Allometric relationships between primary size measures and sapwood area for six common tree species in snow-dependent ecosystems in the Southwest United States

Abstract

High-elevation, snow-dependent, semiarid ecosystems across southwestern United States are expected to be vulnerable to climate change, including drought and fire, with implications for various aspects of the water cycle. To that end, much less is known about the dynamics of transpiration, an important component of the water cycle across this region. At the individual-tree scale, transpiration is estimated by scaling mean sap flux density by the hydroactive sapwood area (SA). SA also remains a key factor in effectively scaling individual tree water-use to stand level. SA across large spatial scales is normally established by relating SA of a few trees to primary size measures, e.g., diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (H), or canopy diameter (CD). Considering the importance of SA in scaling transpiration, the primary objective of this study was therefore to establish six species-specific (aspen, maple, white fir, ponderosa pine, Douglas fir, Englemann spruce) allometric relationships between SA and three primary size measures (DBH, CD, or H) across two high-elevation, snow-dependent, semiarid ecosystems in New Mexico and Arizona. Based on multiple statistical criteria (coefficient of determination, index of agreement, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency) and ease of measurement in the forest, we identified DBH as the primary independent variable for estimating SA across all sites. Based on group regression analysis, we found allometric relationships to be significantly (p < 0.05) different for the same species (ponderosa pine, Douglas-fir) across different sites. Overall, our allometric relationships provide a valuable database for estimating transpiration at different spatial scales from sap flow data in some of our most vulnerable ecosystems.

Keywords

Allometry / Diameter at breast height / Mountain ecosystem / Sapwood area / Southwestern USA

References

[1] Ali A, Xu MS, Zhao YT, Zhang QQ, Zhou LL, Yang XD, Yan ER. Allometric biomass equations for shrub and small tree species in subtropical China. Silva Fennica, 2015, 49(4): 1-10.

[2] Allen CD, Breshears DD, McDowell NG. On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene. Ecosphere, 2015, 6(8): 1-55.

[3] Babst F, Alexander MR, Szejner P, Bouriaud O, Klesse S, Roden J, Ciais P, Poulter B, Frank D, Moore DJP, Trouet V. A tree-ring perspective on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Oecologia, 2014, 176(2): 307-322.

[4] Barnett TP, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP. Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature, 2005, 438(7066): 303-309.

[5] Bartelink HH. Allometric relationships on biomass and needle area of Douglas-fir. For Ecol Manag, 1996, 86(1–3): 193-203.

[6] Bartelink HH. Allometric relationships for biomass and leaf area of beech (Fagus sylvatica L). Ann For Sci, 1997, 54: 39-50.

[7] Bond-Lamberty B, Wang C, Gower ST. Aboveground and belowground biomass and sapwood area allometric equations for six boreal tree species of northern Manitoba. Can J For Res, 2002, 32: 1441-1450.

[8] Bovard BD, Curtis PS, Vogel CS, Su HB, Schmid HP. Environmental controls on sap flow in a northern hardwood forest. Tree Physiol, 2005, 25(1): 31-38.

[9] Brooks PD, Vivoni ER. Mountain ecohydrology: quantifying the role of vegetation in the water balance of montane catchments. Ecohydrology, 2008, 1(3): 187-192.

[10] Brown-Mitic C, Shuttleworth WJ, Harlow RC, Petti J, Burke E, Bales R. Seasonal water dynamics of a sky island subalpine forest in semi-arid southwestern United States. J Arid Environ, 2007, 69(2): 237-258.

[11] Brusca RC, Wiens JF, Meyer WM, Eble J, Franklin K, Overpeck JT, Moore W. Dramatic response to climate change in the Southwest: Robert Whittaker’s 1963 Arizona Mountain plant transect revisited. Ecol Evolut, 2013, 3(10): 3307-3319.

[12] Bush SE, Hultine KR, Sperry JS, Ehleringer JR. Calibration of thermal dissipation sap flow probes for ring- and diffuse-porous trees. Tree Physiol, 2010, 30(12): 1545-1554.

[13] Causton DR. Cannell MGR, Jackson JE. Biometrical, structural and physiological relationships among tree parts. Attributes of trees as crop plants, 1985, Huntingdon: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood 137 159

[14] Cermak J, Cienciala E, Kucera J, Hallgren JE. Radial-velocity profiles of water-flow in trunks of norway spruce and oak and the response of spruce to severing. Tree Physiol, 1992, 10(4): 367-380.

[15] Cienciala E, Kucera J, Malmer A. Tree sap flow and stand transpiration of two Acacia mangium plantations in Sabah, Borneo. J Hydrol, 2000, 236(1–2): 109-120.

[16] Clearwater MJ, Meinzer FC, Andrade JL, Goldstein G, Holbrook NM. Potential errors in measurement of nonuniform sap flow using heat dissipation probes. Tree Physiol, 1999, 19(10): 681-687.

[17] Diffenbaugh NS, Giorgi F, Pal JS. Climate change hotspots in the United States. Geophys Res Lett, 2008 35 16 L16709

[18] Dunisch O, Morais RR. Regulation of xylem sap flow in an evergreen, a semi-deciduous, and a deciduous Meliaceae species from the Amazon. Trees-Struct Funct, 2002, 16(6): 404-416.

[19] Ewers BE, Mackay DS, Gower ST, Ahl DE, Burrows SN, Samanta SS. Tree species effects on stand transpiration in northern Wisconsin. Water Resources Res, 2002

[20] Falkowski MJ, Smith AMS, Gessler PE, Hudak AT, Vierling LA, Evans JS. The influence of conifer forest canopy cover on the accuracy of two individual tree measurement algorithms using lidar data. Can J Remote Sens, 2008, 34: S338-S350.

[21] Farrior CE, Dybzinski R, Levin SA, Pacala SW. Competition for water and light in closed-canopy forests: a tractable model of carbon allocation with implications for carbon sinks. Am Nat, 2013, 181(3): 314-330.

[22] Ford CR, McGuire MA, Mitchell RJ, Teskey RO. Assessing variation in the radial profile of sap flux density in Pinus species and its effect on daily water use. Tree Physiol, 2004, 24(3): 241-249.

[23] Gebauer T, Horna V, Leuschner C. Variability in radial sap flux density patterns and sapwood area among seven co-occurring temperate broad-leaved tree species. Tree Physiol, 2008, 28(12): 1821-1830.

[24] Gebre GM, Tschaplinski TJ, Shirshac TL. Water relations of several hardwood species in response to throughfall manipulation in an upland oak forest during a wet year. Tree Physiol, 1998, 18(5): 299-305.

[25] Gentine P, Guerin M, Uriarte M, McDowell NG, Pockman WT. An allometry-based model of the survival strategies of hydraulic failure and carbon starvation. Ecohydrology, 2016, 9(3): 529-546.

[26] Gochis DJ, Brito-Castillo L, Shuttleworth WJ. Hydroclimatology of the North American Monsoon region in northwest Mexico. J Hydrol, 2006, 316(1–4): 53-70.

[27] Granier A. Evaluation of transpiration in a douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiol, 1987, 3(4): 309-319.

[28] Hatton TJ, Moore SJ, Reece PH. Estimating stand transpiration in a Eucalyptus populnea woodland with the heat pulse method: measurement errors and sampling strategies. Tree Physiol, 1995, 15(4): 219-227.

[29] Herbst M, Roberts JM, Rosier PTW, Taylor ME, Gowing DJ. Edge effects and forest water use: a field study in a mixed deciduous woodland. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 250(3): 176-186.

[30] Hernandez-Santana V, Hernandez-Hernandez A, Vadeboncoeur MA, Asbjornsen H. Scaling from single-point sap velocity measurements to stand transpiration in a multispecies deciduous forest: uncertainty sources, stand structure effect, and future scenarios. Can J For Res, 2015, 45(11): 1489-1497.

[31] Hyndman RJ, Koehler AB. Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. Int J Forecast, 2006, 22(4): 679-688.

[32] James SA, Clearwater MJ, Meinzer FC, Goldstein G. Heat dissipation sensors of variable length for the measurement of sap flow in trees with deep sapwood. Tree Physiol, 2002, 22(4): 277-283.

[33] Jardine AB. Aqueous phase tracers of chemical weathering in a semi-arid mountain critical zone, 2011, Tucson: The University of Arizona.

[34] Kaufmann MR, Troendle CA. The relationship of leaf-area and foliage biomass to sapwood conducting area in 4 subalpine forest tree species. For Sci, 1981, 27(3): 477-482.

[35] Kim S, Kim H. A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecasts. Int J Forecast, 2016, 32(3): 669-679.

[36] Kostner B, Falge E, Tenhunen JD. Age-related effects on leaf area/sapwood area relationships, canopy transpiration and carbon gain of Norway spruce stands (Picea abies) in the Fichtelgebirge, Germany. Tree Physiol, 2002, 22(8): 567-574.

[37] Krause P, Boyle DP, Bäse F. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Can J For Res, 2005, 32: 1441-1450.

[38] Kumagai T, Aoki S, Shimizu T, Otsuki K. Sap flow estimates of stand transpiration at two slope positions in a Japanese cedar forest watershed. Tree Physiol, 2007, 27(2): 161-168.

[39] Kume T, Tsuruta K, Komatsu H, Kumagai T, Higashi N, Shinohara Y, Otsuki K. Effects of sample size on sap flux-based stand-scale transpiration estimates. Tree Physiol, 2010, 30(1): 129-138.

[40] Landsberg JJ, Gower ST. Applications of physiological ecology to forest management, 1997, San Diego: Academic.

[41] Loranty MM, Mackay DS, Ewers BE, Adelman JD, Kruger EL. Environmental drivers of spatial variation in whole-tree transpiration in an aspen-dominated upland-to-wetland forest gradient. Water Resources Res, 2008

[42] Lyon SW, Troch PA. Development and application of a catchment similarity index for subsurface flow. Water Resour Res, 2010

[43] Mackay DS, Ewers BE, Loranty MM, Kruger EL. On the representativeness of plot size and location for scaling transpiration from trees to a stand. J Geophys Res Biogeosci, 2010

[44] Matyssek R, Wieser G, Patzner K, Blaschke H, Haberle KH. Transpiration of forest trees and stands at different altitude: consistencies rather than contrasts?. Eur J For Res, 2009, 128(6): 579-596.

[45] McDowell N, Barnard H, Bond BJ, Hinckley T, Hubbard RM, Ishii H, Köstner B, Magnani F, Marshall J, Meinzer F, Phillips N, Ryan M, Whitehead D. The relationship between tree height and leaf area: sapwood area ratio. Oecologia, 2002, 132(1): 12-20.

[46] McDowell NG, White S, Pockman WT. Transpiration and stomatal conductance across a steep climate gradient in the southern Rocky Mountains. Ecohydrology, 2008, 1(3): 193-204.

[47] Meinzer FC, Goldstein G, Andrade JL. Regulation of water flux through tropical forest canopy trees: do universal rules apply?. Tree Physiol, 2001, 21(1): 19-26.

[48] Mitra B, Papuga S (2012) Toward an improved understanding of the role of transpiration in critical zone dynamics. In: Fall Meeting AGU, San Francisco, Calif, 3–7 Dec Abstract H531-1650

[49] Molotch NP, Brooks PD, Burns SP, Litvak M, Monson RK, McConnell JR, Musselman K. Ecohydrological controls on snowmelt partitioning in mixed-conifer sub-alpine forests. Ecohydrology, 2009, 2(2): 129-142.

[50] Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. River flow forecasting through conceptual model. Part 1—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol, 1970, 10: 282-290.

[51] Niklas KJ. Plant allometry: the scaling of form and process, 1994, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[52] Oishi AC, Oren R, Stoy PC. Estimating components of forest evapotranspiration: a footprint approach for scaling sap flux measurements. Agric For Meteorol, 2008, 148(11): 1719-1732.

[53] Pastor J, Aber JD, Melillo JM. Biomass prediction using generalized allometric regressions for some northeast tree species. For Ecol Manag, 1984, 7: 265-274.

[54] Pataki DE, Bush SE, Gardner P, Solomon DK, Ehleringer JR. Ecohydrology in a Colorado River riparian forest: implications for the decline of Populus fremontii. Ecol Appl, 2005, 15(3): 1009-1018.

[55] Paul KI, Roxburgh SH, Chave J, England JR, Zerihun A, Specht A, Lewis T, Bennett LT, Baker TG, Adams MA, Huxtable D, Montagu KD, Falster DS, Feller M, Sochacki S, Ritson P, Bastin G, Bartle J, Wildy D, Hobbs T, Larmour J, Waterworth R, Stewart HTL, Jonson J, Forrester DI, Applegate G, Mendham D, Bradford M, O’Grady A, Green D, Sudmeyer R, Rance SJ, Turner J, Barton C, Wenk EH, Grove T, Attiwill PA, Pinkard E, Butler D, Brooksbank K, Spencer B, Snowdon P, O’Brien N, Battaglia M, Cameron DM, Hamilton S, Mcauthur G, Sinclair J. Testing the generality of above-ground biomass allometry across plant functional types at the continent scale. Glob Change Biol, 2016, 22(6): 2106-2124.

[56] Reba ML, Link TE, Marks D, Pomeroy J. An assessment of corrections for eddy covariance measured turbulent fluxes over snow in mountain environments. Water Resour Res, 2009

[57] Roberts S, Vertessy R, Grayson R. Transpiration from Eucalyptus sieberi (L. Johnson) forests of different age. For Ecol Manag, 2001, 143(1–3): 153-161.

[58] Sanaei A, Ali A, Ahmadaali K, Jahantab E. Generalized and species-specific prediction models for aboveground biomass in semi-steppe rangelands. J Plant Ecol, 2019, 12(3): 428-437.

[59] Schwinning S, Belnap J, Bowling DR, Ehleringer JR. Sensitivity of the Colorado plateau to change: climate, ecosystems, and society. Ecol Soc, 2008, 13: 28.

[60] Seager R, Ting MF, Held I, Kushnir Y, Lu J, Vecchi G, Huang HP, Harnik N, Leetmaa A, Lau NC, Li C, Velez J, Naik N. Model projections of an imminent transition to a more arid climate in southwestern North America. Science, 2007, 316(5828): 1181-1184.

[61] Small EE, McConnell JR. Comparison of soil moisture and meteorological controls on pine and spruce transpiration. Ecohydrology, 2008, 1(3): 205-214.

[62] Sprugel DG. Correcting for bias in log-transformed allometric equations. Ecology, 1983, 64(1): 209-210.

[63] Swetnam TW, Betancourt JL. Mesoscale disturbance and ecological response to decadal climatic variability in the American Southwest. J Clim, 1998, 11(12): 3128-3147.

[64] Swetnam TL, Falk DA. Application of Metabolic Scaling Theory to reduce error in local maxima tree segmentation from aerial LiDAR. For Ecol Manage, 2014, 323: 158-167.

[65] TerMikaelian MT, Korzukhin MD. Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. For Ecol Manag, 1997, 97(1): 1-24.

[66] Veatch W, Brooks PD, Gustafson JR, Molotch NP. Quantifying the effects of forest canopy cover on net snow accumulation at a continental, mid-latitude site. Ecohydrology, 2009, 2(2): 115-128.

[67] Venkatraman K, Ashwath N. Transpiration in 15 tree species grown on a phytocapped landfill site. Hydrol Curr Res, 2016, 7: 236.

[68] Vertessy RA, Benyon RG, Osullivan SK, Gribben PR. Relationships between stem diameter, sapwood area, leaf-area and transpiration in a young mountain ash forest. Tree Physiol, 1995, 15(9): 559-567.

[69] Vertessy RA, Hatton TJ, Reece P, Osullivan SK, Benyon RG. Estimating stand water use of large mountain ash trees and validation of the sap flow measurement technique. Tree Physiol, 1997, 17(12): 747-756.

[70] Warren JM, Potzelsberger E, Wullschleger SD, Thornton PE, Hasenauer H, Norby RJ. Ecohydrologic impact of reduced stomatal conductance in forests exposed to elevated CO₂. Ecohydrology, 2011, 4(2): 196-210.

[71] Williams AP, Allen CD, Millar CI, Swetnam TW, Michaelsen J, Still CJ, Leavitt SW. Forest responses to increasing aridity and warmth in the southwestern United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107(50): 21289-21294.

[72] Willmott CJ. On the validation of models. Phys Geogr, 1981, 2(2): 184-194.

[73] Wilson KB, Hanson PJ, Mulholland PJ, Baldocchi DD, Wullschleger SD. A comparison of methods for determining forest evapotranspiration and its components: sap-flow, soil water budget, eddy covariance and catchment water balance. Agric For Meteorol, 2001, 106(2): 153-168.

[74] Wullschleger SD, King AW. Radial variation in sap velocity as a function of stem diameter and sapwood thickness in yellow-poplar trees. Tree Physiol, 2000, 20(8): 511-518.

[75] Wullschleger SD, Hanson PJ, Todd DE. Transpiration from a multi-species deciduous forest as estimated by xylem sap flow techniques. For Ecol Manag, 2001, 143(1–3): 205-213.

[76] Xie JB, Tang LS, Wang ZY, Xu GQ, Li Y. Distinguishing the biomass allocation variance resulting from ontogenetic drift or acclimation to soil texture. PLoS ONE, 2012 7 7 e41502

[77] Young-Robertson JM, Bolton WR, Bhatt US, Cristobal J, Thoman R. Deciduous trees are a large and overlooked sink for snowmelt water in the boreal forest. Sci Rep, 2016

[78] Zhao K, Popescu SC (2007) Hierarchical watershed segmentation of canopy height model for multi-scale forest inventory. In: Rönnholm P, Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J (eds) Proceedings of the ISPRS working group “Laser Scanning 2007 and SilviLaser 2007”, ISPRS Volume XXXVI, Part3/W52. Espoo, September 12–14, 2007, Finland, pp 436–442