Past, present and future of industrial plantation forestry and implication on future timber harvesting technology

Andrew McEwan , Enrico Marchi , Raffaele Spinelli , Michal Brink

Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2) : 339 -351.

PDF
Journal of Forestry Research ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2) : 339 -351. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-019-01019-3
Review Article

Past, present and future of industrial plantation forestry and implication on future timber harvesting technology

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Plantation forests are established, and expanding, to satisfy increasing global demand for timber products. Shifting societal values, such as safety, productivity, environmental, quality and social are influencing the plantation forestry sector. This is primarily driven through an ever increasing world population, which in turn influences the way nations view the value systems by which they live. More people require more resources—also forest products. Also, the availability of information is influencing the pace of technological development. These changes could result in a difference in the management of plantations that could affect the forest engineering systems of the future. This review aimed to summarize the current status of plantation forests; summarize future developments and possible scenarios in forest plantation management for the various products; and assess whether these developments in a plantation environment could affect the harvesting systems used. Factors influencing the form of plantations include the type and nature of the plantation owner; the change in demand for different and new forest products; climate change factors, including the use of biomass for energy, carbon sequestration and trading; ecosystem services and other products and services; and sustainability certification of forest management. The impact and influence of these factors were summarised into a series of key drivers that will influence the technology used in harvesting machines, as well as the choice of harvesting machines, systems and methods. These drivers were the effect of variations in tree size, the expansion of plantation areas onto more difficult terrain, diversity in plantation design, increased attention towards site impacts and the increased use of biomass for energy. Specific information is provided regarding how the harvesting systems could be affected.

Keywords

Plantations / Forest products / Biomass / Harvesting system / Mechanization / Trends / Technology

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Andrew McEwan, Enrico Marchi, Raffaele Spinelli, Michal Brink. Past, present and future of industrial plantation forestry and implication on future timber harvesting technology. Journal of Forestry Research, 2019, 31(2): 339-351 DOI:10.1007/s11676-019-01019-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abbas D, Di Fulvio F, Spinelli R. European and United States perspectives on forest operations in environmentally sensitive areas. Scand J For Res, 2018, 33: 188-201.

[2]

Adams T, Turner JA. An investigation into the effects of an emissions trading scheme on forest management and land use in New Zealand. For Policy Econ, 2012, 15: 78-90.

[3]

Adebayo A, Han HS, Johnson L. Productivity and cost of cut-to-length and whole-tree harvesting in a mixed-conifer stand. For Prod J, 2007, 57: 59-69.

[4]

Alig R, Latta G, Adams D, McCarl B. Mitigating greenhouse gases: the importance of land base interactions between forests, agriculture, and residual development in the face of changes in bioenergy and carbon prices. For Policy Econ, 2010, 12: 67-75.

[5]

Assirelli A, Santangelo E, Spinelli R, Pari L. A single-pass reduced tillage technique for the establishment of short rotation poplar (Populus spp.) plantations. Croat J For Eng, 2016, 37(1): 61-69.

[6]

Barua SK, Lehtonen P, Pahkasalo T. Plantation vision: potentials, challenges and policy options for global industrial forest plantation development. Int For Rev, 2014, 16: 117-127.

[7]

Bayne K, Parker R. The introduction of robotics for New Zealand forestry operations: forest sector employee perceptions and implications. Technol Soc, 2012, 34: 138-148.

[8]

Bell J. Changes in logging injury rates associated with use of feller-bunchers in West Virginia. J Saf Res, 2002, 33: 462-471.

[9]

Binkley CS. The environmental benefits of tree plantations. J Sustain For, 2005, 21: 5-14.

[10]

Binkley CS, Brand D, Harkin Z, Bull G, Ravindranath NH, Obersteiner M, Nillson S, Yamagata Y, Krott M. Carbon sink by the forest sector—options and needs for implementation. For Policy Econ, 2002, 4: 65-77.

[11]

Brown MA, Baek Y. The forest products industry at an energy/climate crossroads. Energy Policy, 2010, 38: 7665-7675.

[12]

Buonocore E, Hayha T, Paletto A, Franzese PP. Assessing environmental costs and impacts of forestry activities: a multi-method approach to environmental accounting. Environ Eng, 2014, 271: 10-20.

[13]

Burger JA. Management effects on growth, production and sustainability of managed forest ecosystems: past trends and future directions. For Ecol Manag, 2009, 258: 2335-2346.

[14]

Campinhos E. Sustainable plantations of high-yield shape Eucalyptus trees for production of fiber: the Aracruz case. New For, 1999, 17: 129-143.

[15]

Christie S. Energy, chemicals and carbon: future options for the Eucalyptus value chain. South For, 2008, 70: 175-182.

[16]

Clarke M. The over-the-counter market for forest carbon offsets: an insight into pricing in a market without common price signals. Austral For, 2010, 73: 171-176.

[17]

Cubbage F, Koesbandana S, MacDonagh P, Rubilar R, Balmelli G, Olmos VM, de la Torre R, Murara M, Hoeflich VA, Kotze H, Gonzalez R, Carrero O, Frey G, Adams T, Turner J, Lord R, Huang J, MacIntyre C, McGinley K, Abt R, Phillips R. Global timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk. Biomass Bioenergy, 2010, 34: 1667-1678.

[18]

Dai L, Zhao W, Shao G, Lewis BJ, Yu D, Zhou L, Zhou W. The progress and challenges in sustainable forestry development in China. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol, 2013, 20: 394-403.

[19]

Daigneault AJ, Sohngen B, Sedjo R. Exchange rates and the competitiveness of the United States timber sector in a global economy. For Policy Econ, 2008, 10: 108-116.

[20]

Deal RL, White R. Integrating forest products with ecosystem services: a global perspective. For Policy Econ, 2012, 17: 1-2.

[21]

Deal RL, Cochran B, LaRocco G. Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management. For Policy Econ, 2012, 17: 69-76.

[22]

Di Corato L, Gazheli A, Lagerkvist C. Investing in energy forestry under uncertainty. For Policy Econ, 2013, 34: 56-64.

[23]

Edlund J, Keramati E, Servin M. A long-tracked bogie design for forestry machines on soft and rough terrain. J Terrramech, 2013, 50: 73-83.

[24]

Engelbrecht R, McEwan A, Spinelli R. A robust productivity model for grapple yarding in fast-growing tree plantations. Forests, 2017, 8(396): 1-15.

[25]

Eriksson E, Gillespie AR, Gustavsson L, Langvall O, Olsson M, Sathre R, Stendahl J. Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution. Can J For Res, 2017, 37: 671-681.

[26]

Fenning TM, Gershenzon J. Where will the wood come from? Plantation forests and the role of biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol, 2002, 20: 291-296.

[27]

Flaspohler DJ, Webster CR. Plantations for bioenergy: principles for maintaining biodiversity in intensively managed forests. For Sci, 2011, 57: 516-524.

[28]

Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (2005) Proceedings fao advisory committee on paper and wood products. Forty-sixth Session, Vancouver, Canada. http://www.fao.org/docrep/009/j7552e/j7552e00.htm#TopOfPage. Accessed on 29 Aug 2018

[29]

Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010, main report. FAO forestry paper no. 163; Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, p 378. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1757e/i1757e.pdf. Accessed on 29 Aug 2018

[30]

Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (2016) Global forest resources assessment 2015. How are the world’s forests changing? Second Edition, Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, p 56. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4793e.pdf. Accessed on 29 Aug 2018

[31]

Gonzalez R, Treasure T, Wright J, Saloni D, Phillips R, Abt R, Jameel H. Exploring the potential of Eucalyptus for energy production in the Southern United States: financial analysis of delivered biomass. Part I. Biomass Bioenerg, 2011, 35: 755-766.

[32]

González-García S, Gasol CM, Lozano RG, Moreira MT, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall i Pons J, Feijoo G. Assessing the global warming potential of wooden products from the furniture sector to improve their eco-design. Sci Total Environ, 2011, 410–411: 16-25.

[33]

Goulding CJ. Certification of fast-grown plantation forests—issues, costs, and benefits. N Z J For Sci, 2005, 35: 221-222.

[34]

Guerra S, Oguri G, Denadai M, Esperancini M, Spinelli R. Preliminary trials of the BioBaler working in Brazilian eucalypt plantations. South For J For Sci, 2018, 80(2): 131-135.

[35]

Hartl F, Knoke T. The influence of the oil price on timber supply. For Policy Econ, 2014, 39: 32-42.

[36]

Hedenus F, Azar C. Bioenergy plantations or long-term carbon sinks? A model based analysis. Biomass Bioenergs, 2009, 32: 1693-1702.

[37]

Hoffmann S, Jaeger D, Shuirong W. Adapting Chinese forest operations to socio-economic developments: what is the potential of plantations for strengthening domestic wood supply?. Sustainability, 2018, 10: 1-19.

[38]

Holopainen M, Vastaranta M, Hyyppä J. Outlook for the next generation’s precision forestry in Finland. Forests, 2014, 5: 1682-1694.

[39]

Hurmekoski E, Hetemaki L. Studying the future of the forest sector: review and implications for long-term outlook studies. For Policy Econ, 2013, 34: 17-29.

[40]

Ince PJ, Kramp AD, Skog KE, Yoo D, Sample VA. Modelling future US forest sector market and trade impacts of expansion in wood energy consumption. J For Econ, 2011, 17: 142-156.

[41]

Innes J. What will we use the forests for in the future. IUFRO News, 2013, 42: 1.

[42]

IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p. 996. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-frontmatter.pdf. Accessed on 29 Aug 2018

[43]

Janse G, Ottitsch A. Factors influencing the role of non-wood forest products and services. For Policy Econ, 2005, 7: 309-319.

[44]

Jepma CJ, Nilsson S, Amano M, Bonduki Y, Lonnstedt L, Sathaye J, Wilson T. Carbon sequestration and sustainable forest management: comamon aspects and assessment procedures. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 1997, 27(sup001): 83-96.

[45]

Jonsson R. How to cope with changing demand conditions—the Swedish forest sector as a case study: an analysis of major drivers of change in the use of wood resources. Can J For Res, 2013, 43: 405-418.

[46]

Kährä K, Poikela A, Palander T. Productivity and cost of harwarder systems in industrial roundwood thinnings. Croat J For Eng, 2018, 39: 23-33.

[47]

Kantavichai R, Gallagher TV, Teeter LD. Assessing the economic feasibility of short rotation loblolly biomass plantations. For Policy Econ, 2014, 38: 126-131.

[48]

Khatun K, Valdes PJ, Knorr W, Chaturvedi RK. Assessing the mitigation potential of forestry activities in a changing climate: a case study for Karnataka. For Policy Econ, 2010, 12: 277-286.

[49]

Korhonen J, Toppinen A, Cubbage F, Kuuluvainen J. Factors driving investment in planted forests: a comparison between OECD and non-OECD countries. Int For Rev, 2014, 16: 67-77.

[50]

Kraxner F, Nordstrom E, Havlik P, Gusti M, Mosnier A, Frank S, Valin H, Fritz S, Fuss S, Kindermann G, McCallum I, Khabarov N, Bottcher H, See L, Aoki K, Schmid E, Mathé L, Obersteiner M. Global bioenergy scenarios—future forest development, land-use implications, and trade-offs. Biomass Bioenergy, 2013, 57: 86-96.

[51]

Kroger M, Nyland J. The conflict over Veracel pulpwood plantations in Brazil—application of Ethical Analysis. For Policy Econ, 2012, 14: 74-82.

[52]

Laaksonen-Craig S. Foreign direct investment in the forest sector: implications for sustainable forest management in developed and developing countries. For Policy Econ, 2004, 6: 359-370.

[53]

Lacy P. Forest Investment: the emergence of timberland as an asset class. Austral For, 2006, 69: 151-155.

[54]

Lambert MB, Howard JO (1990) Cost and productivity of new technology for harvesting and in-woods processing small-diameter trees. Research paper PNWRP-430. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, OR, USA

[55]

Lauri P, Maarit A, Kallio I, Schneider U. Price of CO2 emissions and use of wood in Europe. For Policy Econ, 2012, 15: 123-131.

[56]

Leslie AD, Mencuccini M, Perks M. The potential for Eucalyptus as a wood fuel in the UK. Appl Energ, 2012, 89: 176-182.

[57]

Lonnstedt L, Sedjo RA. Forestland ownership changes in the United States and Sweden. For Policy Econ, 2012, 14: 19-27.

[58]

Manley B. Impact of the New Zealand emissions trading scheme on forest valuation. For Policy Econ, 2012, 14: 83-89.

[59]

Marchi E, Chung W, Visser R, Abbas D, Nordfjell T, Mederski PS, McEwan A, Brink M, Laschi A. Sustainable Forest Operations (SFO): a new paradigm in a changing world and climate. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 634: 1385-1397.

[60]

McKenney DW, Yemshanov D, Fox G, Ramlal E. Cost estimates for carbon sequestration from fast growing poplar plantations in Canada. For Policy Econ, 2004, 6: 345-358.

[61]

Michetti M, Rosa R. Afforestation and timber management compliance strategies in climate policy. A computable general equilibrium analysis. Ecol Econ, 2012, 77: 139-148.

[62]

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [MEA] (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being synthesis. Island Press, Washington D.C., USA, p 155. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf. Accessed on 29 Aug 2018

[63]

Moiseyev A, Solberg B, Kallio AMI. Wood biomass use for energy in Europe under different assumptions of coal, gas and CO2 emission prices and market conditions. J For Econ, 2013, 19: 432-449.

[64]

Nahuelhual L, Carmona A, Lara A, Echeverría C, González M. Land-cover change to forest plantations: proximate causes and implications for the landscape in south-central Chile. Landsc Urb Plan, 2012, 107: 12-20.

[65]

Nepal P, Grala RK, Grebner DL. Financial feasibility of increasing carbon sequestration in harvested wood products in Mississippi. For Policy Econ, 2012, 14: 99-106.

[66]

Niquidet K, O’Kelly G. Forest-mill integration: a transaction cost perspective. For Policy Econ, 2010, 12: 207-212.

[67]

Nordfjell T, Öhman E, Lindroos O, Ager B. The technical development of forwarders in Sweden between 1962 and 2012 and of sales between 1975 and 2017. Int J For Eng, 2019, 30: 1-13.

[68]

Parks Peter J., Hall David O., Kriström Bengt, Masera Omar R., Moulton Robert J., Plantinga Andrew J., Swisher Joel N., Winjum Jack K.. An economic approach to planting trees for carbon storage. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 1997, 27(sup001): 9-21.

[69]

Phillips RB (2013) Global dynamics of the pulp and paper industry 2013. New Zeal J For 58:34–42. http://nzjf.org.nz/free_issues/NZJF58_3_2013/647990C9-D846-45bd-8EE1-DA9B5622A907.pdf. Accessed on 29 Aug 2018

[70]

Pirard R. Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: a lexicon. Environ Sci Policy, 2012, 19–20: 59-68.

[71]

Pohjola J, Valsta L. Carbon credits and management of Scots pine and Norway spruce stands in Finland. For Policy Econ, 2007, 9: 789-798.

[72]

Potter S, Loffler S. Applying biotechnology to design tree composition for value-added products: a mini-review. Austral For, 2010, 73: 191-197.

[73]

Puttock G. Estimating cost for integrated harvesting and related forest management activities. Biomass Bioenergy, 1995, 8: 73-79.

[74]

Rauinkar R, Buongiorno J, Turner JA, Zhu S. Global outlook for wood and forests with the bioenergy demand implied by scenarios of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. For Policy Econ, 2010, 12: 48-56.

[75]

Richards KR, Stokes C. A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: a dozen years of research. Clim Change, 2004, 63: 1-48.

[76]

Roberts D, Lethbridge J, Carreau H (2004) Changes in the global forest products industry. BC forum on forest economics and policy. Synthesis paper: SP 04-01. http://www.bc-forum.org/publications.htm. Accessed 29 Apr 2018

[77]

Rudel TK. Tree farms: driving forces and regional patterns in the global expansion of forest plantations. Land Use Pol, 2009, 26: 545-550.

[78]

Rummer B, Taylor S, Corley F (2010) Developing a new generation of woody biomass harvesting equipment. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the council of forest engineering: fueling the future, Auburn, USA, 6–9 June 2010. https://www.cofe.frec.vt.edu/documents/2010/Rummer_Taylor_Corley.pdf. Accessed on 29 Aug 2018

[79]

Sampson R. Neil, Sedjo Roger A.. Economics of carbon sequestration in forestry: An overview. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 1997, 27(sup001): 1-8.

[80]

Sandel B, Svenning JC. Human impacts drive a global topographic signature in tree cover. Nat Commun, 2013, 4: 1-7.

[81]

Schoene DHF, Bernier PY. Adapting forestry and forests to climate change: a challenge to change the paradigm. For Policy Econ, 2012, 24: 12-19.

[82]

Schweier J, Becker G. Economics of poplar short rotation coppice plantations on marginal land in Germany. Biomass Bioenergy, 2013, 59: 494-502.

[83]

Sedjo RA. The potential of high-yield plantation forestry for meeting timber needs. New For, 1999, 17: 339-360.

[84]

Sims R, Venturi P. All-year-round harvesting of short rotation coppice eucalyptus compared with the delivered costs of biomass from more conventional short season, harvesting systems. Biomass Bioenergy, 2004, 26: 27-37.

[85]

Singh S, Davey S, Cole M. Implications of climate change for forests, vegetation and carbon in Australia. N Z J For Sci, 2010, 40: 141-152.

[86]

Siry JP, Cubbage FW, Ahmed MR. Sustainable forest management: global trends and opportunities. For Policy Econ, 2005, 7: 551-561.

[87]

Song C, Zhang Y, Mei Y, Liu H, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Zha T, Zhang K, Huang C, Xu X, Jagger P, Chen X, Bilsborrow R. Sustainability of forests created by China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program: a comparison among three sites in Anhui, Hubei and Shanxi. For Policy Econ, 2014, 38: 161-167.

[88]

Spinelli R, Hartsough BR. Harvesting SRF poplar for pulpwood: experience in the Pacific Northwest. Biomass Bioenergy, 2006, 30: 439-445.

[89]

Spinelli R, Nati C, Magagnotti N. Using modified foragers to harvest short-rotation poplar plantations. Biomass Bioenergy, 2009, 33: 817-821.

[90]

Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, Nati C. Benchmarking the impact of traditional small-scale logging systems used in Mediterranean forestry. For Ecol Manag, 2010, 260: 1997-2001.

[91]

Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, Picchi G, Lombardini C, Nati C. Upsized harvesting technology for coping with the new trends in short-rotation coppice. Appl Eng Agric, 2011, 27: 551-557.

[92]

Spinelli R, Schweier J, De Francesco F. Harvesting techniques for non-industrial biomass plantations. Biosyst Eng, 2012, 113: 319-324.

[93]

Spinelli R, Lombardini C, Magagnotti N. The effect of mechanization level and harvesting system on the thinning cost of Mediterranean softwood plantations. Silva Fenn, 2014, 48: 15.

[94]

Spinelli R, De Francesco F, Eliasson L, Jessup E, Magagnotti N. An agile chipper truck for space-constrained operations. Biomass Bioenergy, 2015, 81: 137-143.

[95]

Spinelli R, de Arruda Moura AC, Manoel da Silva P. Decreasing the diesel fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of industrial in-field chipping operations. J Clean Prod, 2018, 172: 2174-2181.

[96]

Spinelli R, Visser R, Björheden R, Röser D. Recovering energy biomass in conventional forest operations: a review of integrated harvesting systems. Curr For Rep, 2019, 5: 90-100.

[97]

St Clair S, Hillier J, Smith P. Estimating the pre-harvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production. Biomass Bioenergy, 2008, 32: 442-452.

[98]

Stephens ML, Grist P. Market failure for plantations: past experience and emerging trends for delivering wood production and ecosystem services in Australia. Int For Rev, 2014, 16: 205-215.

[99]

Susaeta A, Chang SJ, Carter DR, Lal P. Economics of carbon sequestration under fluctuating economic environment, forest management and technological changes: an application to forest stands in the southern United States. J For Econ, 2014, 20: 47-64.

[100]

Szulecka J, Pretszch J, Secco L. Paradigms in tropical forest plantations: a critical reflection on historical shifts in plantation approaches. Int For Rev, 2014, 16: 128-143.

[101]

Szulecka J, Obidzinski K, Dermawan A. Corporate-society engagement in plantation forestry in Indonesia: evolving approaches and their implications. For Policy Econ, 2016, 62: 19-29.

[102]

Talbot B, Ackerman PA. Renewable energy: the potential and obligations of plantation forestry. South For, 2009, 71: 79-83.

[103]

Tan Z, Chen K, Liu P. Possibilities and challenges of China’s forestry biomass resource utilization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2015, 41: 368-378.

[104]

Tavoni M, Sohngen B, Bosetti V. Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate. Energy Policy, 2007, 35: 5346-5353.

[105]

Tolan A, Visser R. The effect of the number of log sorts on mechanized log processing productivity and value recovery. Int J For Eng, 2015, 26: 36-47.

[106]

Tromborg E, Solberg B. Forest sector impacts of the increased use of wood in energy production in Norway. For Policy Econ, 2010, 12: 39-47.

[107]

Tromborg E, Buongiorno J, Solberg B. The global timber market: implications of changes in economic growth, timber supply, and technological trends. For Policy Econ, 2000, 1: 53-69.

[108]

Tsioras P, Rottensteiner C, Stampfer K. Wood harvesting accidents in the Austrian State Forest Enterprise 2000–2009. Saf Sci, 2014, 62: 400-408.

[109]

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2014). http://unfccc.int/parties_and_observers/items/2704.php. Accessed 29 Apr 2018

[110]

Väätäinen K, Asikainen A, Sikanen L, Ala-Fossi A. the cost effect of forest machine relocations on logging costs in Finland. For Stud, 2006, 45: 135-141.

[111]

Visser R, Stampfer K. Expanding ground-based harvesting onto steep terrain: a review. Croat J For Eng, 2015, 36: 321-331.

[112]

Wang S. Forest economics in an alarmingly urbanized society: the next frontier. For Policy Econ, 2013, 35: 45-49.

[113]

Wang C, Maclaren V. Evaluation of economic and social impacts of the sloping land conversion program: a case study in Dunhua County, China. For Policy Econ, 2012, 14: 50-57.

[114]

Weih M. Intensive short rotation forestry in boreal climates: present and future perspectives. Can J For Res, 2004, 34: 1369-1378.

[115]

Zhang S, Gilless JK, Stewart W. Modeling price-driven interactions between wood bioenergy and global wood product markets. Biomass Bioenergy, 2014, 60: 68-78.

[116]

Zhang D, Stenger A, Harou P. Policy instruments for developing planted forests: theory in practices in China, the U.S. Brazil and France. J For Econ, 2015, 21: 223-227.

[117]

Zhu H, Luo W, Ciesielski PN, Fang Z, Zhu JY, Henriksson G, Himmel ME, Hu L. Wood-derived materials for green electronics, biological devices, and energy applications. Chem Rev, 2016, 116: 9305-9374.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

214

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/