Control efficacy and persistence of fluopyram dust against pine wilt disease

Yajie Guo , Jiayi Ma , Mingqing Weng , Rebeca Carballar-Lejarazú , Wenlong Jiao , Jieqin Wu , Feiping Zhang , Songqing Wu

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 48

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) :48 DOI: 10.1007/s11676-025-01847-6
Original Paper
research-article

Control efficacy and persistence of fluopyram dust against pine wilt disease

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The effectiveness of fluopyram suspension concentrate against pine wilt disease (PWD) is limited by spraying efficiency and water dependence. A traditional dust formulation with strong dispersibility can overcome these shortcomings. However, its efficacy against PWD remains uncertain. This study evaluated the translocation of fluopyram dust within tree tissues, soil and water degradation, and its effective control against PWD. Nursery tests showed effective prevention; field tests showed dust absorption and translocation into pine tissues. Thirty days following application, residual concentrations in soil were low at 0.09 mg kg−1; no detectable residues were found in water samples. Three years after applying fluopyram, its effectiveness increased to approximately 87%. Based on this study, fluopyram had a half-life of 346 d with persistence lasting up to three years. This provides valuable insight for managing PWD through dust applications.

Keywords

Pine wilt disease / Fluopyram / Dust formulation / Efficacy / Persistence

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yajie Guo, Jiayi Ma, Mingqing Weng, Rebeca Carballar-Lejarazú, Wenlong Jiao, Jieqin Wu, Feiping Zhang, Songqing Wu. Control efficacy and persistence of fluopyram dust against pine wilt disease. Journal of Forestry Research, 2025, 36(1): 48 DOI:10.1007/s11676-025-01847-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aćimović SG, VanWoerkom AH, Reeb PD, Vandervoort C, Garavaglia T, Cregg BM, Wise JC. Spatial and temporal distribution of trunk-injected imidacloprid in apple tree canopies. Pest Manag Sci, 2014, 70(11): 1751-1760

[2]

Anhui Provincial Forest Pest Control Station (2006) Control technology of pine wood nematode disease. China Forestry Publishing House, China. Vol. DB34/T496-2005

[3]

Baermann G. Eine einfache methode zur auffindung von Ankylostomum (Nematoden) larven in erdproben. Geneesk Tijdschr Ned-Indië, 1917, 57: 131-137(in German)

[4]

Cabrera JA, Menjivar RD, Dababat AEA, Sikora RA. Properties and nematicide performance of avermectins. J Phytopathol, 2013, 161(2): 65-69

[5]

Chen YH, Ye JR, Wei CJ. Effect of pine wood nematode (PWN) infection on PhenylpropanesMetabolism in Masson pine seedlings. Sci Silvae Sin, 2006, 42(2): 73-77(in Chinese)

[6]

Dipak KH, Aloke P. Role of pesticide formulations for sustainable crop protection and environment management: a review. J Pharmacogn Phytochem, 2019, 8(2): 686-693

[7]

Dong BZ. Transformation mechanism of the novel fungicide fluopyram in environment and biological toxicity of its transformation products. Doctoral dissertation, 2016, Beijing, University of Science and Technology

[8]

Gams W, Van Der Aa H, Van Der Plaats-Niterink A, Samson R, Stalpers JA (1987) CBS course of mycology. In: Gams W, Van Der Aa H, Van Der Plaats-Niterink A, Samson R, Stalpers JA (eds). Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn, Netherlands pp 104

[9]

Guo YJ, Ma JY, Sun YZ, Carballar-Lejarazú R, Weng MQ, Shi WC, Wu JQ, Hu X, Wang R, Zhang FP, Wu SQ. Spatiotemporal dynamics of fluopyram trunk-injection in Pinus massoniana and its efficacy against pine wilt disease. Pest Manag Sci, 2023, 79(6): 2230-2238

[10]

Guo YJ, Ma JY, You ZY, Weng MQ, Carballar-Lejarazú R, Jiao WL, Wu JQ, Hu X, Wang R, Zhang FP, Wu SQ. Field efficacy of fluopyram suspension concentrate against pine wilt disease and its distribution and persistence in pine tree tissues. Forests, 2023, 14(2): 338

[11]

Hazra DK, Karmakar R, Poi R, Bhattacharya S, Mondal S. Recent advances in pesticide formulations for eco-friendly and sustainable vegetable pest management: a review. Arch Agric Environ Sci, 2017, 2: 232-237

[12]

Huang CQ, Zhu QY, Zhou HK. Experiment against Monochamus alternatus with 2% thiacloprid micro-capsule powder. Fujian for, 2013, 1: 38-40(in Chinese)

[13]

James R, Tisserat N, Todd T. Prevention of pine wilt of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) with systemic abamectin injections. Arboric Urban for, 2006, 32(5195-201

[14]

Kim JC, Baek S, Park SE, Kim S, Lee MR, Jo M, Im JS, Ha P, Kim JS, Shin TY. Colonization of Metarhizium anisopliae on the surface of pine tree logs: a promising biocontrol strategy for the Japanese pine sawyer. Monochamus Alternatus Fungal Biol, 2020, 124(2): 125-134

[15]

Knowles A. Recent developments of safer formulations of agrochemicals. Environ, 2008, 28(1): 35-44

[16]

Li BC. Handbook of practical detection methods for pesticide residues (II), 2001, Beijing, Chemical industry press Co., Ltd

[17]

Liu GY, Lin X, Xu SY, Liu G, Liu ZY, Liu F, Mu W. Efficacy of fluopyram as a candidate trunk-injection agent against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Eur J Plant Pathol, 2020, 157(2): 403-411

[18]

Mamiya Y. History of pine wilt disease in Japan. J Nematol, 1988, 20(2): 219-226

[19]

Rathod PH, Shah PG, Parmar KD, Kalasariya RL. The fate of fluopyram in the soil-water-plant ecosystem: a review. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol, 2022, 260(1): 1

[20]

Rodrigues JM. Mota MM, Vieira P. National eradication programme for the pinewood nematode. Pine wilt disease: a worldwide threat to forest ecosystems, 2008, Dordrecht, Springer5-14

[21]

Sousa E, Rodrigues JM, Bonifácio L, Naves PM, Rodrigues A. Fausto B, Jordan A, Chung. Management and control of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Nematodes: morphology, functions and management strategies, 2011, Nova, Nova Science Publishers Inc.157178

[22]

Sousa E, Naves P, Vieira M. Prevention of pine wilt disease induced by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and Monochamus galloprovincialis by trunk injection of emamectin benzoate. Phytoparasitica, 2013, 41(2): 143-148

[23]

Takai K, Soejima T, Suzuki T, Kawazu K. Development of a water-soluble preparation of emamectin benzoate and its preventative effect against the wilting of pot-grown pine trees inoculated with the pine wood nematode, BursaphelenchusXylophilus. Pest Manag Sci, 2001, 57(5): 463-466

[24]

Takai K, Suzuki T, Kawazu K. Distribution and persistence of emamectin benzoate at efficacious concentrations in pine tissues after injection of a liquid formulation. Pest Manag Sci, 2004, 60(1): 42-48

[25]

Togashi K. Population density of Monochamus alternatus adults (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and incidence of pine wilt disease caused byBursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae). Res Popul Ecol, 1988, 30(2): 177-192

[26]

Yang ZH, Tian H, Liu YY. Research development of new-type bactericide-fluopyram. Mod Chem Res, 2017, 4: 103-104(in Chinese)

[27]

Yang HP, Zhang RF, Li Z, Maienfisch P, Xu XY. Design, synthesis and nematicidal activitives of trifluorobutene amide derivatives against Meloidogyne incognita. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 2021, 40 127917

[28]

Zhang ZH. Handbook of pesticide residue detection and quality control, 2009, Beijing, Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd

[29]

Zhang GZ, Zhang YF, Ding YZ. Transportation and effect of omethoate injected in the trunk. Forest Pest Dis, 2001, 1: 11-13(in Chinese)

[30]

Zhou DG. Fluopyram: a new generation of excellent nematicide. World Pesticides, 2016, 38: 61-63(in Chinese)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Northeast Forestry University

PDF

18

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/