A two-level optimization approach to tree-level planning in continuous cover forest management

Abstract

The current trends in forestry in Europe include the increased use of continuous cover forestry (CCF) and the increased availability of tree-level forest inventory data. Accordingly, recent literature suggests methodologies for optimizing the harvest decisions at the tree level. Using tree-level optimization for all trees of the stand is computationally demanding. This study proposed a two-level optimization method for CCF where the harvest prescriptions are optimized at the tree level for only a part of the trees or the first cuttings. The higher-level algorithm optimizes the cutting years and the harvest rates of those diameter classes for which tree-level optimization is not used. The lower-level algorithm allocates the individually optimized trees to different cutting events. The most detailed problem formulations, employing much tree-level optimization, resulted in the highest net present value and longest optimization time. However, restricting tree-level optimization to the largest trees and first cuttings did not significantly alter the time, intensity, or type of first cutting. Computing times could also be shortened by applying accumulated knowledge from previous optimizations, implementing learning aspects in heuristic search, and optimizing the search algorithms for short computing time and good-quality solutions.

Keywords

Management optimization / Forest planning / Differential evolution / Simulated annealing

References

[1] BettingerP, GraetzD, BostonK, SessionsJ, ChungW. Eight heuristic planning techniques applied to three increasingly difficult wildlife planning problems. Silva Fenn, 2002, 36: 561-584

[2] ChenQ, BaldocchiD, GongP, KellyM. Isolating individual trees in a savanna woodland using small footprint LIDAR data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing, 2006, 72: 923-932

[3] ClarkPJ, EvansFC. Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology, 1954, 35: 445-453

[4] de PaulaPR, OlofssonK, PerssonHJ, et al.. Individual tree detection and estimation of stem attributes with mobile laser scanning along boreal forest roads. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2022, 187: 211-224

[5] FranssonP, FranklinO, LindroosO, et al.. A simulation-based approach to a near-optimal thinning strategy: allowing harvesting times to be determined for individual trees. Can J for Res, 2020, 50: 320-331

[6] GobakkenT, NæssetE. Estimation of diameter and basal area distributions in coniferous forest by means of airborne laser scanner data. Scand J for Res, 2004, 19: 529-542

[7] HaightRG. Evaluating the efficiency of even-aged and uneven-aged stand management. For Sci, 1987, 33(1): 116-134

[8] HaightRG, GetzWM. Fixed and equilibrium endpoint problems in uneven-aged stand management. For Sci, 1987, 33(4): 908-931

[9] HaoY, WidagdoFRA, LiuX, et al.. Estimation and calibration of stem diameter distribution using UAV laser scanning data: a case study for larch (Larix olgensis) forests in Northeast China. Remote Sens Environ, 2022, 268 112769

[10] HeinonenT, PukkalaT. The use of cellular automaton approach in forest planning. Can J for Res, 2007, 37: 2188-2200

[11] HelliwellDR. Dauerwald. Forestry, 1997, 70(4): 375-379

[12] HogansonHM, RoseDW. A simulation approach for optimal timber management scheduling. For Sci, 1984, 30: 220-238

[13] HyytiäinenK, TahvonenO. Economics of forest thinnings and rotation periods for Finnish conifer cultures. Scand J for Res, 2001, 17: 274-288

[14] JactelH, BauhusJ, BobergJ, BonalD, CastagneyrolB, GardinerB, Gonzalez-OlabarriaJR, KorichevaJ, MeurisseN, BrockerhoffEG. Tree diversity drives forest stand resistance to natural disturbances. Curr for Rep, 2017, 3: 223-243

[15] JinX, PukkalaT, LiF. Fine-tuning heuristic methods for combinatorial optimization in forest planning. Eur J for Res, 2016, 135: 765-779

[16] JinX, PukkalaT, LiF. Meta optimization of stand management with population-based methods. Can J for Res, 2018, 48: 697-708

[17] KangasA, KurttilaM, HujalaT, EyvindsonK, KangasJ. Decision support for forest management. Managing forest ecosystems, 2nd edn, 2015, Cham, Springer30

[18] KnokeT, AmmerC, StimmB, MosandlR. Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics. Eur J for Res, 2008, 127: 89-101

[19] KnokeTPukkalaT, von GadovK. The economics of continuous cover forestry. Continuous cover forestry. Managing Forest Ecosystems, 2012, Dordrecht, Springer: 167-193 23

[20] LaasasenahoJ. Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch. Commun Inst for Fenn, 1982, 108: 1-86

[21] LeiteRV, SilvaCA, MohanM, et al.. Individual tree attribute estimation and uniformity assessment in fast-growing Eucalyptus spp. forest plantations using lidar and linear mixed-effects models. Remote Sens, 2020, 12(21): 3599

[22] LappiJ, PukkalaT. Analyzing ingrowth using zero-inflated negative binomial models. Silva Fenn, 2020, 54(4): 10370

[23] LopatinE, VäätäinenK, KukkoA, KaartinenH, HyyppäJ, HolmströmE, SikanenL, NuutinenY, RoutaJ. Unlocking digitalization in forest operations with viewshed analysis to improve GNSS positioning accuracy. Forests, 2012, 14: 689

[24] MaltamoM, MalinenJ, PackalénP, et al.. Nonparametric estimation of stem volume using airborne laser scanning, aerial photography, and stand-register data. Can J for Res, 2006, 36: 426-436

[25] MessierC, BauhusJ, DoyonF, et al.. The functional complex network approach to foster forest resilience to global changes. For Ecosyst, 2019, 6: 21

[26] Möller A (1922) Der Dauerwaldgedanke. Sein Sinn und seine Bedeutung. Springer, Berlin 1922. ISBN: 978-3-642-50866-0

[27] NæssetE. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sens Environ, 2002, 80: 88-99

[28] PackalénP, MaltamoM. Estimation of species-specific diameter distributions using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs. Can J for Res, 2008, 38: 1750-1760

[29] PackalenP, PukkalaT, PascualA. Combining spatial and economic criteria in tree-level harvest planning. For Ecosyst, 2020

[30] PardosM, del RíoM, PretzschH, et al.. The greater resilience of mixed forests to drought mainly depends on their composition: analysis along a climate gradient across Europe. For Ecol Manage, 2021, 481 118687

[31] PascualA. Multi-objective forest planning at tree-level combining mixed integer programming and airborne laser scanning. For Ecol Manag, 2021, 483 118714

[32] PeuhkurinenJ, MehtätaloL, MaltamoM. Comparing individual tree detection and the area-based statistical approach for the retrieval of forest stand characteristics using airborne laser scanning in Scots pine stands. Can J for Res, 2011, 41: 583-598

[33] PretzschH, BiberP, UhlE, DahlhausenJ, RötzerT, CaldenteyJ, KoikeT, van ConT, ChavanneA, SeiferfT, du ToitB, FarndenC, PauleitS. Crown size and growing space requirement of common tree species in urban centres, parks, and forests. Urban for Urban Green, 2015, 14(3): 466-479

[34] PukkalaT, MiinaJ. Tree-selection algorithms for optimizing thinning using a distance-dependent growth model. Can J for Res, 1998, 28(5): 693-702

[35] PukkalaT, HeinonenT. Optimizing heuristic search in forest planning. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl, 2006, 7: 1284-1297

[36] PukkalaT, HeinonenT, KurttilaM. An application of a reduced cost approach to spatial forest planning. For Sci, 2008, 55(1): 13-22

[37] PukkalaT. Population-based methods in the optimization of stand management. Silva Fenn, 2009, 43: 261-274

[38] PukkalaT, LähdeE, LaihoO. Optimizing any-aged management of mixed boreal forest under residual basal area constraints. J for Res, 2014, 25(3): 627-636

[39] PukkalaT. Plenterwald, Dauerwald, or clearcut?. For Pol Econ, 2015, 62: 125-134

[40] PukkalaT, LähdeE, LaihoO. Which trees should be removed in thinning treatments?. For Ecosyst, 2015, 2: 32

[41] PukkalaT, LaihoO, LähdeE. Continuous cover management reduces wind damage. For Ecol Manag, 2016, 372: 120-127

[42] PukkalaT, VauhkonenJ, KorhonenKT, PackalenT. Self-learning growth simulator for modelling forest stand dynamics in changing conditions. Forestry, 2021, 94(3): 333-346

[43] PukkalaT. Improved guidelines for any-aged forestry. J for Res, 2022, 33: 1443-1457

[44] RummukainenA, AlanneH, MikkonenE. Wood procurement in the pressure of change. Acta for Fenn, 1995, 248: 7510

[45] SeidlR, LexerMJ. Forest management under climatic and social uncertainty: trade-offs between reducing climate change impacts and fostering adaptive capacity. J Environ Manag, 2013, 114: 461-469

[46] StornR, PriceK. Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim, 1997, 11: 341-359

[47] SunY, JinX, PukkalaT, LiF. Two-level optimization approach to tree-level forest planning. For Ecosyst, 2022, 9 100001

[48] SunY, JinX, PukkalaT, LiF. Predicting individual tree diameter of larch (Larix olgensis) from UAV-LiDAR data using six different algorithms. Remote Sens, 2022, 14(5): 1125

[49] TahvonenO. Optimal structure and development of uneven-aged Norway spruce forests. Can J for Res, 2011, 41: 2389-2402

[50] ThompsonI, MackeyB, McNultyS, MosselerA. Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change: a synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Convent Biol Divers Montreal, 2009, 43: 1-67

[51] VauhkonenJ, EneL, GuptaS, et al.. Comparative testing of single-tree detection algorithms under different types of forest. For an Int J for Res, 2012, 85: 27-40

Funding

University of Eastern Finland (including Kuopio University Hospital)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)