Selective harvesting at rational intervals promotes carbon sequestration in temperate coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests in China

Jihua Hou , Junxia Tian , Li Xu , Zihao Zhang , Zhi Chen , Nianpeng He

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3) : 1025 -1033.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3) : 1025 -1033. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-020-01164-0
Original Paper

Selective harvesting at rational intervals promotes carbon sequestration in temperate coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests in China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Evidence-based selective cutting at prescribed intervals as part of good forest management can enhance the carbon sequestration capacity of the forest. The effect of forest management on carbon sequestration has, however, not been quantified. Thus, carbon content of various organs was measured for 323 tree species, 247 shrub species, and 233 herb species in seven temperate coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests that were subjected to selective cutting with restoration durations of 100, 55, 45, 36, 25, 14, and 6 years to explore dynamic changes in carbon storage. The results showed that biomass carbon allocation in different organs followed a pattern: trunk > root > branch > leaf for all forests. With longer restoration durations, more carbon accumulated in different organs and in soils. Interestingly, when the restoration duration exceeded 50 years, carbon storage in ecosystem was larger than that in primary forests with 100-year cutting intervals, suggesting that a reasonable selective cutting interval can increase forest carbon sequestration. Mean diameter at breast height (DBH) and forest carbon storage were significantly positively correlated, and carbon storage of selectively cut forests exceeded that of primary forests when the stand mean DBH exceeded 15.66 cm. Therefore, mean DBH of forests can be an indicator for combining sustainable forest management and forest carbon sequestration. Additionally, the classic coefficients of 0.45 and 0.50 used to estimate carbon sequestration underestimated values by 2.65% and overestimated by 8.16%, respectively, in comparison with the measured carbon content from different plant organs.

Keywords

Selective cutting / Forests / Diameter at breast height / Carbon / Storage / Management / Restoration

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jihua Hou, Junxia Tian, Li Xu, Zihao Zhang, Zhi Chen, Nianpeng He. Selective harvesting at rational intervals promotes carbon sequestration in temperate coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests in China. Journal of Forestry Research, 2020, 32(3): 1025-1033 DOI:10.1007/s11676-020-01164-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Alam A, Kellomaki S, Kilpelainen A, Strandman H. Effects of stump extraction on the carbon sequestration in Norway spruce forest ecosystems under varying thinning regimes with implications for fossil fuel substitution. Global Change Biol Bioenergy, 2013, 5: 445-458.

[2]

Carey EV, Sala A, Keane R, Callaway RM. Are old forests underestimated as global carbon sinks?. Global Change Biol, 2001, 7: 339-344.

[3]

Cheng XR, Yu MK, Wu TG. Effect of forest structural change on carbon storage in a coastal metasequoia glyptostroboides stand. Sci World J, 2013, 2013: 1-9.

[4]

Dixon RK. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 1994, 265: 171-171.

[5]

Dwyer JM, Fensham R, Buckley YM. Restoration thinning accelerates structural development and carbon sequestration in an endangered Australian ecosystem. J Appl Ecol, 2010, 47: 681-691.

[6]

Fang JY, Chen AP, Peng CH, Zhao SQ, Ci L. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 2001, 292: 2320-2322.

[7]

Fang JY, Yu GR, Liu LL, Hu SJ, Chapin FS. Climate change, human impacts, and carbon sequestration in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115: 4015-4020.

[8]

He NP, Wen D, Zhu JX, Tang XL, Xu L, Zhang L, Hu HF, Huang M, Yu GR. Vegetation carbon sequestration in Chinese forests from 2010 to 2050. Global Change Biol, 2017, 23: 1575-1584.

[9]

He NP, Liu CC, Tian M, Li ML, Yang H, Yu GR, Guo DL, Smith MD, Yu Q, Hou JH. Variation in leaf anatomical traits from tropical to cold-temperate forests and linkage to ecosystem functions. Funct Ecol, 2018, 32: 10-19.

[10]

Levine JS, Cofer WR, Cahoon DR, Winstead EL. Biomass burning—a driver for global change. Environ Sci Technol, 1995, 29: 120-125.

[11]

Liu CC, He NP, Zhang JH, Li Y, Wang QF, Sack L, Yu GR. Variation of stomatal traits from cold temperate to tropical forests and association with water use efficiency. Funct Ecol, 2018, 32: 20-28.

[12]

Lu F, Hu HF, Sun WJ, Zhu JJ, Liu GB, Zhou WM, Zhang QF, Shi PL, Liu XP, Wu X, Zhang L, Wei XH, Dai LM, Zhang KR, Sun YR, Xue S, Zhang WJ, Xiong DP, Deng L, Liu BJ, Zhou L, Zhang C, Zheng X, Cao JS, Huang Y, He NP, Zhou GY, Bai YF, Xie ZQ, Tang ZY, Wu BF, Fang JY, Liu GH, Yu GR. Effects of national ecological restoration projects on carbon sequestration in China from 2001 to 2010. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115: 4039-4044.

[13]

Nilsen P, Strand LT. Thinning intensity effects on carbon and nitrogen stores and fluxes in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand after 33 years. Forest Ecol Manag, 2008, 256: 201-208.

[14]

Piao SL, Fang JY, Ciais P, Peylin P, Huang Y, Sitch S, Wang T. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature, 2009, 458: 1009-1013.

[15]

Piene H, Vancleve K. Weight-loss of litter and cellulose bags in a thinned white spruce forest in interior Alaska. Can J Forest Res, 1978, 8: 42-46.

[16]

Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger AG. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature, 1982, 298: 156-159.

[17]

Pregitzer KS, Euskirchen ES. Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: biome patterns related to forest age. Global Change Biol, 2004, 10: 2052-2077.

[18]

Pyorala P, Kellomaki S, Peltola H. Effects of management on biomass production in Norway spruce stands and carbon balance of bioenergy use. Forest Ecol Manag, 2012, 275: 87-97.

[19]

Su ZY, Xiong YM, Zhu JY, Ye YC, Ye M. Soil organic carbon content and distribution in a small landscape of Dongguan, South China. Pedosphere, 2006, 16: 10-17.

[20]

Tang XL, Zhao X, Bai YF, Tang ZY, Wang WT, Zhao YC, Wan HW, Xie ZQ, Shi XZ, Wu BF, Wang GX, Yan JH, Ma KP, Du S, Li SG, Han SJ, Ma YX, Hu HF, He NP, Yang YH, Han WX, He HL, Yu GR, Fang JY, Zhou GY. Carbon pools in China's terrestrial ecosystems: new estimates based on an intensive field survey. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115: 4021-4026.

[21]

Thornley JHM, Cannell MGR. Managing forests for wood yield and carbon storage: a theoretical study. Tree Physiol, 2000, 20: 477-484.

[22]

Vargas R, Allen EB, Allen MF. Effects of vegetation thinning on above- and belowground carbon in a seasonally dry tropical forest in Mexico. Biotropica, 2009, 41: 302-311.

[23]

Wang WF, Peng CH, Kneeshaw DD, Larocque GR, Lei XD, Zhu Q, Song XZ, Tong QJ. Modeling the effects of varied forest management regimes on carbon dynamics in jack pine stands under climate change. Can J Forest Res, 2013, 43: 469-479.

[24]

Wang RL, Yu GR, He NP, Wang QF, Zhao N, Xu ZW, Ge JP. Latitudinal variation of leaf stomatal traits from species to community level in forests: linkage with ecosystem productivity. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 14454.

[25]

Wen D, He NP. Forest carbon storage along the north–south transect of eastern China: spatial patterns, allocation, and influencing factors. Ecol Indic, 2016, 61: 960-967.

[26]

Xu L, He NP, Yu GR, Wen D, Gao Y, He HL. Differences in pedotransfer functions of bulk density lead to high uncertainty in soil organic carbon estimation at regional scales: evidence from Chinese terrestrial ecosystems. J Geophys Res-Biogeol, 2015, 120: 1567-1575.

[27]

Xu L, Yu GR, He NP, Wang QF, Gao Y, Wen D, Li SG, Niu SL, Ge JP. Carbon storage in China’s terrestrial ecosystems: a synthesis. Sci Rep, 2018, 8: 2806.

[28]

Xu L, Yu GR, He NP. Increased soil organic carbon storage in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems from the 1980s to the 2010s. J Geogr Sci, 2019, 29: 49-66.

[29]

Xua Q, Yang R, Dong YX, Liu YX, Qiu LR. The influence of rapid urbanization and land use changes on terrestrial carbon sources/sinks in Guangzhou, China. Ecol Indic, 2016, 70: 304-316.

[30]

Zhang CY, Zhao XH, von Gadow K. Analyzing selective harvest events in three large forest observational studies in North Eastern China. Forest Ecol Manag, 2014, 316: 100-109.

[31]

Zhang CY, Cheng YX, He HJ, Gao LS, Liang JJ, Zhao XH. Structural drivers of biomass dynamics in two temperate forests in China. Ecosphere, 2017, 8: e01752.

[32]

Zhang JH, Zhao N, Liu CC, Yang H, Li ML, Yu GR, Wilcox K, Yu Q, He NP. C:N: P stoichiometry in China’s forests: from organs to ecosystems. Funct Ecol, 2018, 32: 50-60.

[33]

Zhang X, Guan D, Li W, Sun D, Jin C, Yuan F, Wang A, Wu J. The effects of forest thinning on soil carbon stocks and dynamics: a meta-analysis. Forest Ecol Manag, 2018, 429: 36-43.

[34]

Zhao H, Xu L, Wang QF, Tian J, Tang XL, Tang ZY, Xie ZQ, He NP, Yu GR. Spatial patterns and environmental factors influencing leaf carbon content in the forests and shrublands of China. J Geogr Sci, 2018, 28: 791-801.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

166

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/