Heartwood variations in mid-aged plantations of Erythrophleum fordii

Abstract

Erythrophleum fordii Oliv. (Caesalpiniaceae) is a rosewood species naturally distributed in southeast Asia and south China, and the heartwood is commonly used for high-quality crafts and furniture. While there are differences in heartwood development among single trees with distinct social status, the relationship between heartwood development and growth performance remains unclear. This information is essential to improve plantation management for high-yield heartwood production. Forty dominant, intermediate and suppressed trees were sampled from E. fordii plantations aged in 32–35 years in Pingxiang City, Guangxi, China. Stem analysis was carried out to determine horizontal and vertical variations of heartwood and sapwood. Number of annual rings, diameter and area of heartwood and sapwood as well as ratios of heartwood diameter and area at breast height were all significantly influenced by the social status of trees in stands (P < 0.05). In these mid-aged plantations, E. fordii stems developed heartwood once the xylem diameter reached 5–10 cm, and then heartwood diameter and area increased with increasing xylem diameter. Heartwood ring numbers, diameter and area as well as their ratios decreased with increasing height, while sapwood ring numbers and diameter were relatively constant within the section where heartwood occurred. Heartwood and sapwood diameters were equal at heights of approximately 6-m for dominant, 5-m for intermediate and 3-m for suppressed trees. Dominant trees differed considerably from intermediate and suppressed trees in heartwood volume, while heartwood volume ratios were all below 30%, and near 90% in the stem section below 8-m height regardless of social status. Relationship analysis showed that DBH was the most important factor influencing heartwood in even-aged stands. The findings provide evidence for crop tree selection, thinning regimes and reasonable management of plantations of E. fordii.

Keywords

Erythrophleum fordii / Heartwood formation / Spatial variation / Tree differentiation

References

[1] Climent J, Chambel MR, Gil L, Pardos JA. Vertical heartwood variation patterns and prediction of heartwood volume in Pinus canariensis Sm. For Ecol Manag, 2003, 174: 203-211.

[2] Climent J, Chambel MR, Pérez E, Gil L, Pardos J. Relationship between heartwood radius and early radial growth, tree age, and climate in Pinus canariensis. Can J For Res, 2002, 32: 103-111.

[3] DeBell JD, Lachenbruch B. Heartwood/sapwood variation of western redcedar as influenced by cultural treatments and position in tree. For Ecol Manag, 2009, 258: 2026-2032.

[4] Igartúa DV, Moreno K, Monteoliva SE. Acacia melanoxylon in Argentina: heartwood content and its relationship with site, growth and age of the trees. Forest Syst, 2017, 26: e007.

[5] Kerr G. A review of black heart of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Forestry, 1998, 71: 49-56.

[6] Knapic S, Tavares F, Pereira H. Heartwood and sapwood variation in Acacia melanoxylon R Br. trees in Portugal. Forestry, 2006, 79: 371-380.

[7] Kokutse AD, Stokes A, Kokutse NK, Kokou K. Which factors most influence heartwood distribution and radial growth in plantation teak?. Ann For Sci, 2010, 67: 407.

[8] Lehnebach R, Morel H, Bossu J, Moguedec GL, Amusant N, Beauchêne J, Nicolini E. Heartwood/sapwood profile and the tradeoff between stem and crown increment in a natural forest, the case study of a tropical tree (Dicorynia guianensis Amsh., Fabaceae). Trees Struct Funct, 2017, 31: 199-214.

[9] Li W, Wang CK, Zhang QZ. Differentiation of stand individuals impacts allometry and biomass allocation of Larix gmelinii trees. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35: 1679-1687.

[10] Liu JL, Wang CK, Zhang QJ. Spatial variations in stem heartwood and sapwood for Larix gmelinii trees with various differentiation classes. Sci Silvae Sin, 2014, 50: 114-121.

[11] Miranda I, Gominho J, Lourenco A, Pereira H. The influence of irrigation and fertilization on heartwood and sapwood contents in 18-year-old Eucalyptus globulus trees. Can J For Res, 2006, 36: 2675-2683.

[12] Miranda I, Gominho J, Lourenco A, Pereira H. Variation of heartwood and sapwood in 18-year-old Eucalyptus globulus trees grown with different spacings. Trees Struct Funct, 2009, 23: 367-372.

[13] Moraisa MC, Pereira H. Heartwood and sapwood variation in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. trees at the end of rotation for pulpwood production. Ann For Sci, 2007, 64: 665-671.

[14] Moya R, Berrocal A. Wood colour variation in sapwood and heartwood of young trees of Tectona grandis and its relationship with plantation characteristics, site, and decay resistance. Ann For Sci, 2010, 67: 109.

[15] Nicholas NS, Gregoire TG, Zedaker SM. The reliability of tree crown position classification. Can J For Res, 1991, 21: 698-701.

[16] Ojansuu R, Maltamo M. Sapwood and heartwood taper in scots pine stems. Can J For Res, 1995, 25: 1928-1943.

[17] Okuyama T, Yamamoto H, Wahyudi I, Hadi YS, Bhat KM (2000) Growth stresses and some wood quality attributed in planted teak. In Proceedings of the IUFRO congress, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 7–12 August, 2000

[18] Pérez D, Kanninen M. Effect of thinning on stem form and wood characteristics of teak (Tectona grandis) trees in a humid tropical site in Costa Rica. Silva Fennica, 2005, 39: 217-225.

[19] Pinto I, Pereira H, Usenius A. Heartwood and sapwood development within maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) stems. Trees Struct Funct, 2004, 18: 284-294.

[20] Puhlick JJ, Kuehne C, Kenefic LS. Crop tree growth response and quality after silvicultural rehabilitation of cutover stands. Can J For Res, 2019, 49: 670-679.

[21] Schuler J, Cueni J, Spiecker H, Guo WF. Modelling growing space of four valuable broadleaved tree species in southern China. Forest Sci Pract, 2013, 15: 167-178.

[22] Sellin A. Variation in sapwood thickness of Picea abies in Estonia depending on the tree age. Scand J For Res, 1991, 6: 463-469.

[23] Sellin A. Sapwood-heartwood proportion related to tree diameter, age, and growth rate in Picea abies. Can J For Res, 1994, 24: 1022-1028.

[24] Sousa VB, Cardoso S, Pereira H. Ring width variation and heartwood development in Quercus faginea. Wood Fiber Sci, 2013, 45: 405-414.

[25] Taylor A, Gartner BL, Morrell JJ. Heartwood formation and natural durability—a review. Wood Fiber Sci, 2002, 34: 587-611.

[26] Wang XC, Wang CK, Zhang QZ, Quan XK. Heartwood and sapwood allometry of seven Chinese temperate tree species. Ann For Sci, 2010, 67: 410.

[27] Wilkins AP. Sapwood, heartwood and bark thickness of silviculturally treated Eucalyptus grandis. Wood Sci Technol, 1991, 25: 415-423.

[28] Woeste KE. Heartwood production in a 35-year-old black walnut progeny test. Can J For Res, 2002, 32: 177-181.

[29] Yang BG, Jia HY, Zhao ZG, Pang SJ, Cai DX. Horizontal and vertical distributions of heartwood for teak plantation. Forests, 2020, 11: 225.

[30] Yang KC, Hazenberg G. Sapwood and heartwood width relationship to tree age in Pinus banksiana. Can J For Res, 1991, 21: 521-525.

[31] Yang KC, Hazenberg G. Impact of spacings on sapwood and heartwood thickness in Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P. and Picea glauca (Moench.) Voss. Wood Fiber Sci, 1992, 24: 330-336.

[32] Zhao ZG, Guo JJ, Sha E, Lin KQ, Zeng J, Xu JM. Geographic distribution and phenotypic variation of fruit and seed of Erythrophleum fordii in China. Chin Bull Bot, 2009, 44: 338-344.

[33] Zhao ZG, Guo JJ, Wang CS, Zeng J. Simulating the heartwood formation process of Erythrophleum fordii in South China. J Forest Res, 2015, 26: 1049-1055.