Habitat association and demographic rates for large tree species: implications for native tree species used in forestry

Abstract

Exotic tree species, though widely used in forestry and restoration projects, pose great threats to local ecosystems. They need to be replaced with native species from natural forests. We hypothesized that natural forests contain large, fast-growing, dominant native tree species that are suitable for specific topographic conditions in forestry. We tested this hypothesis using data from a 50-ha forest dynamics plot in subtropical China. We classified the plot into the ridge, slope, and valley habitats and found that 34/87 species had significant associations with at least one topographic habitat. There were 90 tree species with a maximum diameter ≥ 30 cm, and their abundances varied widely in all habitat types. In all habitat types, for most species, rate of biomass gain due to recruitment was < 1% of its original biomass, and rate of biomass gain due to tree growth was between 1 and 5% of its original biomass. For most species, biomass loss due to tree mortality was not significantly different than biomass gain due to recruitment, but the resulting net biomass increment rates did not significantly differ from zero. The time required to reach a diameter of 30 cm from 1 cm diameter for Altingia chinensis in the slope habitat, for Quercus chungii and Morella rubra in the ridge habitat and for Castanopsis carlesii in all habitats could be as short as 30 years in our simulations based on actual distributions of tree growth observed in the forest. Principal component analyses of maximum diameter, abundance and net biomass increment rates suggested several species were worthy of further tests for use in forestry. Our study provides an example for screening native tree species from natural forests for forestry. Because native tree species are better for local ecosystems, our study will also contribute to biodiversity conservation in plantations.

Keywords

Native tree species / Growth simulation / Timber / Wood product / Subtropical forest

References

[1] Ajene IJ, Khamis F, van Asch B, Pietersen G, Rasowo BA, Ekesi S, Mohammed S. Habitat suitability and distribution potential of Liberibacter species (“Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” and “Candidatus Liberibacter africanus”) associated with citrus greening disease. Divers Distrib, 2020, 26(5): 575-588

[2] Almas AD, Conway TM. The role of native species in urban forest planning and practice: a case study of Carolinian Canada. Urban for Urban Green, 2016, 17: 54-62

[3] Amazonas NT, Forrester DI, Oliveira RS, Brancalion PHS. Combining Eucalyptus wood production with the recovery of native tree diversity in mixed plantings: implications for water use and availability. For Ecol Manag, 2018, 418: 34-40

[4] Berthon K, Thomas F, Bekessy S. The role of ‘nativeness’ in urban greening to support animal biodiversity. Landsc Urban Plan, 2021, 205

[5] Bin Y, Ye WH, Muller-Landau HC, Wu LF, Lian JY, Cao HL. Unimodal tree size distributions possibly result from relatively strong conservatism in intermediate size classes. PLoS One, 2012, 7(12):

[6] Bin Y, Spence J, Wu LF, Li BH, Hao ZQ, Ye WH, He FL. Species–habitat associations and demographic rates of forest trees. Ecography, 2016, 39(1): 9-16

[7] Bin Y, Lin GJ, Russo SE, Huang ZL, Shen Y, Cao HL, Lian JY, Ye WH. Testing the competition-colonization trade-off and its correlations with functional trait variations among subtropical tree species. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 14942

[8] Burns J, Puettmann KJ, Perala D. Strip thinning and spacing increases tree growth of young black spruce. North J Appl for, 1996, 13(2): 68-72

[9] Butterfield RP. Early species selection for tropical reforestation: a consideration of stability. For Ecol Manag, 1996, 81(1–3): 161-168

[10] Chave J, Réjou-Méchain M, Búrquez A, et al. Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob Chang Biol, 2014, 20(10): 3177-3190

[11] Chen ZH, Zhang HT, Wang BS. Studies on biomass and production of the lower subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in Heishiding nature reserve-biomass increment and net primary production. Acta Ecol Sin, 1992, 12: 377-386 (in Chinese)

[12] Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. Identifying fast-growing native trees from the neotropics using data from a large, permanent census plot. For Ecol Manag, 1993, 62(1–4): 123-143

[13] Condit R, Ashton P, Bunyavejchewin S, et al. The importance of demographic niches to tree diversity. Science, 2006, 313(5783): 98-101

[14] Condit R (1998) Tropical forest census plots: methods and results from Barro Colorado Island, Panama, and a comparison with other plots. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03664-8

[15] Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Díaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot, 2003, 51(4): 335

[16] Cosyns H, Joa B, Mikoleit R, Krumm F, Schuck A, Winkel G, Schulz T. Resolving the trade-off between production and biodiversity conservation in integrated forest management: comparing tree selection practices of foresters and conservationists. Biodivers Conserv, 2020, 29(13): 3717-3737

[17] Dickens ED, Moorhead DJ, McElvany B. Pine plantation fertilization. Better Crops, 2003, 87(1): 12-15

[18] Dyderski MK, Jagodziński AM. Impact of invasive tree species on natural regeneration species composition, diversity, and density. Forests, 2020, 11(4): 456

[19] Erskine PD, Lamb D, Bristow M. Tree species diversity and ecosystem function: can tropical multi-species plantations generate greater productivity?. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 233(2–3): 205-210

[20] Führer E. Forest functions, ecosystem stability and management. For Ecol Manag, 2000, 132(1): 29-38

[21] Guo J, Wu YQ, Wang B, Lu Y, Cao FL, Wang GB. The effects of fertilization on the growth and physiological characteristics of Ginkgo biloba L. Forests, 2016, 7(12): 293

[22] Gurevitch J, Padilla DK. Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions?. Trends Ecol Evol, 2004, 19(9): 470-474

[23] Harms KE, Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot. J Ecol, 2001, 89(6): 947-959

[24] Ikin K, Knight E, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Manning AD. The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves. Divers Distrib, 2013, 19(3): 294-306

[25] Jiang Y, Zhang BW, Wang WT, Li BH, Wu ZR, Chu CJ. Topography and plant community structure contribute to spatial heterogeneity of soil respiration in a subtropical forest. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 733

[26] Lawson GJ. Leakey RRB, Newton AC. Indigenous trees in west African forest plantations: the need for domestication by clonal techniques. Tropical trees: the potential for domestication and rebuilding of forest resources, 1994, London: HMSO 112-123

[27] Leakey RRB, Simons AJ (1997) The domestication and commercialization of indigenous trees in agroforestry for the alleviation of poverty. In: Forestry sciences. Springer Netherlands, pp 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005912729225

[28] Leakey RRB, Newton AC. Tropical trees: the potential for domestication and the rebuilding of forest resources, 1994, London: HMSO publications

[29] Li BH, Zhang YM, Luan FC, Yuan ZQ, Ali A, Chu CJ, Bin Y. Habitat conditions and tree species shape Liana distribution in a subtropical forest. Forests, 2022, 13(9): 1358

[30] Lieberman M, Lieberman D. Simulation of growth curves from periodic increment data. Ecology, 1985, 66(2): 632-635

[31] Lin GM. Comparison of growth dynamics of Parakmeria lotungensis between plantation and natural forest in Nanping, Fujian China. Subtrop Agric Res, 2013, 9(2): 88-93 in Chinese

[32] Liu CH. Comparison of community characteristics and growth of plantation and natural forest of Lindera communis. J Southwest For College, 2006, 26(1): 10-13 in Chinese

[33] Liu CLC, Kuchma O, Krutovsky KV. Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future. Glob Ecol Conserv, 2018, 15

[34] Lu Y, Ranjitkar S, Harrison RD, Xu JC, Ou XK, Ma XL, He J. Selection of native tree species for subtropical forest restoration in Southwest China. PLoS One, 2017, 12(1):

[35] Manetti MC, Becagli C, Sansone D, Pelleri F. Tree-oriented silviculture: a new approach for coppice stands. Iforest, 2016, 9(5): 791-800

[36] Marianov V, Snyder S, ReVelle C. Trading off species protection and timber production in forests managed for multiple objectives. Environ Plann B Plann Des, 2004, 31(6): 847-862

[37] Mark JK, Newton AC, Oldfield SF, Rivers MC. The international timber trade: a working list of commercial timber tree species. Technical report, 2014, Richmond: Botanic Gardens Conservation International

[38] McDicken KG (1994) Selection and management of nitrogen-fixing trees. Morrilton, USA: Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development

[39] Meli P, Martínez-Ramos M, Rey-Benayas JM, Carabias J. Combining ecological, social and technical criteria to select species for forest restoration. Appl Veg Sci, 2014, 17(4): 744-753

[40] Muller-Landau HC, Condit RS, Chave J, et al. Testing metabolic ecology theory for allometric scaling of tree size, growth and mortality in tropical forests. Ecol Lett, 2006, 9(5): 575-588

[41] Naimi B, Araújo MB. Sdm: a reproducible and extensible R platform for species distribution modelling. Ecography, 2016, 39(4): 368-375

[42] Nichols JD, Vanclay JK. Domestication of native tree species for timber plantations: key insights for tropical island nations. Int Forest Rev, 2012, 14(4): 402-413

[43] Noce S, Collalti A, Santini M. Likelihood of changes in forest species suitability, distribution, and diversity under future climate: the case of southern Europe. Ecol Evol, 2017, 7(22): 9358-9375

[44] Ouyang L, Wu J, Zhao P, Li YQ, Zhu LW, Ni GY, Rao XQ. Consumption of precipitation by evapotranspiration indicates potential drought for broadleaved and coniferous plantations in hilly lands of South China. Agric Water Manag, 2021, 252

[45] Peters HA. Neighbour-regulated mortality: the influence of positive and negative density dependence on tree populations in species-rich tropical forests. Ecol Lett, 2003, 6(8): 757-765

[46] Quine CP, Humphrey JW. Plantations of exotic tree species in Britain: irrelevant for biodiversity or novel habitat for native species?. Biodivers Conserv, 2010, 19(5): 1503-1512

[47] R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Australia

[48] Rondon XJ, Gorchov DL, Noble RB. Projection of tree growth and timber volume following strip clear-cutting in the Peruvian Amazon. For Ecol Manag, 2009, 257(2): 588-599

[49] Salmón Rivera B, Barrette M, Thiffault N (2016) Issues and perspectives on the use of exotic species in the sustainable management of Canadian forests. Reforesta (1): 261–280. https://doi.org/10.21750/refor.1.13.13

[50] Samuelson L, Stokes T, Cooksey T, McLemore P 3rd. Production efficiency of loblolly pine and sweetgum in response to four years of intensive management. Tree Physiol, 2001, 21(6): 369-376

[51] Scholten T, Goebes P, Kühn P, et al. On the combined effect of soil fertility and topography on tree growth in subtropical forest ecosystems—a study from SE China. J Plant Ecol, 2017, 10(1): 111-127

[52] Schuldt A, Huke P, Glatthorn J, Hagge J, Wildermuth B, Matevski D. Tree mixtures mediate negative effects of introduced tree species on bird taxonomic and functional diversity. J Appl Ecol, 2022, 59(12): 3049-3060

[53] Shi W, Zhang QD, Sui XH, Li BH, He FL, Chu CJ. The effects of habitat filtering and non-habitat processes on species spatial distribution vary across life stages. Am J Bot, 2018, 105(9): 1469-1476

[54] Sjöman H, Morgenroth J, Sjöman JD, Sæbø A, Kowarik I. Diversification of the urban forest—can we afford to exclude exotic tree species?. Urban for Urban Gree, 2016, 18: 237-241

[55] Slate ML, Tsombou FM, Callaway RM, Inderjit E-K. Exotic Prosopis juliflora suppresses understory diversity and promotes agricultural weeds more than a native congener. Plant Ecol, 2020, 221(8): 659-669

[56] Taki H, Yamaura Y, Okabe K, Maeto K (2011) Plantation versus natural forest: matrix quality determines pollinator abundance in crop fields. Sci Rep 1: 132. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00132

[57] Uriarte M, Clark JS, Zimmerman JK, Comita LS, Forero-Montaña J, Thompson J. Multidimensional trade-offs in species responses to disturbance: implications for diversity in a subtropical forest. Ecology, 2012, 93(1): 191-205

[58] Wang XL, Wang YQ, Wang YJ. Use of exotic species during ecological restoration can produce effects that resemble vegetation invasions and other unintended consequences. Ecol Eng, 2013, 52: 247-251

[59] Wang T, Dong LB, Liu ZG. Factors driving native tree species restoration in plantations and tree structure conversion in Chinese temperate forests. For Ecol Manag, 2022, 507

[60] Zuidema PA, Babst F, Groenendijk P, et al. Tropical tree growth driven by dry-season climate variability. Nat Geosci, 2022, 15: 269-276

[61] Zuleta D, Russo SE, Barona A, et al. Importance of topography for tree species habitat distributions in a Terra firme forest in the Colombian Amazon. Plant Soil, 2020, 450(1): 133-149