The impact of Persian oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) on soil characteristics in a declining forest

Abstract

Root activity has an important impact on soil development but we have little knowledge of the interaction of the root zone and soil genetic horizons. The aim of this investigation was to study the interactions between soil chemical characteristics and root zone processes in a declining Persian oak forest (Quercus brantii Lindl.). A randomized complete block design was used to investigate the long-term effect of Persian oak on soil horizons, and the chemical and biological properties in two soil zones (under and outside the canopy). Results indicate that the rhizosphere zone had significantly higher total organic carbon (TOC) than outside the canopy soil in the upper soil horizons. In subsurface horizons, water-extractable organic carbon values were significantly higher in rhizosphere than in non-rhizospheric zone. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) values in the rhizospheric zone decreased from the first to the second horizon. The MBC/TOC ratio indicated significant differences between the rhizosphere and soils outside of the canopy, with the exception of the subsurface horizon. In the subsurface horizon of the rhizosphere, there was greater respiration of organic carbon (∑CO₂/TOC) than in outside of canopy soil. In addition, root processes influenced pH, nitrogen fractions, and availability of phosphorus, potassium, iron, zinc and manganese. Differences in soil characteristics between rhizospheric and non-rhizospheric zones were significant in surface horizons due to higher root density than in deeper soil layers. The findings indicate that Persian oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) roots influenced the main soil chemical properties, even in calcareous soils.

Keywords

Declining forest / Persian oak / Rhizosphere / Soil horizons

References

[1] Ballard TM. Impacts of forest management on northern forest soils. For Eco Manag, 2000, 133(2): 37-42.

[2] Burt R (2014) Soil survey staff. In: Kellogg soil survey laboratory methods manual US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

[3] Caglayan K, Elci E, Gazel M. Detection and partial characterization of grapevine leaf roll-associated virus 1 in pomegranate trees in Tukey. Eur J Plant Pathol, 2016, 145(2): 199-202.

[4] Chowdhury S, Thangarajan R, Bolan N, O’Reilly-Wapstra J, Kunhikrishnan A, Naidu R. Nitrification potential in the rhizosphere of Australian native vegetation. Soil Res, 2017, 55(1): 58-69.

[5] Cocco S, Agnelli A, Gobran GR, Corti G. Modifications induced by the roots of Erica arborea L to create a suitable environment in soils developed from alkaline and fine-textured marine sediments. Plant Soil, 2013, 368(3): 297-313.

[6] Cross AT, Lambers H. Young calcareous soil chronosequences as a model for ecological restoration on alkaline mine tailings. Sci Total Environ, 2017, 607(4): 168-175.

[7] Ekblad A, Hogberg P. Analysis of δ13C of CO2 distinguishes between microbial respiration of added C4-sucrose and other soil respiration in a C3-ecosystem. Plant Soil, 2000, 219(2): 197-209.

[8] Fan K, Cardona C, Li Y, Shi Y, Xiang X, Shen C, Wang H, Gilbert JA, Chu H. Rhizosphere-associated bacterial network structure and spatial distribution differ significantly from bulk soil in wheat crop fields. Soil Biol Biochem, 2017, 113(1): 275-284.

[9] Finzi AC, Abramoff RZ, Spiller KS, Brzostek ER, Darby BA, Kramer MA, Phillips RP. Rhizosphere processes are quantitatively important components of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles. Glob Change Biol, 2015, 21(1): 2082-2094.

[10] Fresno T, Penalosa JM, Santner J, Puschenreiter M, Moreno-Jimenez E. Effect of Lupinus albus L. root activities on As and Cu mobility after addition of iron-based soil amendments. Chemosphere, 2017, 182(2): 373-381.

[11] Gusewell S, Schroth MH. How functional is a trait? Phosphorus mobilization through root exudates differs little between Carex species with and without specialized dauciform roots. New Phytol, 2017, 215(2): 1438-1450.

[12] Herbst M, Welp G, Macdonald A, Jate M, Hadicke A, Scherer H, Gaiser T, Herrmann F, Amelung W, Vanderborght J. Correspondence of measured soil carbon fractions and RothC pools for equilibrium and non-equilibrium states. Geoderma, 2018, 314(3): 37-46.

[13] Huot H, Simonnot MO, Morel JL. Pedogenetic trends in soils formed in technogenic parent materials. Soil Sci, 2015, 180(1): 182-192.

[14] Jones JB Jr. Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis, 2001, Boca Raton: CRC Press.

[15] Lehmann J, Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature, 2015, 528(4): 60-61.

[16] Li Y, Wang X. Root-induced changes in radial oxygen loss, rhizosphere oxygen profile, and nitrification of two rice cultivars in Chinese red soil regions. Plant Soil, 2013, 365(4): 115-126.

[17] McGill WB, Figueiredo CT. Carter MR. Total nitrogen. Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 1993, Boca Raton: Lewis Publishing 201 211

[18] Meena VS, Meena SK, Verma JP, Kumar A, Aeron A, Mishra PK, Bisht JK, Pattanayak A, Naveed M, Dotaniya ML. Plant beneficial rhizospheric microorganism (PBRM). Strategies to improve nutrients use efficiency, a review. Ecol Eng, 2017, 107(1): 8-32.

[19] Otieno D, Ondier J, Arnhold S, Okach D, Ruidisch M, Lee B, Kolb A, Onyango J, Huwe B. Patterns of CO₂ exchange and productivity of the herbaceous vegetation and trees in a humid savanna in western Kenya. Plant Ecol, 2015, 216(2): 1441-1456.

[20] Rayment GE, Lyons DJ. Soil chemical methods, Australasia (Vol 3), 2011, Clayton: CSIRO Publishing.

[21] Rutherford PM, McGill WB, Arocena JM, Figueiredo CT. Carter MR, Gregorich EG. Total nitrogen. Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2008 2 Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc 239 250

[22] SAS Institute (2017) Base SAS 9.4 procedures guide: statistical procedures. SAS Institute, Cary

[23] Schlesinger WH, Dietze MC, Jackson RB, Phillips RP, Rhoades CC, Rustad LE, Vose JM. Forest biogeochemistry in response to drought. Glob Chang Biol, 2016, 22(1): 2318-2328.

[24] Shanmugam SG, Magbanua ZV, Williams MA, Jangid K, Whitman WB, Peterson DG, Kingery WL. Bacterial diversity patterns differ in soils developing in sub-tropical and cool-temperate ecosystems. Microbiol Ecol, 2017, 73(1): 556-569.

[25] Skjemstad JO, Baldock JA. Carter MR, Gregorich EG. Total and organic carbon. Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2007 2 Boca Raton: CRC Press 225 237

[26] Subke JA, Moody CS, Hill TC, Voke N, Toet S, Ineson P, The YA. Rhizosphere activity and atmospheric methane concentrations drive variations of methane fluxes in a temperate forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 2018, 116(1): 323-332.

[27] Tao S, Lin B. Water soluble organic carbon and its measurement in soil and sediment. Water Res, 2000, 34(1): 1751-1755.

[28] Wang JJ, Harrell DL, Henderson RE, Bell PF. Comparison of soil-test extractants for phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, zinc, copper, manganese, and iron in Louisiana soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2004, 35(1): 145-160.

[29] Weiss JV, Emerson D, Megonigal JP. Geochemical control of microbial Fe (III). Reduction potential in wetlands, comparison of the rhizosphere to non-rhizosphere soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2004, 48(1): 89-100.

[30] Witt C, Gaunt JL, Galicia CC, Ottow JC, Neue HU. A rapid chloroform-fumigation extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in flooded rice soils. Biol Fert Soils, 2000, 30(1): 510-519.

[31] Yan Dam NM, Bouwmeester HJ. Metabolomics in the rhizosphere, tapping into belowground chemical communication. Trends Plant Sci, 2016, 21(1): 256-265.

[32] Zhu J, Qu B, Li M. Phosphorus mobilization in the Yeyahu Wetland, phosphatase enzyme activities and organic phosphorus fractions in the rhizosphere soils. Int Biodet Biodegr, 2017, 124(1): 304-313.