Comparing tree stress rank and tree condition to determine red oak (Quercus spp.) health in Greentree Reservoirs in the lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley

Cassandra Hug , Pradip Saud , Keight McKnight , Ryan J. Askren , Douglas Osborne

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 33

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) :33 DOI: 10.1007/s11676-025-01826-x
Original Paper
research-article

Comparing tree stress rank and tree condition to determine red oak (Quercus spp.) health in Greentree Reservoirs in the lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Individual tree health plays a vital role in maintaining a forest’s ecological functions, including resources for waterfowl and other wildlife. Seasonal flooding due to altered hydrology is a major stressor on individual tree health in Greentree reservoirs (GTR), impounded bottomland hardwood forests especially less water tolerant species like red oaks (Quercus spp.). We evaluated the health of individual red oak species (n = 6,432) in 662 plots across elevation gradients in 12 GTRs within the lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley using two tree health assessment approaches. The first approach assigns tree conditions (i.e., stressed, moderate, low) based on overall qualitative tree attributes, while the second approach ranks stress, assigning numerical value based on the severity of four distinct qualitative tree attributes (i.e., tip dieback, epicormics branch, bark condition, basal swell). The result indicated that the highest mean stress rank and the highest proportion of stressed tree conditions were red oak species, nuttall oak (Q. texana; 18.59, 0.44), willow oak (Q. phellos; 18.66, 0.38) and cherrybark oak (Q. pagoda; 18.90, 0.37). Red oak stress is positively correlated to elevation across the landscape (τ = 0.10, p < 0.001), but is negatively correlated to relative elevation, topographical changes, within each GTR (τ =  − 0.11, p < 0.001). Additionally, the two health assessments are significantly associated (χ2 = 313.78, df = 2, p < 0.001) and had a 13.1% misclassification rate. By utilizing the stress rank method for better classification of tree conditions to understand the adverse effect of prolonged flooding on the health of desirable red oak and other native tree species, management practices can be adjusted to improve tree health in GTRs, benefiting both wildlife and economic value.

Keywords

Bottomland hardwood forest / Elevation / Flooding disturbance / Health indicator / Misclassification

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Cassandra Hug, Pradip Saud, Keight McKnight, Ryan J. Askren, Douglas Osborne. Comparing tree stress rank and tree condition to determine red oak (Quercus spp.) health in Greentree Reservoirs in the lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Journal of Forestry Research, 2025, 36(1): 33 DOI:10.1007/s11676-025-01826-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adams DE, Anderson RC. Species response to a moisture gradient in central Illinois forests. Am J Bot, 1980, 67(3): 381-392

[2]

Allen JA, Keeland BD, Stanturf JA, Clewell AF, Kennedy HE (2004) A guide to bottomland hardwood restoration: U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Information and Technology Report, USDA

[3]

Arkansas Association of Conservation Districts (2006) Watershed Land Use Map- Bayou Meto. Arkansas Water. map. Retrieved July 30, 2023, From https://arkansaswater.org/29-watershed/119-bayou-meto-08020402

[4]

Brazee NJ, Marra RE, Göcke L, Van Wassenaer P. Non-destructive assessment of internal decay in three hardwood species of northeastern North America using sonic and electrical impedance tomography. Forestry (Lond), 2011, 84(1): 33-39

[5]

Carpenter JR, Mitchell CA. Root respiration characteristics of flood-tolerant and intolerant tree Species1. J Amer Soc Hort Sci, 1980, 105(5): 684-687

[6]

Coleman TW, Graves AD, Heath Z, Flowers RW, Hanavan RP, Cluck DR, Ryerson D. Accuracy of aerial detection surveys for mapping insect and disease disturbances in the United States. For Ecol Manag, 2018, 430: 321-336

[7]

Eichhorn J, Roskams P. Assessment of tree condition. Dev Environ Sci, 2013, 12: 139-167

[8]

Ervin GN, Majure LC, Bried JT. Influence of long-term greentree reservoir impoundment on stand structure, species composition, and hydrophytic Indicators. J Torrey Bot Soc, 2006, 133(3): 468-481

[9]

Esri Inc. (2022). ArcGIS Pro (Version 3.0.3). Esri Inc. https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-pro/overview

[10]

Ferretti M. Forest health assessment and monitoring–issues for consideration. Environ Monit Assess, 1997, 48(1): 45-72

[11]

Fredrickson L (1979) Floral and faunal changes in lowland hardwood forests in Missouri resulting from channelization, drainage, and impoundment

[12]

George E, Horst WJ, Neumann E (2012) Adaptation of plants to adverse chemical soil conditions. In: Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Elsevier, p 409–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-384905-2.00017-0

[13]

Grell AG, Shelton MG, Heitzman E. Changes in plant species composition along an elevation gradient in an old-growth bottomland hardwood-Pinus taeda forest in southern Arkansas. J Torrey Bot Soc, 2005, 132(1): 72-89

[14]

Guillemette F, Bédard S, Fortin M. Evaluation of a tree classification system in relation to mortality risk in Québec northern hardwoods. For Chron, 2008, 84(6): 886-899

[15]

Guo YF, Shelton M, Lockhart BR. Effects of flood duration and season on germination of black, cherrybark, northern red, and water oak acorns. New for, 1998, 15(1): 69-76

[16]

Guo Y, Shelton MG, Heitzman E, Outcalt KW (2002) Effects of flood duration and depth on germination of cherrybark, post, southern red, white, and willow oak acorns. In: Eleventh Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, p 55

[17]

Haq SM, Waheed M, Khoja AA, Amjad MS, Bussmann RW, Ali K, Jones DA. Measuring forest health at stand level: a multi-indicator evaluation for use in adaptive management and policy. Ecol Indic, 2023, 150: 110225

[18]

Harris LD, Gosselink JG (2020) Cumulative impacts of bottomland hardwood forest conversion on hydrology, water quality, and terrestrial wildlife. In: Ecological processes and cumulative impacts. CRC Press, p 259–322. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367811587-11

[19]

Heitmeyer ME. The importance of winter floods to mallards in the Mississippi alluvial valley. J Wildl Manag, 2006, 70(1): 101-110

[20]

Hug C, Saud P, McKnight K, Osborne DC. Forest composition and red oak (Quercus sp.) response to elevation gradients across greentree reservoirs. For Ecosyst, 2023, 10: 100141

[21]

Jenkins M, Schaap B (2018). Forest ecosystem services. Background analytical study, 1

[22]

Johnson EA, Miyanishi K (2021) Disturbance and succession. In: Plant disturbance ecology. Elsevier, p 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818813-2.00001-0

[23]

Kassahun Z, Renninger HJ. Effects of drought on water use of seven tree species from four genera growing in a bottomland hardwood forest. Agric for Meteorol, 2021, 301–302: 108353

[24]

Keeland BD, Draugelis-Dale RO, McCoy JW. Tree growth and mortality during 20Years of managing a green-tree reservoir in Arkansas, USA. Wetlands, 2010, 30(3405-416

[25]

King SL, Keim RF. Hydrologic modifications challenge bottomland hardwood forest management. J for, 2019, 117(5504-514

[26]

Klimas C, Foti TL, Pagan J, Murray EO, Williamson M (2012) Potential natural vegetation of the Mississippi alluvial valley: western Lowlands, Arkansas, field atlas

[27]

Krieger DJ (2001) Economic value of forest ecosystem services: a review

[28]

Lambers H, Chapin FS III, Pons TL (1998) Plant physiological ecology. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78341-3

[29]

Lausch A, Erasmi S, King D, Magdon P, Heurich M. Understanding forest health with remote sensing-part I—a review of spectral traits, processes and remote-sensing characteristics. Remote Sens, 2016, 8(12): 1029

[30]

Lausch A, Erasmi S, King D, Magdon P, Heurich M. Understanding forest health with remote sensing-part II—a review of approaches and data models. Remote Sens, 2017, 9(2129

[31]

Leitman HM, Sohm JE, Franklin MA (1982) Wetland hydrology and tree distribution of the Apalachicola River flood plain, Florida

[32]

Li HB, Zhang XW, Li ZQ, Wen J, Tan X. A review of research on tree risk assessment methods. Forests, 2022, 13(101556

[33]

Looney CE, D’Amato AW, Fraver S, Palik BJ, Frelich LE. Interspecific competition limits the realized niche of Fraxinus nigraalong a waterlogging gradient. Can J for Res, 2018, 48(111292-1301

[34]

MacDonald PO, Frayer WE, Clauser JK (1979) Documentation, chronology, and future projections of bottomland hardwood habitat loss in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Plain: Appendices (Vol 2). Ecological Services, Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior

[35]

Mahaffey A, Evans A (2016) Ecological Forestry Practices for Bottomland Hardwood Forests of the Southeastern US Forest Stewards Guild, p 44. https://foreststewardsguild.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/FSG_Bottomland_Hardwoodsweb

[36]

McKnight JS, Hook DD, Langdon OG, Johnson RL (1981) Flood tolerance and related characteristics of trees of the bottomland forests of the southern United States. In: Wetlands of bottomland hardwood forests. Elsevier, p 29–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-42020-6.50010-x

[37]

Meadows JS, Hodges JD (1997) Silviculture of southern bottomland hardwoods: 25 years of change

[38]

Meadows JS (1993) Logging damage to residual trees following partial cutting in a green ash-sugarberry stand in the Mississippi delta

[39]

Moreau G, Cecil-Cockwell MJ, Pothier D, Achim A, Bédard S, Guillemette F, Caspersen J. Visual assessment of tree vigour in Canadian northern hardwood forests: the need for a simplified system. For Ecol Manage, 2023, 529: 120720

[40]

National Centers for Environmental Information (2022) Global Summary of the Year (GSOY), Version 1. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/search/data-search/global-summary-of-the-year. (Accessed 21 March 2023)

[41]

Naudiyal N, Schmerbeck J. The changing Himalayan landscape: pine-oak forest dynamics and the supply of ecosystem services. J for Res, 2017, 28(3): 431-443

[42]

Pezeshki SR, Chambers JL. Responses of cherrybark oak seedlings to short-term flooding. For Sci, 1985, 31(3760-771

[43]

Ponnamperuma FN (1984) Effects of flooding on soils. In: Flooding and plant growth. Elsevier, p 9–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-424120-6.50007-9

[44]

Potter K, Conkling B (2013) Forest Health Monitoring: national status, trends, and analysis 2012. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station

[45]

R Core Team (2022) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

[46]

Ramsfield TD, Bentz BJ, Faccoli M, Jactel H, Brockerhoff EG. Forest health in a changing world: effects of globalization and climate change on forest insect and pathogen impacts. For, 2016, 89(3): 245-252

[47]

Rives RG, Knapp BO, Olson MG, Weegman MD, Muzika RM. Regenerating mixed bottomland hardwood forests in north Missouri: Effects of harvest treatment on structure, composition, and growth through 15 years. For Ecol Manag, 2020, 475: 118371

[48]

Roussel JR, Auty D, Coops NC, Tompalski P, Goodbody TRH, Meador AS, Bourdon JF, de Boissieu F, Achim A. lidR: an R package for analysis of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. Remote Sens Environ, 2020, 251: 112061

[49]

Rozas V, García-González I. Too wet for oaks? Inter-tree competition and recent persistent wetness predispose oaks to rainfall-induced dieback in Atlantic rainy forest. Glob Planet Change, 2012, 94: 62-71

[50]

Schmidt JP, Moore R, Alber M. Integrating ecosystem services and local government finances into land use planning: a case study from coastal Georgia. Landsc Urban Plan, 2014, 122: 56-67

[51]

Seidl R, Thom D, Kautz M, Martin-Benito D, Peltoniemi M, Vacchiano G, Wild J, Ascoli D, Petr M, Honkaniemi J, Lexer MJ, Trotsiuk V, Mairota P, Svoboda M, Fabrika M, Nagel TA, Reyer CPO. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nature Clim Change, 2017, 7(6): 395-402

[52]

Sierota Z, Grodzki W, Szczepkowski A. Abiotic and biotic disturbances affecting forest health in Poland over the past 30 years: impacts of climate and forest management. Forests, 2019, 10(1): 75

[53]

Souza AF. A review of the structure and dynamics of Araucaria mixed forests in southern Brazil and northern Argentina. N Z J Bot, 2021, 59(12-54

[54]

Spears JG, Wallen KE, Osborne DC. Value similarity and trustworthiness predict support for waterfowl management. Wildl Soc Bull, 2022, 46: e1375

[55]

Spears JG, Wallen KE, Osborne DC. Value similarity and trustworthiness predict support for waterfowl management policy. Wildl Soc Bull, 2022, 46(5): e1375

[56]

Stone C, Mohammed C. Application of remote sensing technologies for assessing planted forests damaged by insect pests and fungal pathogens: a review. Curr for Rep, 2017, 3(275-92

[57]

Straub JN, Leach AG, Kaminski RM, Ezell AW, Leininger TD. Red oak acorn yields in green-tree reservoirs and nonimpounded forests in Mississippi. Wildl Soc Bull, 2019, 43(3491-499

[58]

Taylor D. Seeing the forests for the more than the trees. Environ Health Perspect, 1997, 105(11): 1186-1191

[59]

Twilley RR, Bentley SJSr, Chen Q, Edmonds DA, Hagen SC, Lam NS, Willson CS, Xu KH, Braud D, Hampton Peele R, McCall A. Co-evolution of wetland landscapes, flooding, and human settlement in the Mississippi River delta plain. Sustain Sci, 2016, 11(4): 711-731

[60]

Tyagi A, Ali S, Mir RA, Sharm S, Arpit K, Almalki MA, Mir ZA. Uncovering the effect of waterlogging stress on plant microbiome and disease development: current knowledge and future perspectives. Front Plant Sci, 2024, 15: 1407789

[61]

Unger IM, Kennedy AC, Muzika RM. Flooding effects on soil microbial communities. Appl Soil Ecol, 2009, 42(1): 1-8

[62]

United States Soil Conservation Service, Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station & University Of Arkansas, F. C. E. S. (1982) General soil map, state of Arkansas. [Fayetteville, Ark.: The Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture; Washington, D.C.?: U.S. Dept of Agriculture] [Map] Retrieved from the Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/90684418/

[63]

US Climate Data (2022) Weather averages Pine Bluff, Arkansas. Temperature - Precipitation - Sunshine - Snowfall. https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/pine-bluff/arkansas/united-states/usar1013

[64]

Wahlenberg WG. Epicormic branching of young yellow-poplar. J for, 1950, 48(9417-419

[65]

Walls RL, Wardrop DH, Brooks RP. The impact of experimental sedimentation and flooding on the growth and germination of floodplain trees. Plant Ecol, 2005, 176(2): 203-213

[66]

Wigley TB, Filer T. Characteristics of greentree reservoirs: a survey of managers. Wildl Soc Bull, 1989, 17(2): 136-142

[67]

Wu JN, Zeng HH, Zhao F, Chen CF, Singh AK, Jiang XJ, Yang B, Liu WJ. Plant hydrological niches become narrow but stable as the complexity of interspecific competition increases. Agric for Meteor, 2022, 320: 108953

[68]

Young GL, Karr BL, Leoplod BD, Hodges JD. Effect of greentree reservoir management on Mississippi bottomland hard- woods. Wildl Soc Bull, 1995, 17(2136-142

[69]

Zellers R (2021) Gov. Hutchinson emphasizes importance of waterfowl, rice to Arkansas. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. Retrieved on February 18, 2022, Available at: https://www.agfc.com/en/news/2021/04/14/gov-hutchinson-emphasizes-importance-of-waterfowl-rice-to-arkansas/#:~:text=More%20than%20100%2C000%20waterfowl%20hunters,each%20day%20of%20duck%20season

[70]

Zellers R (2022) Forest Management and recovery work beginning in Bayou Meto. Forest management and recovery work beginning in Bayou Meto - News. Available at: https://www.agfc.com/en/news/2022/07/27/forest-management-and-recovery-work-beginning-in-bayou-meto/

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

28

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/