Climate change impacts on Taxus baccata distribution and conservation

Ilknur Zeren Cetin , Halil Baris Ozel , Tugrul Varol , Ugur Canturk , Hakan Sevik

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 95

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 95 DOI: 10.1007/s11676-025-01893-0
Original Paper
research-article

Climate change impacts on Taxus baccata distribution and conservation

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study looks at the impact of climate change on the future distribution of Taxus baccata L., a species under threat. It examines how altitudinal changes may influence distribution, projecting scenarios to 2100 using the SSPs 585 SSPs 245 scenarios in 20-year intervals. The results show a contraction in distribution in areas such as in Iceland and the United Kingdom, with certain extreme points disappearing. Simultaneously, new suitable areas are expected to emerge in select regions of Asia. The study underscores the significant changes anticipated in the distribution of T. baccata due to global climate change. It suggests that the threshold for addressing climate change on this particular species has been exceeded, and emphasizes the need for concerted efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change impacts on ecosystems and organisms. As climate change affects various aspects of life, the study advocates for sector-wide plans. These would include efficient resource utilization, selecting genotypes for afforestation of this species with lower water requirements, incorporating climate change predictions into management plans, conserving biological and genetic diversity, and developing in-situ and ex-situ conservation strategies. Anticipation of future climate changes and corresponding measures in response are crucial to minimizing the impact on this species. The study recommends establishing mixed forests composed of species resilient to a range of climate scenarios, thereby enhancing forest continuity across regions with varying degrees of climate impact. Genetic diversity is an important defense mechanism important to preserving it. Global climate change will result in significant alterations in the distribution of certain species, potentially causing population declines. Intervention is required to support the adaptation of vulnerable species, necessitating forward-looking strategies that anticipate shifts in their habitat suitability. This study emphasizes the implications of climate change for T. baccata and underscores the urgency of targeted conservation efforts to protect its populations and ensure long-term persistence.

The online version is available at https://link.springer.com/.

Corresponding editor: Tao Xu.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Keywords

Global climate change / Taxus baccata / SSPs 245 / SSPs 585

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ilknur Zeren Cetin, Halil Baris Ozel, Tugrul Varol, Ugur Canturk, Hakan Sevik. Climate change impacts on Taxus baccata distribution and conservation. Journal of Forestry Research, 2025, 36(1): 95 DOI:10.1007/s11676-025-01893-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

AbramoffRZ, CiaisP, ZhuP, HasegawaT, WakatsukiH, MakowskiD. Adaptation strategies strongly reduce the future impacts of climate change on simulated crop yields. Earth’s Future, 2023, 114e2022EF003190.

[2]

AfifaAK, HussainN, AshrafMH, SaleemMZ. Air pollution and climate change as grand challenges to sustainability. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 928. 172370

[3]

AhmadiK, AlaviSJ, AmiriGZ, HosseiniSM, Serra-DiazJM, SvenningJC. The potential impact of future climate on the distribution of European yew (Taxusbaccata L.) in the Hyrcanian Forest region (Iran). Int J Biometeorol, 2020, 64(9): 1451-1462.

[4]

AlaviSJ, AhmadiK, HosseiniSM, TabariM, NouriZ. The response of English yew (Taxusbaccata L.) to climate change in the Caspian Hyrcanian Mixed Forest ecoregion. Reg Environ Change, 2019, 19(5): 1495-1506.

[5]

AustinM. Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecol Model, 2007, 200(1–2): 1-19.

[6]

BachW. Fossil fuel resources and their impacts on environment and climate. Int J Hydrog Energy, 1981, 6(2): 185-201.

[7]

BeltranRS, BurnsJM. Convergence of biannual moulting strategies across birds and mammals. Proc Biol Sci, 2018, 28520180318.

[8]

Bernal-EscobarM, SpeerJH, CoombsL, FeeleyKJ. Growth rates of three common South Florida tree species affected by climate change and urbanization. J Forestry Res, 2025, 36161.

[9]

CalviaG, HidalgoPJ, López-TiradoJ, FarrisE, FenuG, BacchettaG. From Current to potential distribution: the case of Taxus Baccata (Taxaceae, Pinales) on the island of Sardinia (Italy). Plant Biosyst Int J Deal Aspects Plant Biol, 2024, 158(4): 808-822.

[10]

CareyHV, AndrewsMT, MartinSL. Mammalian hibernation: cellular and molecular responses to depressed metabolism and low temperature. Physiol Rev, 2003, 83(4): 1153-1181.

[11]

CavinL, JumpAS. Highest drought sensitivity and lowest resistance to growth suppression are found in the range core of the tree Fagussylvatica L. not the equatorial range edge. Glob Chang Biol, 2017, 23(1): 362-379.

[12]

ChapmanS, WatsonJEM, SalazarA, ThatcherM, McAlpineCA. The impact of urbanization and climate change on urban temperatures: a systematic review. Landsc Ecol, 2017, 32(10): 1921-1935.

[13]

ChhetriPK, GaddisKD, CairnsDM. Predicting the suitable habitat of treeline species in the Nepalese Himalayas under climate change. Mt Res Dev, 2018, 382153.

[14]

DaiAG, ZhaoTB, ChenJ. Climate change and drought: a precipitation and evaporation perspective. Curr Clim Change Rep, 2018, 4(3): 301-312.

[15]

DengW, ZhangHE, FengQY, WuLP, LiHM, LiZY. Investigation of summer temperature patterns of Ficus altissima in southern subtropical China. J Forestry Res, 2025, 36172.

[16]

Enríquez-de-SalamancaÁ, Díaz-SierraR, Martín-ArandaRM, SantosMJ. Environmental impacts of climate change adaptation. Environ Impact Assess Rev, 2017, 64: 87-96.

[17]

ESRI (2017) ESRI: Environmental Systems Research Institute. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.5. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California

[18]

EUFORGEN (2020) Taxus baccata distribution and ecology database. European Forest Genetic Resources Programme (EUFORGEN). Retrieved from https://www.euforgen.org/species/taxus-baccata

[19]

FengJY, LiS, HuangC, TangFR, LiY, HeGW, ZhangXL, ChenFS. Effects of climate change, land use/cover change, and interactions on ecosystem services in Jiulianshan National Nature Reserve of Jiangxi Province. China J Forestry Res, 2025, 36166.

[20]

Fischer M, Rounsevell M, Rando ATM, Mader A, Church A, Elbakidze M, Elias V, Hahn T, Harrison PA, Hauck J, Sandstrom C, Pinto IS, Visconti P, Zimmermann NE, Christie M, Martin-López B, Ring I (2018) The regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia: Summary for policymakers. IPBES Secretariat. https://research.aber.ac.uk/cy/publications/the-regional-assessment-report-on-biodiversity-and-ecosystem-serv

[21]

GajurelJP, WerthS, ShresthaKK, ScheideggerC. Species distribution modeling of Taxus wallichiana (Himalayan yew) in Nepal Himalaya. Asian J Conser Bio, 2014, 3(2): 127-134

[22]

Gómez-PinedaE, Sáenz-RomeroC, Ortega-RodríguezJM, Blanco-GarcíaA, Madrigal-SánchezX, Lindig-CisnerosR, Lopez-ToledoL, Pedraza-SantosME, RehfeldtGE. Suitable climatic habitat changes for Mexican conifers along altitudinal gradients under climatic change scenarios. Ecol Appl, 2020, 302. e02041

[23]

GrittiES, SmithB, SykesMT. Vulnerability of Mediterranean Basin ecosystems to climate change and invasion by exotic plant species. J Biogeogr, 2006, 33(1): 145-157.

[24]

HamannA, WangTL. Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology, 2006, 87(11): 2773-2786.

[25]

HansenG, StoneD. Assessing the observed impact of anthropogenic climate change. Nat Clim Change, 2016, 6(5): 532-537.

[26]

HellerNE, ZavaletaES. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol Conserv, 2009, 142(1): 14-32.

[27]

Hobson KA, Norris DR, Kardynal KJ, Yohannes E (2019) Animal migration: a context for using new techniques and approaches. In: Tracking animal migration with stable isotopes. Academic Press, pp 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814723-8.00001-5

[28]

HuttunenS, KinnunenH, LaaksoK. Impact of increased UV-B on plant ecosystems. Chemosphere, 1998, 36(4–5): 829-833.

[29]

IversonLR, PrasadAM. Potential redistribution of tree species habitat under five climate change scenarios in the eastern US. For Ecol Manag, 2002, 155(1–3): 205-222.

[30]

KoganF, AdamenkoT, GuoW. Global and regional drought dynamics in the climate warming era. Remote Sens Lett, 2013, 4(4): 364-372.

[31]

KrishnanR, ShresthaAB, RenG, RajbhandariR, SaeedS, SanjayJ, SyedMA, VelloreR, XuY, YouQ, RenYWesterP, MishraA, MukherjiA, ShresthaAB. Unravelling climate change in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: Rapid warming in the mountains and increasing extremes. The Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment: mountains, climate change, sustainability and people, 2019, Berlin. Springer. 5797.

[32]

LiGQ, HuangJH, GuoH, DuS. Projecting species loss and turnover under climate change for 111 Chinese tree species. For Ecol Manag, 2020, 477. 118488

[33]

LiHQ, XingLG, SunXP. Predicting the potential distribution of Taxus wallichiana var mairei under climate change in China using Maxent modeling. Pak J Bot, 2022, 54(4): 1305-1310.

[34]

LiPX, ZhuWQ, XieZY, QiaoK. Integration of multiple climate models to predict range shifts and identify management priorities of the endangered Taxus wallichiana in the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountain region. J Forestry Res, 2020, 31(6): 2255-2272.

[35]

LinaresJC. Shifting limiting factors for population dynamics and conservation status of the endangered English yew (Taxus baccata L., Taxaceae). For Ecol Manag, 2013, 291: 119-127.

[36]

LissovskyAA, DudovSV, ObolenskayaEV. Species-distribution modeling: advantages and limitations of its application 1 general approaches. Biol Bull Rev, 2021, 11(3): 254-264.

[37]

LiuJ, MöllerM, ProvanJ, GaoLM, PoudelRC, LiDZ. Geological and ecological factors drive cryptic speciation of yews in a biodiversity hotspot. New Phytol, 2013, 199(4): 1093-1108.

[38]

LópezID, FigueroaA, CorralesJC. Multi-dimensional data preparation: a process to support vulnerability analysis and climate change adaptation. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 87228-87242.

[39]

ManabeS. Role of greenhouse gas in climate change. Tellus A Dyn Meteor Oceanogr, 2019, 7111620078.

[40]

McCarthyMP, BestMJ, BettsRA. Climate change in cities due to global warming and urban effects. Geophys Res Lett, 2010, 379L09705.

[41]

MillerJ. Species distribution modeling. Geogr. Compass, 2010, 4(6): 490-509.

[42]

MontzkaSA, DlugokenckyEJ, ButlerJH. Non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change. Nature, 2011, 476(7358): 43-50.

[43]

NaXD, ZhouHT, ZangSY, WuCS, LiWL, LiM. Maximum Entropy modeling for habitat suitability assessment of Red-crowned crane. Ecol Indic, 2018, 91: 439-446.

[44]

O’BrienCL, RobinsonSA, PancostRD, Sinninghe DamstéJS, SchoutenS, LuntDJ, AlsenzH, BornemannA, BottiniC, BrassellSC, FarnsworthA, ForsterA, HuberBT, InglisGN, JenkynsHC, LinnertC, LittlerK, MarkwickP, McAnenaA, MutterloseJ, NaafsBDA, PüttmannW, SluijsA, van HelmondNAGM, VellekoopJ, WagnerT, WrobelNE. Cretaceous Sea-surface temperature evolution: constraints from TEX86 and planktonic foraminiferal oxygen isotopes. Earth Sci Rev, 2017, 172: 224-247.

[45]

OlivaM, MaffiaA, MarraF, CaninoF, BattagliaS, MallamaciC, MuscoloA. The complex impacts of fire on soil ecosystems: Insights from the 2021 Aspromonte National Park wildfire. J for Res, 2025, 36168.

[46]

PhillipsSJ, DudíkM. Modeling of species distributions with maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 2008, 31(2): 161-175.

[47]

Ponce-ReyesR, Reynoso-RosalesVH, WatsonJE, VanDerWalJ, FullerRA, PresseyRL, PossinghamHP. Vulnerability of cloud forest reserves in Mexico to climate change. Nat Clim Chang, 2012, 2(6): 448-452.

[48]

QianMJ, RosenqvistE, PrinsenE, PescheckF, FlygareAM, KalbinaI, JansenMAK, StridÅ. Downsizing in plants-UV light induces pronounced morphological changes in the absence of stress. Plant Physiol, 2021, 187(1): 378-395.

[49]

RathoreP, RoyA, KarnatakH. Modelling the vulnerability of Taxus wallichiana to climate change scenarios in South East Asia. Ecol Indic, 2019, 102: 199-207.

[50]

RosaEA, RudelTK, YorkR, JorgensonAK, DietzT. The human (anthropogenic) driving forces of global climate change. Clim Change Soc, 2015, 2: 32-60.

[51]

RosenzweigC, NeofotisP. Detection and attribution of anthropogenic climate change impacts. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change, 2013, 4(2): 121-150.

[52]

Rounsevell M (2018) Summary for policymakers of the regional and subregional assessment of biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia. 2018 March. In: IPBES-6 Plenary. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/summary-for-policymakers-of-the-regional-and-subregional-assessme

[53]

Rounsevell M, Fischer M, Torre-Marin Rando M, Mader A (2018) The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia. In: Secretariat of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. https://boris.unibe.ch/185020/

[54]

SomogyiZ. Projected effects of climate change on the carbon stocks of European beech (Fagussylvatica L.) forests in Zala County Hungary. For J, 2016, 62(1): 3-14.

[55]

StridA, ChowWS, AndersonJM. UV-B damage and protection at the molecular level in plants. Photosynth Res, 1994, 39(3): 475-489.

[56]

WangXY, ZhaoCY, JiaQY. Impacts of climate change on forest ecosystems in NorthEast China. Adv Clim Change Res, 2013, 4(4): 230-241.

[57]

WeartSR. The idea of anthropogenic global climate change in the 20th century. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change, 2010, 1(1): 67-81.

[58]

WilliamsJJ, NewboldT. Local climatic changes affect biodiversity responses to land use: a review. Divers Distrib, 2020, 26(1): 76-92.

[59]

WuXT, WangMQ, LiXY, YanYD, DaiMJ, XieWY, ZhouXF, ZhangDL, WenYF. Response of distribution patterns of two closely related species in Taxus genus to climate change since last inter-glacial. Ecol Evol, 2022, 1210e9302.

[60]

WuebblesDJ, JainAK. Concerns about climate change and the role of fossil fuel use. Fuel Process Technol, 2001, 71(1–3): 99-119.

[61]

YuanXN, LiSE, ChenJL, YuHC, YangTY, WangCY, HuangSY, ChenHC, AoX. Impacts of global climate change on agricultural production: a comprehensive review. Agronomy, 2024, 1471360.

[62]

ZachosJC, DickensGR, ZeebeRE. An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics. Nature, 2008, 451(7176): 279-283.

[63]

ZhaoXN, ZhengYT, WangW, WangZ, ZhangQF, LiuJC, ZhangCT. Habitat suitability evaluation of different forest species in Lvliang Mountain by combining prior knowledge and MaxEnt model. Forests, 2023, 142438.

[64]

ZhouYC, HuJH, XieGH, ShaoYK, LiuM. Simulation of potential suitable areas and analysis of natural reserves for four species of Taxus in Southern China. Front Glob Change, 2025, 81346224.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Northeast Forestry University

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

88

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/