Limiting climatic factors in shaping the distribution pattern and niche differentiation of Prunus dielsiana in subtropical China

Hong Zhu , Xiangui Yi , Yongfu Li , Yifan Duan , Xianrong Wang , Libing Zhang

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4) : 1467 -1477.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4) : 1467 -1477. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-020-01194-8
Original Paper

Limiting climatic factors in shaping the distribution pattern and niche differentiation of Prunus dielsiana in subtropical China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Subtropical forest in China has received much attention due to its complex geologic environment and bioclimatic heterogeneity. There have been very few studies addressing which climatic factors have shaped both distribution patterns and niche differentiation of species from this region. It also remains unclear whether phylogenetic niche conservatism retains in plant species from this biodiversity-rich subtropical region in China. In this study, we used geographic occurrence records and bioclimatic factors of Prunus dielsiana (Rosaceae), a wild cherry species, combined with the classical ENM-based DIVA-GIS software to access contemporary distribution and richness patterns of its natural populations. The current distribution of P. dielsiana occupied a relatively wide range but exhibited an uneven pattern eastward in general, and the core distribution zone of its populations are projected to concentrate in the Wushan and Wuling Mountain ranges of western China. Hydrothermic variables, particularly the Temperature Seasonality (bio4) are screened out quantitatively to be the most influential factors that have shaped the current geographical patterns of P. dielsiana. By comparison with other sympatric families, climatic niche at regional scale showed a pattern of phylogenetic niche conservatism within cherry species of Rosaceae. The effect of habitat filtering from altitude is more significant than those of longitude and latitude. We conclude that habitat filtering dominated by limiting hydrothermic factors is the primary driving process of the diversity pattern of P. dielsiana in subtropical China.

Keywords

BIOCLIM / Climatic adaptation / Most limiting factors / Phylogenetic niche conservatism / Species distribution modeling

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hong Zhu, Xiangui Yi, Yongfu Li, Yifan Duan, Xianrong Wang, Libing Zhang. Limiting climatic factors in shaping the distribution pattern and niche differentiation of Prunus dielsiana in subtropical China. Journal of Forestry Research, 2020, 32(4): 1467-1477 DOI:10.1007/s11676-020-01194-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abdusalam A, Li Q. Morphological plasticity and adaptation level of distylous Primula nivalis in a heterogeneous alpine environment. Plant Diver, 2018, 40(6): 284-291.

[2]

Babar S, Amarnath G, Reddy CS, Jentsch A, Sudhakar S. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction of an endemic and endangered plant species (Pterocarpus santalinus L.f.). Curr Sci, 2012, 102(8): 1157-1165.

[3]

Babasaheb BF, Kumar M, Ankush LK. Predicting the potential geographic distribution of cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis in India based on MAXENT ecological niche model. J Environ Biol, 2014, 35(5): 973-982.

[4]

Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett, 2012, 15(4): 365-377.

[5]

Byeon DH, Jung S, Lee WH. Review of CLIMEX and MaxEnt for studying species distribution in South Korea. J Asia-Pac Biodiver, 2018, 11(3): 325-333.

[6]

Carey PD. Changes in the distribution and abundance of Himantoglossum hircinum (L.) Spengel (Orchidaceae) over the last 100 years. Watsonia, 1999, 22: 353-364.

[7]

Carpenter G, Gillison AN, Winter J. DOMAIN: a flexible modelling procedure for mapping potential distributions of plants and animals. Biodivers Conserv, 1993, 2(6): 667-680.

[8]

Clarke A, Gaston KJ. Climate, energy and diversity. Proc R Soc, 2006, 273(1599): 2257-2266.

[9]

Crisp MD, Cook LG. Phylogenetic niche conservatism: what are the underlying evolutionary and ecological causes?. New Phytol, 2012, 196: 681-694.

[10]

Fariasa RS, Silvaa MPP, Maciel-Silva AS, Pôrto KC. Influence of environmental factors on the distribution of Calymperes and Syrrhopodon (Calymperaceae, Bryophyta) in the Atlantic Forest of Northeastern Brazil. Flora, 2017, 234: 158-164.

[11]

Feroz SM, Alam MR, Das P, Mamun AA. Community ecology and spatial distribution of trees in a tropical wet evergreen forest in Kaptai national park in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. J For Res, 2014, 25(2): 311-318.

[12]

Fielding AH, Bell JF. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv, 1997, 24(1): 38-49.

[13]

Ganeshaiah KN, Barve N, Nath N, Chandrashekara K, Swamy M, Shaanker RU. Predicting the potential geographical distribution of the sugarcane woolly aphid using GARP and DIVA-GIS. Curr Sci, 2003, 85(11): 1526-1528.

[14]

Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Cruz M, Rojas E. Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS. Plant Genet Resour Newsl, 2001, 127: 15-19.

[15]

Huang Z, Xie L, Wang H, Zhong J, Li Y, Liu J, Ou Z, Liang X, Li Y, Huang H, Lin Z, Zhang K, Zhang L. Geographic distribution and impacts of climate change on the suitable habitats of Zingiber species in China. Ind Crop Prod, 2019, 138: 11429.

[16]

Kriticos DJ, Jarošik V, Ota N. Extending the suite of bioclim variables: a proposed registry system and case study using principal components analysis. Methods Ecol Evol, 2014, 5: 956-960.

[17]

Less JP, Fordyce JA, Gotelli NJ, Sanders NJ. Invasive ants alter the phylogenetic structure of ant communities. Ecology, 2009, 90(10): 2664-2669.

[18]

Li C, Bartholomew B. Wu CY, Raven PH. Cerasus mill. Flora of China, 2003, St. Louis: Science Press, Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press 404 420

[19]

López-Pujol J, Zhang FM, Sun HQ, Yin TS, Ge S. Mountains of southern China as “plant museums” and “plant cradles”: evolutionary and conservation insights. Mt Res Dev, 2013, 31(3): 261-269.

[20]

Mantyka-pringle CS, Martin TG, Rhodes JR. Interactions between climate and habitat loss effects on biodiversity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol, 2003, 19(5): 1642-1644.

[21]

Niklaus PA, Baruffol M, He JS, Ma K, Schmid B. Can niche plasticity promote biodiversity–productivity relationships through increased complementarity?. Ecology, 2017, 98(4): 1104-1116.

[22]

Ning H, Dai L, Fu D, Liu B, Wang H, Chen H. Factors influencing the geographical distribution of Dendroctonus armandi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytidae) in China. Forests, 2019 10 5 425

[23]

Pearson RG. Species’ distribution modeling for conservation educators and practitioners. Lessons Conserv, 2010, 3: 54-89.

[24]

Peterson AT, Soberón J, Sánchez-Cordero V. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science, 1999, 285(5431): 1265-1276.

[25]

Phillips SJ. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model, 2006, 190: 231-259.

[26]

Prinzing A, Durka W, Klotz S, Brandl R. The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism. Proc R Soc Lond B, 2001, 268: 2383-2389.

[27]

Pulliam HR. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol Lett, 2000, 3(4): 349-361.

[28]

Raina AP, Abraham Z, Sivaraj N. Diversity analysis of Kaempferia galanga L. germplasm from South India using DIVA-GIS approach. Ind Crop Prod, 2014, 69: 433-439.

[29]

Retuerto R, Carballeira A. Estimating plant responses to climate by direct gradient analysis and geographic distribution analysis. Plant Ecol, 2004, 170(2): 185-202.

[30]

Rhodes L, Pollard RP, Maxted N (2016) Cerasus dielsiana. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016. e.T50027827A50027830. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T50027827A50027830.en

[31]

Ricklefs RE. Evolutionary diversification and the origin of the diversity-environment relationship. Ecology, 2006, 87: S3-S13.

[32]

Robertson MP, Peter CI, Villet MH, Ripley BS. Comparing models for predicting species’ potential distributions: a case study using correlative and mechanistic predictive modelling techniques. Ecol Model, 2003, 164: 153-167.

[33]

Schneid CK. Illustriertes Handbuch der Laubholzkunde G, 1905, Jena: Fischer 589 590

[34]

Seidler TG, Plotkin JB. Seed dispersal and spatial pattern in tropical trees. PLoS Biol, 2006 4 11 e344

[35]

Shi T, Luo W, Li H, Huang X, Ni Z, Gao H, Iqbal S, Gao Z. Association between blooming time and climatic adaptation in Prnuns mune. Ecol Evol, 2019, 10(1): 1-15.

[36]

Silva KGD, Venturin N, Carvalho WAC. Spatial and temporal distribution of species diversity in semideciduous seasonal forests with occurrence of fire. Rev Biol Trop, 2017, 65(2): 525-534.

[37]

Stockwell D. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 1999, 13(2): 143-158.

[38]

Sutherst RW, Maywald GF, Kriticos DJ. CLIMEX version 3: user’s guide, 2007, Melbourne: Hearne Scientific Software 131

[39]

Wang WG, Tang XY, Zhu QL, Pan K, Hu Q, He M, Li J. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of major native non-food bioenergy plants in China. PLoS ONE, 2014 9 11 e111587

[40]

Wang Q, Wu S, Su X, Zhang L, Xu X, Lyu L, Cai H, Shrestha N, Liu Y, Wang W, Wang Z. Niche conservatism and elevated diversification shape species diversity in drylands: evidence from Zygophyllaceae. Proc R Soc B, 2018, 285: 20181742.

[41]

Wu M, Feroz SM, Hagihara A, Xue L, Huang Z. Vertical stratification, floristic composition and woody species diversity in a subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest (Dinghushan Nature Reserve, South China). Tropics, 2010, 19(1): 9-19.

[42]

Xie C, Yu X, Liu D, Fang Y. Modelling suitable habitat and ecological characteristics of old trees using DIVA-GIs in Anhui Province, China. Pol J Environ Stud, 2020, 29(2): 1-13.

[43]

Xu Y, Shen Z, Ying L, Wang Z, Huang J, Zang R, Jiang Y. Hotspot analyses indicate significant conservation gaps for evergreen broadleaved woody plants in China. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 1859.

[44]

Yang X, Yan H, Li B, Han Y, Song B. Spatial distribution patterns of Symplocos congeners in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaf forest of southern China. J For Res, 2018, 29(3): 773-784.

[45]

Zhang L, Mi X, Shao H, Ma KP. Strong plant-soil associations in a heterogeneous subtropical broad-leaved forest. Plant Soil, 2011, 347: 211.

[46]

Zhao Q, Ding DS, Yan CH. Restoration and reconstruction of the forest vegetation in the Mufushan-Yanziji Mountains, Nanjing. Geogr Res, 2003, 22(6): 742-750. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[47]

Zhao K, Zhou Y, Zheng Y, Chen B, Ziling W. The chloroplast genome of Prunus dielsiana (Rosaceae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour, 2019, 4(2): 4033-4034.

[48]

Zhou Y, Zhang J, Slade E, Zhang L, Palmares F, Chen J, Wang X, Zhang S. Dietary shifts in relation to fruit availability among masked palm civets (Paguma larvata) in central China. J Mammal, 2008, 89(2): 435-477.

[49]

Zhu H, Zhu SX, Li YF, Yi XG, Duan YF, Wang XR. Leaf phenotypic variation in natural populations of Cerasus dielsiana. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(12): 1168-1178. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[50]

Zhu H, Yi XG, Li YF, Zhu SX, Li M, Duan YF, Wang XR. Phylogeography and population genetic structure of flowering cherry species Cerasus dielsiana in subtropical China. Syst Biodivers, 2019, 17(6): 622-633.

[51]

Zou DT, Wang TG, Luo A, Wang ZH. Species richness patterns and resource plant conservation assessments of Rosaceae in China. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(1): 1-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

128

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/