Woody plant assemblage and the structure of miombo woodland along a disturbance gradient in Hurungwe, Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe

Tatenda Gotore , Hilton G.T. Ndagurwa , Shakkie Kativu , Denis Gautier , Laurent Gazull

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5) : 1867 -1877.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5) : 1867 -1877. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-020-01242-3
Original Paper

Woody plant assemblage and the structure of miombo woodland along a disturbance gradient in Hurungwe, Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Miombo woodlands near human settlements are under significant pressures from human activities, with negative consequences on their structure and composition. As studies are limited, we assessed the structure and species composition of a portion of miombo woodland along an increasing disturbance gradient from a national park, through a buffer zone to communal lands in northeast Zimbabwe. Five concentric plots of 2 and 11 m radii were established in each area to record woody species composition, diameter, height, basal area, density and volume as well as evidence of disturbance. Effects of site, growth stage and their interaction on vegetation diversity and structural parameters were tested using a general linear model (GLM). Principal component analysis (PCA) tested the association between species and site and ANOVA the differences in the level of disturbance across strata. Species diversity did not differ between sites except for evenness, which increased with disturbance. Evenness and richness were greater in seedlings and saplings than mature trees across sites, respectively. Sapling and mature tree diameters differed significantly between sites. Volume and density of mature trees declined with increasing disturbance while seedling densities peaked at intermediate disturbance levels (buffer zone). Tree harvesting, was more evident in the buffer zone and in the communal area relative to the national park. In contrast, fire frequency was greater in the national park and in the buffer zone relative to the communal area. The results of this study identify a true miombo woodland dominated by Brachystegia boehmii with a stable population, as illustrated by an inverse-J shape in diameter class distribution on all sites, and that these woodlands are generally resilient to disturbances, maintaining similar species composition and structure at various levels of disturbance. However, continued monitoring of disturbance levels and miombo woodland response is recommended to ensure sustainable utilisation of these resources.

Keywords

Miombo woodlands / cComposition / Diversity / Structure / Anthropogenic disturbances

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tatenda Gotore, Hilton G.T. Ndagurwa, Shakkie Kativu, Denis Gautier, Laurent Gazull. Woody plant assemblage and the structure of miombo woodland along a disturbance gradient in Hurungwe, Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe. Journal of Forestry Research, 2020, 32(5): 1867-1877 DOI:10.1007/s11676-020-01242-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abbot P, Lowore J, Werren M. Models for the estimation of single tree volume in four Miombo woodland types. For Ecol Manag, 1997, 97(1): 25-37.

[2]

Anderson IP, Brinn PJ, Moyo M, Nyamwanza B (1993) Physical resource inventory of the communal lands of Zimbabwe: an overview, Bulletin 60. UK Natural Resources Institute (NRI), Chatham, pp 30–49

[3]

Banda T, Schwartz MW, Caro T. Woody vegetation structure and composition along a protection gradient in a miombo ecosystem of western Tanzania. For Ecol Manag, 2006, 230(1–3): 179-185.

[4]

Botha J, Witkowski E, Shackleton C. The impact of commercial harvesting on Warburgia salutaris (‘pepper-bark tree’) in Mpumalanga, South Africa. Biodivers Conserv, 2004, 13: 1675-1698.

[5]

Butz RJ. Traditional fire management: historical fire regimes and land use change in pastoral East Africa. Int J Wildland Fire, 2009, 18: 442-450.

[6]

Buzas MA, Gibson TG. Species diversity: benthonic foraminifera in western North Atlantic. Science, 1969, 163: 72-75.

[7]

Chidumayo EN. Changes in miombo woodland structure under different land tenure and use systems in Central Zambia. J Biogeogr, 2002, 29: 1619-1626.

[8]

Chidumayo EN. Development of Brachystegia-Julbernardia woodland after clear-felling in Central Zambia: evidence for high resilience. Appl Veg Sci, 2004, 7(2): 237-242.

[9]

Chidumayo EN. Forest degradation and recovery in a miombo woodland landscape in Zambia: 22 years of observations on permanent sample plots. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 291: 154-161.

[10]

Chidumayo EN, Frost P. Campbell B. Population biology of miombo trees. The miombo in transition: woodland and welfare in Africa, 1996, Bogor: CIFOR 56 71

[11]

Chinuwo T, Gandiwa E, Mugabe PH, Mpofu IDT, Timpong-Jones E. Effects of previous cultivation on regeneration of Julbernadia globiflora and Brachystegia spiciformis in grazing areas of Mupfurudzi resettlement scheme, Zimbabwe. Afr J Range Forage Sci, 2010, 27(1): 45-49.

[12]

Chirwa PT, Syampungani S, Geldenhuys CJ. Seifert T. Managing Southern African woodlands for biomass production: the potential challenges and opportunities. Bioenergy from wood: sustainable production in the tropics, managing forest ecosystems, 2014, Dordrecht: Springer 67 86

[13]

Chivuraise C, Chamboko T, Chagwiza G (2016) An assessment of factors influencing forest harvesting in smallholder tobacco production in Hurungwe District, Zimbabwe: an application of binary logistic regression model. Adv Agric 2016:4186089. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4186089

[14]

Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology, 1951, 32: 476-496.

[15]

Dewees PA, Campbell BM, Katerere Y, Sitoe A, Cunningham AB, Angelsen A, Wunder S. Managing the Miombo woodlands of Southern Africa: policies, incentives and options for the rural poor. J Nat Resour Policy Res, 2010, 2: 57-73.

[16]

Djoudi H, Vergles E, Blackie RR, Koame CK, Gautier D. Dry forests, livelihoods and poverty alleviation: understanding current trends. Inter For Rev, 2015, 17(2): 54-69.

[17]

Dzingirai V, Mangwanya L. Leach M, Scoones I. Struggles over carbon in the Zambezi valley: the case of Kariba REDD in Hurungwe, Zimbabwe. Carbon conflicts and forest landscapes in Africa, 2015, London: Routledge 142 163

[18]

Ebregt A, Greve PD (2000) Buffer zones and their management. Policy and best practices for terrestrial ecosystems in developing countries. Theme Studies Series, 5. National Reference Centre for Nature Management, Wageningen, pp 1–64

[19]

Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J Anim Ecol, 1943, 12: 42-58.

[20]

Forestry Commission (2011) The state of forest genetic resources in Zimbabwe 2002–2011, A Country Report. Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Management, Harare, pp 1–84

[21]

Foxcroft LC, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Pyšek P. Alien plant invasions in tropical and sub-tropical savannas: patterns, processes and prospects. Biol Invasions, 2010, 12: 3913-3933.

[22]

Frost P. Campbell B. The ecology of miombo woodlands. The miombo in transition: woodland and welfare in Africa, 1996, Bogor: CIFOR 11 57

[23]

Geldenhuys CJ. Managing forest complexity through application of disturbance recovery knowledge in development of silvicultural systems and ecological rehabilitation in natural forest systems in Africa. J For Res, 2010, 15: 3-13.

[24]

Gumbo DJ, Dumas-Johansen M, Muir G, Boerstler F, Xia Z. Sustainable management of miombo woodlands: food security, nutrition and wood energy, 2018, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations 1 50

[25]

Hammer Ø, Harper D, Ryan P. Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica, 2001, 4(1): 1-9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm

[26]

Jew EKK, Dougill AJ, Sallu SM, O'Connell J, Benton TG. Miombo woodland under threat: consequences for tree diversity and carbon storage. For Ecol Manag, 2016, 361: 144-153.

[27]

Kalaba FK, Quinn CH, Dougill AJ. Contribution of forest provisioning ecosystem services to rural livelihoods in the miombo woodlands of Zambia. Popul Environ, 2013, 35(2): 159-182.

[28]

Kikula IS. The influence of fire on the composition of miombo woodland of SW Tanzania. Oikos, 1986, 46(4): 317-324.

[29]

Loetsch F, Zohrer F, Haller KE (1973) Forest inventory, vol 2. BLV Verlagsgesellschaft Bern Wien, Munchen, pp 1–469

[30]

Masocha M, Skidmore AK, Poshiwa X, Prins HHT. Frequent burning promotes invasions of alien plants into a Mesic African savanna. Biol Invasions, 2011, 13: 1641-1648.

[31]

Moura I, Maquia I, Rija AA, Ribeiro N, Ribeiro-Barros AI (2017) Biodiversity studies in key species from the African Mopane and Miombo Woodlands. In: Bitz L (ed) Genetic diversity. IntechOpen, London, pp 92–107

[32]

Muposhi VK, Chademana TC, Gandiwa E, Muboko N. Edge effects: impact of anthropogenic activities on vegetation structure and diversity in western Umfurudzi. Afr J Ecol, 2016, 54(4): 450-459.

[33]

Ncube A (2011) Impact of livelihood diversification on household food security: the case of Hurungwe District, Zimbabwe. Unpublished, MA. thesis, Department of Development Studies, University of South Africa, Pretoria, pp 1–262

[34]

Pielou EC. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol, 1966, 13: 131-144.

[35]

R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

[36]

Ryan CM, Williams M. How does fire intensity and frequency affect miombo woodland tree populations and biomass?. Ecol Appl, 2011, 21(1): 48-60.

[37]

Ryan CM, Pritchard R, McNicol I, Owen M, Fisher JA, Lehmann C. Ecosystem services from southern African woodlands and their future under global change. Phil Trans R Soc B, 2016 371 1703 20150312

[38]

Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication, 1949, Urbana: The University of Illinois Press 1 117

[39]

Shirima DD, Totland O, Munishi PKT, Moe SR. Relationships between tree species richness, evenness and aboveground carbon storage in montane forests and miombo woodlands of Tanzania. Basic Appl Ecol, 2015, 16(3): 239-249.

[40]

Sileshi G, Mafongoya PL (2006) The short-term impact of forest fire on soil inverterbrates in the miombo. Biodivers Conserv 15(10):3153–3160

[41]

Simpson EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 1949, 163: 688.

[42]

Syampungani S, Geldenhuys CJ, Chirwa PW. Regeneration dynamics of miombo woodland in response to different anthropogenic disturbances: forest characterisation for sustainable management. Agrofor Syst, 2015, 90: 563-576.

[43]

Syampungani S, Tigabu M, Matakala N, Handavu F, Oden PC. Coppicing ability of dry miombo woodland species harvested for traditional charcoal production in Zambia: a win–win strategy for sustaining rural livelihoods and recovering a woodland ecosystem. J For Res, 2017, 28: 549-556.

[44]

Timberlake J, Chidumayo E, Sawadogo L. Chidumayo EN, Gumbo DJ. Distribution and characteristics of African dry forests and woodlands. The dry forests and woodlands of Africa: managing for products and services, 2010, Earthscan: London 11 41

[45]

Van Wyk GF, Everard DA, Midgley JJ, Gordon IG. Classification and dynamics of a southern African subtropical coastal lowland forest. S Afri J Bot, 1996, 62(3): 133-142.

[46]

Williams M, Ryan CM, Rees RM, Sambane RM, Fernando J, Grace J. Carbon sequestration and biodiversity of re-growing miombo woodlands in Mozambique. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 254(2): 145-155.

[47]

ZimStat (2012) Zimbabwe population census: Mashonaland West provincial report. Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency, Harare, pp 1–186

[48]

Zimudzi C, Chapano C. Diversity, population structure, and above ground biomass in woody species on Ngomakurira Mountain, Domboshawa, Zimbabwe. Int J Biodiversity, 2016, 2016: 4909158.

[49]

Zulu F, Syampungani S, Fushike P. Recovery of Baikiaea forest of southwestern Zambia from shifting cultivation and its implications for sustainable management. J For Res, 2019, 30: 497-506.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

177

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/