28: 1273-1281.

[39] LinesER, ZavalaMA, PurvesDW, CoomesDA. Predictable changes in aboveground allometry of trees along gradients of temperature, aridity and competition. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2012, 21: 1017-1028.

[40] LoehleC. Biomechanical constraints on tree architecture. Trees, 2016, 30: 2061-2070.

[41] Loubota PanzouGJ, LigotG, Gourlet-FleuryS, et al.. Architectural differences associated with functional traits among 45 coexisting tree species in Central Africa. Funct Ecol, 2018, 32: 2583-2593.

[42] Martínez CanoI, Muller-LandauHC, WrightSJ, et al.. Tropical tree height and crown allometries for the Barro Colorado Nature Monument, Panama: a comparison of alternative hierarchical models incorporating interspecific variation in relation to life history traits. Biogeosciences, 2019, 16: 847-862.

[43] Mikola P (1938) Crown and stem form of Norway spruce in the snow damage areas of Maanselkä in Northern Finland. Silva Fennica

[44] MoL, CrowtherTW, MaynardDS, et al.. The global distribution and drivers of wood density and their impact on forest carbon stocks. Nat Ecol Evol, 2024.

[45] MoltoQ, HéraultB, BoreuxJ-J, et al.. Predicting tree heights for biomass estimates in tropical forests – a test from French Guiana. Biogeosciences, 2014, 11: 3121-3130.

[46] MooreJR. Allometric equations to predict the total above-ground biomass of radiata pine trees. Ann for Sci, 2010, 67: 806-806.

[47] Muller- LandauHC. Interspecific and inter-site variation in wood specific gravity of tropical trees. Biotropica, 2004, 36: 20-32.

[48] MurphyHT, BradfordMG. The role of big trees and abundant species in driving spatial patterns of species richness in an Australian tropical rainforest. Ecol Evol, 2022, 12. e9324

[49] NiklasKJPlant allometry: the scaling of form and process, 1994, Chicago. University of Chicago Press.

[50] NiklasKJ. Maximum plant height and the biophysical factors that limit it. Tree Physiol, 2007, 27: 433-440.

[51] PoorterL, BongersL, BongersF. Architecture of 54 moist-forest tree species: traits, trade-offs, and functional groups. Ecology, 2006, 87: 1289-1301.

[52] PoorterH, NiklasKJ, ReichPB, et al.. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: Meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol, 2012, 193: 30-50.

[53] PoorterL, LianesE, Moreno-de las HerasM, ZavalaMA. Architecture of Iberian canopy tree species in relation to wood density, shade tolerance and climate. Plant Ecol, 2012, 213: 707-722.

[54] R Core Team (2023) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

[55] ShendrykI, BroichM, TulbureMG, AlexandrovSV. Bottom-up delineation of individual trees from full-waveform airborne laser scans in a structurally complex eucalypt forest. Remote Sens Environ, 2016, 173: 69-83.

[56] ShinozakiK, YodaK, HozumiK, KiraT. A quantitative analysis of plant form-the pipe model theory: I. Basic analyses. Jpn J Ecol, 1964, 14: 97-105

[57] SileshiGW, NathAJ, KuyahS. Allometric scaling and allocation patterns: implications for predicting productivity across plant communities. Front Forests Glob Change, 2023.

[58] Sivula T, Magnusson M, Matamoros AA, Vehtari A (2023) Uncertainty in bayesian leave-one-out cross-validation based model comparison

[59] SlikJWF, PaoliG, McGuireK, et al.. Large trees drive forest aboveground biomass variation in moist lowland forests across the tropics. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 2013, 22: 1261-1271.

[60] SongX, LiJ, ZengX. Parameterization of height–diameter and crown radius–diameter relationships across the globe. J Plant Ecol, 2024, 17. rtae005

[61] SterckF, BongersF. Ontogenetic changes in size, allometry, and mechanical design of tropical rain forest trees. Am J Bot, 1998, 85(2): 266-272

[62] SullivanMJP, LewisSL, HubauW, et al.. Field methods for sampling tree height for tropical forest biomass estimation. Methods Ecol Evol, 2018, 9: 1179-1189.

[63] SwensonN, EnquistB. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of a key plant functional trait: wood density and its community-wide variation across latitude and elevation. Am J Bot, 2007, 94: 451-459.

[64] TatsumiS, YamaguchiK, FuruyaN. Forestscanner: a mobile application for measuring and mapping trees with LiDAR-equipped iPhone and iPad. Methods Ecol Evol, 2023, 14: 1603-1609.

[65] TavankarF, Lo MonacoA, NikooyM, et al.. Snow damages on trees of an uneven age in mixed broadleaf forests: effects of topographical conditions and tree characteristics. J Forestry Res, 2019, 30: 1383-1394.

[66] ThomasSC. Asymptotic height as a predictor of growth and allometric characteristics in malaysian rain forest trees. Am J Bot, 1996, 83: 556-566.

[67] VehtariA, GelmanA, GabryJ. Practical bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Stat Comput, 2017, 27: 1413-1432.

[68] VehtariA, GelmanA, SimpsonD, et al.. Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: an improved Rˆ for assessing convergence of MCMC (with discussion). Bayesian Anal, 2021, 16: 667-718.

[69] WestG, BrownJ, EnquistB. A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature, 1999, 400: 664-667.

[70] YangJ, SwensonNG. Height and crown allometries and their relationship with functional traits: an example from a subtropical wet forest. Ecol Evol, 2023, 13. e9804

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Northeast Forestry University