A hybrid method for tree-level forest planning

Abstract

Forest inventory is increasingly producing information on the locations and sizes of individual trees. This information can be acquired by airborne or terrestrial laser scanning or analyzing photogrammetric data. However, all trees are seldom detected, especially in young, dense, or multi-layered stands. On the other hand, the complete size distributions of trees can be predicted with various methods, for instance, kNN data imputation in an area-based LiDAR inventory, predicting the parameters of a distribution function from remote sensing data, field sampling, or using histogram matching and calibration methods. The predicted distribution can be used to estimate the number and sizes of the non-detected trees. The study’s objective was to develop a method for forest planning that efficiently uses the available tree-level data in management optimization. The study developed a two-stage hierarchical method for tree-level management optimization for cases where only part of the trees is detected or measured individually. Cutting years and harvest rate curves for the non-detected trees are optimized at the higher level, and the cutting events of the detected trees are optimized at the lower level. The study used differential evolution at the higher level and simulated annealing at the lower level. The method was tested and demonstrated in even-aged Larix olgensis plantations in the Heilongjiang province of China. The optimizations showed that optimizing the harvest decisions at the tree level improves the profitability of management compared to optimizations in which only the dependence of thinning intensity on tree diameter is optimized. The approach demonstrated in this study provides feasible options for tree-level forest planning based on LiDAR inventories. The method is immediately applicable to forestry practice, especially in plantations.

Keywords

Forest planning / Simulated annealing / Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) / Laser scanning / Larix olgensis / Management optimization

References

[1] Baskent EZ. A framework for characterizing and regulating ecosystem services in a management planning context. Forests, 2020

[2] Bettinger P, Graetz D, Boston K, et al.. Eight heuristic planning techniques applied to three increasingly difficult wildlife planning problems. Silva Fennica, 2002, 36: 561-584

[3] Brede B, Calders K, Lau A, et al.. Non-destructive tree volume estimation through quantitative structure modelling: comparing UAV laser scanning with terrestrial LIDAR. Remote Sens Environ, 2019, 233 111355

[4] Chen Q, Baldocchi D, Gong P, Kelly M. Isolating individual trees in a savanna woodland using small footprint LIDAR data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens, 2006, 72: 923-932

[5] Contreras MA, Chung W. Developing a computerized approach for optimizing individual tree removal to efficiently reduce crown fire potential. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 289: 219-233

[6] de Paula PR, Olofsson K, Persson HJ, et al.. Individual tree detection and estimation of stem attributes with mobile laser scanning along boreal forest roads. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens, 2022, 187: 211-224

[7] Dong L, Pukkala T, Li F, Jin X. Developing distance-dependent growth models from irregularly measured sample plot data—a case for Larix olgensis in Northeast China. For Ecol Manage, 2021, 486: 118965

[8] Dong L, Bettinger P, Qin H, Liu Z. Optimizing rotation lengths for maximizing carbon balance of larch plantations in northeast China. J Clean Prod, 2022, 343: 131025

[9] Fransson P, Franklin O, Lindroos O, et al.. A simulation-based approach to a near-optimal thinning strategy: allowing harvesting times to be determined for individual trees. Can J for Res, 2020, 50: 320-331

[10] Gobakken T, Næsset E. Estimation of diameter and basal area distributions in coniferous forest by means of airborne laser scanner data. Scand J for Res, 2004, 19: 529-542

[11] Hao Y, Widagdo FRA, Liu X, et al.. Individual tree diameter estimation in small-scale forest inventory using UAV laser scanning. Remote Sens, 2021

[12] Hao Y, Widagdo FRA, Liu X, et al.. Estimation and calibration of stem diameter distribution using UAV laser scanning data: a case study for larch (Larix olgensis) forests in Northeast China. Remote Sens Environ, 2022, 268: 112769

[13] Hoganson HM, Rose DW. A simulation approach for optimal timber management scheduling. For Sci, 1984, 30(1): 220-238

[14] Hyytiäinen K, Tahvonen O, Valsta L. Optimum juvenile density, harvesting, and stand structure in even-aged Scots pine stands. For Sci, 2005, 51(2120-133

[15] Jeronimo SMA, Kane VR, Churchill DJ, et al.. Applying LiDAR individual tree detection to management of structurally diverse forest landscapes. J for, 2018, 116: 336-346

[16] Jin X, Pukkala T, Li F. Fine-tuning heuristic methods for combinatorial optimization in forest planning. Eur J for Res, 2016, 135: 765-779

[17] Jin XJ, Pukkala T, Li FR, Dong LH. Optimal management of Korean pine plantations in multifunctional forestry. J for Res, 2017, 28(5): 1027-1037

[18] Jin X, Pukkala T, Li F. Meta optimization of stand management with population-based methods. Can J for Res, 2018, 48: 697-708

[19] Kansanen K, Vauhkonen J, Lähivaara T, et al.. Estimating forest stand density and structure using Bayesian individual tree detection, stochastic geometry, and distribution matching. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sen, 2019, 152: 66-78

[20] Kappen G, Kastner E, Kurth T, Puetz J, Reinhardt A, Soininen J (2020) The staggering value of forests-and how to save them. In: Boston consulting group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/the-staggering-value-of-forests-and-how-to-save-them

[21] Leite RV, Silva CA, Mohan M, et al.. Individual tree attribute estimation and uniformity assessment in fast-growing Eucalyptus spp. Forest Plantations Using Lidar Linear Mixed-Effects Models Remote Sens, 2020

[22] Liu K, Shen X, Cao L, et al.. Estimating forest structural attributes using UAV-LiDAR data in Ginkgo plantations. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2018, 146: 465-482

[23] Maltamo M, Malinen J, Packalén P, et al.. Nonparametric estimation of stem volume using airborne laser scanning, aerial photography, and stand-register data. Can J for Res, 2006, 36: 426-436

[24] Mohan M, Silva CA, Klauberg C, et al.. Individual tree detection from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) derived canopy height model in an open canopy mixed conifer forest. Forests, 2017

[25] Næsset E. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sens Environ, 2002, 80: 88-99

[26] Packalén P, Maltamo M. Estimation of species-specific diameter distributions using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs. Can J for Res, 2008, 38: 1750-1760

[27] Packalén P, Temesgen H, Maltamo M. Variable selection strategies for nearest neighbor imputation methods used in remote sensing based forest inventory. Can J Remote Sens, 2012, 38: 557-569

[28] Packalen P, Strunk JL, Pitkänen JA, et al.. Edge-tree correction for predicting forest inventory attributes using area-based approach with airborne laser scanning. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens, 2015, 8: 1274-1280

[29] Packalen P, Pukkala T, Pascual A. Combining spatial and economic criteria in tree-level harvest planning. For Ecosyst, 2020

[30] Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, et al.. (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 1979, 333: 988-993

[31] Pascual A. Multi-objective forest planning at tree-level combining mixed integer programming and airborne laser scanning. For Ecol Manage, 2021, 483 118714

[32] Pascual A, Guerra-Hernández J. Spatial connectivity in tree-level decision-support models using mathematical optimization and individual tree mapping. For Policy Econ, 2022, 139: 102732

[33] Pascual A (2019) Using Tree Detection Based on Airborne Laser Scanning to Improve Forest Inventory Considering Edge Effects and the Co-Registration Factor. Remote Sens 11:. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11222675

[34] Peng W, Pukkala T, Jin X, Li F. Optimal management of larch (Larix olgensis A. Henry) plantations in Northeast China when timber production and carbon stock are considered. Ann for Sci, 2018, 75: 63

[35] Peuhkurinen J, Mehtätalo L, Maltamo M. Comparing individual tree detection and the area-based statistical approach for the retrieval of forest stand characteristics using airborne laser scanning in Scots pine stands. Can J for Res, 2011, 41: 583-598

[36] Pippuri I, Maltamo M, Packalen P, Mäkitalo J. Predicting species-specific basal areas in urban forests using airborne laser scanning and existing stand register data. Eur J for Res, 2013, 132: 999-1012

[37] Pukkala T. Population-based methods in the optimization of stand management. Silva Fennica, 2009, 43: 261-274

[38] Pukkala T. Improved guidelines for any-aged forestry. J for Res, 2022, 33(5): 1443-1457

[39] Pukkala T, Heinonen T. Optimizing heuristic search in forest planning. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl, 2006, 7: 1284-1297

[40] Pukkala T, Miina J, Kurttila M, Kolström T. A spatial yield model for optimizing the thinning regime of mixed stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies. Scand J for Res, 1998, 13: 31-42

[41] Pukkala T, Heinonen T, Kurttila M. An application of a reduced cost approach to spatial forest planning. For Sci, 2009, 55(1): 13-22

[42] Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O. Which trees should be removed in thinning treatments?. For Ecosyst, 2015, 2: 32

[43] Quan Y, Li M, Hao Y, Wang B. Comparison and evaluation of different pit-filling methods for generating high resolution canopy height model using UAV laser scanning data. Remote Sens, 2021

[44] Richards F. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot, 1959, 10: 290-300

[45] Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim, 1997, 11: 341-359

[46] Sun Y, Wang W, Pukkala T, Jin X. Stand delineation based on laser scanning data and simulated annealing. Eur J for Res, 2021, 140: 1065-1080

[47] Sun Y, Jin X, Pukkala T, Li F. Predicting individual tree diameter of larch (Larix olgensis) from UAV-LiDAR data using six different algorithms. Remote Sens, 2022

[48] Sun Y, Jin X, Pukkala T, Li F. Two-level optimization approach to tree-level forest planning. For Ecosyst, 2022, 9 100001

[49] Sun Y, Jin X, Pukkala T, Li F. A comparison of four methods for automatic delineation of tree stands from grids of LiDAR metrics. Remote Sens, 2022

[50] Valbuena R, Packalen P, Martı´n-Fernández S, Maltamo M. Diversity and equitability ordering profiles applied to study forest structure. For Ecol Manage, 2012, 276: 185-195

[51] Vauhkonen J, Ene L, Gupta S, et al.. Comparative testing of single-tree detection algorithms under different types of forest. Forestry Int J Forest Res, 2012, 85: 27-40

[52] Wang M, Im J, Zhao Y, Zhen Z. Multi-platform LiDAR for Non-destructive individual aboveground biomass estimation for Changbai Larch (Larix olgensis Henry) using a Hierarchical Bayesian approach. Remote Sens, 2022

[53] Weinstein BG, Marconi S, Bohlman S, et al.. Individual Tree-Crown Detection in RGB Imagery Using Semi-Supervised Deep Learning Neural Networks. Remote Sens, 2019

[54] Wing BM, Boston K, Ritchie MW. A technique for implementing group selection treatments with multiple objectives using an airborne Lidar-derived stem map in a heuristic environment. Forest Sci, 2019, 65: 211-222

[55] Xiao W, Xu S, Elberink SO, Vosselman G. Individual tree crown modeling and change detection from Airborne Lidar data. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens, 2016, 9: 3467-3477

[56] Xu Q, Hou Z, Maltamo M, Tokola T. Retrieving suppressed trees from model-based height distribution by combining high- and low-density airborne laser scanning data. Can J Remote Sens, 2014, 40: 233-242

[57] Yu X, Hyyppä J, Holopainen M, Vastaranta M. Comparison of area-based and individual tree-based methods for predicting plot-level forest attributes. Remote Sens, 2010, 2: 1481-1495

[58] Zaforemska A, Xiao W, Gaulton R (2019) Individual tree detection from UAV Lidar data in a mixed species Woodland. In: The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences XLII-2/W13: 657–663. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-657-2019

Funding

University of Eastern Finland (including Kuopio University Hospital)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)