Effects of different light intensity on the growth, physiological and biochemical properties, and stomatal ultrastructure of Rhododendron micranthum saplings

Yan Zhao , Duo Xu , Zhihui Yu , Jiaqi Huang , Jiahui Li , Yang Sun , Xuhe Wang , Qingtao Wang , Xiaowei Wang

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 25

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 25 DOI: 10.1007/s11676-024-01819-2
Original Paper

Effects of different light intensity on the growth, physiological and biochemical properties, and stomatal ultrastructure of Rhododendron micranthum saplings

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Rhododendron micranthum Turcz. is a shrub esteemed for its ornamental and medicinal attributes within the Changbai Mountain range of China. We selected 3-year saplings and subjected them to four distinct light conditions: full light (CK), 70% light (L1), 50% light (L2), and 30% light (L3) to investigate variations in morphology, photosynthetic responses, stomatal ultrastructure as well as the mechanisms through which these saplings adapt to differing lighting environments. The results indicate that L2 leaves exhibit significantly greater length, width, and petiole development compared to other treatments across varying intensities. Over time, chlorophyll content and PSII levels in L2-treated saplings surpass those observed in other treatments; Proline (PRO), malondialdehyde (MDA), and soluble protein (SP) contents are markedly lower under L2 treatment. Catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) demonstrate significant correlations across various light conditions but respond differently among treatments, indicating distinct species sensitivities to light intensity while both contribute to environmental stress resistance mechanisms. Findings reveal that R. micranthum saplings at 50% light intensity benefit from enhanced protection via antioxidant enzymes, and shading reduces osmotic adjustment substances yet increases chlorophyll content. Stomatal length/width along with conductance rates and net photosynthesis rates for L2 exceed those of CK, suggesting an improved photosynthetic structure conducive to efficient photosynthesis under this condition. Thus, moderate shading represents optimal growth at 50% illumination, a critical factor promoting sapling development. This research elucidates the ideal environment for R. micranthum adaptation to varying light conditions supporting future conservation initiatives.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yan Zhao, Duo Xu, Zhihui Yu, Jiaqi Huang, Jiahui Li, Yang Sun, Xuhe Wang, Qingtao Wang, Xiaowei Wang. Effects of different light intensity on the growth, physiological and biochemical properties, and stomatal ultrastructure of Rhododendron micranthum saplings. Journal of Forestry Research, 2025, 36(1): 25 DOI:10.1007/s11676-024-01819-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Araus JL, Alegre L, Tapia L, Calafell R, Serret MD. Relationships between photosynthetic capacity and leaf structure in several shade plants Am J Bot, 1986, 73(12): 1760.

[2]

Baltzer JL, Thomas SC. Physiological and morphological correlates of whole-plant light compensation point in temperate deciduous tree seedlings Oecologia, 2007, 153(2): 209-223.

[3]

Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies Plant Soil, 1973, 39(1): 205-207.

[4]

Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels Anal Biochem, 1971, 44(1): 276-287.

[5]

Bhusal N, Kim HS, Han SG, Yoon TM. Photosynthetic traits and plant–water relations of two apple cultivars grown as bi-leader trees under long-term waterlogging conditions Environ Exp Bot, 2020, 176: 104111.

[6]

Brooks JR, Hinckley TM, Sprugel DG. Acclimation responses of mature Abies amabilis Sun foliage to shading Oecologia, 1994, 100(3): 316-324.

[7]

Chai B, Li Y, Yu SS. Three new antinociceptive diterpenoids from the roots of Rhododendron micranthum J Asian Nat Prod Res, 2020, 22(10): 895-904.

[8]

Dai YJ, Shen ZG, Liu Y, Wang LL, Hannaway D, Lu HF. Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg Environ Exp Bot, 2009, 65(2–3): 177-182.

[9]

Deng JY, Wang YJ, Chen LF, Luo T, Wang R, Chen XY. Functional trait divergence associated with heteromorphic leaves in a climbing fig Front Plant Sci, 2023, 14: 1261240.

[10]

Draper HH, Squires EJ, Mahmoodi H, Wu J, Agarwal S, Hadley M. A comparative evaluation of thiobarbituric acid methods for the determination of malondialdehyde in biological materials Free Radic Biol Med, 1993, 15(4): 353-363.

[11]

Eskandarzade P, Zare Mehrjerdi M, Didaran F, Gruda NS, Aliniaeifard S. Shading level and harvest time affect the photosynthetic and physiological properties of basil varieties Agronomy, 2023, 13(10): 2478.

[12]

Gao Z, Khalid M, Jan F, Saeed-ur-Rahman JX, Yu X. Effects of light-regulation and intensity on the growth, physiological and biochemical properties of Aralia elata (miq.) seedlings S Afr N J Bot, 2019, 121: 456-462.

[13]

Guo YH, Yuan C, Tang L, Peng JM, Zhang KL, Li G, Ma XJ. Responses of clonal growth and photosynthesis in Amomum villosum to different light environments Photosynthetica, 2016, 54(3): 396-404.

[14]

Han S, Chen SM, Song AP, Liu RX, Li HY, Jiang JF, Chen FD. Photosynthetic responses of Chrysanthemum morifolium to growth irradiance: morphology, anatomy and chloroplast ultrastructure Photosynthetica, 2017, 55(1): 184-192.

[15]

Huai-Ju C, Cheng-Ling C, Hsu-Liang H. Far-red light-mediated seedling development in Arabidopsis involves FAR-RED INSENSITIVE 219/JASMONATE RESISTANT 1-dependent and-independent pathways PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(7): e0132723.

[16]

Huang D, Wu L, Chen JR, Dong L. Morphological plasticity, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of Athyrium pachyphlebium at different shade levels Photosynthetica, 2011, 49(4): 611-618.

[17]

Izanloo A, Condon AG, Langridge P, Tester M, Schnurbusch T. Different mechanisms of adaptation to cyclic water stress in two South Australian bread wheat cultivars J Exp Bot, 2008, 59(12): 3327-3346.

[18]

Khaliluev MR, Bogoutdinova LR, Raldugina GN, Baranova EN. A simple and effective bioassay method suitable to comparative in vitro study of tomato salt tolerance at early development stages Methods Protoc, 2022, 5(1): 11.

[19]

Li L, Tong YX, Lu JL, Li YM, Liu X, Cheng RF. Morphology, photosynthetic traits, and nutritional quality of lettuce plants as affected by green light substituting proportion of blue and red light Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 627311.

[20]

Li BJ, Deng M, Pan YM, Rong JD, He TY, Chen LG, Zheng YS. Responses of planting modes to photosynthetic characteristics and fluorescence parameters of Fokienia hodginsii seedlings in a heterogeneous nutrient environment Forests, 2023, 14(5): 984.

[21]

Lichtenthaler HK (1987) [34] Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. In: Methods in enzymology. Elsevier, pp 350–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1

[22]

Liu H, Zang RG, Chen HYH. Effects of grazing on photosynthetic features and soil respiration of rangelands in the Tianshan Mountains of Northwest China Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 30087.

[23]

Liu X, Li LM, Li MJ, Su LC, Lian SM, Zhang BH, Li XY, Ge K, Li L. AhGLK1 affects chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis in peanut leaves during recovery from drought Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 2250.

[24]

Loik ME, Holl KD. Photosynthetic responses to light for rainforest seedlings planted in abandoned pasture Costa Rica Restor Ecol, 1999, 7(4): 382-391.

[25]

Lv XC, Li YH, Chen RJ, Rui MM, Wang YZ. Stomatal responses of two drought-tolerant barley varieties with different ROS regulation strategies under drought conditions Antioxidants (Basel), 2023, 12(4): 790.

[26]

Ma XH, Song LL, Yu WW, Hu YY, Liu Y, Wu JS, Ying YQ. Growth, physiological, and biochemical responses of Camptotheca acuminata seedlings to different light environments Front Plant Sci, 2015, 6: 321.

[27]

Ma XM, Liu Q, Zhang ZD, Zhang ZW, Zhou ZY, Jiang Y, Huang XR. Effects of photosynthetic models on the calculation results of photosynthetic response parameters in young Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr. plantation PLoS ONE, 2021, 16(12): e0261683.

[28]

Mäkinen KK, Tenovuo J. Observations on the use of guaiacol and 2, 2'-azino-di(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) as peroxidase substrates Anal Biochem, 1982, 126(1): 100-108.

[29]

Man JG, Yu ZW, Shi Y. Radiation interception, chlorophyll fluorescence and senescence of flag leaves in winter wheat under supplemental irrigation Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 7767.

[30]

Meda A, Lamien CE, Romito M, Millogo J, Nacoulma OG. Determination of the total phenolic, flavonoid and proline contents in Burkina Fasan honey, as well as their radical scavenging activity Food Chem, 2005, 91(3): 571-577.

[31]

Nell TA, Allen JJ, Joiner JN, Albrigo LG. Light, fertilizer, and water level effects on growth, yield, nutrient composition, and light compensation point of Chrysanthemum1 HortScience, 1981, 16(2): 222-224.

[32]

Pathre U, Sinha AK, Shirke PA, Sane PV. Factors determining the midday depression of photosynthesis in trees under monsoon climate Trees, 1998, 12(8): 472-481.

[33]

Pearson M, Saarinen M, Nummelin L, Heiskanen J, Roitto M, Sarjala T, Laine J. Tolerance of peat-grown Scots pine seedlings to waterlogging and drought: morphological, physiological, and metabolic responses to stress For Ecol Manag, 2013, 307: 43-53.

[34]

Pepe M, Crescente MF, Varone L. Effect of water stress on physiological and morphological leaf traits: a comparison among the three widely-spread invasive alien species Ailanthus altissima, Phytolacca Americana, and Robinia pseudoacacia Plants (Basel), 2022, 11(7): 899.

[35]

Petrik P, Petek-Petrik A, Konôpková A, Fleischer P, Stojnic S, Zavadilova I, Kurjak D. Seasonality of PSII thermostability and water use efficiency of in situ mountainous Norway spruce (Picea abies) J for Res, 2023, 34(1): 197-208.

[36]

Sano S, Takemoto T, Ogihara A, Suzuki K, Masumura T, Satoh S, Takano K, Mimura Y, Morita S. Stress responses of shade-treated tea leaves to high light exposure after removal of shading Plants (Basel), 2020, 9(3): 302.

[37]

Sedmak JJ, Grossberg SE. A rapid, sensitive, and versatile assay for protein using Coomassie brilliant blue G250 Anal Biochem, 1977, 79(1–2): 544-552.

[38]

Shao QS, Wang HZ, Guo HP, Zhou AC, Huang YQ, Sun YL, Li MY. Effects of shade treatments on photosynthetic characteristics, chloroplast ultrastructure, and physiology of Anoectochilus roxburghii PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(2): e85996.

[39]

Song JL, Huang H, Hao YW, Song SW, Zhang YT, Su W, Liu HC. Nutritional quality, mineral and antioxidant content in lettuce affected by interaction of light intensity and nutrient solution concentration Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 2796.

[40]

Song SK, He AB, Zhao TC, Yin Q, Mu YX, Wang YD, Liu HY, Nie LX, Peng SB. Effects of shading at different growth stages with various shading intensities on the grain yield and anthocyanin content of colored rice (Oryza sativa L.) Field Crops Res, 2022, 283: 108555.

[41]

Sun N, Zhu Y, Zhou HF, Zhou JF, Zhang HQ, Zhang MK, Zeng H, Yao GM. Grayanane diterpenoid glucosides from the leaves of Rhododendron micranthum and their bioactivities evaluation J Nat Prod, 2018, 81(12): 2673-2681.

[42]

Synková H. Chlorophyll fluorescence: understanding crop performance—basics and applications Photosynthetica, 2018.

[43]

Tang H, Hu YY, Yu WW, Song LL, Wu JS. Growth, photosynthetic and physiological responses of Torreya grandis seedlings to varied light environments Trees, 2015, 29(4): 1011-1022.

[44]

Tang XL, Liu GZ, Jiang J, Lei CJ, Zhang YX, Wang LY, Liu XL. Effects of growth irradiance on photosynthesis and photorespiration of Phoebe bournei leaves Funct Plant Biol, 2020, 47(12): 1053-1061.

[45]

Tang W, Guo HP, Baskin CC, Xiong WD, Yang C, Li ZY, Song H, Wang TR, Yin JN, Wu XL, Miao FH, Zhong SZ, Tao QB, Zhao YR, Sun J. Effect of light intensity on morphology, photosynthesis and carbon metabolism of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seedlings Plants (Basel), 2022, 11(13): 1688.

[46]

Terashima I, Hanba YT, Tholen D, Niinemets Ü. Leaf functional anatomy in relation to photosynthesis Plant Physiol, 2011, 155(1): 108-116.

[47]

Tian YL, Sacharz J, Ware MA, Zhang HY, Ruban AV. Effects of periodic photoinhibitory light exposure on physiology and productivity of Arabidopsis plants grown under low light J Exp Bot, 2017, 68(15): 4249-4262.

[48]

Toro-Tobón G, Alvarez-Flórez F, Mariño-Blanco HD, Melgarejo LM. Foliar functional traits of resource island-forming nurse tree species from a semi-arid ecosystem of La Guajira Colombia Plants (Basel), 2022, 11(13): 1723.

[49]

Veerabagu M, Kirchler T, Elgass K, Stadelhofer B, Stahl M, Harter K, Mira-Rodado V, Chaban C. The interaction of the Arabidopsis response regulator ARR18 with bZIP63 mediates the regulation of PROLINE DEHYDROGENASE expression Mol Plant, 2014, 7(10): 1560-1577.

[50]

Wan YL, Zhang YX, Zhang M, Hong AY, Yang HY, Liu Y. Shade effects on growth, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of three Paeonia species PeerJ, 2020, 8: e9316.

[51]

Wang YL, Gao SS, He XY, Li Y, Zhang Y, Chen W. Response of total phenols, flavonoids, minerals, and amino acids of four edible fern species to four shading treatments PeerJ, 2020, 8: e8354.

[52]

Wu MC, Hou CY, Jiang CM, Wang YT, Wang CY, Chen HH, Chang HM. A novel approach of LED light radiation improves the antioxidant activity of pea seedlings Food Chem, 2007, 101(4): 1753-1758.

[53]

Wu YQ, Yang H, Huang ZJ, Lyu LF, Wu WL, Li WL. Effect of shade strength on the fruit quality of different blueberry cultivars J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2023, 23(3): 4127-4140.

[54]

Yamamoto Y, Kai S, Ohnishi A, Tsumura N, Ishikawa T, Hori H, Morita N, Ishikawa Y. Quality control of PSII: behavior of PSII in the highly crowded grana thylakoids under excessive light Plant Cell Physiol, 2014, 55(7): 1206-1215.

[55]

Yi SJ, Zhou XX, Sun ZY, Li XP, Li W. Cloning and functional characterization of a citrate synthase gene of Rhododendron micranthum Turcz S Afr N J Bot, 2022, 147: 915-925.

[56]

Yu Q, Zhang YQ, Liu YF, Shi PL. Simulation of the stomatal conductance of winter wheat in response to light, temperature and CO2 changes Ann Bot, 2004, 93(4): 435-441.

[57]

Zaiyou J, Xiuren Z, Jing T. Photosynthetic and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Isodon rubescens (Hemsley) H Hara Sci Rep-Uk, 2020, 10: 10043.

[58]

Zhang SR, Ma KP, Chen LZ. Response of photosynthetic plasticity of Paeonia suffruticosa to changed light environments Environ Exp Bot, 2003, 49(2): 121-133.

[59]

Zhang ZX, Yan HM, Zhu YX, Zhang HP, Chai LS, Li L, Wang XJ, Liu YB, Li Y. New lignans, sesquiterpenes and other constituents from twigs and leaves of Rhododendron micranthum Fitoterapia, 2019, 135: 15-21.

[60]

Zhang JF, Ge JR, Dayananda B, Li JQ. Effect of light intensities on the photosynthesis, growth and physiological performances of two maple species Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13: 999026.

[61]

Zheng L, Van Labeke MC. Long-term effects of red- and blue-light emitting diodes on leaf anatomy and photosynthetic efficiency of three ornamental pot plants Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 917.

[62]

Zhou JY, Prognon P. Raw material enzymatic activity determination: a specific case for validation and comparison of analytical methods—the example of superoxide dismutase (SOD) J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2006, 40(5): 1143-1148.

[63]

Zulqarnain A, Durrani AI, Saleem H, Rubab S. Development of an ultrasonic-assisted extraction technique for the extraction of natural coloring substance chlorophyll from leaves of Carica papaya J Oleo Sci, 2021, 70(10): 1367-1372.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Northeast Forestry University

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

403

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/