A review of ecological mechanisms for management practices of protective forests

Abstract

A protective forest, including shelterbelt, windbreak, and shelter forest as its synonyms, is characterized by the protective functions of various forest types distributed or planted on ecologically fragile areas or nearby the objects that need to be protected using the ecological effects of forests. Ecological mechanisms for management practices of protective forests is one of the disciplinary orientations in forest ecology and management. Most protective forest studies are dependent on forestry eco-engineering, such as the Great Plains Shelterbelt Project in the United States, the Great Plan for the Transformation of Nature in the Soviet Union, and the Three-North Afforestation Program in China. The development of sustainable management of protective forests has been given increasing attention by governments, scientists, and media due to their impacts on environment conservation and global change. We introduce forestry eco-engineering and provide a review of their main ecological mechanisms for management practices of protective forests. Ecological mechanisms for management systems currently applied are emphasized, i.e., the theory of protection maturity and phase-directional management; the relationship between structure and protective functions and structural optimization measures; and, the decline mechanism and ecological restoration strategies. In addition, several unresolved problems in management practices of protective forests are discussed as well as the prospects for ecological mechanisms for management practices of protective forests in the future, which include: (1) theories and technologies for management practices of protective forests at the landscape or regional scale; (2) the decline mechanisms and corresponding ecological restoration approaches across multiple scales; and, (3) the comprehensive assessment of forestry eco-engineering at large-scales based on ecosystem principles.

Keywords

Ecologically fragile areas / Ecological effects / Forestry eco-engineering / Management systems / Assessment of protective forests

References

[1] Amichev BY, Bentham MJ, Cerkowniak D, Kort J, Kulshreshtha S, Laroque CP, Piwowar JM, Van Rees KCJ. Mapping and quantification of planted tree and shrub shelterbelts in Saskatchewan, Canada. Agroforest Syst, 2015, 89: 49-65.

[2] Amichev BY, Laroque CP, Van Rees KCJ. Shelterbelt removals in Saskatchewan, Canada: implications for long-term carbon sequestration. Agroforest Syst, 2020, 94: 1665-1680.

[3] Arundell JC, Straw NA. Hornet clearwing moth (Sesia apiformis [Clerck]) and dieback of poplars in eastern England. Arboric J, 2001, 25: 235-253.

[4] Bayoumi AA. The role of shelterbelts in Sudanese irrigated agriculture with particular reference to the Gezira. Part II. A proposed scheme for shelterbelts in the Gezira. Sudan Silva, 1977, 3: 35-38.

[5] Brain S. The great Stalin plan for the transformation of nature. Environ Hist, 2010, 15: 670-700.

[6] Brandle JR, Hintz DL. Windbreaks for the future. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 1988, 22–23: 593-596.

[7] Brandle JR, Laurie H, Zhou XH. Windbreaks in North American Agricultural Systems. Agrofor Syst, 2004, 61: 65-78.

[8] Brang P, Schönenberger W, Frehner M, Schwitter R, Thormann JJ, Wasser B. Management of protection forests in the European Alps: an overview. For Snow Landsc Res, 2006, 80: 23-44.

[9] Burke M, Rundquist B, Zheng H. Detection of shelterbelt density change using historic APFO and NAIP aerial imagery. Remote Sens, 2019, 11: 218.

[10] Cao XS (1983) Shelterbelts for farmland. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, p. 645 (in Chinese)

[11] Chavasse CGR. Management of shelterbelts for wood products. New Zealand J For, 1982, 27: 189-206.

[12] Contreras-Hermosilla A. The underlying causes of forest decline, 2000, Centre of International Forest Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia.

[13] Cornelis WM, Gabriels D. Optimal windbreak design for wind-erosion control. J Arid Environ, 2005, 61: 315-332.

[14] Deng RX, Li Y, Zhang SW, Shi XL. Assessment of the effects of the shelterbelt on the soil temperature at regional scale based on MODIS data. J For Res, 2011, 22: 65-70.

[15] Dong ZB, Chen WN, Li ZS, Yang ZT. The laboratory study on the role of vegetation in soil erosion by wind. J Soil Erosion Soil Water Conser, 1996, 2: 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16] Du XJ, Jiang FQ, Shen H, Lin HM. Early diagnosis of low-value forest: An approach of ecological factors. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2002, 13: 1523-1528. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] Fischer J, Stott J, Zerger A, Warren G, Sherren K, Forrester RI. Reversing a tree regeneration crisis in an endangered ecoregion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106: 10386-10391.

[18] Franklin JF, Donato DC. Variable retention harvesting in the Douglas-fir region. Ecol Process, 2020, 9: 8.

[19] Gardner R. Trees as technology: Planting shelterbelts on the Great Plains. Hist Technol, 2009, 25: 325-341.

[20] Ge YX, Bi GY. Ecological function evaluation of poplar shelterbelt in the plain regions. Prot Forest Sci Technol, 2018, 5: 41-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21] Ghimire K, Dulin MV, Atchison RL, Goodin DG, Hutchinson JMS. Identification of windbreaks in Kansas using object-based image analysis, GIS techniques and field survey. Agrofor Syst, 2014, 88: 1-11.

[22] Grant PF, Nickling WG. Direct field measurement of wind drag on vegetation for application to windbreak design and modelling. Land Degrad Dev, 1998, 9: 57-66.

[23] Heisler GM, Dewalle DR. Effects of windbreak structure on wind flow. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 1988, 22(23): 41-69.

[24] Huang FX, Niu HS, Wang MX, Wang YS, Ding GD. The relationship between vegetation cover and sand transport flux at Mu Us Sandland. Acta Geogr Sin, 2001, 56: 700-710. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25] Iwasaki K, Torita H, Abe T, Uraike T, Touze M, Fukuchi M, Sato H, Iijima T, Imaoka K, Igawa H. Spatial pattern of windbreak effects on maize growth evaluated by an unmanned aerial vehicle in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Agroforest Syst, 2019, 93: 1133-1145.

[26] Ji YH, Zhou GS, Li ZS, Wang SD, Zhou HL, Song XY. Triggers of widespread dieback and mortality of poplar (Populus spp.) plantations across northern China. J Arid Environ, 2020, 174: 104076.

[27] Jiang FQ, Zhu JJ, Zeng DH, Fan ZP, Du XJ, Cao YC (2003) Management for protective plantations. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. p 353 (in Chinese with English brief introduction)

[28] Jiao SR. Report on the causes of the early decline of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica shelterbelt and its preventative and control measures in Zhanggutai of Liaoning province. Sci Silv Sin, 2001, 37: 131-138. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[29] Josephson P. Olšáková D. Introduction: The Stalin Plan for the transformation of nature, and the east European experience. In the name of the great work: Stalin’s Plan for the transformation of nature and its impact in eastern Europe, 2019, New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books 1 42

[30] Jose S. Agroforestry for conserving and enhancing biodiversity. Agroforest Syst, 2012, 85: 1-8.

[31] Kenney WA. A method for estimating windbreak porosity using digitized photographic silhouettes. Agric Forest Meteorol, 1987, 39: 91-94.

[32] Lexer MJ, Bugmann H. Mountain forest management in a changing world. Eur J Forest Res, 2017, 136: 981-982.

[33] Li X, Xiao QF, Niu JZ, Dymond S, McPherson EG, van Doorn N, Yu XX, Xie BY, Zhang KB, Li J. Rainfall interception by tree crown and leaf litter: An interactive process. Hydrol Process, 2017, 31: 3533-3542.

[34] Limousin JM, Rambal S, Ourcival JM, Joffre R. Modelling rainfall interception in a mediterranean Quercus ilex ecosystem: Lesson from a throughfall exclusion experiment. J Hydrol, 2008, 357: 57-66.

[35] Loeffler AE, Gordon AM, Gillespie TJ. Optical porosity and windspeed reduction by coniferous windbreaks in Southern Ontario. Agroforest Syst, 1992, 17: 119-133.

[36] Masaka K, Wakita Y, Iwasaki K, Hayamizu M. Degradation of white birch shelterbelts by attack of white-spotted longicorn beetle in central Hokkaido, northern Japan. BioRxiv, 2020

[37] Mayrinck RC, Laroque CP, Amichev BY, Rees KV. Above- and below-ground carbon sequestration in shelterbelt trees in Canada: a review. Forests, 2019, 10: 922.

[38] Miralles DG, Gash JH, Holmes TRH, de Jeu RAM, Dolman AJ. Global canopy interception from satellite observations. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115: D16122.

[39] Mize CW, Brandle JR, Schoeneberger MM, Bentrup G. Jose S, Gordon AM. Ecological development and function of shelterbelts in temperate North America. Toward Agroforestry Design: An Ecological Approach, 2008, Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer 27 54

[40] Motta R, Haudemand JC. Protective forests and silvicultural stability. Mt Res Dev, 2000, 20: 180-187.

[41] Morales-Hidalgo D, Oswalt SN, Somanathan E. Status and trends in global primary forest, protected areas, and areas designated for conservation of biodiversity from the global forest resources assessment 2015. For Ecol Manage, 2015, 352: 68-77.

[42] Nair PR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter JM. Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron, 2010, 108: 237-307.

[43] Nerlich K, Graeff-Hönninger S, Claupein W. Agroforestry in Europe: A review of the disappearance of traditional systems and development of modern agroforestry practices, with emphasis on experiences in Germany. Agroforest Syst, 2013, 87: 475-492.

[44] Orth J. The shelterbelt project: Cooperative conservation in 1930s America. Agr Hist, 2007, 81: 333-357.

[45] Osorio RJ, Barden CJ, Ciampitti IA. GIS approach to estimate windbreak crop yield effects in Kansas-Nebraska. Agroforest Syst, 2019, 93: 1567-1576.

[46] Park A, Cameron JL. The influence of canopy traits on throughfall and stemflow in five tropical trees growing in a Panamanian plantation. For Ecol Manage, 2008, 255: 1915-1925.

[47] Parpan TV, Parpan VI. Aboveground biomass of common oak windbreaks in the central part of Ukraine. Sci Bull UNFU, 2017, 27: 59-63.

[48] Pisarenko AI, Strakhov VV, Päivinen R, Kuusela K, Dyakun FA, Sdobnova VV. Development of forest resources in the European part of the Russian Federation (European Forest Institute Research Rep. N 11), 2001, Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.

[49] Ren ZP, Li ZB, Liu XL, Cheng SD, Xu GC. Comparing watershed afforestation and natural revegetation impacts on soil moisture in the semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Sci Rep, 2018, 8: 2972.

[50] Schößer B, Helming K, Wiggering H. Assessing land use change impacts-a comparison of the SENSOR land use function approach with other frameworks. J Land Use Sci, 2010, 5: 159-178.

[51] Shaw D. Mastering nature through science: Soviet geographers and the Great Stalin plan for the transformation of nature, 1948–53. Slavonic East Eur Rev, 2015, 93(1): 120-146.

[52] Song LN, Zhu JJ, Yan QL. Review on the shelter forest decline. Chin J Ecol, 2009, 28: 1684-1690. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[53] Song LN, Zhu JJ, Zhang JX, Yang K, Lü LY, Zhang JX, Hao GY. Transpiration and canopy conductance dynamics of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica in its natural range and in an introduced region in the sandy plains of Northern China. Agric Forest Meteorol, 2020, 281: 107830.

[54] Stange C (1996) Windbreak management. School of papers in natural resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

[55] Sun SJ, He CX, Qiu LF, Li CY, Zhang JS, Meng P. Stable isotope analysis reveals prolonged drought stress in poplar plantation mortality of the Three-North Shelter Forest in Northern China. Agric Forest Meteorol, 2018, 252: 39-48.

[56] Thuyet DV, Do TV, Sato T, Hung TT. Effects of species and shelterbelt structure on wind speed reduction in shelter. Agroforest Syst, 2014, 88: 237-244.

[57] Thom D, Seidl R. Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests. Biol Rev, 2016, 91: 760-781.

[58] Vacek S, Khel T, Sharma RP, Kučera J, Král J, Papaj V. Windbreak efficiency in agricultural landscape of the Central Europe: Multiple approaches to wind erosion control. Environ Manage, 2018, 62: 942-954.

[59] Vales DJ, Bunnell FL. Comparison of methods for estimating forest overstory cover. 1. Observer effects. Can J For Res, 1988, 18: 606-609.

[60] Wang HC, Cui WS, Kou WZ. On the conception of protective maturation of protection forests. J Beijing For Univ, 2000, 22: 81-85. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[61] Wang T. Progress in sandy desertification research of China. J Geogr Sci, 2004, 14: 387-400.

[62] Wu TG, Zhang P, Zhang L, Wang JY, Yu MK, Zhou XH, Wang GG. Relationships between shelter effects and optical porosity: A meta-analysis for tree windbreaks. Agric Forest Meteorol, 2018, 259: 75-81.

[63] Yang XG, Yu Y, Fan YW. A method to estimate the structural parameters of windbreaks using remote sensing. Agroforest Syst, 2017, 91: 37-49.

[64] Zagas TD, Raptis DI, Zagas DT. Identifying and mapping the protective forests of southeast Mt. Olympus as a tool for sustainable ecological and silvicultural planning, in a multi-purpose forest management framework. Ecol Eng, 2011, 37: 286-293.

[65] Zhao YZ, Mu XM, Yan BW, Zhao GJ. Meta-analysis on runoff and sediment reductions of re-vegetation with different planting years on Loess Plateau. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2015, 35: 6-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[66] Zheng X, Zhu JJ, Yan QL, Song LN. Effects of land use changes on groundwater table and the decline of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations in the Horqin Sandy Land, Northeast China. Agr Water Manage, 2012, 109: 94-106.

[67] Zheng X, Zhu JJ, Xing Z. Assessment of the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields at the regional scale in Northeast China. Agr Syst, 2016, 143: 49-60.

[68] Zhou XH, Sun ZW. On measuring and evaluating the spatial pattern of shelterbelt networks in landscape. Acta Ecol Sin, 1994, 14: 24-31. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[69] Zhou XH, Brandle JR, Takle ES, Mize CW. Estimation of the three-dimensional aerodynamic structure of a green ash shelterbelt. Agric Forest Meteorol, 2002, 111: 93-108.

[70] Zhou XH, Brandle JR, Mize CW, Takle ES. Three-dimensional aerodynamic structure of a tree shelterbelt: definition, characterization and working models. Agroforest Syst, 2005, 63: 133-147.

[71] Zhu JJ, Matsuzaki T, Gonda Y. Optical stratification porosity as a measure of vertical canopy structure in a Japanese pine coastal forest. For Ecol Manage, 2003, 173: 89-104.

[72] Zhu JJ. Jørgensen SE, Fath BD. Wind shelterbelts. Encyclopedia of Ecology, 2008, Oxford: Academic Press 3803 3812

[73] Zhu JJ, Li FQ, Xu ML, Kang HZ, Wu XY. The role of ectomycorrhizal fungi in alleviating pine decline in semiarid sandy soil of northern China: an experimental approach. Ann For Sci, 2008, 65(3): 304p1-304p12.

[74] Zhu JJ. A review of the present situation and future prospect of science of protective forests. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37: 872-888. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[75] Zhu JJ, Zheng X. The prospects of development of the Three-North Afforestation Program (TNAP): On the basis of the results of the 40-year construction general assessment of the TNAP. Chin J Ecol, 2019, 38: 1600-1610. (in Chinese with English abstract)