Shade coffee plantations maintain woody plant diversity and structure in a cloud forest landscape of southern Mexico
Edson A. Alvarez-Alvarez , R. Carlos Almazán-Núñez , Fernando González-García , Marlene Brito-Millán , Alfredo Méndez-Bahena , Sergio García-Ibáñez
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2) : 637 -648.
Shade coffee plantations maintain woody plant diversity and structure in a cloud forest landscape of southern Mexico
Cloud forest ecosystems of the Latin American tropics are highly threatened by changes in land-use such as expanding croplands and livestock pastures that promote shifts in the structure and composition of plant communities in these forests. However, shade coffee plantations represent a forest management alternative that has been shown to maintain biodiversity in these ecosystems. In this study, we evaluated changes in the composition, diversity, and structure of Mexican cloud-forest woody species for three land use categories: cattle pastures, shade coffee plantations and advanced succession forests. For each category, fifteen 0.28-ha plots were established and the composition and diversity of vegetation was noted. Composition of species was analyzed using ordination methods, and alpha diversity was compared using Hill numbers. Seventy-seven woody species belonging to 40 families were recorded. Species richness and diversity was high in both the advanced successional forest and coffee plantations compared to cattle pastures. Vegetation composition and structure was similar between late succession forests and coffee plantations with both land uses also being more structurally complex than cattle pastures. Our results show how shade coffee cultivation is a land-use activity that maintains woody plant communities in a manner that aligns with biodiversity conservation.
Land uses / Late succession / Plant diversity / Shade coffee / Vegetation structure
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
APG IV (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc, 2016, 181(1): 1-20. |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
Chao A, Ma KH, Hsieh TC (2016). iNEXT (iNterpolation and EXTrapolation) online: software for interpolation and extrapolation of species diversity. https://chao.shinyapps.io/iNEXTOnline/. Accessed 15 Oct 2019 |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9.1.0. Storrs, USA: University of Connecticut. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates/index.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2019 |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Version 2.17. Norway: University of Oslo. https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm. Accessed 15 Oct 2019 |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
INEGI (2010) (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática). Página electrónica institucional. https://www.inegi.org.mx/. Accessed 15 Oct 2019 |
| [33] |
IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) Base referencial mundial del recurso suelo 2014, actualización 2015: sistema internacional de clasificación de suelos para la nomenclatura de suelos y la creación de leyendas de mapas de suelos. Informes sobre recursos mundiales de suelos 106. FAO, Roma, Italia, p 218 |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
SEMARNAT (2010) (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres, Categoría de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación, Diciembre 30, 2010. Ciudad de México, México. http://biblioteca.semarnat.gob.mx/janium/Documentos/Ciga/agenda/DOFsr/DO2454.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 19 |
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
SPSS (2011) SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 20.0. SPSS Institute Inc, Chicago, USA. https://www.ibm.com/mx-es/analytics/spss-statistics-software. Accessed 15 Oct 19 |
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
ter Braak CJF, Ŝmilauer P (2002) CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USA. www.canoco.com. Accessed 15 Oct 19 |
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
Vázquez-Yanez C, Batis-Muñoz AI, Alcocer-Silva MI, Gual-Díaz M, Sánchez-Dirzo C (1999) Árboles y arbustos potencialmente valiosos para la restauración ecológica y la reforestación. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad-Instituto de Ecología AC-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, DF, p 15 |
| [89] |
Villaseñor JL (2010) El bosque húmedo de montaña en México y sus plantas vasculares: catálogo florístico-taxonómico. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, DF, p 38 |
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
W3Tropicos (2010) Missouri Botanical Garden’s VAST nomenclatural database and associated authority files. Missouri Botanical Garden, Saint Louis, Missouri. http://tropicos.org/. Accessed 16 Oct 19 |
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |