Dynamic changes and driving factors of ecosystem service value (ESV) in the Northeast Forest Belt of China

Jiao Shi , Yujuan Gao , Yuyou Zou

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 18

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) :18 DOI: 10.1007/s11676-024-01818-3
Original Paper
research-article

Dynamic changes and driving factors of ecosystem service value (ESV) in the Northeast Forest Belt of China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The scientific assessment of ecosystem service value (ESV) plays a critical role in regional ecological protection and management, rational land use planning, and the establishment of ecological security barriers. The ecosystem service value of the Northeast Forest Belt from 2005 to 2020 was assessed, focusing on spatial–temporal changes and the driving forces behind these dynamics. Using multi-source data, the equivalent factor method, and geographic detectors, we analyzed natural and socio-economic factors affecting the region. which was crucial for effective ecological conservation and land-use planning. Enhanced the effectiveness of policy formulation and land use planning. The results show that the ESV of the Northeast Forest Belt exhibits an overall increasing trend from 2005 to 2020, with forests and wetlands contributing the most. However, there are significant differences between forest belts. Driven by natural and socio-economic factors, the ESV of forest belts in Heilongjiang and Jilin provinces showed significant growth. In contrast, the ESV of Forest Belts in Liaoning and Inner Mongolia of China remains relatively stable, but the spatial differentiation within these regions is characterized by significant clustering of high-value and low-value areas. Furthermore, climate regulation and hydrological regulation services were identified as the most important ecological functions in the Northeast Forest Belt, contributing greatly to regional ecological stability and human well-being. The ESV in the Northeast Forest Belt is improved during the study period, but the stability of the ecosystem is still challenged by the dual impacts of natural and socio-economic factors. To further optimize regional land use planning and ecological protection policies, it is recommended to prioritize the conservation of high-ESV areas, enhance ecological restoration efforts for wetlands and forests, and reasonably control the spatial layout of urban expansion and agricultural development. Additionally, this study highlights the importance of tailored ecological compensation policies and strategic land-use planning to balance environmental protection and economic growth.

Keywords

Ecosystem service value (ESV) / Northeast Forest Belt of China / Equivalent factor method / Geographic detectors / Driving factors

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiao Shi, Yujuan Gao, Yuyou Zou. Dynamic changes and driving factors of ecosystem service value (ESV) in the Northeast Forest Belt of China. Journal of Forestry Research, 2025, 36(1): 18 DOI:10.1007/s11676-024-01818-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adekola O, Mitchell G, Grainger A. Inequality and ecosystem services: the value and social distribution of Niger Delta wetland services. Ecosyst Serv, 2015, 12: 42-54

[2]

Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260

[3]

Gao F, Peng ZD, Xu P. Evaluation of the service functions of the forest ecosystem in Guizhou Province during 1977–2018. Ecol Sci, 2022, 41(4): 181-188 in Chinese

[4]

Huang JK, Hou LL, Kang NN, Liu HF, Lyu XX, Zhang Y, Qiu HG, Gong YZ, Nan ZB. A study on economic value of grassland ecosystem services. Strateg Study CAE, 2023, 25(1): 198-206 in Chinese)

[5]

Jiang H, Wu Q. Ecological service value evaluation and temporal-spatial evolution characteristics in Jiangsu Province based on LUCC. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2021, 30(11): 2712-2725(in Chinese)

[6]

Li T, Chen TY, Hui BH. Economic value of forest ecosystem services in Huangshan City based on meta-analysis. Sci Geogr Sin, 2022, 42(12): 2179-2188 in Chinese)

[7]

Li ZJ, Chen JP, Zhang WK, Lei LZ, Sha ZY. Analysis of evolution and influencing factors of ecosystem service value in Hubei Province. Sci Surv Mapp, 2023, 48(1): 245-257 in Chinese)

[8]

Liu GB, Shangguan ZP, Yao WY, Yang QK, Zhao MJ, Dang XH, Guo MH, Wang GL, Wang B. Ecological effects of soil conservation in Loess Plateau. Bull Chin Acad Sci, 2017, 32(1): 11-19 in Chinese)

[9]

Lu NJ, Yang G, Zhang TQ, Zhang Y, Wu J, Tao L. Spatial and temporal variation of ecosystem service values and correlations of landscape ecological risks in Tokoto County. J Northwest for Univ, 2023, 38(4): 286-294(in Chinese)

[10]

Luisetti T, Turner RK, Jickells T, Andrews J, Elliott M, Schaafsma M, Beaumont N, Malcolm S, Burdon D, Adams C, Watts W. Coastal zone ecosystem services: from science to values and decision making; a case study. Sci Total Environ, 2014, 493: 682-693

[11]

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press

[12]

Navrud S, Strand J. Valuing global ecosystem services: What do European experts say? Applying the Delphi method to contingent valuation of the Amazon rainforest. Environ Resour Econ, 2018, 70(1): 249-269

[13]

Northeast Forest Belt ecological protection and restoration major project construction plan (2021–2035)

[14]

Ouyang ZY, Zhu CQ, Yang GB, Xu WH, Zheng H, Zhang Y, Xiao Y. Gross ecosystem product: concept, accounting framework and case study. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761 in Chinese

[15]

Piao SL, Yin GD, Tan JG, Cheng L, Huang MT, Li Y, Liu RG, Mao JF, Myneni RB, Peng SS, Poulter B, Shi XY, Xiao ZQ, Zeng N, Zeng ZZ, Wang YP. Detection and attribution of vegetation greening trend in China over the last 30 years. Glob Chang Biol, 2015, 21(4): 1601-1609

[16]

Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D, Johnson KA. The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the state of Minnesota. Environ Resour Econ, 2011, 48(2): 219-242

[17]

Shen RL, Xiao GR. Evaluation of ecosystem service value of Wuyishan National Park. Ecol Sci, 2023, 42(2): 58-65 in Chinese

[18]

Shen MS, Liu YY, Zheng H, Chen J. Evaluation of water source conservation service value and its spatial transfer in Yangtze River Basin. J Changjiang River Sci Res Inst, 2024, 41(4): 14-22in Chinese

[19]

Wang JF, Xu CD. Geodetector: principle and prospective. Acta Geogr Sin, 2017, 72(1): 116-134in Chinese

[20]

Wang B, Yang TB. Value evaluation and driving force analysis of ecosystem services in Yinchuan City from 1980 to 2018. Arid Land Geogr, 2021, 44(2): 552-564

[21]

Wang G, Zhang FR. Spatial and temporal evolution and impact factors analysis of ecosystem service value in the Liaohe River Delta over the past 30 years. Huan Jing Ke Xue, 2024, 45(1): 228-238

[22]

Xie GD, Zhang YL, Lu CX, Zheng D, Cheng SK. Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China. J Nat Resour, 2001, 16(1): 47-53in Chinese

[23]

Xie GD, Lu CX, Leng YF, Zheng D, Li SC. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. J Nat Resour, 2003, 18(2): 189-196in Chinese

[24]

Xie GD, Xiao Y, Zhen L, Lu CX. Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chin J Eco Agric, 2005, 13(3): 10-13 in Chinese

[25]

Xie GD, Zhen L, Lu CX, Xiao Y, Chen C. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. J Nat Resour, 2008, 05: 911-919

[26]

Xie GD, Zhang CX, Zhang LM, Chen WH, Li SM. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. J Nat Resour, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254in Chinese

[27]

Yang C, Zhu ZY, Sun XS. Review on the grassland ecological protection and complement policy. World Agric, 2019, 11: 4-11 in Chinese

[28]

Yang XF, Cai HS, Zhang XL, Zuo TY, Chen LT. Spatial-temporal variations of ecosystem service value and its driving factors in the Great Nanchang Metropolitan Area. Chin J Ecol, 2024, 43(8): 2275-2284 in Chinese

[29]

Yin N, Wang S, Liu YX. Ecosystem service value assessment: research progress and prospects. Chin J Ecol, 2021, 40(1): 233-244 in Chinese

[30]

Zhang XY, Zhang X, Li DH, Lu L, Yu H. Multi-scenario simulation of the impact of urban land use change on ecosystem service value in Shenzhen. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(6): 2086-2097in Chinese

[31]

Zhang L, Lei JR, He RX, Zhou P. Evaluation of ecosystem services in Hainan Island wetlands based on meta-analysis. J Hydroecol, 2024, 45(3): 70-77 in Chinese

[32]

Zheng XH, Chen YB, Zheng ZH, Guo C, Huang ZN, Zhou YS. Dynamic changes of ecosystem service value and evolution of its influencing factors in Hubei Province. Ecol Environ Sci, 2023, 32(1): 195-206 in Chinese

[33]

Zhou JW, Luo J. Spatial-temporal differentiation characteristics and correlation of ecosystem service value and ecological risk of Jialing River Basin. J Chongqing Norm Univ Nat Sci, 2023, 40(5): 72-83in Chinese

[34]

Zhu YX, Yao SB. The coordinated development of environment and economy based on the change of ecosystem service value in Shaanxi Province. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(9): 3331-3342in Chinese

[35]

Zhu Q, Yuan Q, Yu DP, Zhou WM, Zhou L, Han YG, Qi L. Construction of ecological security network of Northeast China forest belt based on the circuit theory. Chin J Ecol, 2021, 40(11): 3463-3473 in Chinese

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Northeast Forestry University

PDF

23

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/