Moisture content thresholds for ignition and rate of fire spread for various dead fuels in northeast forest ecosystems of China

Abstract

Fuel moisture content is one of the important factors that determine ignition probability and fire behaviour in forest ecosystems. In this study, ignition and fire spread moisture content thresholds of 40 dead fuel were performed in laboratory experiments, with a focus on the source of ignition and wind speed. Variability in fuel moisture content at time of ignition and during fire spread was observed for different fuels. Matches were more efficient to result in ignition and spread fire with high values of fuel moisture content compared to the use of cigarette butts. Some fuels did not ignite at 15% moisture content, whereas others ignited at 40% moisture content and fire spread at 38% moisture content in the case of matches, or ignited at 27% moisture content and spread fire at 25% moisture content using cigarette butts. A two-way ANOVA showed that both the source of ignition and the wind speed affected ignition and fire spread threshold significantly, but there was no interaction between these factors. The relationship between ignition and fire spread was strong, with R² = 98% for cigarette butts, and 92% for matches. Further information is needed, especially on the density of fuels, fuel proportion (case of mixed fuels), fuel age, and fuel combustibility.

Keywords

Dead fuel / Ignition source / Wind speed / Ignition moisture threshold / Propagation moisture threshold

References

[1] Alessio GA, Penuelas J, Llusia J, Ogaya R, Estiarte M, De Lillis M. Influence of water and terpenes on flammability in some dominant Mediterranean species. Int J Wildl Fire, 2008, 17: 274-286.

[2] Allen KA, Denelle P, Ruiz FMS. Prescribed moorland burning meets good practice guidelines: a monitoring case study using aerial photography in the Peak District, UK. Ecol Indic, 2016, 62: 76-85.

[3] Anderson HE. Forest fuel ignitibility. Fire Technol, 1970, 6: 312-319.

[4] Anderson SAJ, Anderson WR. Ignition and fire spread thresholds in gorse (Ulex europaeus). Int J Wildl Fire, 2010, 19: 589-598.

[5] Bradstock RA, Gill AM, Williams RJ. Flammable Australia: fire regimes, biodiversity and ecosystems in a changing world, 2012, Collingwood: CSIRO publishing.

[6] Cawson JG, Duff TJ. Forest fuel bed ignitability under marginal fire weather conditions in Eucalyptus forests. Int J Wildl Fire, 2019, 28: 198-204.

[7] Chang Y, He HS, Hu Y. Historic and current fire regimes in the Great Xing’an Mountains, northeastern China: implications for long-term forest management. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 254: 445-453.

[8] Charles T, Garten JR. Predicted effects of prescribed burning and harvesting on forest recovery and sustainability in southwest Georgia, USA. J Environ Manag, 2006, 81(4): 323-332.

[9] Chuvieco E, Aguado I, Dimitrakopoulos AP. Conversion of fuel moisture content values to ignition potential for integrated fire danger assessment. Can J For Res, 2004, 34: 2284-2293.

[10] Davies GM, Legg CJ. Fuel moisture thresholds in the flammability of Calluna vulgaris. Fire Technol, 2011, 47: 421-436.

[11] Dimitrakopoulos AP. A statistical classification of Mediterranean species based on their flammability components. Int J Wildl Fire, 2001, 10: 113-118.

[12] Dimitrakopoulos AP, Papaioannou KK. Flammability assessment of Mediterranean forest fuels. Fire Technol, 2001, 37: 143-152.

[13] Fernandes PM, Cruz MG. Plant flammability experiments offer limited insight into vegetation-fire dynamics interactions. New Phytol, 2012, 194: 606-609.

[14] Fernandes PM, Botelho H, Rego F, Loureiro C. Using fuel and weather variables to predict the sustainability of surface fire spread in maritime pine stands. Can J For Res, 2008, 38: 190-201.

[15] Figueroa S, de Rivera J, Jahn W. Influence of permeability on the rate of fire spread over natural and artificial Pinus radiata forest litter. Fire Technol, 2019, 55: 1085-1103.

[16] Finney MA, Cohen JD, Grenfell IC, Yedinak KM. An examination of fire spread thresholds in discontinuous fuel beds A. Int J Wildl Fire, 2010, 19: 163-170.

[17] Fletcher TH, Pickett BM, Smith SG. Effects of moisture on ignition behavior of moist California Chaparral and Utah leaves. Combust Sci Technol, 2007, 179: 1183-1203.

[18] Ganteaume A, Lampin-Maillet C, Guijarro M. Spot fires: fuel bed flammability and capability of firebrands to ignite fuel beds. Int J Wildl Fire, 2009, 18: 951-969.

[19] Ganteaume A, Marielle J, Corinne LM. Effects of vegetation type and fire regime on flammability of undisturbed litter in Southeastern France. For Ecol Manag, 2011, 261: 2223-2231.

[20] Guo F, Su Z, Wang G. Understanding fire drivers and relative impacts in different Chinese forest ecosystems. Sci Total Environ, 2017, 605–606: 411-425.

[21] Hu T, Sun L, Hu H. Soil respiration of the Dahurian Larch (Larix gmelinii) forest and the response to fire disturbance in Da Xing’an Mountains, China. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 1-10.

[22] Hu T, Hu H, Li F. Long-term effects of post-fire restoration types on nitrogen mineralisation in a Dahurian larch (Larix gmelinii)-forest in boreal China. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 679: 237-247.

[23] Jervis FX, Rein G. Experimental study on the burning behaviour of Pinus halepensis needles using small-scale fire calorimetry of live, aged and dead samples. Fire Mater, 2016, 40: 385-395.

[24] Larjavaara M, Kuuluvainen T, Tanskanen H, Venäläinen A. Variation in forest fire ignition probability in Finland. Silva Fenn, 2004, 38: 253-266.

[25] Li J, Song Y, Huang X, Li M. Comparison of forest burned areas in mainland China derived from MCD45A1 and data recorded in yearbooks from 2001 to 2011. Int J Wildl Fire, 2015, 24: 103-113.

[26] Liu Z, He HS, Yang J. Emulating natural fire effects using harvesting in an eastern boreal forest landscape of northeast China. J Veg Sci, 2012, 23: 782-795.

[27] Liu Z, Yang J, He HS. Identifying the threshold of dominant controls on fire spread in a boreal forest landscape of Northeast China. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8: e55618.

[28] Liu Z, Chen JM, Jin G, Qi Y. Estimating seasonal variations of leaf area index using litterfall collection and optical methods in four mixed evergreen-deciduous forests. Agric For Meteorol, 2015, 209–210: 36-48.

[29] Madrigal J, Hernando C, Guijarro M, Díez C. Evaluation of forest fuel flammability and combustion properties with an adapted mass loss calorimeter device. J Fire Sci, 2009, 27: 323-342.

[30] Marino E, Madrigal J, Guijarro M. Flammability descriptors of fine dead fuels resulting from two mechanical treatments in shrubland: a comparative laboratory study. Int J Wildl Fire, 2010, 19: 314-324.

[31] McAllister S, Weise DR. Effects of season on ignition of live wildland fuels using the forced ignition and flame spread test apparatus. Combust Sci Technol, 2017, 189: 231-247.

[32] McCaw WL (1995) Predicting fire spread in Western Australian mallee-heath. CALMScience pp. 35–42

[33] Nelson RM, Hiers JK. The influence of fuelbed properties on moisture drying rates and timelags of longleaf pine litter. Can J For Res, 2008, 38: 2394-2404.

[34] Nelson Jr RM (2001) Water relations of forest fuels. In: Forest fires. Elsevier, pp 79–149

[35] Nolan RH, Boer MM, Resco De Dios V. Large-scale, dynamic transformations in fuel moisture drive wildfire activity across southeastern Australia. Geophys Res Lett, 2016, 43: 4229-4238.

[36] Plucinski MP (2003) The investigation of factors governing ignition and development of fires in heathland vegetation. PhD thesis Univ New South Wales, Australia

[37] Plucinski MP, Anderson WR. Laboratory determination of factors influencing successful point ignition in the litter layer of shrubland vegetation. Int J Wildl Fire, 2008, 17: 628-637.

[38] Plucinski MP, Anderson WR, Bradstock RA, Gill AM. The initiation of fire spread in shrubland fuels recreated in the laboratory. Int J Wildl Fire, 2010, 19: 512-520.

[39] Possell M, Bell TL. The influence of fuel moisture content on the combustion of Eucalyptus foliage. Int J Wildl Fire, 2013, 22: 343-352.

[40] Rossa CG. A generic fuel moisture content attenuation factor for fire spread rate empirical models. For Syst, 2018, 27: 2.

[41] Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. Intermountain Forest & Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture

[42] Santana VM, Marrs RH. Flammability properties of British heathland and moorland vegetation: models for predicting fire ignition. J Environ Manag, 2014, 139: 88-96.

[43] Su Z, Hu H, Wang G, Ma Y, Yang X, Guo F. Using GIS and random forests to identify fire drivers in a forest city, Yichun, China. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk, 2018, 9: 1207-1229.

[44] Su Z, Tigabu M, Cao Q, Wang G, Hu H, Guo F. Comparative analysis of spatial variation in forest fire drivers between boreal and subtropical ecosystems in China. For Ecol Manag, 2019, 454: 117669.

[45] Sun P, Zhang Y, Sun L, Hu H, Zhang H. Influence of fuel moisture content, packing ratio and wind velocity on the ignition probability of fuel beds composed of Mongolian oak leaves via cigarette butts. Forests, 2018, 9: 507.

[46] Syphard AD, Rustigianromsos H, Mann ML, Conlisk E, Moritz MA, Ackerly DD. The relative influence of climate and housing development on current and projected future fire patterns and structure loss across three California landscapes. Glob Environ Chang, 2019, 56: 41-55.

[47] Valette JC (1990) Inflammabilités des espèces forestières méditerranéennes. Conséquences sur la combustibilité des formations forestières. Rev For Fr 42:76–92. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/26171

[48] Wang F, Li J, Zou B, Xu X, Li Z. Effect of prescribed fire on soil properties and N transformation in two vegetation types in South China. Environ Manage, 2013, 51: 1164-1173.

[49] Weise DR, Zhou X, Sun L, Mahalingam S. Fire spread in chaparral-‘Go or no-go?’. Int J Wildl Fire, 2005, 14: 99-106.

[50] Woodman M, Rawson R (1982) Fuel reduction burning in radiata pine plantations. Fire Management Branch, Department of Conservation and Environment, Research report No 14. (Melbourne)

[51] Wu ZW, He HS, Chang Y. Development of customized fire behavior fuel models for boreal forests of Northeastern China. Environ Manage, 2011, 48: 1148-1157.

[52] Yang G, Di XY, Guo QX. The impact of climate change on forest fire danger rating in China’s boreal forest. J For Res, 2011, 22: 249-257.

[53] Ying L, Han J, Du Y, Shen Z. Forest fire characteristics in China: spatial patterns and determinants with thresholds. For Ecol Manag, 2018, 424: 345-354.