Geographical distribution of Aralia elata characteristics correlated with topography and forest structure in Heilongjiang and Jilin Provinces, Northeast China
Hongxu Wei , Guoshuang Chen , Xin Chen , Hengtian Zhao
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3) : 1115 -1125.
Geographical distribution of Aralia elata characteristics correlated with topography and forest structure in Heilongjiang and Jilin Provinces, Northeast China
The Araliaceae family consists of numerous species of medical plants of significant value as non-wood forest products. To conserve and culture these plants in natural forest stands is an important undertaking which should be implemented according to the relationship between forest structure and understory population. In this study, thirty-five plots were established in natural Aralia elata stands. Taller individual and denser populations were found in the northern and in the eastern regions, respectively. Both population densities and individual leaf weight increased along longitude. In contrast, their relationship with elevation and DBH were negative. Along with the altitude gradient, both height and root-collar diameter increased but population density declined. Root-collar diameter and population density decreased with latitude and DBH, respectively. Overall, dominant trees unlikely enforced strong disturbance to the development of understory A. elata populations unless concerning some specific topographic factors.
Aralia elata / Chinese angelica-tree / Stand quality / Geographical distribution / Undergrowth / Non-timber forest species
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Botanic Gardens Conservation International, IUCN SSC Global Tree Specialist Group (2018) Aralia elata. The IUCN Red list of Threatened Species 2018: e.T135795730A135795732. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T135795730A135795732.en. Accessed 16 Nov 2018 |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
FAO. Non-wood forest products and income generation. Unasylava, 1998, 49: 73. |
| [14] |
FAO. Towards a harmonized definition of non-wood forest products. Unasylava, 1999, 50: 63-64. |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Nasi R, Cunningham T (2001) Sustainable management of non-timber forest resources: a review with recommendations for the SBSTTA. Peer review of a document on harvesting of non-timber forest resources and forest biological diversity. Secretariat of Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Quebec, Canada |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
World Reference Base (2019) World soil resource. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-survey/soil-maps-and-databases/en/. Accessed 10 Nov 2019 |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |