Effects of different land-use systems (grazing and understory cultivation) on growth and yield of semi-arid oak coppices

Abstract

The present study examines the extent of negative effects of traditional multiple land-use systems on oak coppices, from a forest management point of view. The study area was located in approximately 10,000 ha of hilly Brant’s oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) woodlands in the central Zagros Mountains. In the same site-quality class, three land-use systems were compared: simple coppice (Co), coppice in conjunction with small ruminant grazing (CoG), and coppice with understory rain-fed wheat cultivation plus grazing (CoCG). Data on total wood volume of trunk and major branches, and annual ring growth, were collected and analyzed from 74 stands in 15 coppiced woodland patches. The results showed the advantage of Co over CoG and CoCG land-uses by 43 and 60 m³ of mean accumulated wood volume per hectare, respectively. The diameter growth analysis also revealed an annual increase in wood production of trees in Co land-uses over 43 years, with an exception of the recent decade, when growth coincided with a severe drought. Using a back-extrapolation method, the minimum rotation age of woodlands in Co land-use was found to be 23.6 years, 5 and 7 years shorter than those of CoG and CoCG land-uses, respectively. Unlike CoCG, woodlands located in Co and CoG land-use systems demonstrated a high level of agreement with self-thinning rule of − 3/2. Values for the stand density index for coppiced oak woodlands were between more than 1000 for the least disturbed (Co) and less than 400 for the most disturbed woodlands (CoCG). The structure and growth rate of the coppiced oak woodlands were irreversibly disrupted by understory tillage plus grazing and in less extent by grazing alone. It was concluded that ending undergrowth cultivation in semi-arid oak coppices should be addressed as a priority by adopting minimum regulations.

Keywords

Coppicing / Land-use impact assessment / Diameter growth / Multi-purpose land-use / Self-thinning rule / Stand density index

References

[1] Acácio V (2009) The dynamics of cork oak systems in Portugal: the role of ecological and land use factors. Ph.D. dissertation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands

[2] Acácio V, Holmgren M. Pathways for resilience in Mediterranean cork oak land use systems. Ann For Sci, 2014, 71(1): 5-13.

[3] Adams SN. Sheep and cattle grazing in forests: a review. J Appl Ecol, 1975, 12(1): 143-152.

[4] Arsalani M, Pourtahamsi K, Azizi G, Bräuning A, Mohammadi H. Tree-ring based December–February precipitation reconstruction in the southern Zagros Mountains, Iran. Dendrochronologia, 2018, 49(1): 45-56.

[5] Askari Y (2017) Estimation of Carbon sequestration based on Persian oak (Quercus brantii) and wild almond (Amygdalus arabica) biomass in Zagros forests. Ph.D. Thesis, Shahrekord University

[6] Assmann E. The principles of forest yield study; studies in the organic production, structure, increment, and yield of forest stands, 1970 1 New York: Pergamon Press 506

[7] Av Laar, Akça A. Forest mensuration, 2007, Dordrecht: Springer 390

[8] Bishop RR, Church MJ, Lawson IT, Roucoux KH, O’Brien C, Ranner H, Heald AJ, Flitcroft CE. Deforestation and human agency in the North Atlantic region: archaeological and palaeoenvironmental evidence from the Western Isles of Scotland. Proc Prehist Soc, 2018, 84: 145-184.

[9] Buckley GP. Ecology and management of coppice woodlands, 1992, New York: Chapman & Hall 336

[10] Burkhart HE, Tomé M. Modeling forest trees and stands, 2012, Dordrecht: Springer 457

[11] Castro M. Rigueiro-Rodróguez A, McAdam J, Mosquera-Losada MR. Silvopastoral systems in Portugal: current status and future prospects. Agroforestry in Europe: current status and future prospects. Advances in Agroforestry, 2009, Dordrecht: Springer 111 126

[12] Chaharmahal Va Bakhtiari Meteorological Administration (2018) Ardal Synoptic Meteorological Station. Partly. https://www.chaharmahalmetir

[13] Condés S, Vallet P, Bielak K, Bravo-Oviedo A, Coll L, Ducey MJ, Pach M, Pretzsch H, Sterba H, Vayred J, del Rio M. Climate influences on the maximum size-density relationship in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands. For Ecol Manage, 2017, 385: 295-307.

[14] Dupouey JL, Dambrine E, Laffite JD, Moares C. Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology, 2002, 83(11): 2978-2984.

[15] Dwivedi P, Bailis R, Carter DR, Sharma A. A landscape-based approach for assessing spatiotemporal impacts of forest biomass-based electricity generation on the age structure of surrounding forest plantations in the Southern United States. GCB Bioenergy, 2012, 4(3): 342-357.

[16] Esmaeili R (2013) Feasibility of development of Brant’s oak forest in Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari province with regard to climatic and topographic conditions (case study: Ardal and Naghan), Shahrekord University

[17] Fonseca T, Monteiro L, Enes T, Cerveira A. Self-thinning dynamics in cork oak woodlands: providing a baseline for managing density. Forest Syst, 2017 26 1 8

[18] Fritts H. Tree rings and climate, 1976, London: Elsevier 583

[19] Fujimori T. Ecological and silvicultural strategies for sustainable forest management, 2001, Amsterdam: Elsevier 413

[20] Goldsmith FB. Buckley GP. Coppicing—a conservation panacea?. Ecology and management of coppice woodlands, 1992, Dordrecht: Springer 306 312

[21] Gordon AM, Newman SM, Coleman B (2018) Temperate agroforestry systems. CABI, p 327

[22] Iranmanesh Y (2013) Assessment on biomass estimation methods and carbon sequestration of Quercus brantii Lindl. in Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari forests. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Natural Resource and Mariane Science, Tarbiat Modares

[23] Jazireie MH, Ebrahimi Rostaghi M. Silviculture in Zagros, 2013, Tehran: University of Tehran Press 600

[24] Johnson PS, Shifley SR, Rogers R. The ecology and silviculture of oaks, 2009, Oxfordshire: CABI 596

[25] Kabukcu C. Identification of woodland management practices and tree growth conditions in archaeological fuel waste remains: a case study from the site of Çatalhöyük in central Anatolia, Turkey. Quat Int, 2018, 463: 282-297.

[26] Khaledian Y, Kiani F, Ebrahimi S. The effect of land use change on soil and water quality in northern Iran. J Mt Sci, 2012, 9(6): 798-816.

[27] Kleine M, Colak AH, Kirca S, Sagheb-Talebi K, Orozumbekov A, Lee DK. Rehabilitating degraded forest landscapes in West and Central Asia. IUFRO World Ser, 2009, 20(4): 5-26.

[28] Klumpp K, Fontaine S, Attard E, Roux XL, Gleixner G, Soussana JF. Grazing triggers soil carbon loss by altering plant roots and their control on soil microbial community. J Ecol, 2009, 97(5): 876-885.

[29] Kosmas C, Danalatos NG, Bermúdez FL, Díaz MAR. Geeson NA, Brandt CJ, Thornes JB. The effect of land use on soil erosion and land degradation under mediterranean conditions. Mediterranean desertification: a mosaic of processes and respondes, 2002, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 57 70

[30] Kumar BM, Nair PKR. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems: opportunities and challenges, 2011, Berlin: Springer 317

[31] Le Houerou HN. Restoration and rehabilitation of arid and semiarid mediterranean ecosystems in north Africa and west Asia: a review. Arid Soil Res Rehabil, 2000, 14(1): 3-14.

[32] Lee HK, Kim YW. Studies on the rotation age for major tree species. (I). Larix leptolepis, Pinus rigida, Quercus spp. Res Rep For Res Inst Seoul, 1990, 41: 103-113.

[33] Mapfumo E, Naeth MA, Baron VS, Dick AC, Chanasyk DS. Grazing impacts on litter and roots: perennial versus annual grasses. J Range Manag, 2002, 55(1): 16-22.

[34] Mohajer MRM. Silviculture, 2013, Tehran: Tehran University 418

[35] Mohammadpour M, Tatian MR, Tamartash R, Hossienzadeh J. Investigating the effects of grazing intensity on the structure and diversity of woody species in the Ilam Strait Dalab forest. Iranian J Forest Poplar Res, 2018, 26(3): 306-318.

[36] Müllerová J, Hédl R, Szabó P. Coppice abandonment and its implications for species diversity in forest vegetation. For Ecol Manag, 2015, 343: 88-100.

[37] Nyland RD. Silviculture: concepts and applications, 2016 3 Long Grove: Waveland Press 704

[38] Ohtsuka T, Shizu Y, Nishiwaki A, Yashiro Y, Koizumi H. Carbon cycling and net ecosystem production at an early stage of secondary succession in an abandoned coppice forest. J Plant Res, 2010, 123(4): 393-401.

[39] Oliver CD, Larson BC. Forest stand dynamics, 1996, New York: Wiley 550

[40] Pardo F, Gil L. The impact of traditional land use on woodlands: a case study in the Spanish Central System. J Hist Geogr, 2005, 31(3): 390-408.

[41] Plieninger T, Schaich H, Kizos T. Land-use legacies in the forest structure of silvopastoral oak woodlands in the Eastern Mediterranean. Reg Environ Change, 2011, 11(3): 603-615.

[42] Pretzsch H. Forest dynamics, growth and yield: from measurement to model, 2009, Berlin: Springer 664

[43] Pretzsch H, Biber P. A re-evaluation of Reineke’s rule and stand density index. Forest Sci, 2005, 51(4): 304-320.

[44] Raiesi F, Riahi M. The influence of grazing exclosure on soil C stocks and dynamics, and ecological indicators in upland arid and semi-arid rangelands. Ecol Ind, 2014, 41: 145-154.

[45] Reid R. Nuberg I, George BH, Reid R. Growing high-quality sawlogs. Agroforestry for natural resource management, 2009, Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing 161 182

[46] Reineke LH. Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. J Agric Res, 1933, 46(7): 627-638.

[47] Richards FJ. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot, 1959, 10(2): 290-301.

[48] Sadeghi Kaji H, Soltani A. Single tree volume modeling for even age Persian oak (Quercus brantii) coppice in Central Zagros (Case study: Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari province, Ardal and Kiar district). Iran J Forest, 2017, 9(3): 361-372.

[49] Salehi A, Wilhelmsson E, Söderberg U. Land cover changes in a forested watershed, southern Zagros, Iran. Land Degrad Dev, 2008, 19(5): 542-553.

[50] Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods, 2012, 9: 671-675.

[51] Soares P, Tomé M, Skovsgaard JP, Vanclay JK. Evaluating a growth model for forest management using continuous forest inventory data. For Ecol Manage, 1995, 71(3): 251-265.

[52] Soltani A, Sankhayan PL, Hofstad O. A recipe for co-management of forest and livestock—Results of bio-economic model at a village level in Iran. Agric Syst, 2015, 140: 74-86.

[53] Valipour A, Plieninger T, Shakeri Z, Ghazanfari H, Namiranian M, Lexer MJ. Traditional silvopastoral management and its effects on forest stand structure in northern Zagros, Iran. Forest Ecol Manag, 2014, 327: 221-230.

[54] Vargas JdD, Huntsinger L, Starrs PF. Campos P, Huntsinger L, Oviedo Pro JL, Starrs PF, Diaz M, Standiford RB, Montero G. Raising livestock in Oak Woodlands. Mediterranean Oak Woodland Working Landscapes: Dehesas of Spain and Ranchlands of California. Landscape Series, 2013, Dordrecht: Springer 273 310

[55] Vincent J, Binkley CS. Efficient multiple-use forestry may require land-use specialization. Land Econ, 1993, 69(4): 370-376.

[56] Weiner J, Stoll P, Muller-Landau H, Jasentuliyana A. The effects of density, spatial pattern, and competitive symmetry on size variation in simulated plant populations. Am Nat, 2001, 158(4): 438-450.

[57] Weller DE. A reevaluation of the −3/2 power rule of plant self-thinning. Ecol Monogr, 1987, 57(1): 23-43.

[58] Westoby M. Macfadyen A, Ford ED. The self-thinning rule. Advances in ecological research, 1984, London: Academic Press 167 225

[59] Williams RA. Use of stand density index as an alternative to stocking percent in upland hardwoods. Northern J Appl For, 2003, 20(3): 137-142.

[60] Xu Z, Bradley DP, Jakes PJ. Measuring forest ecosystem sustainability: a resource accounting approach. Environ Manag, 1995, 19(5): 685-692.

[61] Yang TR, Lam TY, Kershaw JA. Developing relative stand density index for structurally complex mixed species cypress and pine forests. For Ecol Manag, 2018, 409: 425-433.

[62] Yoda K, Kira T, Ogawa H, Hozumi K. Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions (intraspecific competition among higher plants. XI). J Biol Osaka City Univ, 1963, 14: 107-129.