Production of hybrid aspen on agricultural land during one rotation in southern Sweden

Abstract

High potential productivity together with short rotation periods have made hybrid aspen an interesting option for wood production on former arable land in Nordic countries. In this study, some of the oldest active experimental plots with hybrid aspen in Sweden were remeasured at 23–30 years of age. A main aim was to assess age and productivity at the time of maximum mean annual volume increment. In addition, the influence of commercial thinning on stand development and differences in genetic gain among clones were investigated. Data from five experiments in southern Sweden were used, including three genetic trials, one demonstration stand with a clone mixture and one stand regenerated from root suckers. The three genetic trials were treated as single plot experiments, subject to a standard thinning program. In the remaining experiments, different thinning strategies were tested in a balanced block design. Volume growth had culminated or was close to maximum at age 25–30 years. Mean annual stem volume increment at culmination was 20–22 m³ ha⁻¹ a⁻¹. Dominant height reached 30–35 m at 28–30 years of age. Mean diameter at breast height was 27–29 cm after 29–30 years in the genetic trials. Clonal ranking based on diameter at age 7–9 years was positively correlated with the ranking at the final measurement in the genetic trials, 20 years later. This indicates that clones can be selected for superior growth based on results from young trials. More intense thinning programs increased the mean diameter compared to light thinning. The study indicates that one or two early and relatively heavy thinnings can promote the development of crop trees, without jeopardizing total volume production during a rotation of 25–30 years.

Keywords

Populus tremula ×  Populus tremuloides / Rotation length / Thinning / Biomass

References

[1] Bella IE, Yang RC (1991) Should we thin young aspen stands? In: Navratil S, Chapman PB (eds) Aspen management for the 21st century. Proceedings of a symposium Nov. 20–21, 1990. Forestry Canada, Northwest Region/Poplar Council of Canada, Joint Publication, Edmonton, Alberta, pp 135–139

[2] Binkley CS. When is the optimal economic rotation longer than the rotation of maximum sustained yield?. J Environ Econ Manag, 1987, 14(2): 152-158.

[3] Einspahr DW. Production and utilization of triploid hybrid aspen. Iowa State J Res, 1984, 58: 401-409.

[4] IEA. Nordic energy technology perspectives: pathways to a carbon neutral energy future, 2013, Paris: International Energy Agency and Nordic Energy Research, IEA Publications.

[5] Johansson T. Biomass production of hybrid aspen growing on former farm land in Sweden. J For Res, 2013, 24(2): 237-246.

[6] Johansson T. A site dependent top height growth model for hybrid aspen. J For Res, 2013, 24(4): 691-698.

[7] Johnsson H. Hybridaspens ungdomsutveckling och ett försök till framtidsprognos. Svenska Skogsvårdsföreningens Tidskrift, 1953, 51: 73-96. in Swedish

[8] Juodvalkis A, Kairiukstis L, Vasiliauskas R. Effects of thinning on growth of six tree species in north-temperate forests of Lithuania. Eur J For Res, 2005, 124: 187-192.

[9] Li B, Wyckoff GW, Einspahr DW. Hybrid aspen performance and genetic gains. North J Appl For, 1993, 10(3): 117-122.

[10] Liesebach M, von Wuehlisch G, Muhs H-J. Aspen for short-rotation coppice plantations on agricultural sites in Germany: effects of spacing and rotation time on growth and biomass production of aspen progenies. For Ecol Manage, 1999, 121: 25-39.

[11] Mäkinen H, Isomäki A. Thinning intensity and growth of Scots pine stands in Finland. For Ecol Manag, 2004, 201(2): 311-325.

[12] Mc Carthy R, Rytter L. Productivity and thinning effects in hybrid aspen root sucker stands. For Ecol Manag, 2015, 354: 215-223.

[13] Miller GW. Effect of crown growing space on the development of young hardwood crop trees. North J Appl For, 2000, 17: 25-35.

[14] Newman DH. Forestry’s golden rule and the development of the optimal forest rotation literature. J For Econ, 2002, 8: 5-27.

[15] Nilsson U, Agestam E, Ekö P-M, Elfving B, Fahlvik N, Johansson U, Karlsson K, Lundmark T, Wallentin C. Thinning of Scots pine and Norway spruce monocultures in Sweden: effects of different thinning programmes on stand level gross—and net stem volume production. Stud For Suec, 2010, 219: 1-46.

[16] Nordic Energy Research. Sustainable shift—Nordic energy systems towards 2050, 2016, Trondheim: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.

[17] Penner M, Robinson C, Woods M. The response of good and poor aspen clones to thinning. For Chron, 2001, 77(5): 874-884.

[18] R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/

[19] Rice JA, MacDonald GB, Weingartner DH. Precommercial thinning of trembling aspen in northern Ontario: Part 1—growth responses. For Chron, 2001, 77(5): 893-901.

[20] Rytter L, Rytter R-M. Productivity and sustainability of hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. ×  P. Tremuloides Michx.) root sucker stands with varying management strategies. For Ecol Manag, 2017, 401: 223-232.

[21] Rytter L, Stener L-G. Clonal variation in nutrient content in woody biomass of hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. × P. tremuloides Michx.). Silva Fenn, 2003, 37: 313-324.

[22] Rytter L, Stener L-G. Growth and thinning effects during a rotation period of hybrid aspen in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res, 2014, 29(8): 747-756.

[23] Rytter L, Johansson K, Karlsson B, Stener L-G. Kellomäki S, Kilpeläinen A, Alam A. Tree species, genetics and regeneration for bioenergy feedstock in northern Europe. Forest BioEnergy production: management, carbon sequestration and adaptation, 2013, New York: Springer Verlag 7 37

[24] Sabin TE, Stafford SG. Assessing the need for transformation of response variables, 1990, Corvallis: Forest Research Lab, College of Forestry, Oregon State University.

[25] Steneker GA (1974) Thinning of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michaux) in Manitoba. In: Information report. Northern Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Edmonton, Alberta, pp 1–17

[26] Stener L-G (2004) Plusträdskloner av hybridasp. In: Avelsvärderapport no. 105. Skogforsk, Uppsala (in Swedish)

[27] Stener L-G (2010) Tillväxt, vitalitet och densitet för kloner av hybridasp och poppel i sydsvenska fältförsök. In: Arbetsrapport no. 717. Skogforsk, Uppsala (in Swedish)

[28] Stener L-G, Karlsson B. Improvement of Populus tremula ×  P. tremuloides by phenotypic selection and clonal testing. For Genet, 2004, 11(1): 13-27.

[29] Stener L-G, Westin J. Early growth and phenology of hybrid aspen and poplar in clonal field tests in Scandinavia. Silva Fenn, 2017 51 3 id 5656

[30] Tullus A, Rytter L, Tullus T, Weih M, Tullus H. Short-rotation forestry with hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. ×  P. tremuloides Michx) in Northern Europe. Scand J For Res, 2012, 27(1): 10-29.

[31] Tullus H, Tullus A, Rytter L. Kellomäki S, Kilpeläinen A, Alam A. Short-rotation forestry for supplying biomass for energy production. Forest BioEnergy production: management, carbon sequestration and adaptation, 2013, New York: Springer Verlag 39 56